GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERDE BORÇ VADE YAPILARININ BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Yıl 2020, , 466 - 479, 10.06.2020

Rümeysa Bilgin

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.671199

Öz

Bu çalışma, gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki firmaların borç vade yapılarının firma ve ülkeye özgü belirleyicilerini inceleyerek literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır. Kullanılan panel veri seti, 2011'den 2018'e kadar 8 yıl boyunca 30 ülkeden 3981 firmayı kapsamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamına alınan ülkeler, verilerin ulaşılabilirliğine bağlı olarak gelişmekte olan ekonomiler ve geçiş ekonomileri arasından seçilmiştir. Borç vade yapılarının ülkeye ve firmaya özgü belirleyicilerini ayrıştırmak için çok düzeyli (hiyerarşik) bir modelleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Varyans bileşenleri analizi sonucunda borç vade yapılarındaki toplam değişkenliğin sırasıyla% 15 ve% 50'sinin ülke ve firma düzeyindeki faktörlerden kaynaklandığı bulgulanmıştır. Aktif vade yapısı, firma kalitesi, firma büyüklüğü, kaldıraç oranı ve büyüme imkânı değişkenleri, borç vade yapısının firmaya özel belirleyicileri olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bunlara ek olarak banka yoğunlaşması ve borsa gelişmişliğinin de firmaların borç vade yapılarını etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Borç Vade Yapısı, Borç Vade Yapısının Belirleyicileri, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler, Panel Veri Analizi, Çok Düzeyli Modelleme

THE DETERMINANTS OF DEBT MATURITY STRUCTURES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Öz

The study contributes to the literature by examining the firm- and country-specific determinants of the debt maturity structures in developing countries. The sample panel data set comprises of 3981 firms from 30 countries for 8 years from 2011 to 2018. Countries are selected among developing and transition economies based on data availability. A multilevel modelling methodology is employed in order to decompose the determinants of debt maturity. Variance components analysis revealed that country-level and firm-level are the causes of 15% and 50% of the total variability in debt maturity structures, respectively. Asset maturity, firm quality, firm size, leverage and growth opportunity are detected as firm-specific determinants of debt maturity. Besides, it is found that bank concentration and stock market development are also effective on the debt maturity structures of firms. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Debt Maturity Structure, Determinants of Debt Maturity, Developing Countries, Panel Data Analysis, Multilevel Modelling

Kaynakça

• Agca, S., De Nicolo, G. and Detragiache, E. (2015). Financial reforms, financial openness, and corporate debt maturity: International evidence. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(2), 61-75.
• Alvarez-Botas, C. and González-Méndez, V. M. (2019). Corporate debt maturity and economic development. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(5), 669-687.
• Antoniou, A., Guney, Y. and Paudyal, K. (2006). The determinants of debt maturity structure: Evidence from France, Germany and The UK. European Financial Management, 12(2), 161-194.
• Barclay, M. J. and Smith Jr., C. W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 609-631.
• Bilgin, R. (2019). Relative importance of country and firm-specific determinants of capital structure: A multilevel approach. Prague Economic Papers, 28(5), 499-515.
• De Jong, A., Kabir, R. and Nguyen, T. T. (2008). Capital structure around the world: The roles of firm-and country-specific determinants. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1954-1969.
• De Leeuw, J., Meijer, E. and Goldstein, H. (2008). Handbook of multilevel analysis. New York: Springer.
• Deesomsak, R., Paudyal, K. and Pescetto, G. (2009). Debt maturity structure and the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19(1), 26-42.
• Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (1999). Institutions, financial markets, and firms' choice of debt maturity. Journal of Financial Economics, 54 (1999), 295-336.
• Diamond, D. W. (1991). Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3), 709-737.
• Fan, J. P., Titman, S. and Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(01), 23-56.
• Flannery, M. J. (1986). Asymmetric information and risky debt maturity choice. The Journal of Finance, 41(1), 19-37.
• Giannetti, M. (2003). Do better institutions mitigate agency problems? Evidence from corporate finance choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 185-212.
• Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel statistical models. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
• Gonzalez, V. M. (2015). The financial crisis and corporate debt maturity: The role of banking structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 310-328.
• González, V. M. (2017). Firm and country determinants of debt maturity: New international evidence. International Finance, 20(3), 256-270.
• Gonzalez, V. M. and González, F. (2008). Influence of bank concentration and institutions on capital structure: New international evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 363-375.
• Hsiao, C. (1974). Statistical inference for a model with both random cross-sectional and time effects. International Economic Review, 15(1), 12-30.
• Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Hsiao, C. and Pesaran, M. (2004). Random coefficient panel data models. (Working Paper, No. 1233). Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (Cesifo).
• Kane, A., Marcus, A. J. and McDonald, R. L. (1985). Debt policy and the rate of return premium to leverage. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 479-499.
• Kayo, E. K. and Kimura, H. (2011). Hierarchical determinants of capital structure. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(2), 358-371.
• Kim, C. S., Mauer, D. C. and Stohs, M. H. (1995). Corporate debt maturity policy and investor tax-timing options: Theory and evidence. Financial Management, 24(1), 33-45.
• Kirch, G. and Terra, P. R. S. (2012). Determinants of corporate debt maturity in south America: Do institutional quality and financial development matter? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 980-993.
• Mendez, V. M. G. (2013). Determinants of debt maturity structure across firm size. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 42(158), 187-209.
• Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-175.
• Orman, C. and Köksal, B. (2017). Debt maturity across firm types: Evidence from a major developing economy. Emerging Markets Review, 30, 169-199.
• Peisen, L. I. U., Houjian, L. I. and Huang, S. (2018). Does bank concentration affect debt maturity? Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 21(3), 2537-6071.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407-443.
• Pour, E. K. and Lasfer, M. (2019). Taxes, governance, and debt maturity structure: international evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 58, 136-161.
• Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
• Smith, C. W. and Warner, J. B. (1979). Bankruptcy, secured debt, and optimal capital structure: Comment. The Journal of Finance, 34(1), 247-251.
• Stohs, M. H. and Mauer, D. C. (1996). The determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. Journal of Business, 69(3), 279-312.
• Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of The Econometric Society, 38(2), 311-323.
• Titman, S. and Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19.
• Venanzi, D. (2017). How country affects the capital structure choice: Literature review and criticism. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(4), 1-11.
• Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C. and Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52-69.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420-445.