THE ADAPTATION OF REVISED INDIVIDUAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX INTO TURKISH: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 11 Sayı: Ek, 42 - 49, 20.12.2020

Ahmet Günay , Rukiye Çelik

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.772132

Cited By: 1

Öz

Competitiveness is considered as a personality factor that can affect how individuals behave in their personal and professional lives. The Revised Competitiveness Index consisted of 14 items is a widely used measure developed to measure the competitiveness seen as stable personality trait. The study aims to adapt the Revised Competition Index to Turkish. The Revised Competitiveness Index was first translated into Turkish by experts and then translated back into the source language to determine the suitability of the translation and the Turkish form took its final shape. The construct validity, internal consistency and corrected item correlations of this Turkish scale applied to 430 university students are examined. As a result of factor and reliability analysis, 3 statements are taken from the scale. Thus, a two-dimensional structure, such as Enjoyment of Competition and Avoiding of Contention (cronbach alpha: 0.936 and 0.807), is achieved in accordance with the original of the scale. As a result of the study, it is determined that the Individual Competitiveness Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool suitable for Turkish culture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Competition, Competitiveness, Competitiveness Scale

BİREYSEL REKABETÇİLİK ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇE UYARLAMA, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Rekabetçilik, bireylerin kişisel ve mesleki yaşamlarında nasıl davranacaklarını etkileyebilen bir kişilik faktörü olarak değerlendirilmektedir. İstikrarlı bir kişilik özelliği olarak görülen rekabetçiliği ölçmek için geliştirilen 14 maddelik revize edilmiş Rekabet İndeksi, yaygın kullanılan bir araçtır. Bu çalışma, Revize Edilmiş Rekabet Ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlamasını amaçlamaktadır. Öncelikle uzmanlar tarafından Türkçe’ye çevirisi yapılan Rekabet Ölçeği, çevirinin uygunluğunun tespiti için tekrar kaynak dile çevrilmiş ve Türkçe formun son hali verilmiştir. 430 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanan bu Türkçe ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği, iç tutarlılığı ve düzeltilmiş madde korelasyonları incelenmiştir. Faktör ve güvenilirlik analizi neticesinde ölçekten 3 ifade çıkarılmıştır. Böylece ölçeğin aslına uygun olarak Rekabetten Hoşlanma ve Yarışmadan Kaçınma (cronbach alpha: 0,936 ve 0,807) şeklindeki iki boyutlu yapıya ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, Bireysel Rekabetçilik Ölçeğinin, Türk kültürüne uygun, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rekabet, Rekabetçilik, Rekabet Ölçeği

Kaynakça

• Bailey, K. M. ve Nunan, D. (1998). Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Bryman, A. ve Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
• Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.
• Ediger, M. (2000). Competition versus cooperation and pupil achievement. College Student, 34(1), 14–22.
• Furnham, A., Kırkcaldy, B.D. ve Lynn, R. (1994). National attitudes to competitiveness, money, and work among young people: First, second, and third world differences. Human Relations, 47, 119-132.
• Griffin-Pierson, S. (1990). The competitiveness questionnaire: A measure of two components of competitiveness. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23(3), 108–115.
• Harris, P. B. ve Houston, J. M. (2010). A reliability analysis of the revised competitiveness index. Psychological reports, 106(3), 870-874.
• Helmreich, R. L. ve Spence, J. T. (1978). Work and family orientation questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and at¬titudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(35), Manuscript No. 1677.
• Houston, J. M., Carter, D. ve Smither, R. D. (1997) Competitiveness in elite profes¬sional athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1447-1454.
• Houston, J. M., Farese, D. M. ve La Du, T. (1992) Assessing competitiveness: a valida¬tion study of the Competitiveness Index. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1153-1156.
• Houston, J. M., Harris, P. B., McIntire, S. ve Francis, D. (2002) Revising the com¬petitiveness index. Psychological Reports, 90, 31-34.
• Houston, J. M., Harris, P. B., Moore, R. ve Brummett, R. (2005). Competitiveness among Japanese, Chinese, and American undergraduate students. Psychological Reports, 97(1), 205–212.
• Houston, J. M., Kinnie, J., Lupo, B., Terry, C. ve Ho, S. S. (2000). Competitiveness and conflict behavior in simulation of a social dilemma. Psychological Reports, 86, 1219-1225.
• Howitt, D. ve Cramer, D. (2011). Introduction to SPSS statistics in psychology: For version 19 and earlier. (Fifth edition), London: Pearson Education Limited.
• Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlüğü. (2020). Erişim adresi: https://sozluk.gov.tr/, (15 Haziran 2020)
• Jin, Y., de Bot, K., ve Keijzer, M. (2015). Factors associated with foreign language anxiety: A study of Chinese university learners of Japanese and English. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 67–85.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2001). İnsan aile ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Kağitçibasi, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180-186
• Köknel, Ö. (2005). Kaygıdan Mutluluğa Kişilik. İstanbul: Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.
• Martin, H. J. ve Larsen, K. S. (1976). Measurement of competitive-cooperative attitudes. Psychological Reports, 39(1), 303–306.
• Navaro, L. (2015). Haset ve Rekabet. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Newby, J. L. ve Klein, R. G. (2014). Competitiveness reconceptualized: Psychometric development of the Competitiveness Orientation Measure as a unified measure of trait competitiveness. Psychological Record, 64(4), 879–895.
• Riskind, J. ve Wilson, D. (1982). Interpersonal attraction for the competitive person: Unscrambling the competition paradox. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 12(6).
• Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., ve Gold, J. A. (1990). Construction of a hypercompetitiveness attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 630-639.
• Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M. ve Gold, J. A. (1996). Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(2), 374–385.
• Simmons, C. H., King, S. C., Tucker, S. S. ve Wehner, A. E.,(1986) Success strategies: Winning through cooperation or competition. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 126(4).
• Smither, R. D. ve Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: The development and validation of the competitiveness index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(2), 407–418.
• Sosyal, Ş. H. (2005). Davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (Sixth edition), United States: Pearson Education.
• Terry, C. (2000). Predicting conflict behavior: investigating the subscales of the com¬petitiveness index. Poster presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Southeast¬ern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
• Triplett, N. (1897) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. Ameri¬can Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.