Examining the mediating role of impression management in the relationship between democratic, autocratic, and laissez-faire leadership styles and career satisfaction

Öz

Management styles are influential on many issues in organizational processes. One of these effects is on employees. Employee behaviours and perceptions may differ according to management styles. In this study, the effect of management style perception (Democratic, Autocratic, and Laissez-Faire) on the career satisfaction of employees was investigated. In this relationship, the mediating role of impression management was examined. The research sample consists of 365 white-collar employees in Turkey's manufacturing sector. Survey technique was used to collect primary data. According to the analysis of the collected data results, it was determined that there were significant relationships between perceived management style and career satisfaction and that impression management had a "partial mediation" effect. Since researchers have paid little attention to the impact of management style perception on employee career satisfaction, this study aimed to extend previous research by investigating these associations through the impression management mediating effect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Career satisfaction
• Impression management
• Management style perception
• Manufacturing sector.

Kaynakça

1. Ågotnes, KW, Einarsen, SV, Hetland, J, and Skogstad, A. (2018) “The Moderating Effect of Laissez-Faire Leadership on the Relationship Between Co-Worker Conflicts and New Cases of Workplace Bullying: A True Prospective Design”, Hum Resour Manag J., 28: 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12200.
2. Aish, A. M., and Jöreskog, K. G. (1990) “A Panel Model for Political Efficacy and Responsiveness: An Application of LISREL 7 With Weighted Least Squares”, Quality & Quantity, 24(4), 405-426.
3. Al-Ababneh, M., and Lockwood, A. (2010) “The Influence of Managerial Leadership Style on Employee Job Satisfaction in Jordanian Resort Hotels”, 28th EuroCHRIE Annual Research.
4. Barnett, B. R., and Bradley, L. M. (2007) “The Impact of Organisational Support for Career Development on Career Satisfaction”, Career Development International, 12 (7), 617-636. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710834396.
5. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986) “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
6. Barsness, Z. I., Diekmann, K. A., and Seidel, M. L. (2005) “Motivation and Opportunity: The Role of Remote Work, Demographic Dissimilarity, and Social Network Centrality in Impression Management”, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 401-419. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407906.
7. Basım, N. H., Tatar, İ., and Şahin, N. H. (2006) “Self-Perception, Locus of Control, Level of Achievement of Professional Goals and Stress in Impression Management: A Public Sector Example”, Turkish Journal of Psychology, 21(58), 1-14 https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpd1300443320060000m000152.pdf.
8. Bhatti, N., Maitlo, G. M., Shaikh, N., Hashmi, M. A., and Shaikh, F. M. (2012) “The Impact of Autocratic and Democratic Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction”, International Business Research, 5(2), 192

9. Blau, P. M. (1964) “Exchange and Power in Social Life”, New York, NY: Wiley. Bucata, G., and Rizescu, A. M. (2016) “Management Style as a Triggering Factor for Organization Effectiveness and Efficiency”, Journal of Defense Resources Management, 7(2), 159-164
10. Budiasih, Y., Hartanto, C. F. B., Ha, T. M., Nguyen, P. T., and Usanti, T. P. (2020) “The Mediating Impact of Perceived Organisational Politics on the Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(11), 478-495.
11. Bolino, M. C., and Turnley, W. H. (1999) “Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale Development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy”, Organizational Research Methods, 2, 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922005.
12. Bozeman, D. P., and Kacmar, K. M. (1997) “A Cybernetic Model of Impression Management Processes in Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2669.
13. Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C., and Facer, R. L. (2000) “Individual Conceptions of Public Service”, Public Administration Review, 60 (3), 254 – 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00085.
14. Cameron E. and Green M. (2020) “Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change (Fifth)”, Kogan Page.
15. Celik, F. (2022) “Davranışsal İletişim Araştırmalarında Aracılık Testine Genel Bir Bakış”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 49, 392-410.
16. Ciurea V. I., Brezuleanu S., and Ungureanu, G. (2005) “Management, Editura Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, Iasi, ISBN 978-973-744-168-3, 315-316.
17. Chong, V. K., and Law, M. B. C. (2016) “The Effect of A Budget-Based Incentive Compensation Scheme on Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Trust-In-SupervisoraAnd Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(4), 590–613. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-02-2015-0024.
18. Chukwusa, J. (2018) “Autocratic Leadership Style: Obstacle to Success in Academic Libraries”, Library Philosophy and Practice, 1. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/autocratic-leadership-style-obstacle-success/docview/2164513224/se-2.
19. Cropanzano, R., and Mitchell, M. S. (2005) “Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review”, Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
20. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007) “Research Methods in Education”, (6), New York: Routledge / Taylor and Francis Group.
21. Darlington, R. B. and Hayes, A. F. (2017) “Regression Analysis and Linear Models: Concepts, Applications, and Implementation”, New York: The Guilford Press.
22. De Cremer, D. (2006) “Affective and Motivational Consequences of Leader Self-Sacrifice: The Moderating Effect of Autocratic Leadership”, The Leadership Quarterly. 17, 79– 93
23. Demirdelen, D., and Ulama, Ş. (2013) “Managers’ Opinion and Perceptions of Career Satisfaction: A Study in Five Star Hotels in Antalya”, The Journal of Business Science, 1 (2), 65-89. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jobs/issue/22917/245394.
24. Distefano, C. and Hess, B. (2005) “Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Construct Validation: An Empirical Review”, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225-241.
25. Erhardt, N., and Gibbs, J. L. (2014) “The Dialectical Nature of Impression Management in Knowledge Work: Unpacking Tensions in Media Use Between Managers and Subordinates”, Management Communication Quarterly, 28 (2), 155 –186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318913520508.
26. Eryeşil, K., and İraz, R. (2017) “Investigation of the Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Organizational Commitment a Field Study”, Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Vocational School,129-139. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.345364.
27. Faiz, E., and Uludağ, G. (2019) “A Model Proposal for the Effect of Motivated Consumer Innovation on the Switching Cost and Perceived Value: The Case of Smart Phone Market”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(4), 991-1004. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.215.
28. Feldman, D. C., and Klich, N. R. (1991) “Impression Management and Career Strategies”, Giacolone, R. A. ve Rosenfeld, P. (ed.), Applied Impression Management, London, Sage Pub, 67-80.
29. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981) “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
30. Forret, M. L., and Dougherty, T. W. (2004) “Networking Behaviors and Career Outcomes: Differences for Men and Women?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 419–437. doi:10.1002/job.253.