Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT

Yıl 2023, , 54 - 87, 01.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1307685

Öz

In today's world, the concept of human rights stands as a beacon of hope, advocating for the fundamental dignity and freedoms of every individual. Rooted in the recognition that all human beings possess inherent worth, human rights provide a universal framework that transcends cultural, social, and political boundaries. They represent a collective aspiration to create a world where fairness, justice, and equality prevail. Throughout history, the concept of human rights has evolved, driven by the need to address pressing societal challenges and protect individuals from oppression, discrimination, and violence. From ancient civilizations to the modern era, societies have grappled with questions surrounding the rights and responsibilities of individuals and the role of governments in safeguarding these rights. Today, human rights encompass a broad spectrum of principles and entitlements that serve as a moral compass for societies worldwide. They encompass civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, recognizing that a person's well-being and dignity are intertwined with their ability to enjoy a range of freedoms, opportunities, and protections.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, M. (1997) “Individualism, Moral Autonomy and the Language of Human Rights”, South African Journal on Human Rights, 13, 501-513.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2010) “Ulus-Devlet ya da Halkın Egemenliği”, (2 ed.), Ankara: İmge.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2010) “Ulus-Devlet ya da Halkın Egemenliği”, Ankara: İmge .
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2013a) “Laik İktidarın Belirmesi” In M. A. Ağaoğulları, and L. Köker, Tanrı Devletinden Kral Devlete”, (6 ed., pp. 11-90), Ankara: İmge.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2013b) “Devlet İktidarının Sorgulanması”, In M. A. Ağaoğulları, and L. Köker, Tanrı Devletinden Kral-Devlete (6 ed., pp. 235-342), Ankara: İmge.
  • Alpkaya, G. (1996) “AGİK Sürecinden AGİT'e İnsan Hakları”, İstanbul: Kavram.
  • Alston, P. (1982) “A Third Generation of Solidarity Rights: Progressive Development or Obfuscation of International Human Rights Law?”, Netherlands International Law Review, 3, 307–322.
  • Annan, K. (2000, 4 3) “We The Peoples: The Role Of The United Nations In The 21st Century" Presented To General Assembly By Secretary-General” Retrieved from https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000403.ga9704.doc.html
  • Aybay, R. (2015) “İnsan Hakları Hukuku”, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bağce, H. E. (2013) “Cumhuriyet, Meşruiyet ve Demokrasinin Doruk Noktası”, In A. Öztürk, Platondan Skinner'a Antik ve Modern Düşünce (pp. 166-187), Ankara: Doğu-Batı.
  • Barbière, C. (2016, 11 28) “Fillon: French Sovereignty and European integration”, Retrieved from Euractiv: https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/francois-fillon-sovereignty-and-european-integration/
  • Bekmen, A. (2010) “Marksizm”, In B. Örs, Modern Siyasal İdeolojiler (pp. 161-252), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  • Bellamy, A. (2011) “Ethics & International Affairs”, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm, 25, 263 - 269.
  • Best, G. (1989) “The French Revolution and Human Rights”, In G. Best, The Permanent Revolution (pp. 101-129), London: Fontana.
Yıl 2023, , 54 - 87, 01.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1307685

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Adams, M. (1997) “Individualism, Moral Autonomy and the Language of Human Rights”, South African Journal on Human Rights, 13, 501-513.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2010) “Ulus-Devlet ya da Halkın Egemenliği”, (2 ed.), Ankara: İmge.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2010) “Ulus-Devlet ya da Halkın Egemenliği”, Ankara: İmge .
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2013a) “Laik İktidarın Belirmesi” In M. A. Ağaoğulları, and L. Köker, Tanrı Devletinden Kral Devlete”, (6 ed., pp. 11-90), Ankara: İmge.
  • Ağaoğulları, M. A. (2013b) “Devlet İktidarının Sorgulanması”, In M. A. Ağaoğulları, and L. Köker, Tanrı Devletinden Kral-Devlete (6 ed., pp. 235-342), Ankara: İmge.
  • Alpkaya, G. (1996) “AGİK Sürecinden AGİT'e İnsan Hakları”, İstanbul: Kavram.
  • Alston, P. (1982) “A Third Generation of Solidarity Rights: Progressive Development or Obfuscation of International Human Rights Law?”, Netherlands International Law Review, 3, 307–322.
  • Annan, K. (2000, 4 3) “We The Peoples: The Role Of The United Nations In The 21st Century" Presented To General Assembly By Secretary-General” Retrieved from https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000403.ga9704.doc.html
  • Aybay, R. (2015) “İnsan Hakları Hukuku”, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bağce, H. E. (2013) “Cumhuriyet, Meşruiyet ve Demokrasinin Doruk Noktası”, In A. Öztürk, Platondan Skinner'a Antik ve Modern Düşünce (pp. 166-187), Ankara: Doğu-Batı.
  • Barbière, C. (2016, 11 28) “Fillon: French Sovereignty and European integration”, Retrieved from Euractiv: https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/francois-fillon-sovereignty-and-european-integration/
  • Bekmen, A. (2010) “Marksizm”, In B. Örs, Modern Siyasal İdeolojiler (pp. 161-252), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  • Bellamy, A. (2011) “Ethics & International Affairs”, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm, 25, 263 - 269.
  • Best, G. (1989) “The French Revolution and Human Rights”, In G. Best, The Permanent Revolution (pp. 101-129), London: Fontana.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zeynep Yücel 0000-0003-4945-1075

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Aralık 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

APA Yücel, Z. (2024). FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(4), 54-87. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1307685
AMA Yücel Z. FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. Ocak 2024;21(4):54-87. doi:10.11611/yead.1307685
Chicago Yücel, Zeynep. “FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 21, sy. 4 (Ocak 2024): 54-87. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1307685.
EndNote Yücel Z (01 Ocak 2024) FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 21 4 54–87.
IEEE Z. Yücel, “FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 4, ss. 54–87, 2024, doi: 10.11611/yead.1307685.
ISNAD Yücel, Zeynep. “FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 21/4 (Ocak 2024), 54-87. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1307685.
JAMA Yücel Z. FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;21:54–87.
MLA Yücel, Zeynep. “FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 21, sy. 4, 2024, ss. 54-87, doi:10.11611/yead.1307685.
Vancouver Yücel Z. FROM NATURAL LAW TO UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;21(4):54-87.