Evaluating the Impact of Culture and Identity on Sino-Turkish Cooperation in the Belt and Road Framework

Yıl 2024, , 218 - 231, 28.10.2024

Yunus Can Polat

https://doi.org/10.70101/ussmad.1537889

Öz

This study examines the material and intellectual factors that make inter-state cooperation possible from a constructivist perspective and aims to assess the impact of identity and culture on Turkey's planned partnership with China under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The BRI, which envisions the creation of a new China-centered economic-political structure and value system in the long run, seems to be a manifestation of China's desire to transform the existing order of international relations. The article examines from a constructionist perspective the question marks raised by Turkey's participation in this large-scale project, where Westernized intellectuals are the main constitutive element, and where Turkey has been included in the economic, political and military architecture of the West since the Second World War with the Truman Doctrine, Marshall Plan and NATO membership.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Belt and Road Initiative, Turkey-China Relations, Constructivism, Turkish-Islamic Synthesis, Identity and Culture

Türkiye’nin Çin ile İşbirliği Yapabilme Kapasitesinin Kimlik ve Kültür Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi: Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi Çerçevesinde İnşacı Bir Perspektif

Öz

Bu çalışma devletler arası işbirliklerini mümkün kılan maddi ve düşünsel faktörleri inşacı bir perspektiften ele almakta, bu çerçevede Türkiye’nin Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi (BRI) kapsamında Çin ile gerçekleştirmeyi planladığı ortaklık üzerinde kimlik ve kültürün etkisinin değerlendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Uzun vadede Çin merkezli yeni bir ekonomik-politik yapı ve değerler sisteminin yaratılmasını öngören BRI, Çin’in uluslararası ilişkilerin mevcut düzenini dönüştürmeye dair arzularının bir tezahürü gibi görünmektedir. Makalede Batılılaşmış aydınların temel kurucu unsur olduğu, İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan itibaren Truman Doktrini, Marshall Planı ve NATO üyeliği ile Batı’nın iktisadi, politik ve askeri mimarisi içerisinde yer almış Türkiye’nin, bu geniş çaplı projeye katılımının yarattığı soru işaretleri inşacı bir perspektiften irdelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi, Türkiye-Çin İlişkileri, İnşacılık, Türk-İslam Sentezi, Kimlik ve Kültür

Kaynakça

• Adas, C. G. & Tussupova, B. (2016). Effects of the global financial crisis on Chinese economy. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(4), 136-150.
• Balcı, A. & Turan, İ. (2017). Eleştirinin sefaleti: Batı’dan 15 Temmuz darbe girişimini okumak. Bilig(83), 53-77.
• Benabdallah, L. (2019). Contesting the international order by integrating it: The case of China’s Belt and Road initiative. Third World Quarterly, 40(1), 92-108.
• Berkes, N. (2002). Türkiye'de çağdaşlaşma. İstanbul: YKY.
• Bora, T. (2003). The national discourses in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 433-449.
• Bora, T. (2017). Cereyanlar: Türkiye'de siyasi ideolojiler. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2007). Constructivism and identity formation: An interactive approach. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 3(11), 121-144.
• Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2008). Modernity, identity and Turkey's foreign policy. Insight Turkey, 10(1), 55-75.
• Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2014). The culture of the Turkish military: From intervention to accommodation. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 37(2), 19-40.
• Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2023). Constructivism in international relations. In T. Arı (Ed.), Critical theories in international relations: Identity and security dilemma (pp. 81-100). London: Lexington Books.
• Bunskoek, R. & Shih, C. Y. (2021). "Community of common destiny" as post-Western regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian perspective. UI Dergisi, 18(70), 85-101.
• Carlson, A. (2011). Moving beyond sovereignty? A brief consideration of recent changes in China’s approach to international order and the emergence of the tianxia concept. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), 89-102.
• Chin, G. T. & Gallagher, K. P. (2019). Coordinated credit spaces: The globalization of Chinese development finance. Development and Change, 50(1), 245-274.
• Çolakoğlu, S. (2019). China's Belt and Road Initiative and Turkey's Middle Corridor: A question of compatibility. Middle East Institute(29), 1-7.
• Cooley, A. & Nexon, D. (2020). Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Copeaux, E. (2016). Türk tarih tezinden Türk-İslâm sentezine. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Cuihong, C. (2015). Cybersecurity in the Chinese context: Changing concepts, vital interests, and prospects for cooperation. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 1(15), 471-496.
• Dağı, D. (2020). The EU–Turkey migration deal: Performance and prospects. European Foreign Affairs Review, 25(2), 197-216.
• Dossi, S. (2012). Beyond the ‘cognitive iron curtain’: China’s white paper on peaceful development. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 47(2), 124-126.
• Dunford, M. & Liu, W. (2019). Chinese perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(1), 145-167.
• Egeli, S. (2019). Making sense of Turkey’s air and missile defense merry-go-round. All Azimuth, 8(1), 69-92.
• Ergenç, C. & Göçer, D. (2022). BRI engagement and state transformation in the Middle East: A case study on Turkey. In D. Pavlicevic & N. Talmacs (Eds.), The China question: Contestations and adaptations (pp. 93-112). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ferdinand, P. (2016). Westward ho—the China dream and ‘one belt, one road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 92(4), 941-957.
• Flint, C. & Zhu, C. (2019). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum(99), 95-101.
• Flockhart, T. (2008). Constructivism and foreign policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (pp. 79-94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Güneylioğlu, M. (2022). The Turkey-China rapprochement in the context of the BRI: A geoeconomic perspective. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(5), 546-574.
• Gürel, B. & Kozluca, M. (2022). Chinese investment in Turkey: The Belt and Road Initiative, rising expectations and ground realities. European Review, 30(6), 806-834.
• Grant, A. (2019). Crossing Khorgos: Soft power, security, and suspect loyalties at the Sino-Kazakh boundary. Political Geography, 76(2020), 1-10.
• Heck, G. & Hess, S. (2017). Tracing the effects of the EU-Turkey deal: The momentum of the multi-layered Turkish border regime. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 3(2), 35-57.
• Hintz, L. (2016). “Take it outside!” National identity contestation in the foreign policy arena. European Journal of International Relations, 22(2), 335-361.
• Hoffman, M. (1988). States, cosmopolitanism and normative international. 2(1), 60-75.
• Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivist theory in international relations. 23(1), 171-200.
• Hsiung, J. (2003). The aftermath of China's accession to the World Trade Organization. The Independent Review, 8(1), 87-112.
• Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China's Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review(40), 314-321.
• Ülker, E. (2023). Nationalism, religion, and minorities from the Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Turkey. In E. D. Mulle, D. Rodogno, & M. Bieling (Eds.), Sovereignty, nationalism, and the quest for homogeneity in interwar Europe (pp. 61-82). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Ünlü, B. (2018). Türklük sözleşmesi. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
• Ishnazarov, D. (2020). China’s development objectives and its Belt and Road Initiative in the OSCE region. In A. Mihr (Ed.), Transformation and development studies in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) member states (pp. 67-81). Bishkek: Springer.
• Isik, A. F. & Zou, Z. (2019). China-Turkey security cooperation under the background of the ‘Belt and Road’ and the ‘Middle Corridor’ initiatives. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 13(2), 278-293. Jing, R. (2012). The collapse speed of China’s exports in the 2008–2009 financial crisis. CESifo Economic Studies, 58(4), 50-670.
• Johnston, A. I. (1995). Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Johnston, A. I. (1996). Cultural realism and strategy in Maoist China. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security norms and identity in world politics (pp. 216-268). New York: Columbia University Press.
• Kadılar, R. (2017). One Belt One Road Initiative: Perks and challenges for Turkey. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 16(2), 85-90.
• Kadıoğlu, A. S. (2020). Türk-İslam sentezi’nin oluşum ve gelişim süreci. OPUS, 16(27), 813-834. Kara, M. (2023). Turkish-American strategic partnership: Is Turkey still a faithful ally? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 23(2), 431-451.
• Katzeinstein, P. (1997). Tamed power: Germany in Europe. New York: Ithaca.
• Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1998). International organization and the study of world politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645-685.
• Kelleci, F. N. (2022). Türkiye’de sekülerleşme süreçleri ve devletin kimlik politikaları. İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi, 12(1), 543-550.
• Kent, A. (1995). China and the international human rights regime: A case study of multilateral monitoring, 1989-1994. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(1), 1-47.
• Kent, A. (2007). Beyond compliance: China, international organizations, and global security. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1973). Power and interdependence. Surviver, 7(1), 158-165.
• Khanal, S., & Zang, H. (2024). Ten years of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A bibliometric review. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 29(3), 361-395.
• Knight, J. & Ding, S. (2012). China's remarkable economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Koçakoğlu, M. A. (2021). Yumuşak güç kavramı bağlamında kuşak yol girişimi ve Türkiye-Çin ilişkileri. OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(39), 750-776.
• Kratochwil, R. K. (1995). Understanding change in international politics: The Soviet Empire’s demise and the international system. In R. N.-K. (Ed.), International relations theory and the end of the Cold War (pp. 127-166). New York: Columbia University Press.
• Kulaksız, S. (2019). Financial integration via Belt and Road Initiative: China–Turkey cooperation. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 11(1-2), 48-64.
• Li, L., Willett, T. D., & Zhang, N. (2012). The effects of the global financial crisis on China’s financial market and macroeconomy. Economics Research International, 1-7.
• Li, M. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative: Geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition. International Affairs, 96(1), 169-187.
• Liu, W. & Dunford, M. (2016). Inclusive globalization: Unpacking China's Belt and Road Initiative. Area Development and Policy, 1(3), 323-340.
• Luo, X. (2021). Competition between great powers and a looming strategic arms race in the Asia–Pacific. China International Strategy Review(3), 123-136.
• Matthews, J. A. (2019). China’s long term trade and currency goals: The Belt & Road Initiative. Asia Pacific Journal, 17(5), 1-23.
• Mendes, C. A. & Wang, X. (2023). The Belt and Road Initiative in global governance: Impact on the international world order. In P. A. Duarte & E. M. Galan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of globalization with Chinese characteristics: The case of the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 109-123). Singapore: Palgrave & Macmillan.
• Onuf, N. (2013). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. London: Routledge.
• Oran, B. (2001). Türk dış politikasının (TDP) teori ve pratiği; TDP'nin kuramsal çerçevesi: Kültürel boyut. In B. Oran (Ed.), Türk dış politikası: Kurtuluş savaşından bugüne olgular, belgeler, yorumlar (pp. 20-24). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Parasol, M. (2018). The impact of China's 2016 Cyber Security Law on foreign technology firms, and on China's big data and Smart City dreams. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(1), 67-89.
• Qin, Y. (2007). Why is there no Chinese international relations theory? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 3013-340.
• Qin, Y. (2011). Development of international relations theory in China: Progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(1), 231-257.
• Reus-Smith, C. (2002). Imagining society: Constructivism and the English School. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(3), 487-509.
• Rogers, Z. S., Golara, S., Abdulsalam, Y. & Rogers, D. (2024). Protect me not: The effect of tariffs on U.S. supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(1), 1-17.
• Rolland, N. (2017). China's Eurasian century? Political and strategic implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. Washington DC: National Bureau of Asian Research.
• Rolland, N. (2017). China's “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or game-changer. The Washington Quarterly, 40(1), 127-142.
• So, A. Y. (1984). The process of incorporation into the capitalist world-system: The case of China in the nineteenth century. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 8(1), 91-116.
• Tingyang, Z. (2016). All under heaven: The Tianxia system for a possible world order. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
• Wallerstein, I. (1972). Three paths of national development in sixteenth-century Europe. Studies in Comparative International Development, 95-101.
• Waltz, K. (2010). Theory of international politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
• Wang, H. & Rosenau, J. N. (2009). China and global governance. Asian Perspective, 33(3), 5-39.
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
• Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384-396.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Wilmot, S. (2024, June 23). The rise of Chinese EVs is dividing the West. Retrieved June 28, 2024, from https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/the-rise-of-chinese-evs-is-dividing-the-west-850b9e1d
• World Bank (2018, March 29). Belt And Road Initiative, Retrieved June 25, 2024, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative
• Yörük, Z. (2002). Politik psişe olarak Türk kimliği. In Modern Türkiye’de siyasi düşünce: Milliyetçilik (Vol. 4, pp. 309-324).
• Yıldıran, M. (2020). The Chinese vision of BRI and its effects on Turkey and West Asia. In J. Syed & Y.-H. Ying (Eds.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative in a global context Volume I: A business and management perspective (pp. 211-234). Cham: Palgrave & Macmillan.
• Yan, X. (2014). From keeping a low profile to striving for achievement. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(2), 153-184.
• Yang, W., Hu, W., Collins, E., Yang, W., & Esedo, K. (2022). A review of objectives and motivations of the Belt and Road Initiative. International Journal of Humanities Social Science and Management, 2(5), 409-422.
• Yavuz, M. (1998). Turkish identity and foreign policy in flux: The rise of Neo‐Ottomanism. Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 7, 19-41.
• Yesevi, Ç. G. (2012). Türk milliyetçiliğinin evrimi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 75-85.
• Yu, S. (2021). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. In B. Obrani (Ed.), Great potential, many pitfalls: Understanding China's Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 1477-1500). London: Routledge.
• Zehfus, M. (2006). Constructivism and identity: A dangerous liaison. In S. Guzzini & A. Leander (Eds.), Constructivism and international relations (pp. 93-117). Oxon: Routledge.
• Zhang, F. (2011). The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19, 305-328.
• Zhao, M. (2021). The Belt and Road Initiative and China–US strategic competition. China International Strategy Review, 3, 248-260.