Procrastination as a Psychological Factor Influencing Tax Compliance Behaviour

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 53 - 74, 27.03.2026

Alim Yelboğa , Hakan Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.70101/ussmad.1853912

https://izlik.org/JA43CW42MG

Öz

This study examines the relationship between procrastination tendency and tax compliance from a behavioral economics perspective. Traditional tax compliance models mainly focus on deterrence and rational choice, while behavioral factors have received limited attention. This research considers procrastination as a behavioral determinant of tax compliance and distinguishes between voluntary and enforced compliance. The study is based on survey data collected from 403 taxpayers in Türkiye. Procrastination tendency is measured using Lay’s General Procrastination Scale, and tax compliance is assessed through the Tax Compliance Inventory developed by Kirchler and Wahl. The relationships between variables are analyzed using correlation and regression techniques. The findings indicate that procrastination tendency is weakly related to voluntary tax compliance but shows a stronger and statistically significant association with enforced tax compliance. These results suggest that tax non-compliance is not always driven by intentional avoidance but may also stem from behavioral timing and self-control problems. These findings suggest that policies aimed at improving tax compliance should focus not only on deterrent sanctions but also on behavioral policy tools that account for taxpayers’ behavioral tendencies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Propensity to postpone , Tax compliance , Behavioral economics , Voluntary tax compliance , Compulsory tax compliance

Vergi Uyumu Davranışını Etkileyen Psikolojik Bir Faktör Olarak Erteleme Eğilimi

https://izlik.org/JA43CW42MG

Öz

Bu çalışma, bireylerin erteleme eğilimlerini vergi uyumu üzerindeki etkisini davranışsal iktisat perspektifinden incelemektedir. Vergi uyumu literatüründe mükellef davranışları çoğunlukla caydırıcılık ve rasyonel tercih çerçevesinde ele alınmış; bireysel davranışsal eğilimlerin rolü sınırlı biçimde incelenmiştir. Bu araştırma, erteleme eğilimini vergi uyumunun davranışsal bir belirleyicisi olarak ele almakta ve vergi uyumunu gönüllü ve zorunlu uyum olmak üzere iki boyutta değerlendirmektedir. Çalışma, Türkiye’de vergi mükellefi olan 403 bireyden anket yöntemiyle elde edilen veriler kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Erteleme eğilimi Lay’in Genel Erteleme Ölçeği, vergi uyumluluğu ise Kirchler ve Wahl tarafından geliştirilen Vergi Uyumluluk Envanteri aracılığıyla ölçülmüştür. Erteleme eğilimi ile vergi uyumu arasındaki ilişkiler korelasyon ve regresyon analizleriyle test edilmiştir. Bulgular, erteleme eğiliminin gönüllü vergi uyumu ile zayıf; zorunlu vergi uyumu ile ise daha güçlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, vergi uyumsuzluğunun her zaman bilinçli bir kaçınma davranışı olmadığını, bazı durumlarda zamanlama ve öz-denetim sorunlarından kaynaklanabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgular, vergi uyumunu artırmaya yönelik politikaların yalnızca caydırıcı yaptırımlara değil, aynı zamanda mükelleflerin davranışsal eğilimlerini dikkate alan politika araçlarına da odaklanması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Erteleme eğilimi , Vergi uyumu , Davranışsal iktisat , Gönüllü vergi uyumu , Zorunlu vergi uyumu

Kaynakça

• Akerlof, G. A. (1991). Procrastination and obedience. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 1-19.
• Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
• Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the united states and in europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224-246.
• Brown, J. R., Farrell, A. M., & Weisbenner, S. J. (2016). Decision-making approaches and the propensity to default: Evidence and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(3), 477-495.
• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. Johan Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2006). Effects of tax morale on tax compliance: Experimental and survey evidence.
• DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2004). Overestimating self_control: Evidence from the health club industry. In: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
• Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of comparative economics, 35(1), 136-159.
• Gamst-Klaussen, T., Steel, P., & Svartdal, F. (2019). Procrastination and personal finances: Exploring the roles of planning and financial self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 775.
• Geyik, O., Şeren, G. Y., & Mcgee, R. W. (2024). An empirical analysis on the effect of taxpayers' educational level and marital status factor on their attitudes and behaviors towards taxes. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 9(2), 427-449.
• Geyik, O., Şeren, G. Y., & Yakşi, Y. (2024). The effect of tax education on generation alpha’s tax awareness: An experimental study. International Journal of Public Finance, 9(2), 223-246.
• Hartmann, A. J., Mueller, M., & Kirchler, E. (2020). Tax compliance: Research methods and decision processes. In T. Zaleskiewicz & J. Traczyk (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on financial decision making (pp. 291-330). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45500-2_13
• House, J., Robitaille, N., & Mazar, N. (2018). Effectiveness of repeated implementation intention-interventions on organizations’ likelihood to file their overdue taxes. Rotman School of Management Working Paper(2997993).
• Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
• Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225.
• Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Kastlunger, B., & Wahl, I. (2010). Why pay taxes. A review of tax compliance decisions. Developing alternative frameworks for explaining tax compliance, 59.
• Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory tax-i: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346.
• Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of research in personality, 20(4), 474-495.
• Liu, X. (2014). Use tax compliance: The role of norms, audit probability, and sanction severity. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 18(1), 65-80.
• Lu, D., He, Y., & Tan, Y. (2022). Gender, socioeconomic status, cultural differences, education, family size and procrastination: A sociodemographic meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 719425.
• Martinez, S.-K., Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2023). Procrastination in the field: Evidence from tax filing. Journal of the European Economic Association, 21(3), 1119-1153.
• Mas’ud, A., Abd Manaf, N. A., & Saad, N. (2015). Testing assumptions of the “slippery slope framework” using cross-country data: Evidence from sub-saharan africa. International Journal of Business and Society, 16(3). Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1), 193-210.
• O'donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103-124.
• Persian, R., Prastuti, G., Bogiatzis-Gibbons, D., Kurniawan, M. H., Subroto, G., Mustakim, M., Scheunemann, L., Gandy, K., & Sutherland, A. (2023). Behavioural prompts to increase early filing of tax returns: A population-level randomised controlled trial of 11.2 million taxpayers in indonesia. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(3), 701-720.
• Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., & Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455-483.
• Slemrod, J., Christian, C., London, R., & Parker, J. A. (1997). April 15 syndrome. Economic Inquiry, 35(4), 695-709. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological bulletin, 133(1), 65.
• Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. (2013). Sex, education and procrastination: An epidemiological study of procrastinators’ characteristics from a global sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1851
• Svartdal, F., Klingsieck, K. B., Steel, P., & Gamst-Klaussen, T. (2020). Measuring implemental delay in procrastination: Separating onset and sustained goal striving. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109762.
• Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. In Tax compliance and tax morale. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: An empirical analysis of the “slippery slope framework”. Law & Policy, 32(4), 383-406.