Influences of the Living World on Architectural Structures: An Analytical Insight

Öz

Structures in the nature motivate innovation in architectural and engineering disciplines in terms
of aesthetical, functional and structural advantages. Using efficient, lightweight structural forms similar to
those in nature reduces material and energy usage and waste amount. In this sense, it can be clearly seen
that based on learning from nature in relation to meeting gradually increasing and changing requirements
through limited resources and creating modern structural designs, biomimicry will provide much more
contribution on architecture and related fields. In this direction, in the study based on comprehensive
literature research, lots of varying living organisms in the nature have been analyzed in terms of structure;
architectural structures developed by inspiring from natural structures have been sampled and influences
of solutions inspired from nature on architectural environment have been focused.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nature; Living World; Structure; Architectural Form; Structural Design

Mimari Strüktürlerde Canlı Dünyanın Etkilerine Analitik Bir Bakış

Öz

Doğadaki strüktürler estetik, işlevsel ve strüktürel avantajları bakımından mimarlık ve mühendislik
disiplinlerinde yenilikleri motive etmektedir. Doğada bulunan strüktürlere benzer etkin hafif strüktürel
formların kullanımı malzeme ve enerji kullanımını, atık miktarını azaltmaktadır. Bu bağlamda sınırlı
kaynaklarla günümüzün giderek artan ve değişen gereksinimleri karşılamak, modern strüktürel tasarımlar
yaratmak noktasında doğadan öğrenmeyi esas alan biyomimikrinin mimarlık ve ilgili alanlarda daha pek
çok katkı sağlayacağı açıkça görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda kapsamlı literatür araştırmasına temellenen
çalışmada, doğada çok fazla çeşitlilik gösteren canlı organizmalar strüktürel bakımdan analiz edilmekte,
doğal strüktürlerden esinlenilerek geliştirilen mimari strüktürler örneklendirilmekte ve doğadan üretilen
çözümlerin mimarlık ortamına etkileri üzerinde durulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doğa, Canlı Dünya, Strüktür, Mimari Form, Strüktürel Tasarım

Kaynakça

1. Ahmedi, F. (2007). “Efficiency of lightweight structural forms: The case of treelike structures - A comparative structural analysis”, MSc Thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Austria.
2. Arslan, S., Sorguc, G. A. (2004). “Similarities in Structures in Nature and Man-Made Structures: Biomimesis in Architecture”, in: Design and Nature II: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, M.W. Collins, C.A. Brebbia (Eds.), WIT Press, pp. 45-54.
3. Asefi M., Marzban, S. (2010). Redefinition of architecture by means of pneumatic principles, ICSA, 1st International Conference on Structures & Architecture, Edited by Paulo J . S . Cruz, CRC Press, Guimaraes, Portugal, pp. 351–352.
4. AskNature.org. (2014). Why AskNature?http://www.asknature.org/article/view/why_asknature (Accessed in: 01.12.2014)
5. Baldridge, D.W. (2003). The metabolic design methodology, Electronic MSc. Thesis, Published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK, Acces adres: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1069442326 (Accessed in: 10.08.2011)
6. Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006). Introduction to Biomimetics: The Wealth of Inventions in Nature as an Inspiration for Human Innovation, Biomimetics. Biologically Inspired Technologies, Taylor & Francis Group.
7. Benyus, J. M., (1997). Biomimicry Innovation Inspired by Nature. Harper Perennial, NewYork.
8. Biomimicry 3.8. (2014). What is biomimicry?,http://biomimicry.net/about/biomimicry/ (Accessed in: 01.12.2014)

9. Burgess, S. C., Pasini, D. (2004). “Analysis of the structural efficiency of trees”, Journal of Engineering Design, 15: 2, 177-193.
10. Charleson, A.W. (2005). Structure as Architecture, A Source Book for Architects and Structural Engineers, First ed., Elsevier, Architectural Press.
11. Dörstelmann, M. (2014). Fibrous morphology in biology and architecture, ANKA Seminars Institute for Computational Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Universität Stuttgart, Germany.
12. Eilouti, B. H. (2012). Knowledge Recycling and Transformation in Design. in: New Research on Knowledge Management Models and Methods, in:Huei Tse Hou (Eds.), InTech, 65-76.
13. Ekinci, S. (2010). Strüktürün işlevi ve algıda strüktür (Function of structure and structure in perception)”, Journal of Materials in Architecture, Year 5, Number16, 29-39.
14. French, M. (1994). Invention and Evolution: Design in Nature and Engineering, Second ed., New York: Cambridge University Pres.
15. Galant, J.A.L.,(2009). Cylindrical Thin Concrete Shells, Structural Analysis of the Frontón Recoletos Roof”, MSc. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.
16. Garcia, P., A.; Martinez, G., F., (2009). Natural structures: Strategies for geometric and morphological optimization, Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures, Spain.
17. Grigorian, M., (2014). Biomimicry and Theory of Structures-Design Methodology Transfer from Trees to Moment Frames, Journal of Bionic Engineering, Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 638–648.
18. Gruber, P., (2010). Biomimetics in Architecture: Architecture of Life and Buildings, 1. Edition, published by Springer Wien New York.
19. Hallgren, L., Santiago Calatrava, Media 523, Fall 07, Nancy Cheng, Inspiration Presentation Paper, Access adres: http://archgraphics.pbworks.com/f/Hallgren+-+Insp+pres+Paper.pdf (Accessed in: 20.12.2013).
20. Hersey, G., (2001). The Monumental Impulse: Architecture's Biological Roots, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. http://cubeme.com/conch-shell-house-isla-mujeres-mexico/ (05.01.2014), Subject: Conch Shell House (Figure: 6c).
22. http://www.archicentral.com/taiwan-centers-for-disease-control-complex-shortlistedhonorable-mention-by-studio-nicoletti-associati-15350/ (05.01.2014), Subject: Taiwan Centers For Disease Control Complex (Figure: 6d).
23. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympiastadion_(Munich) (05.01.2014), Subject: Munich Olympic Stadium (Figure: 7a).
24. http://thefunambulist.net/2010/12/22/classic-architectures-world-expos-from-the-past/ (05.01.2014), Subject: Classic Architectures (Figure: 7b, Figure: 9a).
25. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/DOMES/TIMELN/bigegg/bigegg.html (05.01.2014), Subject: Tokyo Dome "Big Egg" (Figure: 8a).
26. http://weburbanist.com/2011/09/09/blow-up-buildings-17-inflatable-works-of-mobilearchitecture /(05.01.2014), Subject: Blow-Up Buildings (Figure: 8b, Figure: 8c ).
27. http://inhabitat.com/yorkshire-renaissance-pavilion-by-variousarchitects/ attachment/19497/(05.01.2014), Subject: Inflatable Diamond Grid Eco-Pavilion (Figure: 8d).
28. http://www.foweyaccommodation.co.uk/local/further.aspx (05.01.2014), Subject: The Eden Project (Figure: 9b).
29. http://www.danmclellan.com/Abby/Beijing2009/OlympicPark.htm (05.01.2014), Subject: Water Cube (Figure: 9c).
30. http://rhanvintage.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-otherworldly-architecture-of-zaha.html (05.01.2014), Subject: Abu Dhabi Performing Arts Center (Figure: 10a).
31. http://www.newhouseofart.com/modern-floating-ecopolis-lilypad-architecturedesign/(05.01.2014), Subject: The Lilypad (Figure: 10b).
32. http://inhabitat.com/dragonfly-urban-agriculture-concept-for-ny//(05.01.2014), Subject: The Dragonfly (Figure: 10c).
33. Kishimoto, N, Natori, M.C., Higuchi K. and Ukegawa, K. (2006). New deployable membrane structure models inspired by morphological changes in nature, AIAA-2006-1898, 47th AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (SDM) Conf., Newport, Rhode Island, USA
34. Knippers, J., Speck, T. (2012). Design and construction principles in nature and architecture, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, Volume 7, Number 1, 015002 (10pp), IOP Publishing Ltd.
35. Larsen P., O., Tyas, A., (2003). Lesson from Nature: Design through Evolution, in: Conceptual Structural Design: Bridging The Gap Between Architects And Engineers, Chapter 2, London: Thomas Telford Publishing.
36. Majowiecki, M. (2005). Structural architecture for large roofs: Concepts and realizations, Bautechnik, Volume 82, Issue 3, 147-156
37. Mosseri, A. (2004). Structural Desing in Nature and in Architecture, Design and Nature II: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, in: M.W. Collins, C.A. Brebbia (Eds.), WIT Pres.
38. Pearce, P. (1980). Structure in Nature is a Strategy for Design, The MIT Press. 39. Portoghesi, P., (2000). Nature and Architecture, Skira Editore, Milan.
39. Rian, I., S. Mario (2014), Tree-inspired dendriforms and fractal-like branching structures in architecture: A brief historical overview, Journal of Frontiers of Architectural Research, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 298–323.
40. Selçuk, A., S., Sorguç, G., A. (2007). Mimarlık Tasarımı Paradigmasında Biomimesis’in Etkisi, (Impact of Biomimesis in Architectural Design Paradigm), Journal of Faculty Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University. Vol 22, No 2, 451-459.
41. Senosiain, J. (2003). Bio-Architecture, First edition, Architectural Press, Oxford, Italy, 43. Serie Architects, Access address: http://www.serie.co.uk/html/Projects/tote.html (Accesed in: 11.09.2013).
42. Stach, E. (2010). Structural Morphology and Self-organization, Design and Nature V: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, in: C. A. Brebbia, A. Carpi (Eds.), WIT Pres.
43. Steadman, P. (2008). The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts, Revised Ed., Routledge.
44. Thompson, D. (1968). On Growth and Form, Cambridge University Press.
45. Yeler, M., G. (2012). Mimarlıkta biyomorfizm (Biomorphism in architecture), PhD. Thesis, Trakya University Graduate School of Science, Edirne.
46. Yıldız, A. E. (2007). Mobile Structures of Santiago Calatrava: Other ways of producing architecture”, MSc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University Graduate School of Science, Ankara.
47. Zari, M. P. (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability, SBO7 NZ Conference, Transforming Our Build Environment, New Zealand.