Paternalist Liderliğin İşe Adanmışlığa Etkisinin Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile İncelenmesi: Hastane Çalışanları Örneği

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, paternalist liderliğin işe adanmışlık üzerindeki etkisini hastane çalışanları örnekleminde incelemektir. Araştırma, İç Anadolu Bölgesi’nde bir devlet hastanesinde görev yapan 152 çalışanla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada veriler anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Veri toplama süreci Mart - Ağustos 2022 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde SPSS ve RStudio programları kullanılmıştır. Derlenen veriler, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi, faktör analizi ve kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi uygulanarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın yapısal eşitlik modeli sonuçlarına göre paternalist liderliğin, bilişsel adanmışlık, duygusal adanmışlık ve fiziksel adanmışlık üzerinde pozitif yönde etkisinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca modelde, en yüksek yol katsayısının paternalist liderlik ve fiziksel adanmışlık arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu araştırma, çalışanlarında işe adanmışlık davranışlarını geliştirmek isteyen örgütlere, paternalist liderliğin rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Bu bağlamda sağlık kurumu yöneticilerinin paternalist liderlik özellikleri sergilemeleri, hastane çalışanlarının fiziksel adanmışlıkları başta olmak üzere duygusal ve bilişsel açıdan adanmışlıklarını artıracağı ifade edilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paternalist Liderlik
• İşe Adanmışlık
• Hastane Çalışanları
• Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

Investigation of the Effect of Paternalistic Leadership on Work Engagement with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: The Case of Hospital Workers

Öz

The research aims to examine the effect of paternalistic leadership on work engagement in a sample of hospital workers. The study is conducted with 152 employees working in a state hospital in the Central Anatolia Region. The data in the study are collected through a questionnaire. The data collection process is carried out in March-August 2022. SPSS and RStudio programs are used in the analysis of the data. The collected data are analyzed using descriptive statistics, validity and reliability analysis, factor analysis, and partial least squares structural equation modeling. According to the results of the structural equation model of the study, it is determined that paternalistic leadership has a positive effect on cognitive, emotional, and physical engagement. It is also determined that the highest path coefficient is between paternalistic leadership and physical engagement. This research emphasizes the role of paternalistic leadership in organizations that want to develop work engagement behaviors in their employees. In this context, it can be stated that the paternalistic leadership characteristics of health institution managers would increase hospital workers' emotional and cognitive engagement, especially their physical engagement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paternalistic Leadership
• Work Engagement
• Hospital Workers
• Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling

Kaynakça

1. Arslan, E. T. ve Demir, H. (2017). İşe angaje olma ve iş tatmini arasındaki ilişki: Hekim ve hemşireler üzerine nicel bir araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 24(2), 371–389.
2. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. Scientific Advances an Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical, and Cultural Contributions (London: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 4–45.
3. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied psychology, 49(1), 192–221.
4. Aycan, Z., Schyns, B., Sun, J. M., Felfe, J. ve Saher, N. (2013). Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 962-969.
5. Aydemir, C. ve Endirlik, H. (2019). İşe adanmışlığın bazı demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(3), 1093–1107.
6. Bağcıoğlu, D. ve Kaygın, E. (2018). Çalışanların öz yeterliliklerinin ve esenlik algılarının işe adanmışlıklarına etkisi: İlaç sektörü örneği. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 607–626.
7. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. ve Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 1(1), 389–411.
8. Baş, T. (2010). Anket (6. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.

9. Bedi, A. (2020). A meta‐analytic review of paternalistic leadership. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 960–1008.
10. Cenkci, A. T. ve Özçelik, G. (2015). Leadership styles and subordinate work engagement: The moderating impact of leader gender. Global Business & Management Research, 7(4).
11. Chen, X.-P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T.-J., Farh, J.-L. ve Cheng, B.-S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796–819.
12. Chou, W.-J., Sibley, C. G., Liu, J. H., Lin, T.-T. ve Cheng, B.-S. (2015). Paternalistic leadership profiles: A person-centered approach. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 685–710.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ, 20–26.
14. Çağatay, A. ve Arslan, Ü. (2020). Hastane çalışanlarına göre yöneticilerin çatışma çözme stratejileri. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(4), 2300–2310.
15. Çetinkaya, F. F. (2021). Paternalist liderliğin örgütsel sinizme etkisi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(80), 1662–1681.
16. Ensari, M., Bektaş, G. ve Nal, M. (2020). The Intermediate Role of Employee Loyalty in The Effect of Paternalist Leadership on Work Engagement: A Research in The Health Sector. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 1009–1017.
17. Farh, J.-L. ve Cheng, B.-S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. Management and organizations in the Chinese context içinde (s. 84–127). Springer.
18. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research This, 18(1), 39–50.
19. Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M. ve Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479.
20. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (1 st editi). Sage publications.
21. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
22. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
23. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. ve Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
24. Hair, Joe F, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. ve Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
25. He, G., An, R. ve Hewlin, P. F. (2019). Paternalistic leadership and employee well-being: A moderated mediation model. Chinese Management Studies, 13(3), 645–663.
26. He, G., Wang, Y., Zheng, X., Guo, Z. ve Zhu, Y. (2021). Linking paternalistic leadership to work engagement among Chinese expatriates: a job demand-resource perspective. International Journal of Manpower, 43(4), 889-909.
27. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115–135.
28. Jackson, T. (2016). Paternalistic leadership: The missing link in cross-cultural leadership studies? Içinde International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(1), 3–7.
29. Kılınç, E. (2018). Sağlık kurumlarında paternalist liderlik modelinin incelenmesi. Journal of Healthcare Management and Leadership, 1, 1–12.
30. Koçak, Ö. E. ve Aydın Küçük, B. (2021). How does paternalistic leadership affect employees’ work engagement? The mediating roles of workaholism and trust-in-leader. The Journal of Humanity and Society, 11(3), 179-196.
31. Kurtpınar, M. (2011). Birey-örgüt uyumunun bireysel performans üzerindeki etkisinde kişilik özellikleri ve işe adanmışlığın rolü [Yüksek Lisans Tezi].. Genelkurmay Başkanlığı, Harp Akademileri Komutanlığı.
32. Lau, W. K., Pham, L. N. T. ve Nguyen, L. D. (2019). Remapping the construct of paternalistic leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(7), 764-776.
33. Mansur, J., Sobral, F. ve Goldszmidt, R. (2017). Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 702–713.
34. Martins, J. M., Kashif, U., Dantas, R. M., Rafiq, M. ve Lucas, J. L. (2022). Impact of Paternal Leadership on Employee Retention during COVID-19: Financial Crunch or Financial Gain. Social Sciences, 11(10), 485.
35. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O. ve Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11–35.
36. Nal, M. (2018). Sağlık yöneticilerinin paternalist liderlik davranışlarının çalışanların iş doyumu ve örgütsel adalet algısı ilişkilerinin incelenmesi [Doktora Tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
37. Nal, M. ve Sevim, E. (2020). The effect of paternalist leadership on work engagement: a research on health workers. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, 6(10), 90–107.
38. Nal, M. ve Sevim, E. (2021). The Intermediary Role of Work Engagement in The Effect of Paternalist Leadership on Positive Voice Behavior. Gümüshane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Science/Gümüshane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 12(3), 1130-1140.
39. Öge, E., Çetin, M. ve Top, S. (2018). The effects of paternalistic leadership on workplace loneliness, work family conflict and work engagement among air traffic controllers in Turkey. Journal of Air Transport Management, 66, 25–35.
40. Öner, Z. H. (2012). Servant leadership and paternalistic leadership styles in the Turkish business context: A comparative empirical study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(3), 300-316.
41. Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of international business studies, 37(2), 264–279.
42. Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of management, 34(3), 566–593.
43. Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A. ve Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 391–420.
44. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A. ve Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
45. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. . ve Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. C. Homburg, M. Klarmann ve A. Vomberg (Ed.), Handbook of market research. Springer, Heidelberg.
46. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R. ve Hair Jr, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of family business strategy, 5(1), 105–115.
47. Schaufeli, W. B. ve Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
48. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. ve Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71–92.
49. Shafi, M. Q., Raza, A., Haider, A. ve Gul, N. (2021). Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Organizational Readiness for Change: Mediating Role of Employee Engagement and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 11(1), 126–143.
50. Shu, C., Dai, J. M., Wu, N., Zhang, D., Cheng, R., Yu, H. B., Gao, J. L., Fu, H. ve Sun, C. X. (2018). Mediating effect of work engagement between job stress and depressive symptoms in State Grid employees. Zhonghua lao Dong wei Sheng zhi ye Bing za zhi= Zhonghua Laodong Weisheng Zhiyebing Zazhi= Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, 36(4), 257–259.
51. Tang, C. ve Naumann, S. E. (2015). Paternalistic leadership, subordinate perceived leader–member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(3), 291–306.
52. Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Shimazu, A. (2010). The push and pull of work: About the difference between workaholism and work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York.
53. Tokmak, M. (2019). Algılanan üst yönetim desteğinin işe adanmışlık üzerine etkisi: Bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 36, 273–290.
54. Tuan, L. T. (2018). Driving employees to serve customers beyond their roles in the Vietnamese hospitality industry: The roles of paternalistic leadership and discretionary HR practices. Tourism Management, 69, 132–144.
55. Wang, A.-C., Tsai, C.-Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H.-C., Huang, M.-P., Chou, L.-F. ve Cheng, B.-S. (2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 686–697.
56. Wang, Y., Gao, Y. ve Xun, Y. (2021). Work engagement and associated factors among dental nurses in China. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 1–9.
57. Xu, Q., Zhao, Y., Xi, M. ve Zhao, S. (2018). Impact of benevolent leadership on follower taking charge: Roles of work engagement and role-breadth self-efficacy. Chinese Management Studies, 12(4), 741-755.
58. Zhiying, T. (2017). The impact of paternalistic leadership on innovation and performance in Chinese public hospitals. ISCTE-Instituto Universitario de Lisboa (Portugal).