İstanbul İlinde Tedavi Amaçlı Veteriner Kliniklerine Getirilen Kedilerde Kulak Uyuzu (Otodectes cynotis) Üzerine Araştırma

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1 , 7 - 10 , 29.03.2026

Bilal Deniz , Ayşe Karakuş , Vural Denizhan

https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1748420

https://izlik.org/JA63XF92AT

Öz

Otodectes cynotis infestasyonu, kedilerde otitis externa’nın en yaygın paraziter nedenlerinden biri olup, küçük hayvan hekimliğinde önemli bir sağlık sorunu olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Eylül 2023 ile Eylül 2024 tarihleri arasında İstanbul’daki özel veteriner kliniklerine getirilen sahipli kedilerde O. cynotis enfestasyonunun prevalansını değerlendirmektir. Çalışma popülasyonu, rutin muayeneler ve kulakla ilişkili olmayan şikâyetler de dâhil olmak üzere çeşitli tıbbi nedenlerle kliniğe getirilen 319 kediden oluşmuştur. Kulak uyuzu belirtilerinin varlığına göre herhangi bir ön seçim yapılmamış ve çalışma süresince başvuran tüm kediler ardışık olarak dâhil edilmiştir. Her bir kedi klinik, otoskopik ve mikroskobik muayeneden geçirilmiştir. Enfeste kedilerde gözlenen klinik bulgular arasında baş sallama, pruritus, koyu renkli serumenöz akıntı, eritem ve dış kulak kanalında erozyonlar yer almıştır. Toplam 83 kedide (%26.01) enfestasyon doğrulanmıştır. Irka göre yapılan analizde en yüksek pozitiflik oranı Tekir kedilerde (%30.9) saptanmış, bunu Scottish Fold ve British Shorthair kediler izlemiş (%12,8); Persian ve Russian Blue kedilerde ise infestasyona rastlanmamıştır. Irk ile enfestasyon arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p=0.001). Erkek (%26.8) ve dişi (%25.3) kediler arasında anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır (p=0.76). Yaş arttıkça enfestasyon oranlarında azalma gözlenmiş (0-6 ay: %34.2; 6–12 ay: %26.1; ≥12 ay: %21.6), ancak bu eğilim istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır (p=0.121). Bu bulgular, ırkın O. cynotis enfestasyonuna duyarlılığı etkileyebileceğini, ancak yaş ve cinsiyetin anlamlı risk faktörleri olmadığını göstermektedir. Kedi otoakarozisinin etkin kontrolü için erken tanı ve rutin parazitolojik taramalar büyük önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kedi , Kulak akarı , İstanbul , Otodectes cynotis , Prevalans , Veteriner klinikleri

Etik Beyan

Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Hayvan Deneyleri Yerel Etik Kurulu’ndan 28 Eylül 2023 tarihli ve E-27552122-604.01.02-425226 dosya numaralı, 2023/11-03 karar numaralı Yerel Hayvan Deneyleri Etik Kurulu tarafından onaylanmıştır.

Investigation on Ear Mites (Otodectes cynotis) in Cats Brought to Veterinary Clinics for Treatment in İstanbul Province

https://izlik.org/JA63XF92AT

Öz

Otodectes cynotis infestation is one of the most common parasitic causes of otitis externa in cats and represents a significant health concern in small animal practice. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of O. cynotis infestation in client-owned cats presented to private veterinary clinics in Istanbul between September 2023 and September 2024. The study population consisted of 319 cats that were brought to the clinics for various medical reasons, including routine examinations and non-otological complaints. No pre-selection was made based on the presence of clinical signs of ear mange, and all cats were included consecutively during the study period. Each cat underwent clinical, otoscopic, and microscopic examination. Clinical signs observed in infested cats included head shaking, pruritus, dark ceruminous discharge, erythema, and erosions in the external ear canal. Infestation was confirmed in 83 cats (26.01%). Breed-based analysis revealed the highest positivity rate in Tabby cats (30.9%), followed by Scottish Fold and British Shorthair cats (12.8%), while no infestation was detected in Persian or Russian Blue cats. A statistically significant association was found between breed and infestation (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between males (26.8%) and females (25.3%) (p=0.76). Although infestation rates decreased with age (0-6 months: 34.2%, 6–12 months: 26.1%, ≥12 months: 21.6%), this trend was not statistically significant (p=0.121). These findings indicate that breed may influence susceptibility to O. cynotis, whereas age and sex do not appear to be significant risk factors. Early diagnosis and routine parasitological screening are essential for effective control of feline otoacariasis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cat , Ear mite , İstanbul , Otodectes cynotis , Prevalence , Veterinary clinics

Etik Beyan

It was approved by the Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committee of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, dated 28 September 2023, with file number E-27552122-604.01.02-425226 and decision number 2023/11-03.

Kaynakça

• Acar A, Altınok Yipel F (2016). Factor related to the frequency of cat ear mites (Otodectes cynotis). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 22(1), 75-78.
• Al-Hosary A AT, Mostafa W (2022). Epidemiological study on feline otoacariasis with special reference for therapeutic trials. Pak J Zool, 54(2), 755–761.
• Beugnet F, Bourdeau P, Chalvet-Monfray K et al. (2014). Parasites of domestic owned cats in Europe: co-infestations and risk factors. Parasit Vectors, 7, 291.
• Bowman A (2014). Otodectes cynotis. Obtenido de American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists: https://www. aavp. org/wiki/arthropods/arachnids/astigmata/otodectes-cynotis.
• Ceylan C, İder M, Evci A et al. (2025). Internal and external parasites prevalence of domestic cats in Konya province. J Adv VetBio Sci Tech, 10(1), 1–6.
• Chen CL, Wang YM, Liu CF, Wang JY (2008). The effect of water-soluble chitosan on macrophage activation and the attenuation of mite allergen-induced airway inflammation. Biomater, 29, 2173–2182.
• Curtis CF (2004). Current trends in the treatment of sarcoptes, cheyletiella and otodectes mite infestations in dogs and cats. Vet Dermatol, 15, 108–114.
• Dinçer Ş, Cantoray R, Taşan E (1980). Elazığ sokak kedilerinde görülen iç ve dış parazitler ile bunların yayılış oranları üzerine araştırmalar. Fırat Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 5(1), 7–15.
• El Dakhly KM, Bakry MA, Abdel Rahim MM, Arafa WM, Mohamed HI (2025). Insights into the prevalence and diagnosis of feline otoacariasis in Egypt. J Parasit Dis, 49(1), 193-206.
• Gram D, Payton AJ, Gerig TM, Bevier DE (1994). Treating ear mites in cats: a comparison of subcutaneous and topical ivermectin. Veterinary Medicine, 89(12), 1122-1125.
• Griffin CE (1993). Otitis externa and otitis media. In C. E. Griffin, K. W. Kwochka, & J. M. MacDonald (Eds.), Current Veterinary Dermatology: The Science and Art of Therapy (pp. 245–262). Mosby Year Book.
• Jacobson LS (2002). Diagnosis and medical treatment of otitis externa in the dog and cat. J S Afr Vet Assoc, 73(4), 162–170.
• Kavitha S, Venkatesan M, Nagarajan B, Thirunavukkarasu PS, Nambi AP (2013). Clinical management of feline otodectosis–a study of 11 patients. Intas Polivet, 14(2), 331–332.
• Lefkaditis MA, Koukeri SE, Mihalca AD (2009). Prevalence and intensity of Otodectes cynotis in kittens from Thessaloniki area, Greece. Vet Parasitol, 163, 374–375.
• Lopez RA (1993). Of mites and man. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 203(5), 606–607.
• Maazi N, Jamshidi S, Hadadzadeh H (2010). Ear mite infestation in four imported dogs from Thailand. Medleau L, Hnilica K (2006). Parasitic skin diseases. In Small Animal Dermatology (2nd ed., pp. 99–138). Saunders Elsevier.
• Mimimoğlu M (1954). Ankara ilinde kedi parazitleri üzerine yapılan bir araştırma. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 1(1), 1–10.
• Nuttall T (2015). Otitis Externa: An Essential Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. By Richard G. Harvey and Sue Paterson, CRC Press, London, 2014, pp. 162
• Özkan C, Karaca M, Özdal N (2013). Van kedilerinde Otodectes cynotis'in tedavisinde selamectin kullanımının etkinliği. Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 37(4), 269–272.
• Perego R, Proverbio D, Bagnagatti De Giorgi G et al. (2013). Prevalence of otitis externa in stray cats in northern Italy. J Feline Med Surg, 16, 483–490.
• Russell R, Otranto D, Wall R (2013). Mites. In Encyclopedia of Medical and Veterinary Entomology (pp. 209–242). CABI.
• Scott DW, Horn Jr RT (1987). Zoonotic dermatoses of dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 17, 117–144.
• Scott DW, Miller W, Griffin C (2001). Parasitic skin diseases. In Muller & Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology (6th ed., pp. 476–484). W. B. Saunders Company.
• Sotiraki ST, Koutinas AF, Leontides LS, Adamama-Moraitou KK, Himonasa CA (2001). Factors affecting the frequency of ear canal and face infestation by Otodectes cynotis in the cat. Vet Parasitol, 96, 309–315.
• Vickers TW, Clifford DL, Garcelon DK et al. (2015). Pathology and epidemiology of ceruminous gland tumors among endangered Santa Catalina Island foxes (Urocyon littoralis catalinae) in the Channel Islands, USA. PLoS One, 10(11), e0143211.
• Wall R, Shearer D (2001). Veterinary ectoparasites: biology, pathology and control (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, USA.
• Xhaxhiu D, Kusi I, Rapti D et al. (2009). Ectoparasites of dogs and cats in Albania. Parasitol Res, 105, 1577–1587.
• Yang C, Huang HP (2016). Evidence-based veterinary dermatology: a review of published studies of treatments for Otodectes cynotis (ear mite) infestation in cats. Vet Dermatol, 27(4), 221.e1–e56.