Investigation of individuals' perception of pet adoption and the effect of animal criteria on adoption

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 96 Sayı: 2, 123 - 130, 15.06.2025

Ümit Özcan , Zeynep Nurselin Kot , Gamze Nur Konaçoğlu , Halis Çetiner

https://doi.org/10.33188/vetheder.1636600

Öz

Pet adoption is the assumption of full responsibility for an animal. Social preferences directly affect the adoption rate and preference. The main channels used in adoption are shelters, breeders, neighbors and friends with pets, but there is no precise data on how and why an animal is preferred when adopting an animal from a shelter. The main purpose of the study is to determine the adoption perception and preference parameters of individuals who adopt animals from shelters.
Three hundred four participants were included in the study who adopted cats or dogs from the shelter between June 2023 and January 2024. 26.6% of the individuals included in the study were male, 73.4% were female, and proportionally, the age range in which the highest number of adoptions occurred was over 45 years old with 33%. In addition, it was determined that 18.2% of the individuals were between the ages of 18-25, 18.2% between 26-35 and 21.9% between 26-45, and 43.1% of them owned cats and 56.9% owned dogs. While the rate of cat adoption was higher among women, men preferred dog adoption. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the feeling of pity was dominant due to the poor health status of the adopted animals and this situation affected the adoption behavior of women. Although fear / excitement / nervousness behaviors are exhibited in the first encounter, it differs from other studies in terms of adoption. It was revealed that the training of shelter staff is a key point in adoption.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adoption , Criteria , Cat , Dog , Perception

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the HADYEK- Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments office of Ondokuz Mayıs University with 24.02.2023/2023-4 approval number.

Destekleyen Kurum

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Proje Numarası

PYO.VET.1908.23.003

Bireylerin evcil hayvan sahiplenme algısı ve hayvan kriterlerinin sahiplenme üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi

Öz

Evcil hayvan sahiplenme, bir hayvanın tüm sorumluluğunun üstlenilmesidir. Sosyal tercihler, sahiplenme oranını ve tercihini doğrudan etkilemektedir. Hayvan sahiplenmede kullanılan başlıca kanallar barınaklar, yetiştiriciler, komşular ve evcil hayvanı olan arkadaşlardır ancak barınaktan hayvan sahiplenirken bir hayvanın nasıl ve neden tercih edildiğine dair kesin bir veri bulunmamaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı, barınaklardan hayvan sahiplenen bireylerin sahiplenme algısı ve tercih parametrelerini belirlemektir. Çalışmaya Haziran 2023 - Ocak 2024 tarihleri arasında barınaktan kedi veya köpek sahiplenen 344 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen bireylerin %26,6'sı erkek, %73,4'ü kadındır ve oransal olarak en fazla sahiplenmenin gerçekleştiği yaş aralığı %33 ile 45 yaş üstüdür. Ayrıca bireylerin %18,2'sinin 18-25, %18,2'sinin 26-35 ve %21,9'unun 26-45 yaş aralığında olduğu ve %43,1'inin kedi, %56,9'unun köpek sahibi olduğu belirlendi. Kadınlar arasında kedi sahiplenme oranı daha yüksekken, erkekler köpek sahiplenmeyi tercih etmiştir. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda sahiplenilen hayvanların sağlık durumlarının kötü olması nedeniyle acıma duygusunun baskın olduğu ve bu durumun kadınların sahiplenme davranışını etkilediği ortaya çıkmıştır. İlk karşılaşmada korku/heyecan/sinirlilik davranışları sergilense de sahiplenme açısından diğer çalışmalardan farklılık göstermektedir. Barınak personelinin eğitiminin sahiplenmede kilit nokta olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sahiplenme , Kriter , Kedi , Köpek , Algı

Proje Numarası

PYO.VET.1908.23.003

Kaynakça

• Campanilla BS, Etcuban JO, Maghanoy AP, Nacua PAP, Galamiton NS. Pet adoption app to free animal shelters. J Positive School Psychol. 2022;6(8):5993-6006.
• Power ER. Renting with pets: a pathway to housing insecurity? Housing Stud. 2017;32(3):336-60.
• Bradley J, Rajendran S. Increasing adoption rates at animal shelters: a two-phase approach to predict length of stay and optimal shelter allocation. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17(1):70.
• Landsberg G, Hunthausen W, Ackerman L. Behavior problems of the dog and cat. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
• Smith KK. Governing animals: animal welfare and the liberal state. OUP USA; 2012.
• Serpell J, editor. Best friend or worst enemy: cross-cultural variation in attitudes to the domestic dog. In: The Human-Pet Relationship: Proceedings of the International Symposium; 1985.
• Bradshaw JWS. Sociality in cats: a comparative review. J Vet Behav. 2016;11:113-24.
• Rowan A, Kartal T. Dog population & dog sheltering trends in the United States of America. Animals. 2018;8(5):68.
• Mornement KM, Coleman GJ, Toukhsati SR, Bennett PC. Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Behavioural Assessment for Re-homing K9's (BARK) protocol and owner satisfaction with adopted dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;167:35-42.
• Scott S, Jong E, McArthur M, Hazel SJ. Follow-up surveys of people who have adopted dogs and cats from an Australian shelter. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018;201:40-5.
• Powell L, Reinhard C, Satriale D, Morris M, Serpell J, Watson B. Characterizing unsuccessful animal adoptions: age and breed predict the likelihood of return, reasons for return and post-return outcomes. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8018.
• New J, John C, Salman MD, Scarlett JM, Kass PH, Vaughn JA, Scherr S, et al. Moving: characteristics of dogs and cats and those relinquishing them to 12 US animal shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 1999;2(2):83-96.
• New JC Jr, Salman M, King M, Scarlett JM, Kass PH, Hutchison JM. Characteristics of shelter-relinquished animals and their owners compared with animals and their owners in US pet-owning households. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2000;3(3):179-201.
• New J, John C, Kelch WJ, Hutchison JM, Salman MD, King M, Scarlett JM, et al. Birth and death rate estimates of cats and dogs in US households and related factors. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2004;7(4):229-41.
• Demir P, Koç A. An evaluation of the general situations and problems of temporary animal rescue shelters: the case of Aegean region. 2020.
• Gates MC, Walker J, Zito S, Dale A. Cross-sectional survey of pet ownership, veterinary service utilisation, and pet-related expenditures in New Zealand. N Z Vet J. 2019;67(6):306-14.
• Yiğit A, Aslim G, Can H. Evaluation on shelter medicine and stray animal shelters in Turkey Türkiye’de sahipsiz hayvan barınakları ve barınak hekimliği üzerine bir değerlendirme. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2020;26(1).
• Hirschman EC. Consumers and their animal companions. J Consum Res. 1994;20(4):616-32.
• Kaya H, Bektaş M. Çalışan bireylerin evcil hayvanlara bağlanma nedenlerine ilişkin nitel bir çalışma. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi. 2019;9(2):401-17.
• Weiss E, Miller K, Mohan-Gibbons H, Vela C. Why did you choose this pet?: adopters and pet selection preferences in five animal shelters in the United States. Animals (Basel). 2012;2(2):144-59.
• Houpt KA, Honig SU, Reisner IR. Breaking the human-companion animal bond. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996;208(10):1653-9.
• Özen D, Böhning D, Gürcan İS. Estimation of stray dog and cat populations in metropolitan Ankara, Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2016;40(1):7-12.
• Kulakoğlu Dilek N, Dilek SE. Tourists’ perceptions towards stray/free-roaming animals (FRA): the case of İzmir, Turkey. World Leisure J. 2024;66(4):580-99.