An Examination of International Students’ Awareness and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Turkish Language Learning

Öz

This study aims to examine the awareness, perceptions, and opinions of international students studying in Türkiye regarding the integration of artificial intelligence based applications into the learning process of Turkish as a foreign language. The research was conducted using a cross-sectional survey design, and data were collected from 350 international students through a validated five-point Likert-type scale. The study’s theoretical framework is grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Cultural Adaptation and Ethical Concerns Model, and the Pedagogical Benefit and Awareness Model. The findings revealed that 70% of the participants actively use AI-based platforms for language practice, and they hold positive perceptions of pedagogical advantages, including flexible learning environments (75%), personalized feedback (70%), and culturally enriched content (80%). However, ethical concerns such as cultural bias (40%) and data transparency (25%) were also prominently expressed. Demographic analyses revealed that awareness of AI is significantly associated with age, nationality, and duration of study (p < 0,05), while gender-based differences were observed in perception scores (p = 0,034). The results suggest that international students possess a high level of awareness regarding AI-supported Turkish language learning and perceive these technologies as pedagogically beneficial. Nevertheless, the study highlights the crucial importance of developing transparent and inclusive systems that are sensitive to cultural and ethical considerations during the integration process. In this context, the research emphasizes the need to adopt culturally responsive and ethically grounded strategies for integrating AI technologies into language teaching curricula.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• cultural adaptation
• pedagogical benefit
• technology acceptance model
• Turkish language teaching

Uluslararası Öğrencilerin Türkçe Öğretiminde Yapay Zekâ Entegrasyonuna Yönelik Farkındalık ve Algılarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma Türkiye’de öğrenim gören uluslararası öğrencilerin Türkçeyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenme süreçlerinde yapay zekâ tabanlı uygulamalara yönelik farkındalık, algı ve görüşlerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kesitsel tarama modeli ile yürütülmüş ve 350 uluslararası öğrenciden veriler beşli Likert tipi bir ölçekle toplanmıştır. Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TAM), Kültürel Uyum ve Etik Kaygılar Modeli ile Pedagojik Fayda ve Farkındalık Modeli araştırmanın kuramsal çerçevesini oluşturmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular katılımcıların %70’inin YZ tabanlı platformları aktif şekilde kullandığını ve Likert ölçekle değerlendirilen esnek öğrenme (%75), kişiselleştirilmiş geri bildirim (%70) ve kültürel içerik (%80) gibi pedagojik avantajlara ilişkin olumlu algılar taşıdığını ortaya koymuştur. Buna karşılık kültürel önyargı (%40) ve veri şeffaflığı (%25) gibi etik konulara yönelik endişeler dikkat çekmiştir. Demografik analizler; yaş, milliyet ve öğrenim süresi gibi değişkenlerin YZ farkındalığı üzerinde anlamlı etkiler yarattığını (p<0,05), cinsiyetin ise YZ algısı düzeyinde farklılık oluşturduğunu (p=0,034) göstermiştir. Sonuçlar uluslararası öğrencilerin YZ destekli Türkçe öğreniminde yüksek farkındalığa sahip olduklarını ve bu teknolojileri pedagojik olarak faydalı bulduklarını göstermektedir. Ancak kültürel ve etik duyarlılıklar göz önünde bulundurularak geliştirilecek şeffaf ve kapsayıcı sistemlerin entegrasyon sürecinde kritik öneme sahip olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, YZ teknolojilerinin dil öğretimi müfredatına uyarlanmasında kültürel uygunluk ve etik tasarıma dayalı stratejilerin gerekliliğini ön plana çıkarmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel uyum
• pedagojik fayda
• teknoloji kabul modeli
• Türkçe öğretimi
• yapay zekâ destekli dil öğretimi

Kaynakça

1. Abdelhalim, S. M., & Alsehibany, R. A. (2025). Integrating AI-powered tools in EFL pronunciation instruction: effects on accuracy and L2 motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2534015
2. Aldosari, M. (2024). Another World with Artificial Intelligence in Speaking Classes: To Delve into the Influences on Willingness to Communicate, Personal Best Goals, and Academic Enjoyment. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(4), 439-463.
3. AL-Qadri, A. H., & Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2025). Dimensions of artificial intelligence acceptance among pre-service EFL teachers: exploring usability, usefulness, social norms, ethics and intentions using ChatGPT. The Electronic Library, 43(4), 669-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2024-0391
4. Al-Dokhny, A., Alismaiel, O., Youssif, S., Nasr, N., Drwish, A., & Samir, A. (2024). Can multimodal large language models enhance performance benefits among higher education students? An investigation based on the task–technology fit theory and the artificial intelligence device use acceptance model. Sustainability, 16(23), 10780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310780
5. Ali, Z., Bhar, S. K., Abd Majid, S. N., & Masturi, S. Z. (2025). Exploring Student Beliefs: Does Interaction with AI Language Tools Correlate with Perceived English Learning Improvements?. Education Sciences, 15(5), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050522
6. Alreshidi, N. A. K. (2023, February). Enhancing topic-specific prior knowledge of students impacts their outcomes in mathematics. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1050468). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1050468
7. Amershi, B. (2020). Culture, the process of knowledge, perception of the world and emergence of AI. AI & Society, 35(2), 417-430 https://doi.org/10.1007/SOO146-019-00885-Z
8. Aysu, S. (2024). The use of AI-Powered Tools in Language Learning. Dil Eğitimi ve Öğretiminde, (1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2410

9. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
10. Brauner, P., Philipsen, R., Calero Valdez, A., & Ziefle, M. (2019). What happens when decision support systems fail?—The importance of usability on performance in erroneous systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1225-1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1581258
11. Chapelle, C. A., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.
12. Chen, X. (2019). Cultural adaptation in AI-driven education. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 234-250
13. Chen, Y. (2021). On the Alienation of College Students’ Cognitive Psychological Barriers in the Era of Globalization. Psychiatria Danubine, 33(7), 117-119.
14. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
16. Çetin, M. ve Aktaş, A. (2021). Yapay zekâ ve eğitimde gelecek senaryoları. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı), 4225-4268.
17. Dakulagi, V., Yeap, K. H., Nisar, H., Dakulagi, R., Basavaraj, G. N., & Galindo, M. V. (2025). An overview of techniques and best practices to create intuitive and user-friendly human-machine interfaces. Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Signal Processing in Human-Machine Interaction, 63-77.
18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
19. Demir, A., & Yılmaz, B. (2021). Technology integration in language education: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 567-578.
20. Demirel, Ö. (2012). Yabancı dil öğretimi: Dil pasaportu, dil biyografisi, dil dosyası. Pegem Akademi.
21. Doton, W. (2024). The Role Of Data Securıty In The World Of Educatıon To Increase Parental Trust. Educational Researcher Journal, 1(3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.71288/educationalresearcherjournal.v1i3.19
22. Ebadi, S., & Raygan, A. (2023). Investigating the facilitating conditions, perceived ease of use and usefulness of mobile-assisted language learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 30.
23. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
24. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step : A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Allyn & Bacon.
25. Gupta, A., Gonzalez-Rojas, Y., Juarez, E., Casal, M. C., Moya, J., Falci, D. R., Sarkis, E., Solis, J., Zheng, H., Scott, N., Cathcart, A. ., Parra, S., Sager, J. E., Austin, D., Peppercorn, A., Alexander, E., Yeh, W. W., Brinson, C., Aldinger, M., Shapiro, A. E. & COMET-ICE Investigators. (2022). Effect of sotrovimab on hospitalization or death among high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. Jama, 327(13), 1236-1246. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.2832
26. Habib, S., Vogel, T., & Thorne, E. (2025). Student perspectives on creative pedagogy: Considerations for the Age of AI. Thinking Skills and Creativity, (56), 101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101767
27. Hari, H., Sharma, A., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2025). Exploring ethical frontiers of artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of Responsible Technology, (21), 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100103
28. Hazar, G., Pepe, H. ve Hazar, Z. (2021). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi dersine karşı tutumlarını etkileyen faktörlerin araştırılması. Düzce Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 33-40.
29. Hassenzahl, M. (2013). User experience and experience design. In The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 1–14). Interaction Design Foundation.
30. Horani, O. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Yaseen, H., Hmoud, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2023). The critical determinants impacting artificial intelligence adoption at the organizational level. Information Development, 02666669231166889.
31. Huang, J., Chen, X., Mishra, S., Zheng, H. S., Yu, A. W., Song, X., & Zhou, D. (2023). Large language models cannot self-correct reasoning yet. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01798. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01798
32. Jafarnia, A., Hariri, H., & Parvizi, G. R. (2023). Unlocking the potential: Exploring the multifaceted impact of artificial intelligence integration in language learning. Language Education and Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243867
33. Jegede, O. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and English language learning: Exploring the roles of AI-driven tools in personalizing learning and providing instant feedback. Universal Library of Languages and Literatures, 1(2), 6-19.
34. Kara, M. A. (2024). Fındık Fiyatlarının Yapay Sinir Ağları ile Tahminlenmesi: Türkiye Örneği. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 31-42.
35. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (27. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
36. Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., ve Kuzgun, Y. (2024). Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19343-19366.
37. Kılıçkaya, F. (2021). Dijital pedagoji ve dil öğretiminde yenilikçi yaklaşımlar. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 54(1), 45-62.
38. Kim, M., Çetin, A., & Kara, B. (2019). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103642
39. Köçeri, K. ve Ulaş, A. U. (2025). Yabancı Öğrencilerin Yapay Zekâ ile Türkçe Dil Becerisi Öğrenimi ve Algılarının İncelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 775-797. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1614932
40. Kumi‐Yeboah, A., & Amponsah, S. (2023). An exploratory study of instructors’ perceptions on inclusion of culturally responsive pedagogy in online education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 878-897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13299
41. Li, Y. (2020). AI in language learning: Pedagogical benefits and challenges. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2345-2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09822-0
42. Lun, L., Zetian, D., Hoe, T. W., Juan, X., Jiaxin, D., & Fulai, W. (2024). Factors influencing user intentions on interactive websites: Insights from the technology acceptance model. IEEE Access.
43. Mallik, S., & Gangopadhyay, A. (2023). Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 6, 1151391.
44. Mehdaoui, A. (2024). Unveiling Barriers and Challenges of AI Technology Integration in Education: Assessing Teachers’ Perceptions, Readiness and Anticipated Resistance. Futurity Education, 4(4), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.12.25.06
45. Niemi, H. (2024). AI in education and learning: Perspectives on the education ecosystem. In New Frontiers in Science in the Era of AI (pp. 169-194). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61187-2-11
46. Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Face-to-face, online and hybrid education: University students’ opinions and preferences. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 2(2), ep2206. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/12384
47. Nykyporets, S. S. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on sustainable development of tertiary technical education in Ukraine. In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference «Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technologies on Sustainable Development», December 28-29 2023: 22-25.. WayScience.
48. Oberste-Berghaus, N. (2024). The role of teaching foreign languages in developing intercultural competence. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/808
49. Ortega, M. X. P., Ojeda, S. C., Sandoval, M. C., Rodríguez, L. A. R., & Gómez, F. C. (2025). Learning Ecosystem: Designing An Inclusive Space to Enhance the Higher Education Process. International Journal of Changes in Education, 2(2), 104-114.
50. Priyadarshini, S., & Priyadarshini, S. (2025). Investigating the potential of ChatGPT in substituting or assisting teachers in the digital era. In Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Engineering Applications (pp. 54-69). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003565529-4
51. Procel, G. J. O., Medina, M. L. F., Sotomayor, D. J., & Sanchez, M. A. (2024). Using technology in English teaching. Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 9.
52. Rane, N., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence: key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4843988
53. Rasool, S., Lodhi, H. A., & Hussain, I. (2025). AI and the Future of Learning: Personalization, Equity, and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Social Signs Review, 3(4), 247-259.
54. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technologies. Computers & Education, (128), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
55. Shah, P. (2023). AI and the Future of Education: Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons.
56. Shokri, M. A., & Mousavi, K. (2024). Enhancing writing pedagogy: an exploration of metacognitive awareness raising strategies on creativity and critical thinking in writing courses. Bayan College International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1), 11-41.
57. Sumathy, V., & Navamani, G. (2024). AI-Driven Personalized Learning: Enhancing Student Success through Adaptive Technologies. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1.
58. Taebi, B. (2017). Bridging the gap between social acceptance and ethical acceptability. Risk analysis, 37(10), 1817-1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12734.
59. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, (2), 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
60. Thomas, D. S. (2022). An investigation into the cultural sensitivity of the curriculum: Its impact on students’ engagement in higher education. University of Kent (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.94817
61. Velander, J., Taiye, M. A., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4085-4105.
62. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
63. Vidarshika, W., Dayapathirana, N., & Ranasinghe, A. (2025, April). Understanding AI Chatbot Adoption in Education: The Role of Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Anthropomorphic Tendencies. In 2025 International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSE65633.2025.11031020
64. Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in human behavior, 67, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
65. Yuen, C. L., & Schlote, N. (2024). Learner experiences of mobile apps and artificial Intelligence to support additional language learning in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(4), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241238693
66. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
67. Zheng, Y. D., & Stewart, N. (2024). Improving EFL students’ cultural awareness: Reframing moral dilemmatic stories with ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, (6), 100223.