COMPARISON OF SOCIAL POLICY PRACTICES IN OECD COUNTRIES WITH PANEL ANALYSIS

Öz

This study employs a panel data analysis method to examine the impact of social policy practices in OECD countries on economic development levels. The advent of the Industrial Revolution and subsequent technological developments have led to a widening of the development gap between countries. The study examines the relationships between governance components and gross domestic product (GDP) in detail. Governance is a pivotal factor in the formulation of social policies, with the involvement of the state, private sector and non-governmental organisations. The study demonstrated the impact of the rule of law and other governance components on economic growth. It has been argued that governance practices and social policies have a significant effect on development on a global scale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Governance
• Social Policy
• OECD Panel Data Analysis
• Economic Development
• OECD Countries

Kaynakça

1. Acemoğlu, D. (2003) “Root Causes. Finance Ve Development”, 40(2), 27-43.
2. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009) “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility in Context”, in Global Perspectives on Corporate Governance and CSR, Der. Aras, G. ve Crowther, D., Farnham, England.
3. Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2010) “Governance Without A State: Can It Work?”, Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113-134.
4. Canıkalp, E. and Ünlükaplan, İ. (2015) “Yönetişim Kalitesi Ve Yönetişimin Ölçülebilirliği”, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 81-100.
5. Clark, I. (2000) “Governance, The State, Regulation and Industrial Relations”, Routledge, New York. Das, D. K. (2009) “Two Faces of Globalization”, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
6. Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg P. (2006) “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12 (2), 185-203
7. Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg P. (2006) “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 12(2), 185-203
8. Dinler, Z. and Özdemir, M. (2009) “KPSS İktisat”, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi Yayınları. "Erdut, Z. (2004) “Günümüzde Sosyal Politikanın Açılımlar”, 1. Ulusal Sosyal Politika Kongresi, Yaşam Boyu Sosyal Koruma, Devrimci İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonu, Ankara, Dedeman Otel, 22 24 Ocak, S.32-57

9. Gerber, J. (1987) “Gelişme Stratejileri ve Gelişme İdeolojileri”, Ankara: Yurt Yayınları
10. "Hazenberg, H. (2013) “Is Governance Democratic?”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (1), S.1-23.
11. Hazenberg, H. and Alessandro, M. (2013) “Democracy and Global Governance: The Case for a Bottom-Up and Context Sensitive Approach”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26 (3), 302-318.
12. ILO (2004) “ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean”, International Labour Organization. Jessop, B. (2005) “Cultural Political Economy”, The Knowledge-Based Economy and the State, In Technological Economy (Pp. 142-164). Routledge.
13. Kaufmann, F. X. and Kaufmann, F. X. (2013) “Thinking About Social Policy: The German Tradition”, (Pp. 23-153). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
14. Keune M. and Marginson P. (2013) “Transnational Industrial Relations as Multi-Level Governance: Interdependencies in European Social Dialogue”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3), Eylül, S. 473–497.
15. Keune M. and Marginson P. (2013) “Transnational Industrial Relations as Multi-Level Governance: Interdependencies in European Social Dialogue”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3), Eylül, S. 473–497.
16. Kondo, S. (2002) “Fostering Dialogue to Strengthen Good Governance”, in Public Sector Transparency and Accountability: Making It Happen, OECD, Paris.
17. Özdemir, A. and İnce, G.D. (2021) “OECD Ülkelerinde Sosyal Yardımların Yoksulluk Üzerine Etkisi”, Çalışma Ve Toplum Dergisi, 4 (71), Ocak, S. 2633-2658.
18. Rajagopal, B. (2013) “Global Governance: Old and New Challenges”, in Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration Of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHRC), New York.
19. Rawls, A. W. (2012) “Durkheim’s Theory of Modernity: Self-Regulating Practices As Constitutive Orders of Social and Moral Facts”, Journal of Classical Sociology, 12(3-4), 479-512.
20. Rosenberg, N., Birdzell JR. and L. E. (1992) “Batı Nasıl Zengin Oldu, Endüstri Dünyasının Ekonomik Değişimi”, (Çev. E. Güven), İstanbul: Form Yayınları.
21. Sözen, S. and Algan, B. (2009) “İyi Yönetişim”, Ankara: İçişleri Bakanlığı Genel Yayın No: 654.
22. Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. (2008) “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox (No. W14282)”, National Bureau of Economic Research., P. R., Wells, R., & Olney, M. L. (2008). Fundamentos De Economía. Reverté.
23. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) “New Risks and Social Change”, New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation Of The European Welfare State, 1-28.
24. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2011) “Opportunity and Solidarity”, Journal of Social Policy, 40(3), 453-470.
25. Welz, C. (2008) “The European Social Dialogue Under Articles 138 and 139 Of The EC Treaty”, Kluwer Law Publishing.
26. World Bank. (2024) “Dünya Bankası Yönetişim Endeksi Verileri ve OECD Ülkelerinin Gayrisafi Yurtiçi Hasıla Verileri”, Doi: Https://Www.Theglobaleconomy.Com/