Kızıl Şahinde (Buteo Rufinus) Humerus ve Antebrachium Kemiklerinin Bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ile Üç Boyutlu Olarak İncelenmesi

Öz

Kızıl şahin (Buteo Rufinus) Falconiformes takımında yer alan ve Accipitridae familyasının bir üyesi olarak bulunan orta boylu geniş kanatlara sahip bir yırtıcı kuştur. Kızıl şahin yabani bir kanatlı türü olup kanat teleklerindeki siyah renkli tüyleri ve kızıl rengiyle kolayca tanınmaktadır. Kanatlılarda ön veya torakal extremite kanat halinde gelişmiştir. Kanat (Ossa membri thoracicci) ise sırasıyla scapula, clavicula, os coracoides, humerus, antebrachium (ulna ve radius), carpus, metecarpus ve digiti’den meydana gelmektedir. Radyografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi ve manyetik rezonans gibi teknikler, anatomik yapıların ve organların en iyi görünümünü sağlamaları, invaziv olmamaları ve hassas teşhislere imkan vermeleri nedeniyle nesli tükenmekte olan türlerin ve yaban hayatında biyolojik verilerin değerlendirilmesine önemli derecede katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma ile önemli bir yırtıcı kuş olan Kızıl şahinin humerus ve antebrachium kemiklerinin multi dedektörlü bilgisayarlı tomografi ile 3D modellerini oluşturmak, ayrıca elde edilen modeller aracılığı ile belirtilen kemiklerin morfolojik ve morfometrik olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Materiyal olarak 3 adet dişi ve 3 adet erkek olmak üzere toplam 6 adet ölmüş erişkin Kızıl şahin’e ait humerus ve antebrachium kemikleri kullanıldı. Morfolojik olarak sonuçlar incelendiğinde, bilgisayarlı tomografi ile elde edilen 3 boyutlu görüntülerin anatomik yapıları net bir şekilde ortaya koyduğu sonucuna varılmıştr. Morfometrik sonuçlar incelendiğinde Kızıl şahinlerde ortalama humerus uzunluğu, ortlama ulna uzunluğu ve ortalama radius uzunluğu cinsiyet ayrımı yapmaksızın sol ve sağ extremite için mm şeklinde belirtilmiştir. Ayrıca humerus, ulna ve radius kemiklerinin morfometrik ölçümleri sağ ve sol kanat arasında istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırılmış ve bazı değerler arasında p<0.05 değeri ile anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilgisayarlı tomografi
• Humerus
• Kızıl şahin
• Radius
• Ulna

Three-Dimensional Examination of Humerus and Antebrachium Bones in the Red hawk (Buteo Rufinus) with Computed tomography (CT)

Öz

The red hawk (Buteo Rufinus) is a medium-sized bird of prey with wide wings, belonging to the order Falconiformes and a member of the Accipitridae family. The Red hawk is a wild bird species and is easily recognized by its black feathers and red color on its wing feathers. In poultry, the thoracic extremity is developed as a wing. Techniques such as radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance contribute significantly to the evaluation of biological data in endangered species and wildlife because they provide the best view of anatomical structures and organs, are non-invasive, and allow sensitive diagnoses. The aim of this study was to create 3D models of the humerus and antebrachium bones of the Red hawk, an important bird of prey, with multi-detector computer tomography and to examine the bones mentioned morphologically and morphometrically through the models obtained. Humerus and antebrachium bones of a total of 6 dead adult Red hawks, 3 females and 3 males, were used as materials. When the morphometric results were examined, the average humerus length, average ulna length and average radius length in Red hawks were expressed in mm for the left and right extremities, regardless of gender. Moreover morphometric measurements of the humerus, ulna and radius bones were compared statistically between the right and left wings, and it was concluded that there was a significant difference between some values with a value of p<0.05.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Computed tomography
• Humerus
• Red hawk
• Radius
• Ulna

Kaynakça

1. Allison R, Tumarkin-Deratzian, David RV et al. (2006). Bone surface texture as an ontogenetic indicator in long bones of the Canada goose Branta canadensis (Anseriformes: Anatidae). Zool J Linn Soc, 148, 133-168.
2. Aslan L, Adizel Ö, Karasu A et al. (2009). Treatment of injuries and fractures in wild birds in the Van Lake basin between 2006 and 2008. YYU Vet Fak Derg, 20 (2), 7-12.
3. Atalar Ö, Kürtül İ, Özdemir D (2007). Morphological and morphometric approach to the bones of the wings in the Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo Rufinus). Fırat Univ Sağlık Bilim Vet Derg, 21 (4), 163-166.
4. Baumel JJ, Club NO (1993). Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. 2nd edition, Massachusetts Published by the club, Cambrıdge.
5. Bhargavi S, Venkatesan S, Ramesh G et al. (2017). Morphometrical analysis of the wing of the Blue-and-Yellow macaw (Ara ararauna) with reference to the Aerodynamics. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci, 6 (8), 2707-2710.
6. Bonser RH (1995). Longitudinal variation in mechanical competence of bone along the avian humerus. J Exp Biol, 198 (1), 209-212.
7. Borges NC, Cruz VS, Fares NB (2017). Morphological evaluation of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral column of the giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla linnaeus, 1758). Pesqui Vet Bras, 37 (4), 401-407.
8. Bostan B (2000). Our Birds of Prey. İskenderun Environmental Protection Association Publications, Hatay. Buttle EP (2004). Concomitant leg injuries in raptors with wing damage. J S Afr Vet Assoc, 75, 154.

9. Çevik Demirkan A (2002). Skeletal system in duck. PhD. Thesis, Akara University Health Sciences Institute, Ankara.
10. Charuta A, Bartyzel BJ, Karbowicz M et al. (2005). Morphology and morphometry of the antebrachial skeleton and bones of hand of the domestic Pekin duck. Vet Zootech-Lıth, 51, 26-30.
11. Coles BH (1985). Avian Medicine and Surgery. Blackwell Scientife Publications, Oxford.
12. D’Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJ et al. (1999). Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 27 (1), 30-37.
13. Deem SL, Terrell SP, Forrester DJ (2002). A retrospective study of morbiditiy and mortality of raptors admitted to Colorodo State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital durung 1995 to 1998. J Wildl Dis, 38, 101-106.
14. Demiraslan Y, Tufan T, Sari M et al. (2014). The effect of clinoptilolite on long bone morphometry in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Vet Anim Sci, 2 (6), 179-183.
15. Demircioğlu İ, Doğan GK, Karaavci FA et al. (2020). Three-dimensional modelling and morphometric investigation of computed tomography images of brown bear’s (Ursus arctos) ossa cruris (Zeugopodium). Folia Morphol, 79 (4), 811-816.
16. Demirsoy A (1992). Basic rules of life. Vertebrates/Amniota (reptiles, birds and mammals), Volume III/Part II, Meteksan İnc, Ankara.
17. Doğan GK, Takçı İ (2021). A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare. BSJ Health Sci, 4 (1), 6-16.
18. Dursun N (2008). Anatomy of Domestic Birds. Medisan Publishing House, Ankara.
19. Frongia GN, Naitana S, Farina V et al. (2021). Correlation between wing bone microstructure and different flight styles: the case of the griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) and greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus). J Anat, 239 (1), 59-69.
20. Gültekin M (1974). Evil Comparative Osteologia of Mammals and Canals. Ankara University Press, Ankara. İşler CT (2018). Use of radio-diagnostic technique in wild animals. Cumhur Medical J, 3 (2), 24-28.
21. Kibar M, Bumin A (2006). Evaluation of fractures resulting from gunshot wounds in birds of prey: 85 cases (1998-2005). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 12 (1), 11-16.
22. Lök S, Yalçın H (2007). Comparative macroanatomical studies on wing bones (ossea alae) in rock partridge (A. Graeca) and pheasants (P. Colchicus). J Vet Sci, 21, 85-94.
23. Novitskaya E, Ruestes CJ, Porter MM et al. (2017). Reinforcements in avian wing bones: Experiments, analysis, and modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 76, 85-96.
24. Orhan İÖ, Özgel Ö, Kabak M (2002). Neurocranium bones in the Red hawk (Buteo rufinus). Vet J Ankara Univ, 49, 153-157.
25. Prokop M (2003). General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol, 45 (1), 4-10.
26. Punch P (2001). A retrospective study of the success of medical and surgical treatment of wild Australian raptors. Aust Vet J, 79, 747-752.
27. Tiwari Y, Pandey A, Shrivastav AB et al. (2011). Gross morphometrical studies on pectoral limb of Pariah kite (Milvus migrans). Annu Res Rev Biol, 1 (4), 111-116.
28. Umar S (1999). Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Development and Promotion Foundation Publication No. 3. Boyut Publishing, İstanbul.
29. Valente ALS (2007). Diagnostic imaging of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). PhD Thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain.
30. Verhoff MA, Ramsthaler F, Krähahn J et al. (2008). Digital forensic osteology possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. Forensic Sci Int, 174 (2-3), 152-156.
31. Vistro WA, Kalhoro IB, uddin Shah MG et al. (2015). Comparative anatomical studies on humerus of Commercial broiler and Desi chicken. Int J Acad, 6 (6), 153-158.
32. Von Den Driesch A (1976). A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin I, USA.
33. Yaman M (1997). Comparison of biometric measurements of the humerus, radius, ulna and manus bones that form the wing skeleton in domestic and wild subspecies of quail, Coturnix coturnix Linnaeus, 1758 (Aves: Gall.). MSc, Selçuk University Institute of Science and Technology, Konya.
34. Yıldız H. Yıldız B, Eren G (1998). Morphometric research on humerus and antebrachium bones in chickens, domestic ducks, pigeons and quails. Uludag Univ Vet Fak Derg, 17 (1), 87-91.