ENTROPİ ve EATWOS YÖNTEMLERİ İLE TÜRKİYE KONTEYNER LİMANLARININ VERİMLİLİK ANALİZİ

Öz

Amaç: Uluslararası ticarette denizyolu taşımacılığının önemi oldukça fazladır. Dünya ticaretinin yaklaşık %90’ı denizyolu ile yapılmaktadır. Ülkemizde ise bu oran yaklaşık %86’dır. Ülke limanlarının etkin ve verimli bir şekilde çalışması ülke ekonomisini ve dış ticareti olumlu şekilde etkilemektedir. Günümüzde konteyner taşımacılığının giderek artması nedeniyle bu limanların etkin ve verimli işlev görmesi son derece önem arz etmektedir.

Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren konteyner limanlarının verimliliklerini irdelemek için Entropi ve EATWOS Yöntemlerinden oluşan hibrit bir verimlilik analizi yapılmıştır. Entropi Yöntemi ile girdi ve çıktı faktörlerinin ağırlık dereceleri belirlenmiş, EATWOS Yöntemi ile konteyner limanlarının verimlilik değerleri hesaplanmıştır.

Bulgular: Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre verimlilik değerleri yüksek çıkan limanların teknik ve operasyonel olarak diğer limanlardan daha iyi limanlar olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte yük elleçleme miktarı yüksek olan limanların verimlilik değerlerinin diğer limanlara oranla daha yüksek olduğu anlaşılmıştır.

Özgünlük: Literatürde, limanlarla ilgili bu yöntemle yapılmış bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Yapılan çalışmanın literatürdeki bu eksikliği dolduracağı öngörülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Konteyner Limanları
• Entropi Yöntemi
• EATWOS Yöntemi
• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
• Verimlilik Analizi.

EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TURKEY CONTAINER PORTS WITH ENTROPY AND EATWOS METHODS

Abstract

Purpose: The importance of international trade in maritime transport is very high. Approximately 90% of the world trade is carried out by sea. In our country, this rate is around 86%. The effective and efficient operation of the country ports, positively affects the national economy and foreign trade. Today, due to the increasing number of container transportation, it is of utmost importance that these ports function effectively and efficiently.

Methodology: In this study, to analyze the efficiency of container ports operating in Turkey, a hybrid analysis method consisting of Entropy and EATWOS methods are made. Weight values of input and output factors were determined by Entropy method and efficiency values of container ports were calculated by EATWOS method.

Findings: According to the results of the study, it has been observed that ports with high efficiency values are technically and operationally better ports than other ports. However, it has been understood that the efficiency values of ports with high cargo handling amount are higher than other ports.

Originality: In the literature, there has been no previous study about ports made with this method. It is predicted that this study will fill this gap in the literature.

Keywords

• Container Ports
• Entropy Method
• EATWOS Method
• Multi-Criteria Decision Making
• Efficiency Analysis.

Kaynakça

1. ACER, A. ve TİMOR, M. (2017), Kümeleme ve Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) İle Konteyner Terminal Etkinliklerinin Belirlenmesi, Alphanumeric Journal, 5 (2), 339-352.
2. AKGÜL, E. F., FIŞKIN, C. S., DÜZALAN, B., ERDOĞAN, T. ve ÇETİN, Ç. K. (2015), Liman Rekabetçiliği ve Etkinlik: Türkiye’deki Konteyner Limanları Üzerine Bir Analiz, 2. Ulusal Liman Kongresi, İzmir.
3. AL-ERAQI, A. S., MUSTAFA, A., KHADER, A. T. ve BARROS, C. P. (2008), Efficiency of Middle Eastern and East African Seaports: Application of DEA Using Window Analysis, European Journal of Scientific Research, 23 (4), 597-612.
4. ALMAWSHEKI, E. S. ve SHAH, M. Z. (2015), Technical Efficiency Analysis of Container Terminals in the Middle Eastern Region, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31 (4), 477-486.
5. ALP, İ., ÖZTEL, A. ve KÖSE, M. S. (2015), Entropi Tabanlı MAUT Yöntemi İle Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı Ölçümü: Bir Vaka Çalışması, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11 (2), 65-81.
6. ARSLAN, O., ARSLAN, A. E. ve ACAR, M. Ş. (2019), O-Tipi ORC-Binary Jeotermal Güç Santralı Optimizasyonu: EATWOS Analizi, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 222-236.
7. ATEŞ, A. (2010), Türkiye Konteyner Terminallerinde Verimlilik Analizi, Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
8. ATEŞ, A. ve ESMER, S. (2013), Türk Konteyner Terminalleri Üzerinde 2009 Yılı Küresel Finans Krizinin Etkileri, Journal of Turkish Court of Accounts/Sayıştay Dergisi, 91, 105-125.

9. ATEŞ, A. ve ESMER, S. (2014), Farklı Yöntemler İle Türk Konteyner Limanlarının Verimliliği, Verimlilik Dergisi, 1, 61-76.
10. ATEŞ, A., ESMER, S., ÇAKIR, E. ve BALCI, K. (2013), Karadeniz Konteyner Terminallerinin Göreceli Etkinlik Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (1), 1-22.
11. BANSAL, A., SINGH, R. K., ISSAR, S. ve VARKEY, J. (2014), Evaluation of Vendors Ranking by EATWOS Approach, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11 (3), 290-311.
12. BARROS, C. P. (2003), Measurement of Efficiency of Portuguese Seaport Authorities with DEA, International Journal of Transport Economics, 30 (3), 335-354.
13. BARROS, C. P. ve ATHANASIOUS, M. (2004), Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence for Greece and Portugal, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6 (2), 122-140.
14. BAYAR, S. (2005), Veri Zarflama Analizi Kullanılarak Liman Verimliliğinin Ölçülmesi: Türk Limanlarından Bir Örnek, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
15. BICHOU, K. (2013), An Empirical Study of The Impacts of Operating and Market Conditions on Container-Port Efficiency and Benchmarking, Research in Transportation Economics, 42 (1), 28-37.
16. BIRAFANE, M. ve EL ABDI, M. (2019), Efficiency of Moroccan Seaports: Application of DEA Using Window Analysis, Engineering, 11 (02), 107-118.
17. BULĞURCU, B. (2019), Sales Operation Evaluation of Insurance Companies: A Novel Integrated Model Based on Entropy- EATWOS, Contemporary Challenges in Business Life Sciences, IJOPEC Publication, Londrina.
18. CHEON, S. (2007), Evaluating Impacts of Institutional Reforms on Port Efficiency Changes: Malmquist Productivity Index for World Container Ports, 2nd Annual National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, California.
19. CHEON, S., DOWALL, D. E. ve SONG, D. W. (2009), Typology of Long Term Port Efficiency Improvement Paths: Malmquist Total Factor Productivity for World Container Ports, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15 (4), 340-350.
20. COTO-MILAN, P. ve BANOS, P. J. RODRIGUEZ (2000), Economic Efficiency in Spanish Ports: Some Empirical Evidence, Maritime Policy and Management, 27 (2), 169-174.
21. CULLINANE, K., SONG, D. W. ve GRAY, R. (2002), A Stochastic Frontier Model of the Efficiency of Major Container Terminals in Asia: Assessing the Influence of Administrative and Ownership Structures, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36 (8), 743-762.
22. CULLIANE, K., SONG, D. W., JI, P. ve WANG, T. F. (2004), An Application of DEA Window Analysis to Consider Port Production Efficiency, Review of Network Economics, 3 (2), 186-208.
23. CULLINANE, K., SONG, D. W. ve WANG, T. (2005), The Application of Mathematical Programming Approaches to Estimating Container Port Production Efficiency, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24 (1), 73-92.
24. CULLINANE, K., WANG, T. F., SONG, D. W. ve JI, P. (2006), The Technical Efficiency of Container Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40 (4), 354-374.
25. CULLINANE, K. ve WANG, T. (2010), The Efficiency Analysis of Container Port Production Using DEA Panel Data Approaches, OR Spectrum, 32 (3), 717-738.
26. ÇAĞLAR, A. G. V. ve ORAL, E. Z. (2011), Liman Verimlilik ve Etkinlik Ölçme Yöntemlerinin Analizi, 7. Kıyı Mühendisliği Sempozyumu, Trabzon, 665-676.
27. ÇETİN, Ç. K. ve ARABELEN, G. (2012), Türkiye'de Limancılık Eğitimi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (1), 75-81.
28. DWARAKISH, G. S. ve SALİM, A. M. (2015), Rewiev on the Role of Ports in the Development of a Nation, Aquatic Procedia, 4 (1), 295-301.
29. ESTACHE, A., GONZALEZ, M. ve TRUJILLO, L. (2002), Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico, World Development, 30 (4), 545-560.
30. FERRARI, C., MERK, O., BOTTASSO, A., CONTI, M. ve TEI, A. (2012), Ports and Regional Development: A European Perspective, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, OECD Publishing.
31. FUJITA, M. ve MORI, T. (1996), The Role of Ports in the Making of Major Cities: Self-Agglomeration and Hub-Effect, Journal of Development Economics, 49 (1), 93-120.
32. FUNG NG, A. ve LEE, C. (2007), Port Productivity Analysis by Using DEA: A Case Study in Malaysia, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney, Australia, Working Paper ITLS-WP-07-1.
33. GÖRÇÜN, Ö. F. (2019a), Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetlerinin Lojistik ve Taşımacılık Performansları ve Verimliliklerinin Analizi İçin Hibrit Bir Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli, MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (3), 2775-2798.
34. GÖRÇÜN, Ö. F. (2019b), Kentsel Lojistikte Kullanılan Hafif Raylı Sistem Hatlarının Entegre Entropi ve EATWOS Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Analizi, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 10 (1), 254-267.
35. GÜNER, S. (2015), Proposal of a Two-Stage Model for Measuring the Port Efficiency and an Implication on Turkish Ports, Alphanumeric Journal, 3 (2), 99-106.
36. HLALI, A. (2018), Efficiency Analysis with Different Models: The Case of Container Ports, Journal of Marine Science: Research & Development, 8 (2), 250.
37. HOYLE, B. S. (1998), Cities and Ports: Concepts and Issues, Vegueta, 3, 263-278.
38. HUNG, S. W., LU, W. M. ve WANG, T. P. (2010), Benchmarking the Operating Efficiency of Asia Container Ports, European Journal of Operational Research, 203 (3), 706-713.
39. ITOH, H. (2002), Efficiency Changes at Major Container Ports in Japan: A Window Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 14 (2), 133-152.
40. JUNG, B. M. (2011), Economic Contribution of Ports to the Local Economies in Korea, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 27 (1), 1-30.
41. KALGORA, B., GOLI, S. Y., DAMIGOU, B., ABDOULKARIM, H. T. ve AMPONSEM, K. K. (2019), Measuring West-Africa Ports Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Transportation Technologies, 9 (3), 287-308.
42. KAMMOUN, R. (2018), The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores, Logistics & Sustainable Transport, 9 (2), 73-84.
43. KUMAR, N., SINGH, A., VERMA, A. ve SONAL, T. (2016), Measuring Efficiency of IPL Players Using EATWOS, International Journal of Advanced Production and Industrial Engineering, 1 (2), 13-16.
44. KUNDAKCI, N. (2019), A Comparative Analyze Based on EATWOS and OCRA Methods for Supplier Evaluation, Alphanumeric Journal, 7 (1), 103-112.
45. KUTIN, N., NGUYEN, T. T. ve VALLEE, T. (2017), Relative Efficiencies of ASEAN Container Ports Based on Data Envelopment Analysis, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33 (2), 67-77.
46. LIU, B. L., LIU, W. L. ve CHENG, C. P. (2005), Efficiency Analysis of Container Terminals in China: An Application of DEA Approach, Unpublished manuscript, Nankai University/Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan.
47. LIN, L. C. ve TSENG, L. A. (2005), Application of DEA and SFA on the Measurement of Operating Efficiencies for 27 International Container Ports, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Bangkok Thailand, 5, 592-607.
48. MARTINEZ-BUDRIA, E., DIAZ-ARMAS, R., NAVVARO-IBANEZ, M. ve RAVELO-MESA, T. (1999), A Study of the Efficiency of Spanish Port Authorities Using Data Envelopment Analysis, International Journal of Transport Economics, 26 (2), 237–253.
49. MUNISAMY, S. ve JUN, O. B. (2013), Efficiency of Latin American Container Seaports Using DEA, Proceedings of 3rd Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference 25-26 February 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
50. NOTTEBOOM, T. (2008), Bundling of Freight Flows and Hinterland Network Developments, The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport, Operations, Technology, Design and Implementation, Edward Elgar, Cheltanham.
51. NOTTEBOOM, T., COECK, C. ve VAN DEN BROECK, J. (2000), Measuring and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals by Means of Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Models, International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2 (2), 83-106.
52. NOTTEBOOM, T. E. ve RODRIGUE, J. P. (2005), Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development, Maritime Policy & Management, 32 (3), 297-313.
53. ÖZBEK, A. (2015a), Analysis of Private Pension Companies in Turkey by EATWOS, European Journal of Business and Management, 7 (26), 31-43.
54. ÖZBEK, A. (2015b), Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey, International Business Research, 8 (9), 95-104.
55. ÖZBEK, A. (2015c), Efficiency Analysis of the Turkish Red Crescent Between 2012 and 2014, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7 (9), 322-334.
56. ÖZBEK, A. (2016), Efficiency Analysis of Gold Mining Companies Through Financial Statements, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6 (10), 273-290.
57. ÖZBEK, A. (2017), Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hayırsever Kuruluşlarında Verimlilik Analizi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (2), 99-114.
58. ÖZDAĞOĞLU, A. (2018), BIST Sınai İşletmelerinin Gri Entropi-EATWOS Bütünleşik Yaklaşımı İle Performans Değerlendirmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (2), 271-299.
59. PANAYIDES, P. M., WANG, T. ve MAXOULIS, C. (2008), Measuring Seaport Economic Efficiency: A Comperative DEA Study, IAME Annual Conference, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China,
60. PETERS, M. L. ve ZELEWSKI, S. (2006), Efficiency Analysis Under Consideration of Satisficing Levels for Output Quantities, Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS).
61. PETERS, M. L. ve ZELEWSKI, S. (2016), Benefits and Risks of Satisficing Levels for Input and Output Quantities in Efficiency Analyses from a Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective, International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 5 (12), 94-101.
62. PETERS, M. L., ZELEWSKI, S. ve BRUNS, A. S. (2012), Extended Version of EATWOS Concerning Satisficing Levels for Input Quantities, Pioneering Supply Chain Design-A Comprehensive Insight into Emerging Trends, Technologies and Applications, Lohmar-Köln: Eul Verlag, 303-318.
63. POITRAS, G., TONGZON, J. ve LI, H. (1996), Measuring Port Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Department of Economics and Statistics, National University of Singapore.
64. RAJASEKAR, T. ve DEO, M. (2014), Does Size Influence the Operational Efficiency of the Major Ports of India?-A Study, IUP Journal of Operations Management, 13 (1), 20-39.
65. RIOS, L. R. ve MAÇADA, A. C. G. (2006), Analysing the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals of Mercosur Using DEA, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8 (4), 331-346.
66. ROLL, Y. ve HAYUTH, Y. (1993), Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Maritime Policy and Management, 20 (2), 153-161.
67. SAĞLAM, B. B., AÇIK, A. ve ERTÜRK, E. (2018), Evaluation of Investment Impact on Port Efficiency: Berthing Time Difference as a Performance Indicator, Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 6 (1), 37-46.
68. SCHØYEN, H. ve ODECK, J. (2013), The Technical Efficiency of Norwegian Container Ports: A Comparison to Some Nordic and UK Container Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15 (2), 197-221.
69. SHEMSHADI, A., SHIRAZI, H., TOREIHI, M. ve TAROKH, M. J. (2011), A Fuzzy VIKOR Method for Supplier Selection Based on Entropy Measure for Objective Weighting, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (10), 12160-12167.
70. SONG, B. ve CUI, Y. (2014), Productivity Changes in Chinese Container Terminals 2006–2011, Transport Policy, 35, 377-384.
71. TONGZON, J. L. (1995), Determinants of Port Performance and Efficiency, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29 (3), 245-252.
72. TONGZON, J. (2001), Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35 (2), 107-122.
73. TONGZON, J. ve HENG, W. (2005), Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals), Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39 (5), 405-424.
74. TONGZON, J., CHANG, Y. T. ve LEE, S. Y. (2008), Efficiency Measurement of Selected Korean and Other International Ports Using Stepwise Data Envelopment Analysis (sDEA), IAME Annual Conference, Dalian, China.
75. TRUJILLO, L., GONZÁLEZ, M. M. ve JIMÉNEZ, J. L. (2013), An Overview on the Reform Process of African Ports, Utilities Policy, 25, 12-22.
76. VALENTINE, V. ve GRAY, R. (2001), The Measurement of Port Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul South Korea.
77. WANG, T. F., SONG, D. W. ve CULLINANE, K. (2003), Container Port Production Efficiency: A Comparative Study of DEA and FDH Approaches, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5 (10), 698-713.
78. WIEGMANS, B. W., RIETVELD, P., PELS, E. ve VAN WOUDENBERG, S. (2004), Container Terminals and Utilisation of Facilities, International Journal of Transport Economics, 31, 313-339.
79. WU, J. ve GOH, M. (2010), Container Port Efficiency in Emerging and More Advanced Markets, Transportation Research Part E, 46, 1030-1042.
80. YUEN, A. C. L., ZHANG, A. ve CHEUNG, W. (2013), Foreign Participation and Competition: A Way to Improve the Container Port Efficiency in China?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 220-231.
81. YÜKSEKYILDIZ, E. ve TUNÇEL, A. L. (2020), Determining the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals in Turkey Using Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis, Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 9 (2), 102-113.