Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Özellikleri, Üstbiliş, İnternet Kullanım Fonksiyonu ve Problemli İnternet Kullanım Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Üniversite öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanımı ile ilişkili olabilecek faktörlerin incelenmesinin ve olası risk durumlarının belirlenmesinin önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Üniversite dönemi, bireylerin ebeveyn kontrolünden uzaklaşıp kendi kararlarını vermeye ve hayatlarına yön vermeye başladıkları kritik bir dönemdir. Sorunlu internet kullanımı ile cinsiyet, psikiyatrik tanı, üstbilişsel inançlar ve kişilik arasındaki ilişki gösterilmiş olmasına rağmen, mevcut araştırma sayısı sınırlıdır ve bulgular çelişkilidir. Ayrıca internet kullanım süresinin ve amacının yer aldığı ve tüm bu değişkenlerin birlikte incelendiği herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özelliklerini, üstbilişsel inançlarını, internet kullanım işlevlerini ve problemli internet kullanımlarını tanı, cinsiyet ve internet kullanım süreleri açısından incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Veriler yaş ortalamaları 20.11 olan 696 üniversite öğrencisinden toplanmıştır. Araştırmada, betimsel ve parametrik olmayan bağımsız gruplar karşılaştırma analizleri kullanılmıştır (Mann Whitney U Testi ve Kruskal-Wallis Testi). Bu çalışmada, Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri Ölçeği (BFKÖ), Üstbiliş Ölçeği-30 (ÜÖ-30), İnternet Kullanım Fonksiyonları Ölçeği (İKFÖ), İnternette Bilişsel Durum Ölçeği (İBDÖ) ve Demografik Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, kadınların vicdanlılık ve nevrotizm alt ölçeği puanları daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Analiz sonuçları tanıya göre önemli bir fark olduğunu göstermiştir. Psikiyatrik tanısı olan grubun ölçek puanlarının, nevrotizm, açıklık, kontrol edilemezlik ve tehlike, bilişsel güven eksikliği, ÜÖ-30 toplam puanı ve bilgi işlevleri alt boyutlarında daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Nevrotizm, kontrol edilemezlik ve tehlike, sosyal işlevler, sanal duygusal işlevler, sosyal rahatlık, yalnızlık/depresyon, dürtüde azalma, dikkat dağınıklığı ve İBDÖ toplam puanı alt boyut puanlarının internet kullanım süresi ile doğru orantılı olarak arttığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üniversite öğrencileri
• Kişilik
• Üstbiliş
• Problemli internet kullanımı

Examinatıon of Personality Traits, Metacognition, Internet Use Function and Problematic Internet Use of University Students

Öz

It is thought that it is critical to examine the factors that may be associated with the problematic internet use of university students and to determine possible risk situations. The university period is a critical period when individuals move away from parental control, and begin to make their own decisions and manage their lives. Although the relationship between problematic internet use and gender, psychiatric diagnosis, metacognitive characteristics and personality has been demonstrated, the number of available studies is limited and the findings are contradictory. In addition, no study was found in which the duration and purpose of Internet use were included and all these variables were examined together. In this study, it was aimed to examine the personality traits, metacognitive structures, internet usage functions and problematic internet use of university students in terms of diagnosis, gender and internet usege time. Data were collected from 696 university students that aged mean 20.11. The design of the study was descriptive and nonparametric independent groups comparison analyzes (Mann Whitney U Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test). The Big Five Inventory (BFI) Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), Internet Use Function Questionnaire (IUFQ), Online Cognition Scale (OCS) and a Demographic Form were used in this study. According to the results of the analysis, the Conscientiousness and Neuroticism scale scores of the women were higher. Analysis results showed a significant difference according to diagnosis. It was observed that the scale scores of the diagnosed group were higher in the sub-dimensions of Neuroticism, Openness, Uncontrollability and Danger, Lack of Cognitive Confidence, MCQ-30 Total Score and Information Functions. It was observed that the sub-dimension scores of Neuroticism, Uncontrollability and Danger, Social Functions, Virtual Emotional Functions, Social Comfort, Loneliness/Depression, Diminished Impulse, Distraction and OCS Total Score increased in direct proportion to internet usage time.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• University students
• Personality
• Metacognition
• Problematic internet use

Kaynakça

1. Adalıer, A., Balkan, E. (2012). The relationship between internet addiction and psychological symptoms. International Journal of Global Education, 1(2), 42-49.
2. Akdur, S., Durak Batıgün, A. (2017). Mizah tarzları ile kişilik özellikleri, kişilerarası ilişki tarzları ve psikolojik sağlık arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(39), 1-10.
3. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (2015). Ruhsal bozuklukların tanısal ve sayımsal elkitabı. Beşinci Baskı (DSM-5), Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru Elkitabı (Çev. Ed.: E. Köroğlu). Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 2013).
4. Andreassen, C.S., Griffiths, M.D., Gjertsen, S.R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., and Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90-99.
5. Arpaci, I. (2020). Gender differences in the relationship between problematic internet use and nomophobia. Current Psychology, 1-10.
6. Bahrami, F. and Yousefi, N. (2011). Females are more anxious than males: A metacognitive perspective. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 83-90.
7. Balcı, Ş., Gülnar, B. (2009). Üniversite öğrencileri arasında internet bağımlılığı ve internet bağımlılarının profili. Selçuk İletişim, 6(1), 5-22.
8. Barahmand, U. (2009). Meta-cognitive profiles in anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 169(3), 240-243.

9. Batıgün, A.D., Kılıç, N. (2011). İnternet bağımlılığı ile kişilik özellikleri, sosyal destek, psikolojik belirtiler ve bazı sosyo-demografik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67), 1-10.
10. Benet-Martínez, V. and John, O.P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
11. Bianchi, A. and Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51.
12. Bulut, M.B., Yıldız, M. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özelliklerinin yaşam doyumlarına etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(2), 397-412.
13. Bulut-Serin, N. (2011). An examination of predictor variables for problematic internet use. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 54-62.
14. Burger, J.M. (2006). Kişilik: Psikoloji biliminin insan doğasına dair söyledikleri. (Çev.: İ.D. Ergüvan Sarıoğlu), İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
15. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
16. Cao, F. and Su, L. (2007). Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(3), 275-281.
17. Caplan, S.E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553-575.
18. Caplan, S.E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625-648.
19. Cartwright-Hatton, S. and Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279-315.
20. Casale, S., Musicò, A., and Spada, M.M. (2021). A systematic review of metacognitions in internet gaming disorder and problematic internet, smartphone and social networking sites use. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1494-1508.
21. Ceyhan, E. (2010). Predictiveness of identity status, main Internet use purposes and gender on university students' the problematic internet use. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1343-1355.
22. Chauvin, B., Hermand, D., and Mullet, E. (2007). Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 27(1), 171-185.
23. Chen, Y.L. and Gau, S.S.F. (2016). Sleep problems and internet addiction among children and adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sleep Research, 25(4), 458-465.
24. Correa, T., Hinsley, A.W., and De Zuniga, H.G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
25. Costa Jr, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.
26. Costa Jr, P.T., Terracciano, A., and McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331.
27. Çelik, S., Atak, H., Başal, A. (2012). Predictive role of personality traits on internet addiction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(4), 10-24.
28. Çevik-Saldıran, T. (2021). İnternet bağımlılığında cinsiyet, fiziksel aktivite ve yaşam kalitesinin tahmini etkileri: Üniversite öğrenci örneklemi. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 22(1), 10-19.
29. Çınar, Ç.Y., Mutlu, E. (2019). İnternet bağımlılığının benlik saygısı, dikkat, gelişmeleri kaçırma korkusu, yaşam doyumu ve kişilik özellikleri ile ilişkisi. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 20(3), 133-142.
30. Davis, R.A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187-195.
31. Davis, R.A., Flett, G.L., and Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(4), 331-345.
32. Davis, R.N. and Valentiner, D.P. (2000). Does meta-cognitive theory enhance our understanding of pathological worry and anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3), 513-526.
33. Doğan, T. (2013). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ve öznel iyi oluş. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 56-64.
34. Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K.M., and Walsh, S.P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 739-741.
35. Engelberg, E. and Sjöberg, L. (2004). Internet use, social skills, and adjustment. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 41-47.
36. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
37. Floros, G. and Siomos, K. (2014). Excessive internet use and personality traits. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 1(1), 19-26.
38. Gioia, F., Rega, V., and Boursier, V. (2021). Problematic internet use and emotional dysregulation among young people: A literature review. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 18(1), 41-54.
39. Gocłowska, M.A., Ritter, S.M., Elliot, A.J., and Baas, M. (2019). Novelty seeking is linked to openness and extraversion, and can lead to greater creative performance. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 252-266.
40. Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
41. Goldberg, L.R. (1999). The Curious Experiences Survey, a revised version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and relations to demographic and personality variables. Psychological Assessment, 11(2), 134-145.
42. Görgü, N.S. (2014). Üstbilişsel inançlar ve algılanan ebeveyn tutumlarının endişe ve obsesif düşünceler üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
43. Grekin, E.R., Sher, K.J., and Wood, P.K. (2006). Personality and substance dependence symptoms: Modeling substance-specific traits. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(4), 415-424.
44. Griffiths, M. (2000). Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously?. Addiction Research, 8(5), 413-418.
45. Griffiths, M.D. (1996). Internet addiction: An issue for clinical psychology? Clinical Psychology Forum, 97, 32-36.
46. Gülgöz, S. (2002). Five-factor model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In The five-factor model of personality across cultures (s.175-196). Springer, Boston, MA.
47. Günay, E. (2012). The Effects of internet use on individual's socialization based on personality traits. Yeni Symposium, 50(3), 123-133.
48. Hampson, S.E., Andrews, J.A., Barckley, M., Lichtenstein, E., and Lee, M. E. (2000). Conscientiousness, perceived risk, and risk-reduction behaviors: A preliminary study. Health Psychology, 19(5), 496-500.
49. Hausenblas, H.A. and Giacobbi Jr, P.R. (2004). Relationship between exercise dependence symptoms and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1265-1273.
50. Irak, M., Çapan, D., Soylu, C. (2015). Üstbilişsel süreçlerde yaşa bağlı değişiklikler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 30(75), 64-75.
51. Ju, Mei hsu. (2000). Research on personal characteristics, the behavior of using Internet and Internet addiction for Taiwanese college study. Unpublished Master Thesis, Taiwan.
52. Kalckreuth, S., Trefflich, F., and Rummel-Kluge, C. (2014). Mental health related internet use among psychiatric patients: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1-11.
53. Kalkan, B. and Bhat, C. S. (2020). Relationships of problematic internet use, online gaming, and online gambling with depression and quality of life among college students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 18-28.
54. Kaval, A. (2018). Lise öğrencilerinde internet bağımlılığının yordayıcıları: Bir yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
55. Keser-Özcan, N., Buzlu, S. (2005). Problemli internet kullanımını belirlemede yardımcı bir araç: “İnternette Bilişsel Durum Ölçeği”nin üniversite öğrencilerinde geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Journal of Dependence, 6, 19-26.
56. Kesici, Ş., Şahin, İ. (2009). A comparative study of uses of the internet among college students with and without Internet addiction. Psychological Reports, 105(3), 1103-1112.
57. Khan, M.A., Shabbir, F., and Rajput, T.A. (2017). Effect of gender and physical activity on internet addiction in medical students. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 191-194.
58. Ko, C.H., Yen, C.F., Yen, C.N., Yen, J.Y., Chen, C.C., and Chen, S.H. (2005). Screening for Internet addiction: An empirical study on cut‐off points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 21(12), 545-551.
59. Ko, C.H., Yen, J.Y., Chen, C.C., Chen, S.H., and Yen, C.F. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(4), 273-277.
60. Koronczai, B., Kökönyei, G., Griffiths, M.D., and Demetrovics, Z. (2019). The relationship between personality traits, psychopathological symptoms, and problematic internet use: A complex mediation model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e11837.
61. Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., and Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768-821.
62. Kuss, D.J., Griffiths, M.D., and Binder, J.F. (2013). Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 959-966.
63. Lenzo, V., Toffle, M.E., Tripodi, F., and Quattropani, M.C. (2016). Gender differences in anxiety, depression and metacognition. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 9, 1-6.
64. Lodi-Smith, J. and Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 68-86.
65. Malouff, J.M., Thorsteinsson, E.B., and Schutte, N.S. (2005). The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 101-114.
66. Marciano, L., Camerini, A.L., and Schulz, P.J. (2020). Neuroticism in the digital age: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 100026.
67. Marino, C., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., Fernie, B.A., Nikčević, A.V., and Spada, M.M. (2018). Personality traits and metacognitions as predictors of positive mental health in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 365-379.
68. Mayda, A.S. (2015). Bir öğrenci yurdunda kalan üniversite öğrencilerindeki internet bağımlılığı ile Beck Depresyon Ölçeği arasındaki ilişki. Konuralp Medical Journal, 7(1), 6-14.
69. McAdams, D.P. and Olson, B.D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517-542.
70. McCrae, R.R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265.
71. McCrae, R.R. and Costa Jr, P.T. (1991). The NEO Personality Inventory: Using the five‐factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(4), 367-372.
72. McCrae, R.R. and John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
73. Metin, A. (2011). Kimliğin toplumsal inşası ve geleneksel kadın kimliğinin aktarımı. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1), 74-92.
74. Morahan-Martin, J. and Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 13-29.
75. Oktan, V. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde problemli internet kullanımı, yalnızlık ve algılanan sosyal destek. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(1), 281-292.
76. Ozer, D.J. and Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
77. Özdel, L., Bostancı, M., Özdel, O., Oğuzhanoğlu, N.K. (2002). Üniversite öğrencilerinde depresif belirtiler ve sosyodemografik özelliklerle ilişkisi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 3(3), 155-161.
78. Öztürk, C., Bektas, M., Ayar, D., Öztornacı, B.Ö. and Yağcı, D. (2015). Association of personality traits and risk of internet addiction in adolescents. Asian Nursing Research, 9(2), 120-124.
79. Öztürk, E. and Kaymak-Özmen, S. (2011). An investigation of the problematic internet use of teacher candidates based on personality types, shyness and demographic factors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 1799-1808.
80. Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J.M., Simmering, M.G. and Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586.
81. Samarein, Z.A., Far, N.S., Yekleh, M., Tahmasebi, S., Yaryari, F., Ramezani, V., and Sandi, L. (2013). Relationship between personality traits and internet addiction of students at Kharazmi University. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research, 2(1), 10-17.
82. Schmitt, D.P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., and Allik, J. (2008). Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168-182.
83. Servidio, R. (2014). Exploring the effects of demographic factors, Internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 85-92.
84. Shapira, N.A., Lessig, M.C., Goldsmith, T.D., Szabo, S.T., Lazoritz, M., Gold, M.S., and Stein, D.J. (2003). Problematic internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depression and Anxiety, 17(4), 207-216.
85. Soba, M., Şimşek, A., Demir, E. (2019). Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine ampirik bir uygulama: Beş faktör kişilik modeli. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 28-43.
86. Somer, O. (1998). Beş-faktör kişilik model. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 1(2), 35-62.
87. Soule, L.C., Shell, L.W., and Kleen, B.A. (2003). Exploring internet addiction: Demographic characteristics and stereotypes of heavy internet users. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(1), 64-73.
88. Spada, M.M. and Wells, A. (2009). A metacognitive model of problem drinking. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 16(5), 383-393.
89. Spada, M.M., Langston, B., Nikčević, A., and Moneta, G.B. (2008). The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2325-2335.
90. Suler, J.R. (1999). To get what you need: Healthy and pathological internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(5), 385-393.
91. Sun, X., Zhu, C. and So, S.H.W. (2017). Dysfunctional metacognition across psychopathologies: A meta-analytic review. European Psychiatry, 45, 139-153.
92. Sümer, N., Lajunen, T., and Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident. Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application. Elsevier LTD, pp.215-227.
93. Tahiroğlu, A.Y., Çelik, G.G., Fettahoğlu, C., Yıldırım, V., Toros, F., Avcı, A., ..., Uzel, M. (2010). Problematic internet use in the psychiatric sample compared community sample. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 47(3), 241-247.
94. Thompson, E.R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English big-five mini-markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 542-548.
95. Tosun, A., Irak, M. (2008). Üstbiliş Ölçeği-30'un Türkçe uyarlaması, geçerliği, güvenirliği, kaygı ve obsesif-kompülsif belirtilerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(1), 67-80.
96. Tsai, H.F., Cheng, S.H., Yeh, T.L., Shih, C.C., Chen, K.C., Yang, Y.C., and Yang, Y.K. (2009). The risk factors of Internet addiction-a survey of university freshmen. Psychiatry Research, 167(3), 294-299.
97. Turhan, Ö. (2019). Beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde depresyonun aracılık rolü. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5, 9-21.
98. Wästlund, E., Norlander, T., and Archer, T. (2001). Internet blues revisited: Replication and extension of an Internet paradox study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 385-391.
99. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., and Harkness, A.R. (1994). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 18-31.
100. Weiser, E.B. (2000). Gender differences in internet use patterns and internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 167-178.
101. Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
102. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
103. Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. New York: Guilford Press.
104. Wells, A. and Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A Short Form of The Metacognitions Questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(4), 385-396.
105. Wells, A. and Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion. A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
106. Wells, A. and Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 881-888.
107. Winter, K.A. and Kuiper, N.A. (1997). Individual differences in the experience of emotions. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(7), 791-821.
108. Yao, M.Z., He, J., Ko, D.M., and Pang, K. (2014). The influence of personality, parental behaviors, and self-esteem on Internet addiction: A study of Chinese college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 104-110.
109. Yılmaz, A.E., Gençöz, T., and Wells, A. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Metacognitions Questionnaire‐30 and metacognitive predictors of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a Turkish sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 15(6), 424-439.
110. Young, K.S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.
111. Young, K.S. and Rodgers, R.C. (1998, April). Internet addiction: Personality traits associated with its development. In 69th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association (pp. 40-50).
112. Young, K., Pistner, M., O'mara, J., and Buchanan, J. (1999). Cyber disorders: The mental health concern for the new millennium. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2(5), 475-479.