Türkiye’de Doğum Şekillerine Yönelik Sağlık Tarafları Üzerinde Yapılan Çalışmaların Sistematik Derlemesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı; normal doğum, sezaryen doğum ve sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğum şekillerine yönelik bilgi, tutum ve davranışları belirlemeye yönelik yapılan çalışmaların sistematik derleme yöntemi ile analiz edilmesi ve sezaryen oranlarının artmasının nedenlerinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmada son on yılda yapılan araştırmalar dikkate alınmıştır. Bu amaçla 01.02.2021-05.02.2021 tarihleri arasında Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi internet erişim ağı üzerinden belirlenen kelimelerle Google Akademik, EBSCO ve ULAKBİM dizinlerinin/veri tabanlarının üzerinden tarama yapılmıştır. İkincil verilerin kullanıldığı sistematik derleme çalışmasının hazırlanmasında, PRISMA yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Sezaryen doğumun tercih edilmesinde; normal doğum korkusu, tıbbi nedenler ve çevre etkisi gibi faktörlerin önemli derecede belirleyici olduğu görülmüştür. Normal doğum ve sezaryen doğum şekilleri ile ilgili bilgi düzeyinin ve algısının doğum şekline karar vermede önemli rol oynamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Normal doğum
• sezaryen doğum
• sistematik derleme

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

YOK

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF STUDIES OF HEALTH TOWARDS BIRTHDAY PARTIES FIGURE IN TURKEY

Öz

You In this study, it was aimed to analyze the studies conducted to determine the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards delivery types by systematic review method and to determine the reasons for the increase in cesarean rates. In the study, researches conducted in the last ten years were taken into consideration. For this purpose, between the dates of 01.02.2021-05.02.2021, Google Scholar, EBSCO and ULAKBİM directories/databases were searched with the words determined over the Internet access network of Artvin Coruh University. In the preparation of a systematic review study using secondary data, the PRISMA method was used. Among the causes of cesarean delivery, factors such as fear of normal birth, medical reasons and environmental effects were found to have an important effect. It has been observed that the level of knowledge and perception about normal delivery and cesarean delivery types have an important role in decision making.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Normal delivery
• cesarean delivery
• systematic review

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

1. Aksu, H., and Ozsoy, S. (2015). Birth preferences of midwifery and nursing students and influencing factors. Journal of Health Sciences, 4(1), 44-48.
2. Akyol, A., Gonen Yagcı, S., and Tekirdag, A.İ. (2011). Comparison of birth type and characteristics of health personnel with those who are not health personnel. JOPP Journal, 3(2), 55-63.
3. Bıyık, İ., and Aslan, M.M. (2020). The effect of education in pregnancy on fear of childbirth and cesarean section rates. Kocaeli Med J. 9(2), 77-82.
4. Chen, M.M., & Hancock, H. (2012). Women's knowledge of options for birth after caesarean section. Women Birth, 25(3), 19-26.
5. Cakmak, B., Arslan, S., and Nacar, M.C. (2014). Opinions of women on optional cesarean section. Fırat Med J, 19(3), 122-125.
6. Doganer, G., Doganer, A., Duran, O., Tuna, M., Tezcan, S., and Turan, G. (2013). Determining the thoughts of students studying in health sciences about their birth type preferences. Journal of the Turkish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 10, 31-36.
7. Dogru, H.Y. (2017). Factors affecting women's opinions about mode of delivery. Med Med J, 32(4), 250-256.
8. Elkin, N. (2016). Preferences for the mode of delivery and related factors of women aged 18-49 who applied to a family health center. Anadolu Clinic, 21(2), 119-28.

9. Ergol, S., and Kurtuncu, M. (2014). Factors affecting the cesarean section preferences of women in a university hospital. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 26–34.
10. Filiz, M., and Karagoz, N. (2020). Perception of health personnel in determining the contribution of public hospital associations to the country's health policies [Example of Sivas province].Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 105-27.
11. Filiz, M. (2020). A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between leadership style and organizational commitment in health institutions. Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Dicle University, 10(20), 276-96.
12. Filiz, M. (2021). Educational and academic structure of the nursing department in Turkey. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 11(2), 78-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/buyasambid/issue/67359/1003411.
13. Gozukara, F., and Eroglu, K. (2008). Factors affecting the preferences of women who have given birth for the first time (primiparous).Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal, 15(1), 32-46.
14. Gozukara, F., Karapınar, O., Hakverdi, A.U., Kurt, R., and Demirkıran, G. (2016). Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a survey study in healthcare workers. Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology Medicine, 13(4), 151-153.
15. Guler, E.S., and Yanıkkerem, E. (2018). Women's thoughts about birth methods and vaginal birth after cesarean section, Sted, 7(1), 27-36.
16. Gur, E.B., Guluzar, A.T., Tatar, S., Oran, N., Yavuz, M.Y., Hepyılmaz, I. et al. (2014). Evaluation of high cesarean section rate in terms of obstetricians and midwives in Turkey. Turkey Clinics J Gynecol Obst, 24(2),71-79.
17. Higgins, J.P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley and Sons.
18. Karaca, P.P., and Koyuncu, R.G. (2015). Determining the thoughts of the students studying at the vocational school of health services about their birth type preferences. Journal of İnonu University Vocational School of Health Services, 3(1), 1-8.
19. Karacam, Z. (2013). Systematic review methodology: a guide to preparing systematic reviews. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal, 6(1), 26-33.
20. Liberati, A., Altman, G.D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P.C., & Loanidis, J. (2009). The prısma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta analyses of studies that evaluate healtcare ınterventions: explantion and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 15(4), 65- 94.
21. Lunny, C., Brennan, S.E., McDonald, S., & McKenzie, J.E. (2016). Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1-8.
22. Metin, H.T., Akyigit, E., and Guzel, F.E. (2020). Examination of nurses and midwives' preferences for delivery method; Bitlis example. Journal of Women's Health Nursing, 6(2), 87-100.
23. Moher, D., Liberati. A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Reprint-preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: the prısma statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873-480.
24. Oner, S., and Kocas, F. (2016). The frequency of cesarean section and affecting factors in a group of women aged 18-49 in Mersin. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 15(5), 401-407.
25. Sarowar, M.G., Medin, E., & Gazi, R. (2010). Calculation of costs of pregnancy and puerperium-related care: experience from a hospital in a lowincome country. J Health Popul Nutr, 28(3), 264-272.
26. Sayıner, F.D., Ozerdogan, N., Giray, S., Ozdemir, E., and Savcı, A. (2009). Factors affecting women's birth type preferences. Journal of Perinatology, 17(3), 104-112.
27. Sonmez, C.I., and Sivaslıoglu, A.A. (2019). Preference of delivery method of pregnant women and factors affecting them. Konuralp Medical Journal, 11(3), 369-376.
28. Tektas, E., Bozkurt, G., Ergin, E., and Sezgin, S. (2018). Birth type preferences of health sciences faculty students and influencing factors. Cukurova Med J, 43(1), 63-9.
29. Victor, L. (2008). Systematic reviewing. Social Research Update, 54(1), 1-4.
30. Yanıkkerem, E., and Cimen, E. (2017). Nurses' perspectives on delivery methods and vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Manisa CBU Journal of Health Sciences Institute, 4(1), 533-41.