Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitim Deneyimleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Bu çalışma ile Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı bakış açılarını değerlendirmek amaçlandı. Bu amaçla 24 soruluk anket formu ile 591 öğrenciden veri toplandı. Verilere göre birçok öğrencinin dersler sırasında altyapı eksikliği nedeniyle sıklıkla çeşitli teknolojik sorunlar ve engellerle karşılaştığı belirlendi. Öte yandan, rahat bir yaşam alanı olan öğrenciler, uzaktan eğitime karşı daha iyimser bir bakış açısına sahipti. Uzaktan eğitim deneyimine sahip olmak derse katılım oranını olumlu etkiledi. Birinci sınıflarda derslere katılım sıklığı daha yüksek, öğretim elemanlarına soru sorma sıklığı ise daha düşüktü. Birinci sınıf öğrencileri çoğunlukla uzaktan eğitimin etkili öğrenme sağladığı görüşüne katılmadı veya kararsız olduklarını belirtti. Üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri uzaktan eğitimi dezavantajlı olarak değerlendirmedi. Birçok öğrencinin yüz yüze eğitimi tercih ettiği görülürken, uzaktan eğitime devam etmek isteyen bir öğrenci grubunun varlığı da belirlendi. Sonuç olarak, fiziksel, teknolojik ve zamansal esneklik uzaktan eğitimin güçlü yönlerinden biri olarak görülebilir. Teknolojik alt yapı eksikliğinden dolayı derslere katılımın zor olması bu yöntem için büyük bir dezavantaj olarak görülmektedir. Öğrencilerin genel olarak yüz yüze eğitimi tercih ettiği görülse de uzaktan eğitime devam etmek isteyen ve yöntemin bazı avantajlara sahip olduğunu bildiren bir grup öğrencinin varlığı da dikkat çekicidir. Uygun koşullarda yaşamanın öğrencilerin uzaktan eğitimden yararlanabilmesiyle pozitif ilişkili olduğu düşünülebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim
• Uzaklık
• Öğrenciler
• Veterinerlik eğitimi

An Assessment on the Experiences of Distance Education of Students at Veterinary Faculty of Ankara University

Öz

This study aimed to evaluate the perspectives of Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine students towards distance education. Data were collected from 591 students with a 24-question survey. According to the data, many students often encountered various technological problems and barriers due to lack of infrastructure during the courses. On the other hand, students with comfortable living environments had a more optimistic view of distance education. Having prior experience in distance education had a positive effect on the class participation rate. The frequency of participation in the courses was higher and the frequency of asking questions to the lecturers was lower in first graders. First graders mostly disagreed with the view that distance education provides effective learning or stated that they were undecided. Third and fourth year students did not consider distance education as disadvantageous. While it was seen that many students prefer face-to-face education, the presence of a group of students who want to continue distance education was also noteworthy. In conclusion, physical, technological and temporal flexibility can be seen as one of the strengths of the distance education. The difficulty of accessing the course due to the lack of technological infrastructure is seen as a major disadvantage of this method. Although it has seen that students generally preferred face-to-face education, the existence of a group of students who wanted to continue distance education and reported that the method has some advantages is also remarkable. It can be considered that living in favorable conditions is positively related to students' ability to benefit from distance education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• student
• veterinary education
• Distance

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi MS, Ahmed N, Sajjad B et al. (2020). E-learning perception and satisfaction among health sciences students amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Work, 67 (3), 549-556.
2. Ahmady S, Kallestrup P, Sadoughi MM et al. (2021). Distance learning strategies in medical education during COVID-19: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot, 10, 421.
3. Ahmed SA, Hegazy NN, Malak HWA et al. (2020). Model for utilizing distance learning post COVID-19 using (PACT)™ a cross sectional qualitative study. BMC Med Educ, 20, 400.
4. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM et al. (2020). Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ, 20 (1), 341.
5. Anderson T (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. Intl Rev Res Open Dis, 4 (2), 1-14.
6. Armstrong-Mensah E, Ramsey-White K, Yankey B, Self-Brown S (2020). COVID-19 and distance learning: Effects on Georgia State University School of Public Health students. Front. Public Health, 8, 1-10.
7. Armutak A (2021). Veterinary ethics in the Covid-19 pandemic. Sağlık Bilimlerinde İleri Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (Suppl.1), 63-73.
8. Aslım G, Tekindal MA, Yiğit A, Sanal Ş, Menteş A (2023). Evaluation of the attitudes and opinions of veterinary school students on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Vet Med Educ, In Press, DOI: 10.3138/jvme-2021-0150.

9. Başağaoğlu Demirekin Z, Buyukcavus MH (2022). Effect of distance learning on the quality of life, anxiety and stress levels of dental students during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ, 22 (1), 309.
10. Can N, Köroğlu Y (2020). Covid-19 döneminde yaygınlaşan uzaktan eğitimin değerlendirilmesi ve eğitim emekçileri açısından incelenmesi. Madde, Diyalektik ve Toplum, 3 (4), 370-380.
11. Chan SL, Lin CC, Chau PH, Takemura N, Fung JTC (2021). Evaluating online learning engagement of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today, 104, 104985.
12. Choudhary OP (2021). Online veterinary anatomy education in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Pros and cons. Int J Morphol, 39 (4), 1231-1233.
13. Çelik E, Danış EM, Aslım G, Tekindal MA, Yaşar A (2022). An evaluation on coping with stress of Selcuk University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine students: Covid-19 pandemic process. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 38 (1), 50-58.
14. Di Giacomo P, Di Paolo C (2021). Covid-19 and dental distance-based education: Students' perceptions in an Italian University. BMC Med Educ, 21 (1), 414.
15. Di Pietro G, Biagi F, Costa P, Karpiński Z, Mazza J (2020). The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and international datasets. Erişim Tarihi:10.04.2021 Erişim Adresi: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.Eu/repository/handle/ JRC121071
16. Dixson MD (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learn J, 19 (4), EJ1079585.
17. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L (2020). Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open, 10 (11), e042378.
18. Elshami W, Taha MH, Abuzaid M et al. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Med Educ Online, 26 (1), 1920090.
19. Eom SB, Ashill N (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decis Sci J Innov Educ, 14 (2), 185-215.
20. Ertürk Avunduk AT, Delikan E (2021). Satisfaction and stress levels of dentistry students relating to distance education. Dent Med Probl, 58 (3), 291-298.
21. Flottemesch K (2000). Building effective interaction in distance education: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40 (3), 46-51.
22. Fulford CP, Zhang S (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. Am J Distance Educ, 7 (3), 8-21.
23. Gebril M, Smith Brillant M, Glogauer M, Set S (2021). Evaluation of the online learning experience of Dalhousie dentistry and dental hygiene students during COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. J Can Dent Assoc, 87, 18.
24. Gençoğlu C, Çiftçi M (2020). Covid-19 salgınında eğitim: Türkiye üzerinden bir analiz. Journal of History School, 46, 1648-1673.
25. Harvey HL, Parahoo S, Santally M (2017). Should gender differences be considered when assessing student satisfaction in the online learning environment for millennials? High Educ Q, 71(2), 141-158.
26. Houlden S Veletsianos G (2019). A posthumanist critique of flexible online learning and its “anytime anyplace” claims. Br J Educ Technol, 50 (3), 1005-1008.
27. Hunt JA, Anderson SL (2022). Remote assessment of veterinary clinical skills courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Vet Med Educ, 49 (1), 16-24.
28. Kafes AY, Yıldırım A (2021). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Eğitim Memnuniyeti Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Studies, 16 (6), 1641-1657.
29. Kim SY, Kim SJ, Lee SH (2021). Effects of online learning on nursing students in South Korea during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18 (16), 8506.
30. Koort J, Åvall-Jääskeläinen S (2021). Redesigning and teaching veterinary microbiology laboratory exercises with combined on-site and online participation during the COVID-19 pandemic. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 368 (16),108.
31. Li W, Gillies R, He M et al. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Hum Resour Health, 19 (1), 64.
32. Liu X, He W, Zhao L, Hong JC (2021). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning during the COVID-19 lockdown. Front Psychol, 12, 752131.
33. Mahdy MAA, Sayed RKA (2022). Evaluation of the online learning of veterinary anatomy education during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown in Egypt: Students' perceptions. Anat Sci Educ, 15 (1), 67-82.
34. Mehall S (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24 (1), 182-204.
35. Mehta V, Oppenheim R, Wooster M (2021). Distance learning in surgical education. Curr Surg Rep, 9 (9), 23.
36. Miyazoe T, Anderson T (2010). The Interaction Equivalency Theorem. J Interact Online Learn, 9 (2), 94-104.
37. Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. Internet High Educ, 14,129-135.
38. Ng CF (2021). The physical learning environment of online distance learners in higher education – A conceptual model. Front Psychol, 12, 635117.
39. O’Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J et al. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review. BMC Med Educ, 18, 130.
40. Oncu S, Cakir H (2011). Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies. Computers & Education, 57 (1), 1098-1108.
41. Parkes RSV, Barrs VRD (2021). Interaction identified as both a challenge and a benefit in a rapid switch to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Vet Med Educ, 48(6), 629-635.
42. Rutkowska A, Liska D, Cieślik B et al. (2021). Stress levels and mental well-being among Slovak students during e-learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel), 9 (10), 1356.
43. Saadeh K, Henderson V, Paramasivam SJ, Jeevaratnam K (2021). To what extent do preclinical veterinary students in the UK utilize online resources to study physiology. Adv Physiol Educ, 45 (1), 160–171.
44. Sandhu P, de Wolf M (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ Online, 25 (1), 1764740.
45. Silva PGDB, de Oliveira CAL, Borges MMF et a. (2021). Distance learning during social seclusion by COVID-19: Improving the quality of life of undergraduate dentistry students. Eur J Dent Educ, 25 (1), 124–134.
46. Tsai CL, Ku HY, Campbell A (2021). Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Educ, 42 (1), 106-125.
47. Turan Z, Kucuk S, Cilligol Karabey S (2022). The university students’ self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 19, 35.
48. Türkiye Bilim Terimleri (2020). Türkiye Bilim Terimleri (TBT)’nin amacı nedir?. Erişim Tarihi: 28 Eylül 2023. Erişim Adresi: https://www.bilimterimleri.com/aciklamalar/tr-index.html.
49. Veletsianos G, Kimmons R, Larsen R, Rogers J (2021). Temporal flexibility, gender, and online learning completion. Distance Educ, 42 (1), 22-36.
50. Wagner MN, Kupriyanova M, Ovezova U, Ilina A (2021). Distance learning courses: New opportunities for the development of university education. Propós Represent, 9 (3), e1275.
51. Yeh CY, Tsai CC (2022). Massive distance education: barriers and challenges in shifting to a complete online learning environment. Front Psychol, 13, e928717.