DETERMINATION OF PHENOLIC SUBSTANCE AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY IN SOME TREE BARK EXTRACTS

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1 - 5, 30.06.2020

Özlem Özgenç , Sefa Durmaz , Selin Şahin Sevgili , Elaf Elhussein

Öz

In this study, the total amount of phenolic substances and antioxidant activity were determined in the extracts obtained from tree barks of 3 coniferious (scots pine, spruce, cedar) and 8 deciduous (poplar, chestnut, oak, pseudoacacia, beech, eucalyptus, iron and mimosa). The tree barks were extracted with alcohol: benzene (1: 2 v / v) solvent according to TAPPI T 204 cm-07 standard. The antioxidant activities (AA) of the extracts were determined by the capture activity of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical. The total amount of phenol in the contents of the extracts (TPM (mg-GAE / g-DL)) was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. It also provides information about the antioxidant activity of the extract due to its total phenolic substance dependence on oxidation-reduction reactions and the total amount of phenolic substance in the bark extract has a linear relationship between TPM (mg-GAE / g-DL) and antioxidant activity (AA). Compared to coniferous tree barks; higher tannin content and antioxidant activity were determined in the leafy (excluding beech) bark extracts. The highest TPM (mg-GAE / g-DL) and AA were found especially in the extracts of mimosa (Acacia Dealbata L.), iron (Casuarina equisetifolia L.), oak (Quercus pontica L.) and poplar (Populus tremula L.) species.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Antioxidation activity, Extraction, Tree bark, polyphenols analysis

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBİTAK

Proje Numarası

117O772

Teşekkür

This work was partially funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK. Project No: 117O772).

Kaynakça

• Aydin S. and Üstün F. (2007). Tanenlerin Kimyasal Yapilari, Farmakolojik Etkileri, Analiz Yöntemleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 33(1). 21-31.
• Durmaz S., Erisir E., Yildiz U. C. and Kurtulus O. C. (2015). Using Kraft black liquor as a wood preservative. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 195. 2177-2180.
• Fengel D. and Wegener G. (1989). Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Harun J. and Labosky P. (2007). Antitermitic and antifungal properties of selected bark extractives. Wood and fiber science. 17(3). 327-335.
• Hillis W. E. (1987). Heartwood and Tree Exudates. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Kartal S.N., Hwang W.-J., Imamura Y. and Sekine Y. (2006). Effect of essential oil compounds and plant extracts on decay and termite resistance of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 64(6). 61-455
• Mihara R., Barry K. M., Mohammed C. L., and Mitsunaga T. (2005). Comparison of antifungal and antioxidant activities of Acacia mangium and A. auriculiformis heartwood extracts. Journal of chemical ecology. 31(4). 789-804.
• Mohan D., Shi J., Nicholas D. D., Pittman Jr. C. U., Steele P. H. and Cooper J. E. (2008). Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere, 71(3), 65-456.
• Onuorah EO. (2000). The Wood Preservative Potentials of Heartwood Extracts of Milicia Excelsa and Erythrophleum Suaveolens. Bioresource technology, 75(2), 3-171.
• Ozgenç O. and Durmaz S. (2016). Anti-Fungal Activity on Some Wood extracts as a Wood Protectant. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting. IRG/WP 16-30684. 7 pp.
• Özgenç Ö., Durmaz S., Kuştaş S. and Erişir E. (2016). The Determination of Antifungal Specialties on Some Tree Bark Extracts. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences. 5(1).
• Pizzi A. and Cameron F. A. (1986). Flavonoid tannins-structural wood components for drought-resistance mechanisms of plants. Wood Science and Technology. 20(2). 119-124.
• Rowell R. M. (2012). Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. Boca Raton: CRC press.
• Schmidt O. (2006). Wood and tree fungi. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 119-133.
• Singh T. and Singh AP. (2011). A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Science and Technology. 46(5). 70-851.
• Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Sen S. and Akcay C. (2013). Antifungal properties of some plant extracts used as wood preservatives. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 85. 23-28.
• Temiz A., Yildiz U. C. and Nilsson T. (2006). Comparison of Copper Emission Rates from Wood Treated with Different Preservatives to The Environment. Building and Environment. 41(7). 910-914.
• Volf I., Ignat I., Neamtu M. and Popa V. I. (2014). Thermal stability, antioxidant activity, and photo-oxidation of natural polyphenols. Chemical Papers, 68(1), 121-129.
• Yang DQ. (2009). Potential utilization of plant and fungal extracts for wood protection. Forest Products Journal. 59(4). 97-103.
• Yu J., Wang L., Walzem R. L., Miller E. G., Pike L. M. and Patil B. S. (2005). Antioxidant activity of citrus limonoids, flavonoids, and coumarins. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 53(6). 2009-2014.