Farklı Direnç Sınıflarındaki Kerestelerin Bazı Mekanik Özelliklerinin Tahribatlı ve Tahribatsız Yöntemlerle Belirlenmesi

Öz

Geleneksel tahribatlı testler, inşaat kerestesinin mekanik özelliklerini belirlemek için kullanılır. Bu testlerden doğru sonuçlar elde edilmesine rağmen, malzemeye zarar verir ve kullanılamaz hale getirir. Sonuç olarak, test edilen malzeme tekrar kullanılamaz ve ekonomik kayıplara neden olur. Ayrıca, tahribatlı yöntemler testleri gerçekleştirmek için bir laboratuvar altyapısı gerektirir ve yerinde değerlendirme sağlamaz. Tahribatlı testlerin bu dezavantajları nedeniyle tahribatsız test yöntemleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Tahribatsız testler, malzemeye hiç veya çok az zarar vererek maliyet kaybını önler, yerinde test olanağı sağlar ve malzemenin tekrar kullanılmasını sağlar. Buna dayanarak, bu çalışmada farklı direnç sınıflarındaki kerestelerin teknolojik özelliklerini tahribatsız ve tahribatlı testlerle belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla keresteler üzerinde tahribatsız vida çekme direnci, makaslama modülü, yoğunluk, eğilme direnci ve elastikiyet modülü testleri yapılmıştır. Bu tahribatsız testlerle bir regresyon eğrisi oluşturmak için yoğunluk, eğilme direnci ve elastikiyet modülü testleri de tahribatlı olarak yapılmıştır. Yapılan testler sonucunda elde edilen veriler kullanılarak oldukça yüksek doğrulukta bir regresyon eğrisi elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kereste Direnç Sınıfı
• TS EN 338
• Tahribatsız Yöntemler
• Tahribatlı Yöntemler
• Kızılağaç.

Determination of Some Mechanical Properties of Timber of Different Strength Classes By Non-Destructive And Destructive Methods

Öz

Traditional destructive testing is used to determine the mechanical properties of construction timber. Although accurate results are obtained from these tests, they damage the material and render it unusable. As a result, the tested material cannot be reused, resulting in economic losses. In addition, destructive methods require a laboratory infrastructure to perform the tests and do not provide on-site evaluation. Due to these disadvantages of destructive testing, non-destructive testing methods have emerged. Non-destructive testing prevents cost loss by causing no or very little damage to the material, providing on-site testing and enabling the material to be reused. Based on this, this study aims to determine the technological properties of timbers of different resistance classes by non-destructive and destructive tests. For this purpose, non-destructive screw withdrawal force, shear modulus, density, bending strength and modulus of elasticity tests were performed on the timbers. In order to create a regression curve with these destructive tests, density, bending strength and modulus of elasticity tests were also performed destructively. A highly accurate regression curve was found using the data obtained as a result of the tests.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Timber Resistance Class
• TS EN 338
• Non-Destructive Methods
• Destructive Methods
• Alder.

Kaynakça

1. Akyıldız H and Malkoçoğlu A. (2001). Screw holding resistance of some important woods growing in the Eastern Black Sea Region. Artvin Çoruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 2(1), 54-60.
2. Bucur V. (2003). Nondestructive characterization and imaging of wood. Springer Science & Business Media. Dong Q., Xing K. and Zhang H. (2017). Artificial neural network for assessment of energy consumption and cost for cross laminated timber office building in severe cold regions. Sustainability, 10(1), 84.
3. Dündar T. (2009). Lecture Note on Nondestructive Test Methods in Building Materials (Unpublished), Department of Forest Industry Engineering, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
4. Gerhards C. (1982a). Effects of conts on stress waves in lumber. Res Pap 384. Forest Products Laboratory, USDA, Washington DC.
5. Gerhards C. (1982b). Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading. Factors affecting applications: state of the art. Forest Products Journal, 32(2), 20-25.
6. Gorgun H.V. and Dundar T. (2016). Comparison Of Acoustic-Based Nondestructive Test Methods for Assessing the Bending Properties of Lumbers. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 16(2), 616-621.
7. Görgün H.V. (2013). Determination of Bending Strength and Modulus of Elasticity in Wooden Beams by Nondestructive and Destructive Test Methods. Master Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Science and Technology. Istanbul.
8. Güntekin E. and Yılmaz T. (2012). Strength classification for red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) timber. Journal of SDU Faculty of Forestry, 13, 140-142.

9. Kasal B., Drdacky M. and Jirovsky I. (2003). Semi-destructive methods for evaluation of timber structures. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. 66, 835-842.
10. Kloiber M., Drdácký M., Machado J.S., Piazza M. and Yamaguchi N. (2015). Prediction of mechanical properties by means of semi-destructive methods: A review. Construction and Building Materials. 101, 1215-1234.
11. Llana D.F., Short I., and Harte A.M. (2020). Use of non-destructive test methods on Irish hardwood standing trees and small-diameter round timber for prediction of mechanical properties. Annals of forest science, 77, 1-13.
12. Olsson A. and Abdeljaber O. (2024). Predicting out-of-plane bending strength of cross laminated timber: Finite element simulation and experimental validation of homogeneous and inhomogeneous CLT. Engineering Structures, 308, 118032.
13. Ondrejka V., Gergeľ T., Bucha T. and Pástor M. (2021). Innovative methods of non-destructive evaluation of log quality. Central European Forestry Journal, 67(1), 3-13.
14. Pellerin R.F. and Ross R.J. (2002). Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood, Forest Products Society Publication, Madiosun, USA, 1-892529-26-2.
15. Ridley-Ellis D., Stapel P. and Baño V. (2016). Strength grading of sawn timber in Europe: an explanation for engineers and researchers. European journal of wood and wood products, 74, 291-306.
16. Ross R.J., Brashew B.K. and Pellerin R.F. (1998). Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Forest Products Journal, 48(1). 14-19.
17. Sandoz J.L. (1989). Grading of construction timber by ultrasound. Wood Sci Technol, 23, 95- 108.
18. Sandoz J.L. (1991). Form and treatment effects on conical roundwood tested in bending. Wood Science and Technology, 25, 203-214.
19. TS EN 14081. (2019). Timber structures-Strength classification of rectangular sawn building timbers-Part 1: General requirements. Turkish Standards Institute.
20. TS EN 338 (2016). Construction timber - Strength classes. Turkish Standards Institute.
21. TS EN 384 (2022). Construction timber - Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density. Turkish Standards Institute.
22. TS EN 408 (2016). Wooden Structures - Building Timber and Glued Laminated Timber - Determination of Some Physical and Mechanical Properties. Turkish Standards Institute.
23. Wang Z., Fu H., Gong M., Luo J., Dong W., Wang,T. and Chui Y.H. (2017). Planar shear and bending properties of hybrid CLT fabricated with lumber and LVL. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 172-177.
24. Yin T., He L., Huang Q., Gong Y., Wang Z. and Gong M. (2024). Effect of lamination grade on bending and shear properties of CLT made from fast-growing Chinese fir. Industrial Crops and Products, 207, 117741.