Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats

Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3 30 Kasım 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats

Öz

Early pregnancy diagnosis is needed for small ruminants. Effective methods for early pregnancy detection are of great importance. Identifying pregnancy enhances rebreeding and is crucial for controlled breeding programs. However, various methods exist for diagnosing pregnancy in small ruminants. The choice of methods is influenced by equipment availability, the number of days post-insemination and the required accuracy level. Measurement of progesterone concentrations is used in pregnancy diagnosis in small ruminants. The detection of progesterone (P4) assays can facilitate the diagnosis of pregnancy approximately three weeks post-insemination. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of two progesterone assays (CLIA and ELFA) for the early diagnosis of pregnancy (at day 21 post-insemination) in Kilis goats, using transrectal ultrasonography at day 50 as the reference standard. Kilis goats (n: 150) were synchronized with a 10-day intravaginal sponge. Artificial insemination applications were intracervically performed with frozen-thawed semen straws. Blood samples were collected 21 days post-insemination to assess progesterone levels for pregnancy diagnosis. The pregnancy rate and average progesterone level determined by the CLIA method were found to be higher than those determined by the ELFA method. Additionally, in early pregnancy determination, the number of truly pregnant animals was significantly higher, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The CLIA method is a precise and dependable approach for measuring plasma progesterone levels. In the study, it was concluded that the CLIA progesterone assay method evaluated for early pregnancy detection in Kilis goats was superior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

The Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Scientific Ethical Committee approved the experiments (2022/08-01).

Kaynakça

  1. Al-janabi HSO, Kelkawi AHA, Abdul-Hsin IF, Kadhim MJ, Hussein MM (2018). Comparative evaluation study of ELISA system and MINI-VIDAS system for detection of Cytomegalovirus IgM antibodies. JPSR, 10 (10), 2549-2550.
  2. Al‐Merestani MR, Zarkawi M, Wardeh MF (2003). Improving the reproductive efficiency, pregnancy diagnosis and monitoring the resumption of luteal activity in indigenous Damascus goats. Reprod Domest Anim, 38 (1), 36-40.
  3. Alwan AF, Amin FAM, Ibrahim NS (2010). Blood progesterone and estrogen hormones level during pregnancy and after birth in Iraqi sheep and goat. Basra J Vet Res, 9 (2), 153-157.
  4. Amer HA (2010). Ultrasonographic assessment of early pregnancy diagnosis, fetometry and sex determination in goats. Anim Reprod Sci, 117 (3-4), 226–231.
  5. Arcot PJ, Pandey HC, Coshic P et al. (2022). Comparative evaluation of ADVIA Centaur® XP chemiluminescence system for screening of HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis in Indian blood donors. Transfus Apher Sci, 61 (2), 103318.
  6. Bolet G (1986). Timing and extent of embryonic mortality in pigs sheep and goats: Genetic variability.
  7. Sreenan JM, Diskin MG (Eds.). Embryonic mortality in farm animals (pp. 34). Curr T Vet, Springer, Dordrecht.
  8. Boscos CM, Samartz FC, Lymber AG, Stefanakis A, Belibasaki S (2003). Assessment of progesterone concentration using enzymeimmunoassay for early pregnancy diagnosis in sheep and goats. Reprod Domest Anim, 38 (3), 170-174.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Dölerme ve Suni Tohumlama

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Kasım 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Kasım 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

17 Eylül 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Coşkun, N., Karaca, F., & Ateş, C. T. (2025). Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats. Van Veterinary Journal, 36(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1728594
AMA
1.Coşkun N, Karaca F, Ateş CT. Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats. Van Vet J. 2025;36(3):205-212. doi:10.36483/vanvetj.1728594
Chicago
Coşkun, Nurdan, Fikret Karaca, ve Cafer Tayyar Ateş. 2025. “Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats”. Van Veterinary Journal 36 (3): 205-12. https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1728594.
EndNote
Coşkun N, Karaca F, Ateş CT (01 Kasım 2025) Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats. Van Veterinary Journal 36 3 205–212.
IEEE
[1]N. Coşkun, F. Karaca, ve C. T. Ateş, “Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats”, Van Vet J, c. 36, sy 3, ss. 205–212, Kas. 2025, doi: 10.36483/vanvetj.1728594.
ISNAD
Coşkun, Nurdan - Karaca, Fikret - Ateş, Cafer Tayyar. “Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats”. Van Veterinary Journal 36/3 (01 Kasım 2025): 205-212. https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1728594.
JAMA
1.Coşkun N, Karaca F, Ateş CT. Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats. Van Vet J. 2025;36:205–212.
MLA
Coşkun, Nurdan, vd. “Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats”. Van Veterinary Journal, c. 36, sy 3, Kasım 2025, ss. 205-12, doi:10.36483/vanvetj.1728594.
Vancouver
1.Nurdan Coşkun, Fikret Karaca, Cafer Tayyar Ateş. Comparison of CLIA and ELFA Progesterone Assay Methods for Evaluating Pregnancy in Kilis Goats. Van Vet J. 01 Kasım 2025;36(3):205-12. doi:10.36483/vanvetj.1728594

Creative Commons License
Kabul edilen makaleler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 uluslararası lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.