NORMATIVE POWER POLICY IN EUROPEAN UNION-AFRİCA RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COTONOU AGREEMENT AND THE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS AND ITS IMPACTS ON EMPOWERING AFRICA

Öz

This study analyzes the normative power policy of the European Union (EU) in its relationships with Africa through the Cotonou Agreement, which includes normative provisions and conditionality, and the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). The study also tries to evaluate how effective the EU's normative power policy towards the continent and these agreements developed within the framework of the normative values are in the strengthening of the region. In the study, which was conducted by using the literature review method, current articles, books, and reports on the subject have been examined. The results of the study revealed that the normative power policy of the EU in its relations with Africa has been based on a realistic strategy rather than an idealist approach, and this policy has been used to realize the EU's political and economic interests, which have been the basis of its relations with the countries in the continent where the EU has a colonial past. In other words, the study argues that the normative power used by the EU in its relations with Africa is based on the economic interests of the EU. Therefore, it has been argued that the normative power policy of the EU towards the continent, the Cotonou Agreement developed within the framework of normative values, and the EPA has not been effective in improving and developing Africa. In particular, the EU practices cannot be implemented in compliance with the normative values it has set forth as part of the economic and commercial cooperation. The promotion of the values, the strengthening, and development of the continent might be kept relatively in the second place by the Union by prioritizing its own interests in economy and commercial cooperation. In this context, considering the structure and basic needs of the continent rather than the interests of the member states in the EU's normative approach to the continent will both ensure consistency in the normative approach of the EU by preventing the interests of the Union and its member states from getting ahead of EU norms and will be extremely important in the development and strengthening of the continent.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Union
• Africa
• Normative Power
• Cotonou Agreement
• Economic Partnership Agreement

COTONOU ANLAŞMASI VE EKONOMİK ORTAKLIK ANLAŞMALARI BAĞLAMINDA AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ-AFRİKA İLİŞKİLERİNDE NORMATİF GÜÇ POLİTİKASI VE AFRİKA’YI GÜÇLENDİRMEDEKİ ETKİSİ

Öz

This study analyzes the normative power policy of the European Union (EU) in its relationships with Africa through the Cotonou Agreement, which includes normative provisions and conditionality, and the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). The study also tries to evaluate how effective the EU's normative power policy towards the continent and these agreements developed within the framework of the normative values are in the strengthening of the region. In the study, which was conducted by using the literature review method, current articles, books, and reports on the subject have been examined. The results of the study revealed that the normative power policy of the EU in its relations with Africa has been based on a realistic strategy rather than an idealist approach, and this policy has been used to realize the EU's political and economic interests, which have been the basis of its relations with the countries in the continent where the EU has a colonial past. In other words, the study argues that the normative power used by the EU in its relations with Africa is based on the economic interests of the EU. Therefore, it has been argued that the normative power policy of the EU towards the continent, the Cotonou Agreement developed within the framework of normative values, and the EPA has not been effective in improving and developing Africa. In particular, the EU practices cannot be implemented in compliance with the normative values it has set forth as part of the economic and commercial cooperation. The promotion of the values, the strengthening, and development of the continent might be kept relatively in the second place by the Union by prioritizing its own interests in economy and commercial cooperation. In this context, considering the structure and basic needs of the continent rather than the interests of the member states in the EU's normative approach to the continent will both ensure consistency in the normative approach of the EU by preventing the interests of the Union and its member states from getting ahead of EU norms and will be extremely important in the development and strengthening of the continent.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Birliği
• Afrika
• Normatif Güç
• Cotonou Anlaşması
• Ekonomik Ortaklık Anlaşmaları

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, M. ve Uğur, Ö. (2016) “Avrupa Birliği’nin Dış Politikadaki Aktörlüğüne Etki Eden Güç Unsurları: Sivil Güç, Askeri Güç ve Normatif Güç”, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(1): 213-227.
2. Arts, K. ve Byron, J. (1997) “The Mid-Term Review Of The Lomé IV Convention: Heralding The Future?”, Third World Quarterly, 18(1): 73-91.
3. Arts, K. (2000) “Integrating Human Rights into Development Cooperation: The case of the Lome Convention”, The Hague ; Cambridge, Mass.:Kluwer Law International.
4. Banthia, A. (2007) “Success Of Failure? An Evaluation of Fifty Years (1957-2007) of European Union Development Policy in Africa, Caribbean, And The Pasific”, Political Perspectives, 2(1): 1-36.
5. Bekar, N. (2021). “Avrupa Birliği (AB) ülkelerinin Afrika’daki Kalkınma Programları”, Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(1): 312-345.
6. Berthelot, J. (2017) “Outcomes of The Trade Union Conference on Economic Partnership Agreements – Africa/EU”, https://www.bilaterals.org/?outcomes-of-the-trade-union&lang=en, (06.10.2021).
7. Bicchi, F. (2006) “Our Size Fits All’: Normative Power Europe and The Mediterranean,” Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451733.
8. Bozkaya, Ö. ve Kıncal, A. (2020) “AB’nin Dış Ticaret Stratejisinde Normatif Güç Kullanımı”, Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 28(2): 255-284.

9. Björkdahl, A. (2002) “Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual And Methodological Reflections”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216
10. Börzel, A., T. and Risse, T. (2000) “When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change 4(15)”, European Integration Online Papers, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=302768, (06.10.2021).
11. Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (2006) “The European Union as A Global Actor”, 2nd Edition, New York: Routledge.
12. Cebeci, M. E. (2015) “İdeal güç Avrupa: Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye İlişkileri Üzerinden Bir Çözümleme”, Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23(2): 41-57.
13. Cosgrove, A. C. (1969) “The Common Market and Its Colonial Heritage”, Journal of Contemporary History, 4(1): 73-87.
14. Dağdemir, U. E. (2006) “Avrupa Birliği Genelleştirilmiş Tercihler Sisteminin Az Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Avrupa Birliği’ne İhracatları Üzerine Etkileri”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4): 121-143.
15. Del Sarto, A. R. (2016) “Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, Its Borderlands, and The ‘Arab Spring’”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12282
16. Diez, T. (2005) “Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33: 613-636.
17. Dunne, T. (2008) “Good citizen Europe”, International Affairs, 84(1), 13- 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00686.x
18. Eckes, C. (2012) “EU Counter –Terrorist Sanctions Against Individuals: Problems And Perils”, European Foreign Affairs Review 17, 1: 113-132.
19. Ellickson, C. R. (2001) “The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective From The Legal Academy”, M. Hecter and K. D. Opp (Eds.) Social Norms, New York: Russell Sage, 35-76.
20. European Commission. (2005) “The Trade and Development Aspects of EPA Negotiations”, https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2021/september/tradoc_159786.pdf, (06.10.2021).
21. European Council. “The Cotonou Agreement”, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/cotonou-agreement/, (06.10.2021).
22. European Parliament. “Treaty of Rome”, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-rome, (06.10.2021).
23. Farrell, M. (2005) “A Triumph of Realism over Idealism? Cooperation between the European Union and Africa. Journal of European Integration”, 27(3), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330500190107
24. Flint, A. (2008) “Trade, Poverty And The Environment: The EU, Cotonou and African- Carribean Pacific Bloc”, Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Flint, A. (2009) “The End of A ‘Special Relationship’? The New EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements”, Review of African Political Economy, 36(119), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240902863595
26. Goertz, G. and Diehl, F. P. (1992) “Toward A Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual And Measurement Issues”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(4): 634-664.
27. Göksoy, S. (2013) “Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Zorunlu Eğitim Uygulamaları”, Asya Öğretim Dergisi, 1(1): 30-41.
28. Grilli, R. E. (1993) “The European Community and The Developing Countries”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gruhn, V. I. (1976) “The Lomé Convention: Inching Towards Interdependence. International Organization”, 30(2): 241-262.
30. Güven, S. (2008) “Kalkınmada İşbirliğinde Siyasi Koşulluluk: Lome/Cotonou Ortaklığı-Eleştirel Bakış”, Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Toplulukları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, No:28, 1-215, http://ataum.ankara.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/209/2018/07/Kalkinma-Isbirliginde-Siyasi-Kosulluluk.pdf, (11.09.2021).
31. Işıktaş, Y. (2015) “Hukuk Başlangıcı”, İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi.
32. Jorgensen, E. K. and Laatikainen,V. K. (2004 24–26 June) “The European Union and the United Nations”, Second Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Bologna.
33. Langan, M. (2012) “Normative Power Europe And The Moral Economy of Africa-EU Ties: A Conceptual Reorientation of “Normative Power””, New Political Economy, 17(3), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.562975
34. Hettne, B. and Söderbaum, F. (2005) “Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as A Global Actor And The Role of Interregionalism”, European Foreign Affairs Review, 10(4): 535-552.
35. Hinkle, L., Hoppe, M. and Newfarmer, R. (2006) “Beyond Cotonou: Economic Partnership Agreements in Africa”, R. Newfarmer (Ed.) Trade, Doha, And Development: A Window into The Issues, Washington: World Bank, 263-277.
36. Hoffmann, K. (2010) “The EU in Central Asia: Successful Good Governance Promotion?”, Third World Quarterly, 31(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590903557397
37. Hurt, R. S. (2003) “Co-Operation and Coercion? The Cotonou Agreement Between The European Union and ACP States and The End of The Lome Convention”, Third World Quarterly, 24(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701373
38. Hurt, S. (2016) “Why African States are Refusing to Sign on to EU Trade Deals”, World Politics Review, https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/20411/why-african-states-are-refusing-to-sign-on-to-eu-trade-deals, (02.09.2021).
39. Hyde-Price, A. (2006) “‘Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451634
40. Hyde-Price, A. (2008) “A Tragic Actor? A Realist Perspective of Ethical Power Europe”, International Affairs, 84(1): 29-44.
41. Kaçar, F. ve Öztürk, K. (2017) “Avrupa Birliği’nin Normatif Gücü: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28: 359-370.
42. Karasar, N. (2005) “Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi”, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
43. Karingi, S. Perez, R. Oulmane, N. Lang, R. and Sadni Jallab, M. (2006) “Assessment of the impact of the Economic Partnership Aggreement between the COMESA countries and the European Union”, (ATPC Work in Progress No.37), https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13294/1/MPRA_paper_13294.pdf, (04.08.2021).
44. Karingi, N., S. and Deotti, L. (2008 12-14 November) “Interim Economic Partnership Agreements point to the classic regional trade agreements after all: Shoul African countries really be worried?”, Third African Economic Conference, Tunisia.
45. Krohn, F. (2009) “What Kind Of Power? The EU as An International Actor”, Atlantic Community, 1-19, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.464.7896, (03.10.2021).
46. Lenaghan, P. M. (2006) “Trade Negotiations Or Trade Capitulations: An African Experience”, Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 17(1): 117-141.
47. Lister, M. (1988) “The European Community and The Developing World”, Aldershot:Avebury.
48. Lister, M. (1997) “The European Union and The South”, London: Routledge.
49. Liszkowska, D. (2017) “The European Union as A Normative Power on The Example of The EU-Turkey Relations”, European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2(6): 366-370.
50. Manners, I. (2002) “Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353
51. Manners, I. (2006a) “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond The Crossroads”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451600
52. Manners, I. (2006b) “The European Union as a normative power: A response to Thomas Diez”, Milennium: Journal of Internation Studies, 35(1), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060350010201
53. Manners, I. (2009) “The EU’s Normative Power in Changing World Politics”, A. Gerrits (Ed.) Normative Power Europe in a Changing World: A Discussion, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 9-25.
54. Manners, I. (2011) “The European Union’s Normative Power: Critical Perspectives and Perspectives on The Critical”, R. G. Whitman (Ed.) Normative Nower Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 226-247.
55. Markos, G. (2020) “Post-Colonial Perspective on The Discourse of ‘Normative Power Europe’ in The African-EU Relations”, Journal of Global Economics, 8(6): 1-7.
56. Merlingen, M. (2007) “Everything is Dangerous: A Critique of “Normative Power Europe””, Security Dialogue, 38(4): 435-453.
57. Montana, M. I. (2003) “The Lomé Convention From Inception to The Dynamics of The Post-Cold War, 1957-1990s”, African and Asian Studies, 2(1): 63-85.
58. Okcu, Uyar, E. (2015) “Normatif Güç Avrupa? Avrupa Birliği-Afrika İlişkileri ve Ekonomik Ortaklık Anlaşmaları”, U. B. Yıldız (Ed.) Avrupa Birliği’nin Dış İlişkileri: Bölgesel Politikalar, Bölgeler ve Uluslararası Aktörler ile İlişkiler, Ankara: Nobel, 239-265.
59. Olsen, R. G. (1997) “Western Europe’s Relations with Africa Since The End of The Cold War”, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35(2): 299-319.
60. Oren, N., Luck, M. and Miles, S. (2010) “A model of normative power”, M. Luck and S. Sen (Eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 815-822.
61. Perez, R. (2006) “Are The Economic Partnership Agreements A First-Best Optimum For The African Caribbean Pasific Countries?”, Journal of World Trade, 40(6): 1-27.
62. Pişkin, M. (2016) “Avrupa Birliği ve Sahra-Altı Afrika Arasındaki Ekonomik Ortaklık Anlaşmalarının Ekonomik Etkilerinin İncelenmesi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1): 201-226.
63. Pollack, A. M. (2012) “Living in A Material World: A Critique of ‘Normative Power Europe’”, H. Zimmermann and A. Dür (Eds.) Key Controversies in European Integration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 199-204.
64. Portela, C. Raube, K. (2009) “(In-) coherence in EU foreign policy: Exploring sources and remedies Los Angeles”, European Studies Association Bi‐annual Convention, http://aei.pitt.edu/33122/1/portela._clara_(2).pdf, (06.10.2021).
65. Ravenhill, J. (2002) “Back To The Nest? Europe’s Relations With The African, Caribbean And Pasific Group of Countries”, (Working Paper PEIF-9), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=68D0F055DB4D4F0358CEBAEE0618C618?doi=10.1.1.72.5363&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (02.10.2021).
66. Reichenbach, T. (2008) “A Brief Survey on Normative Power Europe”, Celsius Note for Internal, https://celsius-europe.eu/?page_id=12, (02.10.2021).
67. Sacks, C., C. (1998). EU Development Cooperation in Perspective. C. Cosgrove-Sacks (Ed.) The European Union and Developing Countries: The challenges of Globalization, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 3-35.
68. Scheipers, S. and Sicurelli, D. (2008) “Empowering Africa: Normative Power in EU-Africa Relations”, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996774
69. Sicurelli, D. (2010) “The European Union’s African politicies: Norms, interests, impact”, Ashgate.
70. Sönmez, P. (2015) “Avrupa Birliği’nde Yeni Dönem Postkolonyal İlişkiler ve Göç Politikaları Diyaloğu”, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
71. Stender, F. Berger, A. Brandi, C. and Schwab, J. (2020) “The Trade Effects of The Economic Partnership Agreements Between The European Union and The African, Caribbean and Pasific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data”, (Discussion Paper 7/2020), German Development Institute, https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_7.2020.pdf, (02.10.2021).
72. Stevens, C. (2005) “Economic Partnership Agreements And African Integration: A Help or A Hindrance?”, Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex, 1-14, https://www.ids.ac.uk/download.php?file=files/CSEPAs_SSAWeb.pdf, (04.10.2021).
73. Storey, A. (2006) “Normative Power Europe? Economic Partnership Agreements and Africa”, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 24(3), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589000600976646
74. Tabak, H. (2017) “Normlar, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika”, E. Efegil. (Ed) Dış Politikada Sosyolojik Unsurların Rolü, İstanbul: Gündoğan Yayınları, 139-173.
75. Türk Dil Kurumu. (t.y.) http://www.tdk.gov.tr, (05.10.2021).
76. Traidcraft (2012) “Economic Partnerhip Agreements- Still Pushing The Wrong Deal for Africa”, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59242ebc03596e804886c7f4/t/59e9d5cae5dd5bd36435734f/1508496852067/EPAs+-+still+pushing+the+wrong+deal+for+Africa.pdf, (05.04.2021).
77. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2008) “North-South FTA’s After ALL? A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of The Interim Economic Partnership Agreements: And Recommendations on How They Could Be Made Really Address Africa’s Developmental Objectives”, https://repository.uneca.org/bitstream/handle/10855/14968/bib-57535_I.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (05.05.2021).
78. Vatandaş, S. (2018) “Avrupa Birliği’nin Normatif Gücü: İnsan Hakları ve Demokrasi İdeali Bağlamında Bir Analiz”, Bilge Strateji, 10(19): 149-176.
79. Vogel, C. (2011) “The Africa Policy of “Normative” Power EU Considering Cotonou Agreement and Promotion of EPAs”, GRIN Publishing, 1-15, https://www.uni-koeln.de/phil-fak/afrikanistik/kant/data/Vogel-KANT2.pdf, (06.10.2021).
80. Waever, O. (2000) “The EU as A Security Actor: Reflections From A Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security Orders”, M. Kelstrup ve M. Williams (Eds.) International relations Theory and The Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, London: Routledge, 250-294.
81. Williams, A. (2004) “EU Human Rights Policies: A Study in Irony”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Wong, R.Y.P. (2007) “Foreign Policy”, P. Graziano and M.P. Vink (Eds.) Europeanization: New Research Agendas, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 321-337.
83. Zimelis, A. (2011) “Conditionality and the EU-ACP partnership: A misguided approach to development?”, Austrilian Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2011.595698