A STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF LOCUST BEAN GUM ON THE SWELLING BEHAVIOR OF CLAY SOILS WITH DIFFERENT PLASTICITY

Öz

Swelling clays cause severe engineering issues due to moisture-induced volume changes. This study experimentally investigates how locust bean gum (LBG), which is a sustainable biopolymer, affects the swelling behavior of kaolin-bentonite mixtures with varying plasticity levels. One-dimensional oedometer tests were conducted on medium- and high-plasticity clay mixtures to evaluate the impact of LBG concentration and mixing water temperature on swelling potential and swelling pressure. Results reveal that LBG effectively mitigates swelling, especially in highly plastic clays. At room temperature, a 2% LBG treatment reduced swelling potential and pressure by 79% and 68%, respectively. Notably, increasing the mixing water temperature to 60 °C further enhanced these reductions to 95% and 90%, respectively. In contrast, treating medium-plasticity clays with LBG completely neutralized the swelling tendency, resulting in immediate settlement under low vertical stress. This behavioral difference indicates that the settlement in medium-plasticity clays is driven by biopolymer-induced structural flocculation, whereas the swelling suppression in high-plasticity clays is governed by a hydrogel network that physically restricts clay hydration. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that soil plasticity and preparation temperature are critical factors for optimizing sustainable soil stabilization using biopolymers. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biopolymers
• Locust bean gum
• Clay plasticity
• Swelling potential
• Swelling pressure
• Sustainable soil improvement

Destekleyen Kurum

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) of Bursa Uludağ University under the Rapid Support Project No. 2171.

Proje Numarası

2171

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval was not required for this study, as it did not involve human participants or animal subjects.

Teşekkür

The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of undergraduate students Semanur Taslak, Kutay Kocakulak, and Memet Akif Çiçek during the laboratory experiments.

Farklı Plastisiteye Sahip Kil Zeminlerin Şişme Davranışına Keçiboynuzu Sakızının Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Şişen kil zeminler, suyla temas ettiklerinde gösterdikleri yüksek hacimsel değişimler nedeniyle ciddi mühendislik sorunları yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, sürdürülebilir ve doğal bir biyopolimer olan keçiboynuzu sakızının (LBG), farklı plastisiteye sahip kaolen-bentonit karışımlarının şişme davranışı üzerindeki etkileri deneysel olarak incelenmiştir. Orta ve yüksek plastisiteli kil karışımları üzerinde tek boyutlu ödometre deneyleri yapılarak, biyopolimer oranının ve karışım suyunun sıcaklığının şişme potansiyeli ile şişme basıncı üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, LBG'nin özellikle yüksek plastisiteli killerde şişmeyi başarılı bir şekilde baskıladığını göstermiştir. Oda sıcaklığında %2 LBG ilavesi, şişme potansiyelini %79, şişme basıncını ise %68 oranında düşürmüştür. Biyopolimer çözeltisinin 60 °C'de su ile hazırlanması durumunda ise bu iyileşme oranları sırasıyla %95 ve %90 seviyelerine çıkmıştır. Öte yandan, orta plastisiteli karışımlarda LBG ilavesi şişme eğilimini tamamen ortadan kaldırmış ve numunenin düşük düşey gerilme altında oturmasına neden olmuştur. Bu mekanik farklılık; orta plastisiteli killerdeki oturmanın biyopolimer kaynaklı flokülasyondan (yumaklaşma), yüksek plastisiteli killerdeki şişme direncinin ise kilin su almasını fiziksel olarak engelleyen hidrojel ağından kaynaklandığını göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulgular, biyopolimer tabanlı sürdürülebilir zemin iyileştirme uygulamalarında zemin plastisitesinin ve hazırlama koşullarının ne denli kritik bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biyopolimerler
• Keçiboynuzu sakızı
• Kil plastisitesi
• Şişme potansiyeli
• Şişme basıncı
• Sürdürülebilir zemin iyileştirme

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi (BAP) tarafından 2171 numaralı Hızlı Destek Projesi kapsamında desteklenmiştir.

Proje Numarası

2171

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma insan katılımcılar veya hayvan denekler içermediğinden etik kurul onayına gerek yoktur.

Teşekkür

Yazar, laboratuvar deneylerinin yürütülmesi sırasında sağladıkları katkılardan dolayı lisans öğrencileri Semanur Taslak, Kutay Kocakulak ve Memet Akif Çiçek’e teşekkür eder.

Kaynakça

1. Anandha Kumar, S., Sujatha, E. R., Pugazhendi, A. & Jamal, M. T. (2023). Guar gum-stabilized soil: a clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 25(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02032-z
2. Bagheri, P., Gratchev, I. & Rybachuk, M. (2023). Effects of Xanthan Gum Biopolymer on Soil Mechanical Properties. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020887
3. Barman, D. & Dash, S. K. (2022). Stabilization of expansive soils using chemical additives: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(4), 1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011
4. Benghazi, Z., Tobal, R. & Djellali, A. (2024). Life Cycle Analysis Comparison of Stabilizing Materials for Expansive Soils. ARCHive-SR, 8(2), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.21625/archive-sr.v8i2.1086
5. Bouazza, A., Gates, W. P. & Ranjith, P. G. (2009). Hydraulic conductivity of biopolymer-treated silty sand. Geotechnique, 59(1), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00137
6. Bozyigit, I., Javadi, A. & Altun, S. (2021). Strength properties of xanthan gum and guar gum treated kaolin at different water contents. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 13(5), 1160–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.007
7. Cabalar, A F, Wiszniewski, M. & Skutnik, Z. (2017). Effects of Xanthan Gum Biopolymer on the Permeability, Odometer, Unconfined Compressive and Triaxial Shear Behavior of a Sand. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 54(5), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9481-1
8. Cabalar, Ali Firat, Awraheem, M. H. & Khalaf, M. M. (2018). Geotechnical properties of a low-plasticity clay with biopolymer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(8), 4018170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002380

9. Chang, I., Im, J. & Cho, G. C. (2016). Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. In Sustainability (Vol. 8, Issue 3, p. 251). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030251
10. Chang, I., Im, J., Prasidhi, A. K. & Cho, G. C. (2015). Effects of Xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Construction and Building Materials, 74, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.026
11. Chang, I., Lee, M., Tran, A. T. P., Lee, S., Kwon, Y. M., Im, J. & Cho, G. C. (2020). Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices. Transportation Geotechnics, 24, 100385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385
12. Chen, R., Zhang, L. & Budhu, M. (2013). Biopolymer Stabilization of Mine Tailings. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(10), 1802–1807. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000902
13. Cheng, Z. & Geng, X. (2023). Investigation of unconfined compressive strength for biopolymer treated clay. Construction and Building Materials, 385, 131458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131458
14. Dave, T. N. & Siddiqui, A. K. (2020). A Review of Expansive Soil—Effects and Mitigation Techniques (pp. 519–527). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0890-5_43
15. Dehghan, H., Tabarsa, A., Latifi, N. & Bagheri, Y. (2019). Use of xanthan and guar gums in soil strengthening. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1625-0
16. Fatehi, H., Ong, D. E. L., Yu, J. & Chang, I. (2021). Biopolymers as green binders for soil improvement in geotechnical applications: A review. Geosciences, 11(7), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070291
17. Gezgin, A. T. & Ercan, C. (2026). Harnessing biopolymers for sustainable soil improvement in geotechnical engineering: a state-of-the-art review. In International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 23, Issue 1). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06853-z
18. Hamza, M., Nie, Z., Aziz, M., Ijaz, N., Fang, C., Ghani, M. U., Ijaz, Z., Noshin, S. & Salman, M. (2023). Geotechnical properties of problematic expansive subgrade stabilized with guar gum biopolymer. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 25(5), 1699–1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02466-7
19. Ilman, B. & Balkis, A. P. (2023). Review on biopolymer binders as renewable, sustainable stabilizers for soils. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 9(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00470-x
20. Jaiswal, V., Avesh, M., Gautam, A., Sharma, M. & Yadav, B. (2024). Towards Sustainable Soil Stabilization: A Review of Innovative Techniques. In Futuristic Trends in Construction Materials & Civil Engineering Volume 3 Book 4 (pp. 24–32). Iterative International Publishers, Selfypage Developers Pvt Ltd. https://doi.org/10.58532/V3BICE4P2CH2
21. Joga, J. R. & Varaprasad, B. J. S. (2019). Sustainable improvement of expansive clays using xanthan gum as a biopolymer. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 5(9), 1893–1903. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091380
22. Jones, L., Banks, V. & Jefferson, I. (2020). Chapter 8 Swelling and shrinking soils. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 29(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1144/EGSP29.8
23. Jones, L. D. & Jefferson, I. (2023). Expansive soils. In ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering, Second edition, Volume I (pp. 447–478). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1680/icemge.66816.0447
24. Judge, P. K., Sundberg, E., DeGroot, D. J. & Zhang, G. (2022). Effects of biopolymers on the liquid limit and undrained shear strength of soft clays. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81(8), 342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02830-9
25. Khatami, H. R. & O’Kelly, B. C. (2013). Improving mechanical properties of sand using biopolymers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(8), 1402–1406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000861
26. Kiran, T. S., Naresh, S. & Alekhya, D. V. N. V. L. (2025). Innovative Biopolymer Solutions for Sustainable Soil Stabilization in Modern Civil Engineering. Journal of Geotechnical Studies, 10(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.46610/JoGS.2025.v10i02.002
27. Kurt Albayrak, Z. N., Artuk, F., Tavlasoglu Yilmaz, E., Gunek, S. & Pinarbas, B. (2026). Experimental investigation on the combined use of locust bean gum and polyester fibers for sustainable stabilization of high plasticity clay. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 143, 104306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2026.104306
28. Kwon, Y. M., Chang, I. & Cho, G. C. (2023). Consolidation and swelling behavior of kaolinite clay containing xanthan gum biopolymer. Acta Geotechnica, 18(7), 3555–3571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01794-8
29. Lee, S., Im, J., Cho, G. C. & Chang, I. (2019). Laboratory triaxial test behavior of xanthan gum biopolymer-treated sands. Geomechanics and Engineering, 17(5), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.17.5.445
30. Mitchell, J. K. & Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of Soil Behavior (3rd ed.). Wiley.
31. Mohammed, A. A., Nahazanan, H., Nasir, N. A. M., Huseien, G. F. & Saad, A. H. (2023). Calcium-Based Binders in Concrete or Soil Stabilization: Challenges, Problems, and Calcined Clay as Partial Replacement to Produce Low-Carbon Cement. Materials, 16(5), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052020
32. Mudgil, D., Barak, S. & Khatkar, B. S. (2014). Guar gum: Processing, properties and food applications - A Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x
33. Nelson, J. D. . & Miller, D. J. . (1992). Expansive soils : problems and practice in foundation and pavement engineering. J. Wiley.
34. Prajapati, V. D., Jani, G. K., Moradiya, N. G., Randeria, N. P., Nagar, B. J., Naikwadi, N. N. & Variya, B. C. (2013). Galactomannan: A versatile biodegradable seed polysaccharide. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 60, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.017
35. Prakash, D. & Kumar, R. (2023). A review on natural polymer locust bean gum. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 13(1), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2023.13.1.0031
36. Sasar, M., Aryal, R., Jung Karki, A. & Abdelaziz, S. L. (2024). The Durability of Biopolymer Treated Sands to Cyclic Drying and Wetting: Mechanisms of Sample Deterioration. IFCEE 2024, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485415.017
37. Shen, X., Wang, L., Yang, B., Han, J. & Zhang, L. (2025). Effect of locust bean gum biopolymer on mechanical properties of organic soil. Environmental Earth Sciences, 84(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-12030-1
38. Smith, C., McGregor, J., Martsinovich, N., Armistead, S., Yu, X. & Siripanich, N. (2023). Enhancing the Water and Biodegradation Resistance of Biopolymer Stabilised Soils – Design Concepts (pp. 293–302). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33465-8_23
39. Sulaiman, H., Taha, M. R., Abd Rahman, N. & Mohd Taib, A. (2022). Performance of soil stabilized with biopolymer materials – xanthan gum and guar gum. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 128, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103276
40. Vydehi, K. V. & Moghal, A. A. B. (2022). Effect of Biopolymeric Stabilization on the Strength and Compressibility Characteristics of Cohesive Soil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004068
41. Weng, Z. yu, Yu, J., Deng, Y. feng, Cai, Y. yan & Wang, L. na. (2023). Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanism of red clay solidified by xanthan gum biopolymer. Journal of Central South University, 30(6), 1948–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5327-3