BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 30, 44 - 69, 01.05.2015

Gökhan Orhan Sedat Çobanoğlu

Öz

In this study, administrative reconstruction and reform processes of post-Soviet Russia will be examined. The transition from communism to market economy has brought substantial changes at the administrative domain in Russia. The study explored the players and factors contributed to administrative change and transformation process in Yeltsin and Putin rule. Departing from policy transfer literature, it was also examined whether implementation of public policy took the voluntary or coercive forms. In conclusion, though market economy and centralized administration system seem like a contradiction, this process was explained with reference to ”Doppelganger” which means “dual goes, together moves”.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Russia Administrative Reconstruction Market Economy Centralization

Kaynakça

  • ANJA, Jakobi, and SOMMERER, Thomas, “International Institutions and Poli- cy Diffusion: Sources–Mechanisms-Impact.”, Workshop Proposal for the 2012 ECPR Joint Sessions, 2012, University of Antwerp.
  • AVRAAMOVA, Elena Mihaylovna, “Vosproizvodstvo Adaptatsionnıh Praktik v Period Rossiyskoy Transformatsii”, Obshestvennıye Nauki i Sovremen- nost, 6, 2005, 5-15.
  • BARABAŞEV, Aleksey Georgiyeviç, ZAYTSEVA, Tatyana Vyaçeslovnova, Re- forma Gosudartvennıy Slujbı Rossiyskoy Federatsii, İzdatelskiy Dom GU VSHA, 2006, http://read.ru/id/526198, 14.06.2013.
  • BARABAŞEV, Aleksey Georgiyeviç, KLİMENKO, Andrey (2010), Administra- tivnaya Reforma i Reform Gosudarstvennoy Slujbı v Rossii-Voprosı Rea- lizatsii i Koordinatsii, Gosudarstvennıy Universitet, Moskva.
  • BAYRAMOĞLU, Songül, Yönetişim Zihniyeti: Türkiye’de Üst Kurullar ve Siya- sal İktidarın Değişimi, İletişim Yayınları, Ankara, 2005.
  • BENSON, David, JORDAN, Andrew, “What have we learned from policy trans- fer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited”, Political studies review, 2011, 9, 3, 366-378.
  • BUTTERFIELD, Jim, “Russia’s Costly Decentralization”, 3th Central European Regional Studies Conference, October, Slovakia, 2009.
  • CALOGERO, Marino, “The introduction of new public management princip- les in the Italian public sector” Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences, 6, 30, 2010, 30- 54.
  • CAMDESSUS, Michel, “Russia’s Transformation Efforts at a Turning Point”, In: Address at the Conference of the US-Russia Business Council, March 1995.
  • Cata, Ernesto Harnandes, “Russia and IMF: The Political Economy of Macro-Sta- bilization”, IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment, 94, 20, Sep- tember, 1994, 1-21.
  • CHANG, Duckjoon, “Federalism at Bay: Putin’s Political Reforms and Fede- ral-Regional Relations in Russia”, In: SES-COE Seminar Russian Studies Dialogue: A Korea- Japan Perspective, May. 2005.
  • ÇEVIK, Hasan Hüseyin, DEMIRCI, Süleyman, Kamu politikası: kavramlar, ak- törler, süreç, modeller, analiz, karar verme, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2012.
  • GRUYEV, Sergey Maratoviç, MANAYENKOV Dimitriy Nikoloyaviç i TSUH- LO, Sergey Vladimiroviç, Barter Korporativnoe Upravlenie v Rossii, 2003, http://www.cefir.ru/download.php?id=54, 13.03.2013
  • DOLOWITZ, David and MARSH, David,” Who Learns What from Whom: a Re- view of the
  • Policy Transfer Literature” Political Studies, 1996, 343-351.
  • DOLOWITZ, David and MARSH, David, “Learning From Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making”, Governance,13, 1, 2000, 5-24.
  • ENIKOLOPOV, Ruben, ZHURAVSKAYA, Ekaterina, “Decentralization and po- litical institutions”, Journal of public economics, 91, 11, 2007, 2261-2290.
  • ENGDAHL, William, “How “Shock Therapy” has ruined Russia?”, EIR, 20,19, 1993, 6-8.
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis, Devletin İnşası: Yüzyılda Dünya Düzeni ve Yönetişim, Çev: Devrim Çetinkasap, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2004.
  • FURTAN, William Hartley, “Policy Convergance: Canadian Perspective”, Paper presented at the workshop on North American Trade Relationships: Policy Challenges for 2002 and Beyond, Chicago Illinois, August 2001.
  • GAYDAR, Yegor Timuroviç, “Russian Reform”, Gaidar Institute for Econo- mic Policy, 1996, 1-44. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2144676, 25.04.2013.
  • GAYDAR, Yegor Timuroviç, Gosudorstvo i evolyutsiya, Dni parajenii i pobed, İzdatelstvo Evraziya, 1997.
  • GELMAN, Vladimir Yakovleviç vd., Reforma Mestnoy Vlasti v Gorodah Rossii 1991-2006, Norma, Sankt- Peterburg, 2008.
  • GÜLER, Birgül Ayman, Yeni Sağ ve Devletin Değişimi: Yapısal Uyarlama Politi- kaları 1980-2005, 2. Bs, İmge Yayınevi, Ankara, 1995.
  • HABRİYEVA, Taliya Yarullovna, NOZDRAÇEV Aleksandr Filipoviç i TİHO- MİROV Yuriy Aleksandroviç, “Administrativnaya Reforma v Rossii: Re- şeniye i Problemı”, Jurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, 2, 110, 2011, 3-23.
  • HAKTANKAÇMAZ, İlker, “Reform Transferinde Uluslararası Örgütlerin Rolü”, Review of International Law & Politics, 6, 22, 2010, 23-54.
  • HUTCHCROFT, Paul David, “Centralization and decentralization in administra- tion and politics: assessing territorial dimensions of authority and power”, Governance, 14,1, 2001, 23-53.
  • Korotçeviç, V’itakiy İvanoviç, İstoriya Sovremennoy Rossii: 1991-2003, İzda- telstvo, Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, 2004.
  • KOTZ, David, ”Lessons from Economic Transition in Russia and China”, Politi- cal Economy and Contemporary Capitalism: Radical Perspectives on Eco- nomic Theory and Policy, Eds.Ron Baiman, Heather Boushey, and Dawn Saunders, 2000, 210-217.
  • KOTZ, David, WEIR, Fred, Russia’s path from Gorbachev to Putin: the demise of the Soviet system and the new Russia, Routledge, Londan and New York, 2007.
  • McFaul, Michel, “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatiza- tion in Russia”, World Politics, 47, 2, January 1995, 210-243.
  • MCFAUL, Michel and WEİSS, Kathryn, “The Myth of the Authoritarian Model: How Putin’s Crackdown Holds Russia Back”, Foreign Affairs, 87,1, Feb- ruary 2008, pp.68-84.
  • MARSDEN, Greg, STEAD, Dominic, “Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence”, Transport policy, 2011, 18, 3, 492-500.
  • NİKOS, Michalopoulos, “Trends of administrative reform in Europe: towards ad- ministrative convergence?” International Public Management Review, 2, 2, 2001, 39-53.
  • NEUMAN, William, Lawrence, Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri I: Nitel ve Ni- cel Yaklaşımlar, Çev: Sedef Özge, 2c., 7.bs., Yayın Odası, Ankara, 2014.
  • NISHIMURA, Yoshiaki, “Economic Policy for Transition to Market Economy”, Economic and Social Research Institute Paper, 2001, 1-35.
  • ÖZALP, Ahmet, “Diyalektik Düzlemde Refah Devleti İle Yeni Sağ İlişkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 2008,106- 119.
  • PETROV, Nikolay, “Putin’s Anti-Federal Reform 2: Back to USSR”, Center for Political and Geographic Research, 2004, 1-8.
  • PETROV, Nikolay, LİPMAN, Masha ve HALE, Henry E. (2010), “Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications Hybrid Regimes”, Russia and Eurasia Program, No: 106, February, pp.1-39.
  • Pynnöniemi, Katri, “Russian Foreing Policy Think Tanks in 2002”, Finnish Insti- tute of International Affairs, 2003.
  • ROSKIN, Michael, Çağdaş Devlet Sistemleri: Siyaset, Coğrafya, Kültür. Çev: Bahattin Seçilmişoğlu, Adres Yayınları, Ankara, 2007.
  • SACHS, Jeffrey, “Privatization in Russia: Some Lessons from Eastern Europe”, 1992, The American Economic Review, 82, 2, 1992, 43-48.
  • SCHNEIDER, Eberhard, “centralization is Central”, Hannes Adomeit/Anders Aslund (eds.), Russia versus the United States and Europe-or” Strategic Triangle”?, Developments in Russian Domestic and Foreign Policy, Wes- tern Responses, and Prospects for Policy Coordination, 2005, pp. 29-34.
  • SHEVSTSOVA, Lilia, ”The Political Dimension of Economic Reform under Vla- dimir Putin: Obstacles, Pitfalls, and Opportunities”, NBR Analysis, 13, 2, April 2002, 45-72.
  • SEZEN, Seriye, “Kamu yönetimi reformları: küresel bir düzenleme mi?”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 2009, 42,1, 23-41.
  • SİMONYAN, Renald Hikaroviç, “Reformı v Rossii 1990-h Godov; Ob Argumen- tah ‘Za’”. Sotsiologiçeskaya Publitsistika, 2006, 114-121.
  • SOBACI, Mehmet, Cahit, ” Politika Transferi Bağlamında Ulusal ve Global Dü- zeyde İdari Reformların Analizi”, Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sos- yal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa, 2009.
  • STONE, Diane, “Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusi- on of Policy Ideas”, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionali- sation, Coventery, 2000, 1-41.
  • SUPYAN, Victor, “Privatization in Russia: Preliminary results and socioecono- mic implications”, Demokratizatsiya, 2001.
  • USTYUJANİNA, Elena Vladimirovna, “Drugaya” Çastnaya Sobstvennost: Pri- vatizatsiya Po-Russki, Ekonomiçeskaya Nauka Sovremennoy Rossii, 2, Moskva, 2001, 74-95.
  • WILLIAMSON, Oliver, Eoton, “Markets, Hierarchies, and the Modern Coorpa- ration: An Unfolding Perspective”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 17, 1992, 335-352.
  • WOLMAN, Harold, “Policy transfer: what we know about what transfers, how it happens, and how to do it”, The George Washington University Institute of Public Policy Papers, 2009, 1-31.
  • YAKOVLEV, Poman Püstemoviç, “Osobennosti Formirovaniya i Funktsionrova- niya Grajdanskovo Obşestva v Sovremennoy Rossii”, Vestnik VEGU, 4, 2010, 145-151.
  • YILDIZ, Mete, SOBACI, Mehmet Cahit, “Kamu Politikası ve Kamu Politikası Analizi: Genel Bir Çerçeve”, Kamu Politikası: Kuram ve Uygulama, Der. Yıldız, Mehmet Cahit Sobacı, 1.Bs. Adres Yayınları, Ankara, 2013. 16-42. İNTERNET SAYFALARI
  • https://www.oprf.ru/about/, 10.02.2016
  • https://snob.ru/selected/entry/30178, 28.08.2016
  • http://www.budgetrf.ru/, 20.07.2016
  • http://law7.ru/base41/d4ru5844.htm, 02.07.2013
  • http://law7.ru/base41/d4ru5448.htm, 02.07.2013
  • http://law7.ru/base29/d2ru4168.htm, 02.07.2013

Sovyet Sonrası Dönemde Rusya’da İdari Reform Politikaları

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 30, 44 - 69, 01.05.2015

Gökhan Orhan Sedat Çobanoğlu

Öz

Bu çalışmada Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasından sonra Rusya’da uygulanan idari yeniden yapılanma ve reform süreci incelenmiştir. Komünist yönetim anlayışından piyasa ekonomisi odaklı bir anlayışa geçilmesi, birçok değişimi beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu noktada, Yeltsin ve Putin dönemlerinde değişim ve dönüşüm aşamasında hangi oyuncuların ve faktörlerin sürece dâhil olduğu sorgulanmıştır. Politika transferi yazınından hareketle kamu politikalarının uygulanmasında gönüllü ya da zorlayıcı formların olup olmadığı da incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, piyasa ekonomisi ve merkeziyetçi yönetim anlayışının bir çelişki gibi görünmesine rağmen, bu süreç Doppelganger kelimesinin “çift gezer, birlikte hareket eder” anlamlarıyla açıklanmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rusya İdari Yeniden Yapılanma Piyasa Ekonomisi Merkeziyetçilik

Kaynakça

  • ANJA, Jakobi, and SOMMERER, Thomas, “International Institutions and Poli- cy Diffusion: Sources–Mechanisms-Impact.”, Workshop Proposal for the 2012 ECPR Joint Sessions, 2012, University of Antwerp.
  • AVRAAMOVA, Elena Mihaylovna, “Vosproizvodstvo Adaptatsionnıh Praktik v Period Rossiyskoy Transformatsii”, Obshestvennıye Nauki i Sovremen- nost, 6, 2005, 5-15.
  • BARABAŞEV, Aleksey Georgiyeviç, ZAYTSEVA, Tatyana Vyaçeslovnova, Re- forma Gosudartvennıy Slujbı Rossiyskoy Federatsii, İzdatelskiy Dom GU VSHA, 2006, http://read.ru/id/526198, 14.06.2013.
  • BARABAŞEV, Aleksey Georgiyeviç, KLİMENKO, Andrey (2010), Administra- tivnaya Reforma i Reform Gosudarstvennoy Slujbı v Rossii-Voprosı Rea- lizatsii i Koordinatsii, Gosudarstvennıy Universitet, Moskva.
  • BAYRAMOĞLU, Songül, Yönetişim Zihniyeti: Türkiye’de Üst Kurullar ve Siya- sal İktidarın Değişimi, İletişim Yayınları, Ankara, 2005.
  • BENSON, David, JORDAN, Andrew, “What have we learned from policy trans- fer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited”, Political studies review, 2011, 9, 3, 366-378.
  • BUTTERFIELD, Jim, “Russia’s Costly Decentralization”, 3th Central European Regional Studies Conference, October, Slovakia, 2009.
  • CALOGERO, Marino, “The introduction of new public management princip- les in the Italian public sector” Transylvanian Review Of Administrative Sciences, 6, 30, 2010, 30- 54.
  • CAMDESSUS, Michel, “Russia’s Transformation Efforts at a Turning Point”, In: Address at the Conference of the US-Russia Business Council, March 1995.
  • Cata, Ernesto Harnandes, “Russia and IMF: The Political Economy of Macro-Sta- bilization”, IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment, 94, 20, Sep- tember, 1994, 1-21.
  • CHANG, Duckjoon, “Federalism at Bay: Putin’s Political Reforms and Fede- ral-Regional Relations in Russia”, In: SES-COE Seminar Russian Studies Dialogue: A Korea- Japan Perspective, May. 2005.
  • ÇEVIK, Hasan Hüseyin, DEMIRCI, Süleyman, Kamu politikası: kavramlar, ak- törler, süreç, modeller, analiz, karar verme, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2012.
  • GRUYEV, Sergey Maratoviç, MANAYENKOV Dimitriy Nikoloyaviç i TSUH- LO, Sergey Vladimiroviç, Barter Korporativnoe Upravlenie v Rossii, 2003, http://www.cefir.ru/download.php?id=54, 13.03.2013
  • DOLOWITZ, David and MARSH, David,” Who Learns What from Whom: a Re- view of the
  • Policy Transfer Literature” Political Studies, 1996, 343-351.
  • DOLOWITZ, David and MARSH, David, “Learning From Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making”, Governance,13, 1, 2000, 5-24.
  • ENIKOLOPOV, Ruben, ZHURAVSKAYA, Ekaterina, “Decentralization and po- litical institutions”, Journal of public economics, 91, 11, 2007, 2261-2290.
  • ENGDAHL, William, “How “Shock Therapy” has ruined Russia?”, EIR, 20,19, 1993, 6-8.
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis, Devletin İnşası: Yüzyılda Dünya Düzeni ve Yönetişim, Çev: Devrim Çetinkasap, Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2004.
  • FURTAN, William Hartley, “Policy Convergance: Canadian Perspective”, Paper presented at the workshop on North American Trade Relationships: Policy Challenges for 2002 and Beyond, Chicago Illinois, August 2001.
  • GAYDAR, Yegor Timuroviç, “Russian Reform”, Gaidar Institute for Econo- mic Policy, 1996, 1-44. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2144676, 25.04.2013.
  • GAYDAR, Yegor Timuroviç, Gosudorstvo i evolyutsiya, Dni parajenii i pobed, İzdatelstvo Evraziya, 1997.
  • GELMAN, Vladimir Yakovleviç vd., Reforma Mestnoy Vlasti v Gorodah Rossii 1991-2006, Norma, Sankt- Peterburg, 2008.
  • GÜLER, Birgül Ayman, Yeni Sağ ve Devletin Değişimi: Yapısal Uyarlama Politi- kaları 1980-2005, 2. Bs, İmge Yayınevi, Ankara, 1995.
  • HABRİYEVA, Taliya Yarullovna, NOZDRAÇEV Aleksandr Filipoviç i TİHO- MİROV Yuriy Aleksandroviç, “Administrativnaya Reforma v Rossii: Re- şeniye i Problemı”, Jurnal Rossiyskogo Prava, 2, 110, 2011, 3-23.
  • HAKTANKAÇMAZ, İlker, “Reform Transferinde Uluslararası Örgütlerin Rolü”, Review of International Law & Politics, 6, 22, 2010, 23-54.
  • HUTCHCROFT, Paul David, “Centralization and decentralization in administra- tion and politics: assessing territorial dimensions of authority and power”, Governance, 14,1, 2001, 23-53.
  • Korotçeviç, V’itakiy İvanoviç, İstoriya Sovremennoy Rossii: 1991-2003, İzda- telstvo, Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, 2004.
  • KOTZ, David, ”Lessons from Economic Transition in Russia and China”, Politi- cal Economy and Contemporary Capitalism: Radical Perspectives on Eco- nomic Theory and Policy, Eds.Ron Baiman, Heather Boushey, and Dawn Saunders, 2000, 210-217.
  • KOTZ, David, WEIR, Fred, Russia’s path from Gorbachev to Putin: the demise of the Soviet system and the new Russia, Routledge, Londan and New York, 2007.
  • McFaul, Michel, “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatiza- tion in Russia”, World Politics, 47, 2, January 1995, 210-243.
  • MCFAUL, Michel and WEİSS, Kathryn, “The Myth of the Authoritarian Model: How Putin’s Crackdown Holds Russia Back”, Foreign Affairs, 87,1, Feb- ruary 2008, pp.68-84.
  • MARSDEN, Greg, STEAD, Dominic, “Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence”, Transport policy, 2011, 18, 3, 492-500.
  • NİKOS, Michalopoulos, “Trends of administrative reform in Europe: towards ad- ministrative convergence?” International Public Management Review, 2, 2, 2001, 39-53.
  • NEUMAN, William, Lawrence, Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri I: Nitel ve Ni- cel Yaklaşımlar, Çev: Sedef Özge, 2c., 7.bs., Yayın Odası, Ankara, 2014.
  • NISHIMURA, Yoshiaki, “Economic Policy for Transition to Market Economy”, Economic and Social Research Institute Paper, 2001, 1-35.
  • ÖZALP, Ahmet, “Diyalektik Düzlemde Refah Devleti İle Yeni Sağ İlişkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 2008,106- 119.
  • PETROV, Nikolay, “Putin’s Anti-Federal Reform 2: Back to USSR”, Center for Political and Geographic Research, 2004, 1-8.
  • PETROV, Nikolay, LİPMAN, Masha ve HALE, Henry E. (2010), “Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications Hybrid Regimes”, Russia and Eurasia Program, No: 106, February, pp.1-39.
  • Pynnöniemi, Katri, “Russian Foreing Policy Think Tanks in 2002”, Finnish Insti- tute of International Affairs, 2003.
  • ROSKIN, Michael, Çağdaş Devlet Sistemleri: Siyaset, Coğrafya, Kültür. Çev: Bahattin Seçilmişoğlu, Adres Yayınları, Ankara, 2007.
  • SACHS, Jeffrey, “Privatization in Russia: Some Lessons from Eastern Europe”, 1992, The American Economic Review, 82, 2, 1992, 43-48.
  • SCHNEIDER, Eberhard, “centralization is Central”, Hannes Adomeit/Anders Aslund (eds.), Russia versus the United States and Europe-or” Strategic Triangle”?, Developments in Russian Domestic and Foreign Policy, Wes- tern Responses, and Prospects for Policy Coordination, 2005, pp. 29-34.
  • SHEVSTSOVA, Lilia, ”The Political Dimension of Economic Reform under Vla- dimir Putin: Obstacles, Pitfalls, and Opportunities”, NBR Analysis, 13, 2, April 2002, 45-72.
  • SEZEN, Seriye, “Kamu yönetimi reformları: küresel bir düzenleme mi?”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 2009, 42,1, 23-41.
  • SİMONYAN, Renald Hikaroviç, “Reformı v Rossii 1990-h Godov; Ob Argumen- tah ‘Za’”. Sotsiologiçeskaya Publitsistika, 2006, 114-121.
  • SOBACI, Mehmet, Cahit, ” Politika Transferi Bağlamında Ulusal ve Global Dü- zeyde İdari Reformların Analizi”, Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sos- yal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa, 2009.
  • STONE, Diane, “Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusi- on of Policy Ideas”, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionali- sation, Coventery, 2000, 1-41.
  • SUPYAN, Victor, “Privatization in Russia: Preliminary results and socioecono- mic implications”, Demokratizatsiya, 2001.
  • USTYUJANİNA, Elena Vladimirovna, “Drugaya” Çastnaya Sobstvennost: Pri- vatizatsiya Po-Russki, Ekonomiçeskaya Nauka Sovremennoy Rossii, 2, Moskva, 2001, 74-95.
  • WILLIAMSON, Oliver, Eoton, “Markets, Hierarchies, and the Modern Coorpa- ration: An Unfolding Perspective”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 17, 1992, 335-352.
  • WOLMAN, Harold, “Policy transfer: what we know about what transfers, how it happens, and how to do it”, The George Washington University Institute of Public Policy Papers, 2009, 1-31.
  • YAKOVLEV, Poman Püstemoviç, “Osobennosti Formirovaniya i Funktsionrova- niya Grajdanskovo Obşestva v Sovremennoy Rossii”, Vestnik VEGU, 4, 2010, 145-151.
  • YILDIZ, Mete, SOBACI, Mehmet Cahit, “Kamu Politikası ve Kamu Politikası Analizi: Genel Bir Çerçeve”, Kamu Politikası: Kuram ve Uygulama, Der. Yıldız, Mehmet Cahit Sobacı, 1.Bs. Adres Yayınları, Ankara, 2013. 16-42. İNTERNET SAYFALARI
  • https://www.oprf.ru/about/, 10.02.2016
  • https://snob.ru/selected/entry/30178, 28.08.2016
  • http://www.budgetrf.ru/, 20.07.2016
  • http://law7.ru/base41/d4ru5844.htm, 02.07.2013
  • http://law7.ru/base41/d4ru5448.htm, 02.07.2013
  • http://law7.ru/base29/d2ru4168.htm, 02.07.2013
Toplam 60 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Gökhan Orhan Bu kişi benim

Sedat Çobanoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Sayı: 30

Kaynak Göster

APA Orhan, G., & Çobanoğlu, S. (2015). Sovyet Sonrası Dönemde Rusya’da İdari Reform Politikaları. Yasama Dergisi(30), 44-69.