Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Mapping Corporate Social Responsibility Research in Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Biometric Analysis

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 166 - 179, 31.12.2024

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the studies on corporate social responsibility in sustainable development by bibliometric analysis method. For this purpose, a total of 4,540 publications published in the SCOPUS database have been comprehensively evaluated by bibliometric analysis method. The findings clearly reveal the central role of the concept of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development processes. Bocken et al. 2014 study stands out as the most cited work in the literature with 2,461 citations. In addition, García-Sánchez stands out as the author with the highest number of publications in the field, while Sustainability Switzerland and the Journal of Cleaner Production are the journals that host the highest number of publications in this field. At the country level, China, the USA and the United Kingdom stand out as the main actors of the literature. Turhish contributions in this field are quite limited. The study makes a significant contribution to the literature in this field both methodologically and theoretically by addressing the relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility from a broad perspective.

Kaynakça

  • Akman, A. Z., & Erdírencelebi, M. (2023). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının bibliyometrik analizi: 2017-2021 dönemine bir bakış. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 23–45.
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Bhagwat, P. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. In Conference on Inclusive & Sustainable Growth (pp. 15-16).
  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
  • Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “our common future”. United Nations.
  • Carroll A.B., (1991). Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34, 4.
  • Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
  • Ebner, D., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2006, September). The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. In Corporate responsibility research conference (Vol. 4, No. 5.9, p. 2006). Belfast Dublin: Queens University.
  • Elsevier. (2023). Scopus: Content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content
  • Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51–71.
  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.
  • Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
  • Himmetoğlu, A. (2023). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk: Bir bibliyometrik analiz çalışması. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 10(3), 547–565.
  • Kocabaş, C., & Alkan, G. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma alanındaki yayınların R programı ile bibliyometrik analizi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(29 Ekim Özel Sayısı), 3714-3732.
  • Lu, J., Liang, M., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Guan, H., Mazeikaite, K., & Streimikis, J. (2021). Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 686-703.
  • Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296-306.
  • Sawhney, R. K., Goel, P., & Bhardwaj, S. (2022). Mapping corporate social responsibility research: A bibliometric analysis. Transnational Marketing Journal, 10(2), 351-373.
  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.
  • Sheehy, B., & Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 13(11), 5965.
  • Silveira, L. M. D., & Petrini, M. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility: A bibliometric analysis of international scientific production. Gestão & Produção, 25, 56-67.
  • Simionescu, L. N. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development (SD). Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 10(2), 179-190.
  • The United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, general assembly resolution 70/1, 25 September 20151.
  • Tiltay, M. A., Öz, M., & Tepe, M. E. (2021). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları bağlamında kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamaları: Türkiye’de mevcut durum ve eğilimler. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 351-372.
  • Ye, N., Kueh, T. B., Hou, L., Liu, Y., & Yu, H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122679.

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmada Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Araştırmalarının Haritalanması: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi ve Bibliyometrik Analiz

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 166 - 179, 31.12.2024

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir kalkınmada kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk üzerine yapılan çalışmaları bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda SCOPUS veri tabanında yayımlanmış toplam 4.540 yayın bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle kapsamlı bir şekilde değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının sürdürülebilir kalkınma süreçlerindeki merkezi rolünü açıkça ortaya koymaktadır. Bocken ve diğerleri 2014 yılındaki çalışması 2.461 atıf ile literatürde en çok referans gösterilen eser olarak öne çıkmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra García-Sánchez, alanın en fazla yayına sahip yazarı olarak dikkat çekerken, Sustainability Switzerland ve Journal of Cleaner Production dergileri bu konuda en fazla yayına ev sahipliği yapan yayın organları olmuştur. Ülkeler düzeyinde Çin, ABD ve Birleşik Krallık literatürün ana aktörleri olarak öne çıkmıştır. Türkiye’nin ise bu alandaki katkılarının oldukça sınırlı olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ile kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ilişkisini geniş bir perspektifle ele alarak bu alandaki literatüre hem metodolojik hem de teorik açıdan önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Akman, A. Z., & Erdírencelebi, M. (2023). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının bibliyometrik analizi: 2017-2021 dönemine bir bakış. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 23–45.
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Bhagwat, P. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. In Conference on Inclusive & Sustainable Growth (pp. 15-16).
  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
  • Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “our common future”. United Nations.
  • Carroll A.B., (1991). Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34, 4.
  • Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
  • Ebner, D., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2006, September). The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. In Corporate responsibility research conference (Vol. 4, No. 5.9, p. 2006). Belfast Dublin: Queens University.
  • Elsevier. (2023). Scopus: Content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content
  • Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51–71.
  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.
  • Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
  • Himmetoğlu, A. (2023). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk: Bir bibliyometrik analiz çalışması. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 10(3), 547–565.
  • Kocabaş, C., & Alkan, G. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma alanındaki yayınların R programı ile bibliyometrik analizi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(29 Ekim Özel Sayısı), 3714-3732.
  • Lu, J., Liang, M., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Guan, H., Mazeikaite, K., & Streimikis, J. (2021). Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 686-703.
  • Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296-306.
  • Sawhney, R. K., Goel, P., & Bhardwaj, S. (2022). Mapping corporate social responsibility research: A bibliometric analysis. Transnational Marketing Journal, 10(2), 351-373.
  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.
  • Sheehy, B., & Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 13(11), 5965.
  • Silveira, L. M. D., & Petrini, M. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility: A bibliometric analysis of international scientific production. Gestão & Produção, 25, 56-67.
  • Simionescu, L. N. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development (SD). Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 10(2), 179-190.
  • The United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, general assembly resolution 70/1, 25 September 20151.
  • Tiltay, M. A., Öz, M., & Tepe, M. E. (2021). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları bağlamında kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamaları: Türkiye’de mevcut durum ve eğilimler. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 351-372.
  • Ye, N., Kueh, T. B., Hou, L., Liu, Y., & Yu, H. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122679.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Sürdürülebilirlik Muhasebesi ve Raporlama, Yönetimde Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yasin Şeker 0000-0003-0513-7682

Oğuz Yusuf Atasel 0000-0003-1654-9850

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 27 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Şeker, Y., & Atasel, O. Y. (2024). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmada Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Araştırmalarının Haritalanması: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi ve Bibliyometrik Analiz. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 166-179.

Adres: Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Telefon: 0276 221 21 60 Faks :0276 221 21 61
E-posta: sosyaldergi@usak.edu.tr