Büyüme Gelişim Döneminde Maksiller Yetmezliğe Bağlı Sınıf III Bireyde Mini-Plak Ankrajlı Yüz Maskesi Uygulaması

Öz

Genellikle maksiller yetmezlikle karakterize olan iskeletsel sınıf III anomaliler sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerin etkisiyle bireyler ve evebeynleri tarafından özellikle büyüme gelişim döneminde farkedilmektedir. Günümüzde iskelestel sınıf III anomalilerin tedavisinde sıklıkla yüz maskesi kullanılmaktadır. Konvansiyonel yüz maskesi uygulaması, ankraj ünitesi ile bireyin vertikal yönde büyümesinde istenmeyen değişimlere neden olabilmektedir. Bu noktada istenmeyen dentoalveolar etkileri en aza indirmek amacıyla maksilla protraksiyonu, yüz maskesinin iskeletsel ankraj üniteleri ile birlikte kullanımıyla elde edilebilmektedir. Bu olgu sunumunun amacı büyüme gelişim döneminde olan maksiller yetmezliğe bağlı sınıf III anomaliye sahip bireyin mini-plak ankrajlı yüz maskesi uygulaması ile iskeletsel, dentoalveolar ve yumuşak dokudaki değişimlerinin sunulmasıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İskeletsel sınıf III
• maksiller yetmezlik
• iskeletsel ankraj

Application of Mini-Plate Anchored Face Mask in Class III Individual Due to Maxillary Deficiency During the Period of Growth and Development

Öz

Individuals and parents are noticed by skeletal class III anomalies, which are typically characterized by maxillary insufficiency, especially during the growth and development due to the influence of social and environmental factors. Today, in the treatment of skeletal class III anomalies, face masks are frequently used. Conventional application of the face mask may cause undesirable changes in the growth of the individual with the anchorage unit in the vertical direction. At this point, it is possible to achieve maxilla protraction by using the face mask together with skeletal anchorage units to minimize undesired dentoalveolar effects. The aim of this case report is to present, by applying a face mask with mini-plate anchorage, the skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes of an individual with class III anomaly due to maxillary insufficiency in the growth and development period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Skeletal class III
• maxillary deficiency
• skeletal anchorag

Kaynakça

1. 1. Williams S, Andreasen CE. The Morphology of Potential Class III Skeletal Pattern in Growing Child. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 89: 302-11.
2. 2. Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr. Components of Adult Class III Malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42(5):295-305.
3. 3. Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD. Skeletal Malocclusion: a Developmental Disorder with a Life-long Morbidity. J Clin Med Res. 2014;6(6):399-408.
4. 4. Bernabé E, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM. Condition-specific Impacts on Quality of Life Attributed to Malocclusion by Adolescents with Normal Occlusion and Class I, II and III Malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):977- 82.
5. 5. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F. Effects of Facemask Treatment Anchored with Miniplates After Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions; a pilot study. Angle Ortho. 2011;81: 639-46.
6. 6. Şar Ç, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC. Comparative Evaluation of Maxillary Protraction with or without Skeletal Anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139: 636-49.
7. 7. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The Effects of Maxillary Protraction Therapy with or without Rapid Palatal Expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(3):299-309.
8. 8. Kilicoglu, H. and Kirlic, Y. Profile Changes in Patients with Class III Malocclusions After Delaire Mask Therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998; 113(4): 453-462.

9. 9. Ngan, P. Early Timely Treatment of Class III Malocclusion. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2005;11(3):140–145.
10. 10. Zhou YH, Ding P, Lin Y, Qiu LX. Facemask Therapy with Miniplate Implant Anchorage in a Patient with Maxillary Hypoplasia. Chin Med J. 2007;120(15):1372- 5.
11. 11. Delaire J. Maxillary Development Revisited: Relevance to the Orthopaedic Treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19 (3):289- 311.
12. 12. Hegmann M, Rüther AK. The Grummons Face Mask as an Early Treatment Modality within a Class III Therapy Concept. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64(6):450-6.
13. 13. Nanda R. Biomechanical and Clinical Considerations of a Modified Protraction Headgear. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(2): 125-139.