EN
TR
Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures
Öz
We evaluated and compared the functional and radiological results of 80 cases treated with the unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties for displaced femoral neck fractures, performed in Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department between 1996 and 2002. 40 cases treated with unipolar prosthesis were allocated in Group I and 40 cases treated with bipolar prosthesis were in Group II. There was 24 female and 16 male patients in Group I whereas 29 female and 11 male patients in Group II. In Group I it was 71 (45-97) and in Group II it was 67 (47-87). All cases in both groups were evaluated according to Garden classification and preoperatively prepared for hemiarthroplasty. All cases were followed by radiological evaluations and by Haris Hip evaluation System. The functional results in group II were beter than group I and the difference was statistically significant (p<0,001). We concluded that the results of bipolar
prosthesis are functionally better than the unipolar prosthesis and the complication rate in bipolar prosthesis is lower.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Haziran 2008
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Haziran 2008
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2008 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2
APA
Bölük, K., Bilgen, M. S., & Durak, K. (2008). Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty, 34(2), 41-44. https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK
AMA
1.Bölük K, Bilgen MS, Durak K. Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures. Uludağ Tıp Derg. 2008;34(2):41-44. https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK
Chicago
Bölük, Kemal, M. Sadık Bilgen, ve Kemal Durak. 2008. “Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures”. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty 34 (2): 41-44. https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK.
EndNote
Bölük K, Bilgen MS, Durak K (01 Haziran 2008) Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty 34 2 41–44.
IEEE
[1]K. Bölük, M. S. Bilgen, ve K. Durak, “Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures”, Uludağ Tıp Derg, c. 34, sy 2, ss. 41–44, Haz. 2008, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK
ISNAD
Bölük, Kemal - Bilgen, M. Sadık - Durak, Kemal. “Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures”. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty 34/2 (01 Haziran 2008): 41-44. https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK.
JAMA
1.Bölük K, Bilgen MS, Durak K. Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures. Uludağ Tıp Derg. 2008;34:41–44.
MLA
Bölük, Kemal, vd. “Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures”. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty, c. 34, sy 2, Haziran 2008, ss. 41-44, https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK.
Vancouver
1.Kemal Bölük, M. Sadık Bilgen, Kemal Durak. Using Unipolar and Bipolar Prosthesis in Eldery With Displaced Femur Neck Fractures. Uludağ Tıp Derg [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2008;34(2):41-4. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA47BJ73EK
