İnovatif Liderliğin Tedarik Zinciri Performansına Etkisinde Tedarik Zinciri İnovasyonunun Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmada inovatif liderliğin tedarik zinciri performansına etkisinde tedarik zinciri inovasyonunun aracılık rolü araştırılmıştır. Alanyazında tedarik zinciri inovasyonu ve tedarik zinciri performansına etki eden faktörler özelinde birçok çalışma yapılmış olmasına rağmen inovatif liderlik etkisinin dâhil edildiği çok az çalışma vardır. Araştırma konusu, araştırma için geliştirilen model, uygulanan sektör (sağlık hizmetleri) ve tespit edilen bulguların alanyazına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın sağlık sektöründe yapılmasının nedeni; Covid 19 pandemisinin sağlık hizmetleri arzının önemini tüm dünyada artırmasıdır. Bu kapsamda araştırmada veri toplama yönetimi olarak beşli Likert tipi anket kullanılarak Türkiye’deki 418 kamu ve özel hastaneden elde edilen veri ile çalışmanın hipotezleri, çoklu regresyon analizleri ile test edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda; inovatif liderlik ve tedarik zinciri inovasyonunun tedarik zinciri performansına pozitif etki ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca inovatif liderliğin tedarik zinciri hız ve çevre performansına etkisinde tedarik zinciri hizmet ve süreç inovasyonunun aracılık rolünün olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İnovatif Liderlik
• Tedarik Zinciri İnovasyonu
• Tedarik Zinciri Performansı

The Intermediate Role of Supply Chain Innovation on the Effect of Innovative Leadership on Supply Chain Performance

Öz

In the study, the mediating role of supply chain innovation on the effect of innovative leadership on supply chain performance is investigated. Although there are many studies in the literature on the factors affecting supply chain innovation and supply chain performance, there are very few studies that include the innovative leadership effect. It is thought that the research subject, the model developed for the study, the applied sector (health services) and the findings would contribute to the literature. The reason for the selection of the health sector for the study is the fact that the Covid 19 pandemic has increased the importance of healthcare supply all over the world. In this context, the hypotheses of the study are tested with multiple regression analyzes with the data obtained from 418 public and private hospitals in Turkey by using a five-point Likert type questionnaire as the data collection method in the research. As a result of the analyzes made it is determined that innovative leadership and supply chain innovation have positive effects on supply chain performance. In the study, it is also seen that supply chain service and process innovation have a mediating role in the effect of innovative leadership on supply chain speed and environmental performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation Leadership
• Supply Chain Innovation
• Supply Chain Performance

Kaynakça

1. Aboelmaged, M. G. (2012). Harvesting organizational knowledge and innovation practices: An empirical examination of their effects on operations strategy. Business Process Management Journal, 18(5), 712-734.
2. Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M. ve Haridy, S. (2020). The relationship between leadership styles and organisational innovation: A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management, (ahead-of-print).
3. Alrowwad, A. A. ve Abualoush, S. H. (2020). Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2), 217.
4. Arlbjørn, J. S., de Haas, H. ve Munksgaard, K. B. (2011). Exploring supply chain innovation. Logistics Research, 3(1), 4.
5. Ataman, S., Gümüş, A. ve Ataman, F. (2021). Örgütsel imaj algısı: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi öğrencilerine yönelik bir uygulama. Vankulu Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 0(7), 297.
6. Athanasopoulou, P. (2009). Relationship quality: a critical literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 584.
7. Bağış, Ö. Ü. M. (2021). Dinamik yeteneklerin entelektüel yapısı üzerine ortak kelime analizi: 1991-2021. International EMI Entrepreneurship and Social Sciences Congress, (294-310), Gorazde, Bosna Hersek.
8. Baig, H., Ahmed, W. ve Najmi , A. (2022). Understanding influence of supply chain collaboration on innovation-based market performance. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(2), 377.

9. Balkar, O. E. (2019). Lojistik inovasyon yeteneğinin rekabet gücü ve ihracat performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Kahramanmaraş ilinde bir alan çalışması [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi.
10. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
11. Birasnav, M., Mittal, R. ve Loughlin, S. (2015). Linking leadership behaviors and information exchange to improve supply chain performance: A conceptual model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 213.
12. Birasnav, M. ve Bienstock, J. (2019). Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: An empirical study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 130, 151.
13. Birk, S. K. (2008). Supply chain innovation in other industries: what can we learn?. Healthcare Executive, 23(3), 48-54.
14. Can, P. ve Erciş, A. (2013). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminin inovasyon stratejilerine etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 95.
15. Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R. ve Gefen, D. (2010). The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 339-349.
16. Chapman, R., Soosay, C. ve Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in logistic services and the new business model: a conceptual framework. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 33(7), 630.
17. Chen, J. (1997). Achieving maximum supply chain efficiency. IIE Solutions, 29(6), 30-31.
18. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovators dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
19. Croxton, K. L., Garcia-Dastugue, S. J., Lambert, D. M. ve Rogers, D. S. (2001). The supply chain management processes. The İnternational Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 13-36.
20. Cummings, L. L. ve O'Connell, M. J. (1978). Organizational innovation: A model and needed research. Journal of Business Research, 6(1), 33-50.
21. Çiğdem, Ş. ve Erdoğan, S. (2019). Tedarik zinciri ve ürün inovasyonu ilişkisi: İlk 1000 sanayi firması üzerinde bir çalışma. Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 76.
22. Delbufalo, E. (2012). Outcomes of inter‐organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta‐analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 380.
23. Dingler, A. ve Enkel, E. (2016). Socialization and innovation: Insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109(9), 50-60.
24. Domínguez-Escrig, E., Mallén-Broch, F. F., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R. ve Chiva-Gómez, R. (2019). The influence of leaders’ stewardship behavior on innovation success: the mediating effect of radical innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 859.
25. Elenkov, D. S. ve Manev, I. M. (2005). Top management leadership and influence on innovation: The role of sociocultural context. Journal of Management, 31(3), 389.
26. Elkins, T. ve Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 590.
27. Eng, T. Y., Mohsen, K. ve Wu, L. C. (2022). Wireless information technology competency and transformational leadership in supply chain management: implications for innovative capability. Information Technology & People, (ahead-of-print).
28. Ford, E. W. ve Hughes, J. A. (2007). A collaborative product commerce approach to value‐based health plan purchasing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(1), 35.
29. Giannakis, M. (2011). Conceptualizing and managing service supply chains. The Service Industries Journal, 31(11), 1809-1823.
30. Gosling, J., Jia, F., Gong, Y. ve Brown, S. (2016). The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1465.
31. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
32. Güven, M. E. (2020). İşletmelerin inovatif performanslarının ihracat performansına etkisi: Bir alan çalışması [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İnönü Üniversitesi.
33. Güzel, D. ve Yazıcılar, F. G. (2016). Tedarik zinciri inovasyonunun performansa etkisi: bir uygulama. Journal Of International Social Research, 9(47), 872.
34. Hammer, M. ve Champy, J. (1994). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business.
35. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
36. Herzlinger, R. (2006). Innovating in health care framework. Harvard Business School Publishing.
37. Jamkhaneh, H. B. ve Ghadikolaei, A. H. S. (2020). Measuring the maturity of service supply chain process: a new framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(1), 250.
38. Jia, F., Gong, Y. ve Brown, S. (2019). Multi-tier sustainable supply chain management: The role of supply chain leadership. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 60.
39. Jia, X., Chen, J., Mei, L. ve Wu, Q. (2018). How leadership matters in organizational innovation: a perspective of openness. Management Decision. 56(1), 9.
40. Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Martínez-Costa, M. ve Rodriguez, C. S. (2018). The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 550.
41. Jung, D. I., Chow, C. ve Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 525-544.
42. Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
43. Karakaş, Y. E. ve Güçlü, İ. (2018). Tedarik zinciri yönetimi düzeyi ve inovasyon eğilim ilişkisi üzerine Sinop ilinde bir araştırma. İçtimaiyat, 2(2), 85.
44. Laursen, K. ve Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
45. Le, P. B. (2021). Determinants of frugal innovation for firms in emerging markets: the roles of leadership, knowledge sharing and collaborative culture. International Journal of Emerging Markets, (ahead-of-print).
46. Lee, S. M., Lee, D. ve Schniederjans, M. J. (2011). Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(11), 1193.
47. Li, G. (2020). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on knowledge sharing and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, 13.
48. Liao, Y., Hong, P. ve Rao, S. S. (2010). Supply management, supply flexibility and performance outcomes: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 6-22.
49. Liao, Y. ve Li, Y. (2019). Complementarity effect of supply chain competencies on innovation capability. Business Process Management Journal, 25(6), 1251.
50. Lichocik, G. ve Sadowski, A. (2013). Efficiency of supply chain management. Strategic and operational approach. Log Forum, 9(2), 119-125.
51. Lin, H. F. (2014). Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system adoption: Using the technology–organization–environment framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86(8), 80-92.
52. Liu, W., Zhang, J. ve Wang, S. (2021). Factors influencing the smart supply chain innovation performance of commodity distribution enterprises: An investigation from China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(10), 2073.
53. McKone‐Sweet, K. E., Hamilton, P., ve Willis, S. B. (2005). The ailing healthcare supply chain: A prescription for change. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(1), 4-17.
54. McMillan, C. (2010). Five competitive forces of effective leadership and innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(1), 17.
55. Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. the Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 393.
56. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlarla istatistiksel veri analizi-1. Kaan Kitabevi.
57. Özgül, B. (2020). Yeşil inovasyon, öncülleri ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişki: Rekabet stratejisinin moderatör rolü [Doktora Tezi]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
58. Prabhu, M. ve Srivastava, A.K. (2022). Leadership and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Journal of Modelling in Management, (ahead-of-print).
59. Prajogo, D. I. ve Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 34(3), 296-312.
60. Prasad, B. ve Junn, P. (2016). CEO transformational and transactional leadership and organizational innovation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Management Decision, 54(7), 1551.
61. Reiner, G. (2005). Customer-oriented improvement and evaluation of supply chain processes supported by simulation models. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 381-395.
62. Reyes, P. M., Li, S. ve Visich, J. K. (2016). Determinants of RFID adoption stage and perceived benefits. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 802.
63. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2020 Haber Bülteni. (2020). Sağlık Bakanlığı, www.sbsgm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/41611/0/haber-bülteni-2020pdf.pdf adresinden 01 Kasım 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır.
64. Saini, M., Arif, M. ve Kulonda, D. J. (2018). Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes. Construction Innovation, 18(1), 85.
65. Sharif, A. M. ve Irani, Z. (2012). Supply chain leadership. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 58.
66. Shih, S. C., Rivers, P. A. ve Hsu, H. S. (2009). Strategic information technology alliances for effective health-care supply chain management. Health Services Management Research, 22(3), 140-150.
67. Simon, A. ve Yaya, L. H. P. (2012). Improving innovation and customer satisfaction through systems integration. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(7), 1031.
68. Soosay, C. A. ve Chapman, R. L. (2006). An empirical examination of performance measurement for managing continuous innovation in logistics. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 192-205.
69. Syed, T. A., Blome, C. ve Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Resolving paradoxes in IT success through IT ambidexterity: the moderating role of uncertain environments. Information & Management, 57(6), 2.
70. Tan, Y. C. ve Ndubisi, N. O. (2014). Evaluating supply chain relationship quality, organisational resources, technological innovation and enterprise performance in the palm oil processing sector in Asia. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(6), 492.
71. Thompson, D. I., Osheroff, J., Classen, D. ve Sittig, D. F. (2007). A review of methods to estimate the benefits of electronic medical records in hospitals and the need for a national benefits database. Journal of Healthcare Information Management: JHIM, 21(1), 62-68.
72. Türkalp, E. (2019). İnovasyon yönetiminin işletme performansına etkileri: değirmen makinası imalatı yapan firmalara yönelik bir araştırma [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Karatay Üniversitesi.
73. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J. ve Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931-951.
74. Wang, L., Zhao, P. H. ve Qu, H. Y. (2012). The empirical research of the effect about communication trust and commitment on supply chain cooperation. In Advanced Materials Research, 468, 2963.
75. Yee, R. W., Lee, P. K., Yeung, A. C. ve Cheng, T. E. (2013). The relationships among leadership, goal orientation, and service quality in high-contact service industries: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 460.
76. Yıldız, B., ve Aytekin, M. (2019). Kalite yönetimi uygulamalarının firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde inovasyonun aracı rolü ile çevresel dinamizmin moderatör rolü. Journal of Yaşar University, 14(56), 489.
77. Yıldız, B. ve Sayın, B. (2020). Tedarik zinciri müşteri entegrasyonunun firma performansı üzerindeki etkisinde ürün inovasyon kapasitesinin aracı rolü. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 319.
78. Yılmaz, Y.E. (2016). Pazarlamada süreç, inovasyon stratejileri ve firma performansı ilişkisi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Okan Üniversitesi.
79. Yoon, S. N., Lee, D. ve Schniederjans, M. (2016). Effects of innovation leadership and supply chain innovation on supply chain efficiency: Focusing on hospital size. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 412-421.
80. Youn, S., Yang, M. G. M. ve Hong, P. (2012). Integrative leadership for effective supply chain implementation: An empirical study of Korean firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 240.