Bovine Ephemeral Fever in Turkey and Its Economic Effect

Yıl 2022, , 71 - 75, 29.11.2022

Cemalettin Ayvazoğlu , Pınar Ayvazoğlu Demir

https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1141040

Öz

Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) is a viral infection that causes a significant decrease in milk and meat production, infertility in cows and bulls, abortion and a significant economic loss due to its rapid spread in the herd. Partial budgeting method was used in the study to measure the economic impact of vaccine use and non-vaccination use. In line with preventive medicine, it has been determined that if animals are vaccinated regularly, there is an average of 8.10 (dolars) vaccination cost per animal, but the average treatment cost of an animal that has not been vaccinated during the epidemic is 20.2 (dolars). It was determined in the economic analysis that in addition to the treatment costs, the loss of milk for a dairy cow increased to approximately 85 (dolars), for a livestock to 148 (dolars) with the loss of condition, but the economic loss increased due to high morbidity. In this context, early diagnosis, detection and monitoring of spreading conditions are as extremely important as vaccination in the fight against BEF infection. It can be said that the economic loss will be minimized with the vaccination and preventive medicine practices to be made by rapid intervention to the disease with the early warning system created by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for this purpose in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bovine ephemeral fever, cattle, Turkey

Türkiye’de Üç Gün Hastalığı ve Ekonomik Boyutu

Öz

Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF), süt ve et üretiminde önemli bir düşüşe, inek ve boğalarda kısırlığa, düşüklere ve sürüde hızla yayılması nedeniyle önemli ekonomik kayıplara neden olan viral bir enfeksiyondur. Çalışmada aşı kullanımının ve aşı kullanmamanın ekonomik etkisini ölçmek için kısmi bütçeleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Koruyucu hekimlik doğrultusunda, hayvanlar düzenli aşılanırsa hayvan başına ortalama 8,10 (dolars) aşı maliyeti olduğu, salgın sırasında aşılanmayan bir hayvanın ortalama tedavi maliyetinin ise 20,2 (dolars) olduğu belirlendi. Yapılan ekonomik analizde tedavi maliyetlerine ek olarak kondisyon kaybı ile birlikte süt ineği için süt kaybının yaklaşık 85 (dolars), besi hayvanı için 148 (dolars) olduğu, ancak yüksek morbidite nedeniyle ekonomik kaybın arttığı belirlendi. Bu bağlamda BEF enfeksiyonu ile mücadelede aşılama kadar erken teşhis, yayılma koşullarının tespiti ve takibi de son derece önemlidir. Türkiye'de Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı tarafından bu amaçla oluşturulan erken uyarı sistemi ile hastalığa hızlı müdahale edilerek yapılacak aşılama ve koruyucu hekimlik uygulamaları ile ekonomik kaybın en aza indirileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sığır, Türkiye, Sığır üç gün hastalığı

Kaynakça

• Abaylı H (2018). Üç Gün Hastalığı Virusu Türkiye İzolatının Tüm Genom Sekanslanması ve Bu Virusa Karşı DNA Aşısı Geliştirilmesi. Doktora tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ, Türkiye.
• Abdullah SW, Khan MUR, Aslam A et al. (2020). Detection of Bovine Ephemeral Fever Virus and its Effects on Blood Parameters and Serum Calcium Levels in Cattle Population of District Swabi, Pakistan. Indian J Anim Res, 54 (4), 456-461.
• Alkan F, Albayrak H, Timurkan MO, Ozan E, Coskun N (2017). Assessment of the molecular epidemiology of bovine ephemeral fever in Turkey. Vet Arhiv, 87 (6), 665-675.
• Aziz-Boaron O, Gleser D, Yadin H et al. (2014). The protective effectiveness of an inactivated bovine ephemeral fever virus vaccine. Vet Microbiol, 173 (1-2), 1-8.
• Davis SS, Gibson DS, Clark R (1984). The effect of bovine ephemeral fever on milk production. Australian Vet J, 61 (4), 128-130.
• EM AE, Gameel AA, Afaleq, AI, Gundi, OA, Bukhari A (1997). Bovine ephemeral fever in Saudi Arabia. Vet Rec, 140 (24), 630-631.
• Girgin H, Yonguc AD, Akçora A, Aksak E (1986). Türkiye’de ilk bovine ephemeral fever salgını. Etlik Vet Mikrobiyol Derg, 5 (10), 5-14.
• He CQ, Liu YX, Wang HM et al. (2016). New genetic mechanism, origin and population dynamic of bovine ephemeral fever virus. Vet Microbiol, 182 (1), 50-56.
• Hsieh YC, Wang SY, Lee YF et al. (2006). DNA sequence analysis of glycoprotein G gene of bovine ephemeral fever virus and development of a double oil emulsion vaccine against bovine ephemeral fever. J Vet Med Sci, 68 (6), 543-548.
• Kirkland PD (2002). Akabane and bovine ephemeral fever virus infections. Vet Clin Food Anim Practic, 18 (3), 501-514.
• Liu D, Li K, Zhang L et al. (2017). Seroprevalence investigation of bovine ephemeral fever in yaks in Tibetan Plateau of China from 2012 to 2015. Trop Anim Health Prod, 49 (1), 227-230.
• Mackerras IM, Mackerras MJ, Burnet FM (1940). Experimental studies of ephemeral fever in Australian cattle. CSIRO Bull, 136, 1–116.
• Nandi S, Negi BS (1999). Bovine ephemeral fever: a review. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 22 (2), 81-91.
• Newton LG, Wheatley CH (1970). The occurrence and spread of ephemeral fever of cattle in Queensland. Australian Vet J, 46 (12), 561-568.
• Oğuzoğlu TC, Ertürk A, Çizmeci SG, Koç BT, Akça Y (2013). A report on Bovine Ephemeral Fever Virus in Turkey: Antigenic Variations of Different Strains of EFV in the 1985 and 2012 Outbreaks Using Partial Glycoprotein Gene Sequences. Transbound Emerg Dis, 62 (5), 66-70.
• Öztürk SA (2012). Bovine Ephemeral Fever. AVKAE Derg, 2 (2), 26-30.
• Pyasi S, Jonniya NA, Sk MF et al. (2021). Finding potential inhibitors against RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of bovine ephemeral fever virus (BEFV): an in-silico study. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 8 (1), 1-19.
• Sackett D, Holmes P, Abbott K et al. (2006). Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the profitability of Australian beef cattle and sheep producers. MLA Report AHW, 87.
• Sellers RF (1980). Weather, host and vector–their interplay in the spread of insect-borne animal virus diseases. Epidemiol Infect, 85 (1), 65-102.
• St George TD (1988). Bovine ephemeral fever: a review. Trop Anim Health Prod, 20 (4), 194-202.
• Tonbak S, Berber E, Çabalar M (2013b). Türkiye’nin bazı bölgelerinde 2008 yılında görülen bovine ephemeral fever virüs enfeksiyonlarının polimeraz zincir reaksiyonuyla belirlenmesi. Fırat Uni Med J Health Sci, 27 (1), 35-37.
• Tonbak S, Berber E, Yoruk MD et al. (2013a). A Large-Scale Outbreak of Bovine Ephemeral Fever in Turkey, 2012, J Vet Med Sci, 75 (11), 1511–1514.
• Uren MF, St George TD, Kirkland PD et al. (1987). Epidemiology of Bovine Ephemeral Fever in Australia 1981-1985. Australian J Biol Sci, 40 (2), 125-136.
• Vanselow BA, Abetz I, Trenfield K (1985). A bovine ephemeral fever vaccine incorporating adjuvant Quil A: a comparative study using adjuvants Quil A, aluminium hydroxide gel and dextran sulphate. Vet Rec, 117 (2), 37-43.
• Walker PJ (2009). Animal Viruses of Agricultural Importance. Mahy BWJ, Regenmortel MHV (Ed). Desk Encyclopedia of Animal and Bacterial Virology (pp. 57-65). Academic Press, San Diego.
• Walker PJ (2013). Bovine ephemeral fever: cyclic resurgence of a climate-sensitive vector-borne disease. Microbiol Australia, 34 (1), 41-42.
• Walker PJ, Klement E (2015). Epidemiology and control of bovine ephemeral fever. Vet Res, 46 (1), 1-19.
• Yeruham I, Braverman Y, Yadin H et al. (2002). Epidemiological investigations of outbreaks of bovine ephemeral fever in Israel. Vet Rec, 151 (4), 117-121.