Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States

Yıl 2022, Cilt 0, Sayı 14, 91 - 108, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103

Öz

This study investigates the impact of peacefulness on gender equality by employing panel data analysis. The study uses the Gender Inequality Index (GII) as a dependent variable and Global Peace Index (GPI) as an independent variable. The sample of the study covers 25 European Union Member States for the period of 2010-2019. The study found that increasing levels of peace have an impact on decreasing levels of gender inequality. The result suggests that peace is a determining variable in gender equality and complements the literature that reveals the positive impact of gender equality on peace levels of countries. This result points out the transformative relationship between peace and gender equality.

Kaynakça

  • Ackerly, Brooke A. and Jacqui True. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. London: Red Globe Press, 2019.
  • Caprioli, Mary and Mark A. Boyer. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(4), (2001): 503-518, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/0022002701045004005.
  • Caprioli, Mary and Peter F. Trumbore. “Ethnic Discrimination and Interstate Violence: Testing the International Impact of Domestic Behavior”, Journal of Peace Research, 40(1), (2003): 5-23, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343303040001842.
  • Caprioli, Mary. “Gendered Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research, 37 (1), (2000): 53–68, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0022343300037001003.
  • Caprioli, Mary. “Primed For Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict”, International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), (2005): 161-178, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00340.
  • Chinkin, Christine “Adoption of 1325 Resolution”, In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 26-38. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Cockburn, Cynthia. From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed Books, 2007.
  • Confortini, Catia Cecilia. “Feminist Contributions and Challenges to Peace Studies”, (2010): 1, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-47?print=pdf.
  • Doğan, Nezahat. “Determinants of Global Peace and Gender Equality as an Invisible Hand: A Cross Country Analysis”, Kadın/Woman 2000, 20(2), (2019): 13-28, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v20i2.80.
  • Driscoll, John C. and Aart C. Kraay. “Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), (1998): 549-560.
  • Elshtain, Jean B. Women and War. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
  • Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.
  • Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research”, Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), (1969): 167-191.
  • Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS) and Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Women, Peace and Security Index 2019/20: Tracking Sustainable Peace Through Inclusion, Justice, and Security for Women. (Washington, DC, 2019).
  • Goetz, Anne Marie and Rob Jenkins. “Gender, Security, and Governance: The Case of Sustainable Development Goal 16”, Gender & Development, 24(1), (2016): 127-137, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1144412.
  • Gray, Mark M., Miki Caul Kittilson and Wayne Sandholtz. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000”, International Organization, 60(2), (2006): 293-333, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060176.
  • Harding, Sandra. “Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?”. In Feminism and Methodology, ed. Sandra Harding, 1-14. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987.
  • Hausman, Jerry A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46(6), (1978): 1251–1271.
  • Hope, Sr. Kempe Ronald. “Peace, Justice and Inclusive Institutions: Overcoming Challenges to the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16”, Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1), (2020): 57-77, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1667320.
  • Hudson, Valerie M., Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Mary Caprioli, and Chad F. Emmett, Sex & World Peace. West Sussex: Columbia University Press, 2012.
  • Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP). Global Peace Index 2020: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, 2020, Accessed May 30, 2021, https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GPI_2020_web.pdf.
  • Koch, Michael T. and Sarah A. Fulton. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies”, The Journal of Politics, 73(1), (2011): 1-16, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000824.
  • Melander, Erik. “Gender Equality and Intrastate Armed Conflict”, International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), (2005): 695-714, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00384.x.
  • Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala and Nahla Valji. “Scholarly Debates and Contested Meanings of WPS”. In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 53-97. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross-Section Dependence in Panels”, IZA Discussion Paper, (2004).
  • Peterson, V. Spike. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Colorado: Lynne Rienner, 1992.
  • Regan, Patrick M. and Aida Paskeviciute. “Women's Access to Politics and Peaceful States”, Journal of Peace Research, 40(3), (2003): 287-302, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/0022343303040003003.
  • Richards, David L. and Ronald Gelleny. “Women's Status and Economic Globalization”, International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), (2007): 855-876, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00480.x.
  • Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu and Vladimir Strezov. “Effect of Foreign Direct Investments, Economic Development and Energy Consumption on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Developing Countries”, Science of the Total Environment, 646(1), (2019): 862-871, Accessed May 30, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365.
  • Stauffer, Katelyn E. and Diana Z. O’Brien. Quantitative Methods and Feminist Political Science, 2018. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-210.
  • Sylvester, Christine. Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues”. In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Brooke A. Ackerly, Maria Stern and Jacqui True, 19-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), (1988): 429–440, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/03058298880170030801.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Peace and Security from a Feminist Perspective”, In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 15-26. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
  • Toksöz, Gülay. “Sayıların Kadın Mücadelesindeki Yeri”, In Türkiye’de Feminist Yöntem, ed. Emine Erdoğan Nehir Gündoğdu, 123-147. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. 2020.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, 4-15 September 1995. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/Beijing%20full%20report%20E.pdf.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, Copenhagen, 14 to 30 July 1980. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Copenhagen/Copenhagen%20Full%20Optimized.pdf.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, Nairobi, 15-26 July 1985. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Nairobi/Nairobi%20Full%20Optimized.pdf.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2020a, Accessed May 30, 2021, http://hdr.undp.org/en/faq-page/gender-inequality-index-gii#t294n2918.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2020b, Accessed May 30, 2021, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Sustainable Development Goals, 2015, Accessed June 02, 2021, https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-5-gender-equality.html.
  • World Economic Forum (WEF). Global Gender Gap Report, 2020, Accessed June 02, 2021, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf.
  • Yerdelen Tatoğlu, Ferda. Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. Istanbul: Beta, 2020.
  • Zinsser, Judith P. “From Mexico to Copenhagen to Nairobi: The United Nations Decade for Women, 1975- 1985”, Journal of World History, 13(1), (2002): 139-168.

Barışın Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Üzerindeki Etkisi: Avrupa Birliği Üye Devletleri Örneği

Yıl 2022, Cilt 0, Sayı 14, 91 - 108, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103

Öz

Bu çalışma ülkelerin barışçıllık seviyelerinin toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği üzerindeki etkisini panel veri analiziyle incelemektedir. Çalışmanın bağımlı değişkeni Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği Endeksi (GII), bağımsız değişkeni Küresel Barış Endeksidir (GPI) Çalışmanın örneklemini, 2010-2019 dönemi için 25 Avrupa Birliği Üye Devletinden oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma ülkelerin yükselen barış seviyelerinin toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliğinin azalması yönünde bir etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuç barışın toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinde belirleyici bir değişken olduğunu ve toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin ülkelerin barışçıllık seviyeleri üzerindeki olumlu etkisini ortaya koyan literatürü tamamlar niteliktedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışma barış ve toplumsal cinsiyet arasındaki dönüştürücü ilişkiye işaret etmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Ackerly, Brooke A. and Jacqui True. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. London: Red Globe Press, 2019.
  • Caprioli, Mary and Mark A. Boyer. “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(4), (2001): 503-518, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/0022002701045004005.
  • Caprioli, Mary and Peter F. Trumbore. “Ethnic Discrimination and Interstate Violence: Testing the International Impact of Domestic Behavior”, Journal of Peace Research, 40(1), (2003): 5-23, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343303040001842.
  • Caprioli, Mary. “Gendered Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research, 37 (1), (2000): 53–68, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0022343300037001003.
  • Caprioli, Mary. “Primed For Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict”, International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), (2005): 161-178, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00340.
  • Chinkin, Christine “Adoption of 1325 Resolution”, In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 26-38. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Cockburn, Cynthia. From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed Books, 2007.
  • Confortini, Catia Cecilia. “Feminist Contributions and Challenges to Peace Studies”, (2010): 1, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-47?print=pdf.
  • Doğan, Nezahat. “Determinants of Global Peace and Gender Equality as an Invisible Hand: A Cross Country Analysis”, Kadın/Woman 2000, 20(2), (2019): 13-28, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v20i2.80.
  • Driscoll, John C. and Aart C. Kraay. “Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), (1998): 549-560.
  • Elshtain, Jean B. Women and War. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
  • Enloe, Cynthia H. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.
  • Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research”, Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), (1969): 167-191.
  • Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS) and Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Women, Peace and Security Index 2019/20: Tracking Sustainable Peace Through Inclusion, Justice, and Security for Women. (Washington, DC, 2019).
  • Goetz, Anne Marie and Rob Jenkins. “Gender, Security, and Governance: The Case of Sustainable Development Goal 16”, Gender & Development, 24(1), (2016): 127-137, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1144412.
  • Gray, Mark M., Miki Caul Kittilson and Wayne Sandholtz. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000”, International Organization, 60(2), (2006): 293-333, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060176.
  • Harding, Sandra. “Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?”. In Feminism and Methodology, ed. Sandra Harding, 1-14. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987.
  • Hausman, Jerry A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46(6), (1978): 1251–1271.
  • Hope, Sr. Kempe Ronald. “Peace, Justice and Inclusive Institutions: Overcoming Challenges to the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16”, Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1), (2020): 57-77, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1667320.
  • Hudson, Valerie M., Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Mary Caprioli, and Chad F. Emmett, Sex & World Peace. West Sussex: Columbia University Press, 2012.
  • Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP). Global Peace Index 2020: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, 2020, Accessed May 30, 2021, https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GPI_2020_web.pdf.
  • Koch, Michael T. and Sarah A. Fulton. “In the Defense of Women: Gender, Office Holding, and National Security Policy in Established Democracies”, The Journal of Politics, 73(1), (2011): 1-16, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000824.
  • Melander, Erik. “Gender Equality and Intrastate Armed Conflict”, International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), (2005): 695-714, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00384.x.
  • Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala and Nahla Valji. “Scholarly Debates and Contested Meanings of WPS”. In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 53-97. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross-Section Dependence in Panels”, IZA Discussion Paper, (2004).
  • Peterson, V. Spike. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Colorado: Lynne Rienner, 1992.
  • Regan, Patrick M. and Aida Paskeviciute. “Women's Access to Politics and Peaceful States”, Journal of Peace Research, 40(3), (2003): 287-302, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/0022343303040003003.
  • Richards, David L. and Ronald Gelleny. “Women's Status and Economic Globalization”, International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), (2007): 855-876, Accessed May 10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00480.x.
  • Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu and Vladimir Strezov. “Effect of Foreign Direct Investments, Economic Development and Energy Consumption on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Developing Countries”, Science of the Total Environment, 646(1), (2019): 862-871, Accessed May 30, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365.
  • Stauffer, Katelyn E. and Diana Z. O’Brien. Quantitative Methods and Feminist Political Science, 2018. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-210.
  • Sylvester, Christine. Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues”. In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Brooke A. Ackerly, Maria Stern and Jacqui True, 19-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), (1988): 429–440, Accessed May 10, 2021, doi:10.1177/03058298880170030801.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. “Peace and Security from a Feminist Perspective”, In The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace and Security, ed. Sara. E. Davies and Jacqui True, 15-26. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  • Tickner, J. Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
  • Toksöz, Gülay. “Sayıların Kadın Mücadelesindeki Yeri”, In Türkiye’de Feminist Yöntem, ed. Emine Erdoğan Nehir Gündoğdu, 123-147. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. 2020.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, 4-15 September 1995. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/Beijing%20full%20report%20E.pdf.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, Copenhagen, 14 to 30 July 1980. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Copenhagen/Copenhagen%20Full%20Optimized.pdf.
  • United Nations (UN). Report of the World Conference to Review and Appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace, Nairobi, 15-26 July 1985. Accessed May 10, 2021, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Nairobi/Nairobi%20Full%20Optimized.pdf.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2020a, Accessed May 30, 2021, http://hdr.undp.org/en/faq-page/gender-inequality-index-gii#t294n2918.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2020b, Accessed May 30, 2021, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Sustainable Development Goals, 2015, Accessed June 02, 2021, https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-5-gender-equality.html.
  • World Economic Forum (WEF). Global Gender Gap Report, 2020, Accessed June 02, 2021, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf.
  • Yerdelen Tatoğlu, Ferda. Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. Istanbul: Beta, 2020.
  • Zinsser, Judith P. “From Mexico to Copenhagen to Nairobi: The United Nations Decade for Women, 1975- 1985”, Journal of World History, 13(1), (2002): 139-168.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası İlişkiler
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Adviye Damla ÜNLÜ> (Sorumlu Yazar)
İstanbul Üniversitesi
0000-0002-5902-4096
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022, Cilt 0, Sayı 14

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { uskudarsbd983986, journal = {Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {2459-0223}, eissn = {2717-7769}, address = {Üsküdar Üniversitesi Merkez Yerleşke Altunizade Mah. Haluk Türksoy Sk. No: 14, PK. 34662 Üsküdar/İstanbul/Türkiye}, publisher = {Üsküdar Üniversitesi}, year = {2022}, volume = {0}, number = {14}, pages = {91 - 108}, doi = {10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103}, title = {Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States}, key = {cite}, author = {Ünlü, Adviye Damla} }
APA Ünlü, A. D. (2022). Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States . Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 0 (14) , 91-108 . DOI: 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103
MLA Ünlü, A. D. "Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States" . Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 0 (2022 ): 91-108 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uskudarsbd/issue/70963/983986>
Chicago Ünlü, A. D. "Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States". Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 0 (2022 ): 91-108
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Barışın Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Üzerindeki Etkisi: Avrupa Birliği Üye Devletleri Örneği AU - Adviye DamlaÜnlü Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 N1 - doi: 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103 DO - 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103 T2 - Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 91 EP - 108 VL - 0 IS - 14 SN - 2459-0223-2717-7769 M3 - doi: 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103 UR - https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103 Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States %A Adviye Damla Ünlü %T Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States %D 2022 %J Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi %P 2459-0223-2717-7769 %V 0 %N 14 %R doi: 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103 %U 10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103
ISNAD Ünlü, Adviye Damla . "Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States". Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 0 / 14 (Haziran 2022): 91-108 . https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103
AMA Ünlü A. D. Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States. ÜSBİD. 2022; 0(14): 91-108.
Vancouver Ünlü A. D. Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2022; 0(14): 91-108.
IEEE A. D. Ünlü , "Impact of Peace on Gender Equality: The Case of European Union Member States", Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 0, sayı. 14, ss. 91-108, Haz. 2022, doi:10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.14.103

Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi’nde yayımlanan makalelerdeki görüşler yazarına aittir. Dergiye, daha önce başka bir dergide, kitapta vb. herhangi bir kaynakta yayımlanan makaleler kabul edilmemektedir. Ulusal veya uluslararası konferans, seminer ve panellerde sunulan bildiriler, dipnotta belirtildikten ve makale formatına dönüştürüldükten sonra yayın sürecine alınabilir.


Dergide yayımlanan akademik makaleler sadece eğitim amaçlı olarak çoğaltılabilir. Eğitim amacı dışında makaleler, makalelerdeki şekil, grafik ve tablolar izin alınmadan kısmen veya tamamen çoğaltılamaz, arşivlenemez. Akademik yayınlarda kaynak gösterilmesi şartı ile makalelerden alıntı yapılabilir. 


Yazarların, Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi’nde yayınlanmak üzere göndermiş oldukları makaleler için telif ücreti talep etmeyeceklerini taahhüt ettikleri kabul edilir.