316L PASLANMAZ ÇELİĞİNDEN ÜRETİLEN SÜSPANSİYON KONTROL KOLUNUN TOPOLOJİ OPTİMİZASYONU İLE İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, geleneksel SAE 1045 çeliği ile seçici lazer ergitme yöntemi için 316L paslanmaz çeliği kullanılarak tasarlanan süspansiyon kontrol kolunun sayısal analiz temelli karşılaştırmasını sunmaktadır. Yapısal bütünlüğü korurken kütle azaltımı sağlamak amacıyla yoğunluk tabanlı topoloji optimizasyonu, SIMP, uygulanmış ve her iki malzeme için de yaklaşık %30 oranında kütle tasarrufu elde edilmiştir. Sayısal analiz sonuçları, SAE 1045 çeliğinin rijitlik açısından hafif bir performans avantajını koruduğunu gösterse de her iki tasarımın da 1x10^7 çevrimlik sonsuz ömüre ulaştığı saptanmıştır. Optimize edilen 316L bileşeni, 1,56 yorulma emniyet katsayısı ile güvenli mühendislik sınırları içerisinde kalarak dinamik yükler altında yapısal güvenilirliğini kanıtlamıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, eklemeli imalatın sunduğu tasarım özgürlüğü ile birleşen 316L paslanmaz çeliğinin, otomotiv süspansiyon sistemlerinde geleneksel malzemelere karşı oldukça rekabetçi ve güvenilir bir alternatif olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 316L paslanmaz çeliği
• SAE 1045 çeliği
• eklemeli imalat
• topoloji optimizasyonu
• süspansiyon kontrol kolu
• kütle azaltımı

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Teşekkür

Yazarlar, 22AG001-TÜBİTAK 1004 numaralı proje kapsamında bu araştırmayı desteklediği için Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu’na (TÜBİTAK) teşekkür eder.

Analysis of a 316L Stainless Steel Control Arm Through Topology Optimization

Öz

This study presents a numerical comparison between a suspension control arm fabricated from traditional SAE 1045 steel and a variant designed for additive manufacturing using 316L stainless steel. Utilizing selective laser melting parameters as a baseline, density based topology optimization SIMP was applied to achieve mass reduction while maintaining good mechnaical property, resulting in a 30% reduction in mass. Numerical results indicate that while SAE 1045 maintains a slight performance advantage in terms of stiffness, both designs successfully reach the infinite fatigue life of 1x10^7 cycles. The optimized 316L component, with a fatigue safety factor of 1.56, maintained within safe engineering limits, demonstrating its strength under dynamic loading conditions. The findings highlight that 316L stainless steel, coupled with the design freedom of additive manufacturing, serves as a highly competitive and dependable alternative to conventional materials in automotive suspension systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 316L stainless steel
• SAE 1045 steel
• additive manufacturing
• topology optimization
• suspension control arm
• mass reduction

Kaynakça

1. Bendsøe, M. P., & Kikuchi, N. (1988). Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 71(2), 197-224, DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
2. Chen, J., Wei, H., Bao, K., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Peng, Y., ... & Wang, K. (2021). Dynamic mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel fabricated by an additive manufacturing process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 11, 170-179, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.097
3. D’Andrea, D. (2023). Additive manufacturing of AISI 316L stainless steel: a review. Metals, 13(8), 1370, DOI: 10.3390/met13081370
4. DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., ... & Zhang, W. (2018). Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Progress in materials science, 92, 112-224, DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
5. Demirdogen, C., Ridge, J., Pollock, P., & Anderson, S. (2004). Weight optimized design of a front suspension component for commercial heavy trucks (No. 2004-01-2709). SAE Technical Paper, DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2709
6. Euser, V. K., Jones, D. R., Martinez, D. T., Valdez, J. A., Trujillo, C. P., Cady, C. M., & Fensin, S. J. (2023). The effect of microstructure on the dynamic shock response of 1045 steel. Acta Materialia, 250, 118874, DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118874
7. Gardan, J. (2017). Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Additive Manufacturing Handbook, 149-168, DOI: 10.1201/9781315119106
8. Gündüz, S., & Acarer, M. (2006). The effect of heat treatment on high temperature mechanical properties of microalloyed medium carbon steel. Materials & design, 27(10), 1076-1085, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.020

9. Hassan, H. Z., & Saeed, N. M. (2024). Advancements and applications of lightweight structures: a comprehensive review. Discover Civil Engineering, 1(1), 47, DOI: 10.1007/s44290-024-00049-z
10. Jiang, J., Xu, X., & Stringer, J. (2018). Support structures for additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2(4), 64, DOI: 10.3390/jmmp2040064
11. Kaya, C., & Ermis, K. (2023). Topology Optimization of Leaf Spring Brackets in Truck Suspensions. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science, 12(1), 2285-2290.
12. Kumar, A., & Jerome Stanley, M. (2022). Design, Topology Optimization and Fabrication of a Semi-trailing Arm for an Off-Road Vehicle Using Optistruct. In Energy and Exergy for Sustainable and Clean Environment, Volume 1 (pp. 557-569). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8278-0_36
13. Lee, D. C., & Lee, J. I. (2003). Structural optimization concept for the design of an aluminium control arm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 217(8), 647-656, DOI: 10.1243/095440703606920
14. Lin, R., Zhan, X., & Li, X. (2025). Topology Optimization Design of Automotive Suspension Control Arm. Engineering Reports, 7(5), e70188, DOI: 10.1002/eng2.70188
15. Reitz, W. (2006). A Review of:“Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steel” JC Lippold and DJ Kotecki, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, 2005, 360 pages, ISBN 0471473790, DOI: 10.1080/10426910500476747
16. Liu, X., Zhang, S., Bao, Y., Zhang, Z., & Yue, Z. (2022). Strain-controlled fatigue behavior and microevolution of 316L stainless steel under cyclic shear path. Materials, 15(15), 5362, DOI: 10.3390/ma15155362
17. Lukoševičius, V., Makaras, R., Rutka, A., Keršys, R., Dargužis, A., & Skvireckas, R. (2021). Investigation of vehicle stability with consideration of suspension performance. Applied sciences, 11(20), 9778, DOI: 10.3390/app11209778
18. MANINAS, N., PAPANTONIOU, I., & Vaxevanidis, N. M. Design, analysis and topology optimization of a car’s suspension lower control arm. Materials Research Proceedings, 46, DOI: 10.21741/9781644903377-50
19. Nelson, E. A. (2003). Draw Direction Constraints in Topology Optimization-A Practical Example (No. 2003-01-1306). SAE Technical Paper, DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-1306
20. Peng, Y. (2022, April). Topological Optimization of Automobile’s Control Arm. In 2022 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC) (pp. 1610-1615). IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/IPEC54454.2022.9777504
21. Pereira, T., Kennedy, J. V., & Potgieter, J. (2019). A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia manufacturing, 30, 11-18, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003
22. Puchi Cabrera, E. S. (2001). High temperature deformation of 316L stainless steel. Materials science and technology, 17(2), 155-161, DOI:10.1179/026708301101509944
23. Rozvany, G. I., Zhou, M., & Birker, T. (1992). Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Structural optimization, 4(3), 250-252, DOI: 10.1007/BF01742754
24. Singh, S., Samir, S., Kumar, K., & Thapa, S. (2021). Effect of heat treatment processes on the mechanical properties of AISI 1045 steel. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 5097-5101, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.590
25. Smarzewski, P., & Stolarski, A. (2022). Properties and performance of concrete materials and structures. Crystals, 12(9), 1193, DOI: 10.3390/cryst12091193
26. Tang, L., Wu, J., Liu, J., Jiang, C., & Shangguan, W. B. (2014). Topology optimization and performance calculation for control arms of a suspension. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 6, 734568, DOI: 10.1155/2014/73456
27. Thompson, S. W., Parthasarathi, V., & Findley, K. O. (2021). A comparison of bending-fatigue properties of surface-induction-hardened SAE 1045 bar steels with and without vanadium and the influence of comparable low-temperature induction-tempering and furnace-tempering treatments. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 807, 140812, DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.140812
28. Vossou, C., Nakos, A., & Koulocheris, D. (2022, December). Topology optimization of a MacPherson control arm. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1271, No. 1, p. 012013). IOP Publishing, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1271/1/012013
29. Yang, R. J., Chuang, C. H., Che, X., & Soto, C. (2000). New applications of topology optimisation in automotive industry. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 23(1-2), 1-15, DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.2000.001878
30. Yap, C. Y., Chua, C. K., Dong, Z. L., Liu, Z. H., Zhang, D. Q., Loh, L. E., & Sing, S. L. (2015). Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications. Applied physics reviews, 2(4), DOI: 10.1063/1.4935926