Taking the Bitter with the Sweet: The Paradoxical Role of Inward Foreign Direct Investments in Institutional Quality and Environmental Performance Relationship

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4, 22 - 43, 19.12.2025

Şerife Örs , Tarhan Okan , Fatih Şahin

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1727862

Öz

This study investigates the paradoxical role of inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) in the relationship between institutional quality and environmental performance in least developed countries (LDCs) and developing countries (DCs). Although strong institutional quality is typically associated with enhanced environmental outcomes through increased institutional pressures, it may simultaneously attract IFDIs that exacerbate environmentally harmful activities, particularly in regions perceived as pollution havens. Using panel regression analysis on country-level secondary data from 2013 to 2022, the findings reveal that institutional quality directly improves environmental performance, whereas IFDI negatively mediates this relationship, partially offsetting its benefits. The results suggest that while investment-related environmental risks persist, broader institutional environments continue to exert societal pressures on actors to safeguard environmental sustainability. This study contributes to the literature by providing a more integrated understanding of how institutional dynamics influence environmental outcomes through complex investment channels, particularly within vulnerable economies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutional Quality , Environmental Performance , Inward FDI , Least Developed Countries , Developing Countries

Etik Beyan

Since this study uses country-level data based on secondary data, ethics committee approval is not required.

TAKING THE BITTER WITH THE SWEET: THE PARADOXICAL ROLE OF INWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP

Öz

Bu çalışma, en az gelişmiş ülkeler (LDC'ler) ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde (DC'ler) kurumsal kalite ile çevresel performans arasındaki ilişkide içe doğru doğrudan yabancı yatırımların (DYY) paradoksal rolünü incelemektedir. Güçlü kurumsal kalite genellikle artan kurumsal baskılar yoluyla çevresel sonuçların iyileşmesiyle ilişkilendirilse de, aynı zamanda çevre açısından zararlı faaliyetleri artırabilecek DYY’leri çekebilir; özellikle bu ülkeler “kirlilik cennetleri” olarak algılandığında bu risk daha da belirginleşir. 2013–2022 yılları arasındaki ülke düzeyinde ikincil verilere dayanarak yapılan panel regresyon analizi, kurumsal kalitenin çevresel performansı doğrudan iyileştirdiğini, ancak DYY’nin bu ilişkiye olumsuz yönde aracılık ettiğini ve bu iyileştirici etkinin bir kısmını kısıtladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, yatırım kaynaklı çevresel risklerin devam ettiğini ancak daha geniş kurumsal ortamların çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin korunması yönünde toplumsal baskılar oluşturmaya devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, özellikle kırılgan ekonomiler bağlamında, kurumsal dinamiklerin çevresel sonuçları karmaşık yatırım kanalları aracılığıyla nasıl etkilediğine dair daha bütüncül bir anlayış sunarak literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Kalite , Çevresel Performans , İçe Doğru Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar , Az Gelişmiş Ülkeler , Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada ikincil verilerden hareketle ülke düzeyinde veriler kullanıldığı için etik kurul iznine gerek duyulmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

• Abbas, H. S. M., Xu, X., Sun, C., Ullah, A., Nabi, G., Gillani, S., and Raza, M. A. A. (2021) “Sustainable use of energy resources, regulatory quality, and foreign direct investment in controlling GHGs emissions among selected Asian economies”, Sustainability, 13(3): 1123.
• Abdouli, M. and Hammami, S. (2017) “Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries”, International Business Review, 26(2): 264-278.
• Adams, S. and Opoku, E. E. O. (2015) “Foreign direct investment, regulations and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 47: 48-56.
• Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Riaz, M. F. and Ali, T. (2021) “Improving the environment begins at home: Revisiting the links between FDI and environment”, Energy, 215,: 119150.
• Ali, S., Yusop, Z., Kaliappan, S. R. and Chin, L. (2020) “Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11): 11671-11682.
• Ali, H. S., Zeqiraj, V., Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Yusop, Z., Bare, U. A. A. and Chin, L. (2019) “Does quality institutions promote environmental quality?”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 10446-10456.
• Alonso, J. A. and Garcimartín, C. (2013) “The determinants of institutional quality. More on the debate”, Journal of International development, 25(2): 206-226.
• Asghari, M. (2013) “Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis”, Int J Sci Res Environ Sci, 1(6): 92-100.
• Bakhsh, K., Rose, S., Ali, M. F., Ahmad, N. and Shahbaz, M. (2017) “Economic growth, CO2 emissions, renewable waste and FDI relation in Pakistan: New evidences from 3SLS”, Journal of environmental management, 196: 627-632.
• Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N. and Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2019) “An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 23010-23026.
• Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986) “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173.
• Bhasin, N. and Garg, S. (2018) “Does host country institutional quality act as a differentiator in intra-regional FDI? Evidence from selected Asian economies”, Foreign Trade Review, 53(2): 81-97.
• Bokpin, G. A. (2017) “Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of institutions and governance”, Research in International Business and Finance, 39: 239-247.
• Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. (1997) “Concepts and their measurement: Quantitative data analysis, with SPSS for Windows”.
• Brown, M. B. and Forsythe, A. B. (1974) “Robust tests for the equality of variances”, Journal of the American statistical association, 69(346): 364-367.
• Buchanan, B.G., Quan,V.L. and Meenakshi, R. (2012) “Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence”, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 21: 81–89.
• Caetano, R. V., Marques, A. C. and Afonso, T. L. (2024) “Can sustainable development induce foreign direct investment? Analysis of the complex inward and outward flows of investment in European Union countries”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2): 9756-9783.
• Chandran, V. G. R. and Tang, C. F. (2013) “The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24: 445-453.
• Cong Y, and Freedman M. (2011) Corporate governance and environmental performance and disclosures. Advances in Accounting, incorporating”, Advances in International Accounting, 27: 223–232.
• Contractor, F. J., Nuruzzaman, N., Dangol, R. and Raghunath, S. (2021) “How FDI inflows to emerging markets are influenced by country regulatory factors: an exploratory study”, Journal of International Management, 27(1): 100834.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A. and Ramamurti, R. (2017) “Home country underdevelopment and internationalization: Innovation-based and escape-based internationalization”, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 27(3): 217-230.
• Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H. and Wheeler, D. (2002) “Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve”, Journal of economic perspectives, 16(1): 147-168.
• Deng, P. and Zhang, S. (2018) “Institutional quality and internationalization of emerging market firms: Focusing on Chinese SMEs”, Journal of Business Research, 92: 279-289.
• Dinda, S. (2004) “Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey”, Ecological economics, 49(4): 431-455.
• Dkhili, H. (2018) “Environmental performance and institutions quality: evidence from developed and developing countries”, Marketing and Management of Innovations, (3): 333-344.
• Doytch, N. and Uctum, M. (2016) “Globalization and the environmental impact of sectoral FDI”, Economic Systems, 40(4): 582-594.
• Fakher, H. A. and Abedi, Z. (2017) “Relationship between environmental quality and economic growth in developing countries (based on environmental performance index)”, Environmental Energy and Economic Research, 1(3): 299-310.
• Haque, F. and Ntim, C. G. (2018) “Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3): 415-435.
• Hartmann, J. and Uhlenbruck, K. (2015) “National institutional antecedents to corporate environmental performance”, Journal of World Business, 50(4): 729-741.
• Ilhan-Nas, T., Okan, T., Tatoglu, E., Demirbag, M., Wood, G. and Glaister, K. W. (2018) “Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs”, Journal of World Business, 53(6): 862-879.
• Jacobs, M. (2013) “Green growth”, Falkner, R. (ed.) The handbook of global climate and environment policy (pp. 197–214). John Wiley & Sons
• Judge, G. G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., Lütkepohl, H. and Lee, T. C. (1991) “The theory and practice of econometrics”, John Wiley & Sons
• Khan, H., Weili, L. and Khan, I. (2022) “The role of institutional quality in FDI inflows and carbon emission reduction: evidence from the global developing and belt road initiative countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-28.
• Khan, S. M., Saif-ur-Rehman, & Fiaz, S. (2023) “Impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Institutional Performance and Scientific Innovations on Environmental Degradation: Evidence from OIC Countries”, Research Journal for Societal Issues, 5(1): 194-210.
• Khan, H., Dong, Y., Bibi, R. and Khan, I. (2024) “Institutional quality and foreign direct investment: Global evidence”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3): 10547-10591.
• Kim, H. (2010) “Political stability and foreign direct investment”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3): 59-71.
• Kim, M. S. and Sun, Y. (2016) “Bootstrap and k-step bootstrap bias corrections for the fixed effects estimator in nonlinear panel data models”, Econometric Theory, 32(6): 1523-1568.
• Lau, L.S., Choong, C.K., and Eng, Y.K., (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter?”, Energy Policy, 68: 490–497.
• Levene, H. (1960) “Robust tests for equality of variances”, Contributions to probability and statistics, 278-292. Liao, X., Dogan, E. and Baek, J. (2017) “Does corruption matter for the environment? Panel evidence from China”, Economics, 11(1): 20170027.
• Liu, X., Lu, J. and Choi, S. J. (2014) “Bridging knowledge gaps: returnees and reverse knowledge spillovers from Chinese local firms to foreign firms”, Management International Review, 54: 253-276.
• MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. and Lockwood, C. M. (2000) “Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect”, Prevention science, 1: 173-181.
• Mavragani, A., Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2016). Open economy, institutional quality, and environmental performance: A macroeconomic approach. Sustainability, 8(7), 601.
• Mengistu, A. A. and Adhikary, B. K. (2011) “Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3): 281-299.
• Meyer, A. L., Van Kooten, G. C. and Wang, S. (2003) “Institutional, social and economic roots of deforestation: a cross-country comparison”, International Forestry Review, 5(1): 29-37.
• Neequaye, N. A. and Oladi, R. (2015) “Environment, growth, and FDI revisited”, International Review of Economics & Finance, 39: 47-56.
• Neyman, J. and Scott, E. L. (1948) “Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations”, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1-32.
• North, D. C. (1990) “Institutions, institutional change and economic performance”, Cambridge University. Okan, T., İlhan-Nas, T. and Şahin, F. (2020) “Gelişmekte olan ülkelerden kaçış temelli uluslararasılaşma: Kurumsal bir perspektif”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1-2): 54-86.
• Ozturk I. and Al-Mulali U. (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia”, Ecol Ind, 57:324–330.
• Peres, M., Ameer, W. and Xu, H. (2018) “The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries”, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 31(1): 626-644.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers”, Economics, 1240(1), 1.
• Piteli, E. E., Kafouros, M. and Pitelis, C. N. (2021) “Follow the people and the money: Effects of inward FDI on migrant remittances and the contingent role of new firm creation and institutional infrastructure in emerging economies”, Journal of World Business, 56(2): 101178.
• Sabir, S., Rafique, A. and Abbas, K. (2019) “Institutions and FDI: evidence from developed and developing countries”, Financial Innovation, 5(1): 1-20.
• Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M. and Cetin, M. (2015) “The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52: 347-356.
• Shan, S., Lin, Z., Li, Y. and Zeng, Y. (2018) “Attracting Chinese FDI in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size and institutional quality”, Critical perspectives on international business, 14(2/3): 139-153.
• Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I. and Ozturk, I. (2017) “Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation”, Energy, 124: 706-719.
• Şahin, F. (2022) “Dikey yayılımların yerel kurumsal bağlamı: Türkiye otomotiv sanayii örneği”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Trabzon.
• Tian, L., Zhai, Y., Zhang, Y., Tan, Y. and Feng, S. (2023) “Pollution emission reduction effect of the coordinated development of inward and outward FDI in China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 391: 136233.
• Ullah, I. and Khan, M. A. (2017) “Institutional quality and foreign direct investment inflows: evidence from Asian countries”, Journal of Economic Studies, 44(6): 1030-1050.
• Wei, Y., Ding, S. and Konwar, Z. (2022) “The two faces of FDI in environmental performance: a meta-analysis of empirical evidence in China”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 20(1): 65-94.
• Wu, B. and Deng, P. (2020) “Internationalization of SMEs from emerging markets: An institutional escape perspective”, Journal of Business Research, 108: 337-350.
• Yerdelen-Tatoğlu, F. (2018) “Panel zaman serileri analizi Stata uygulamalı”, Beta Yayınları.
• Yerrabati, S. (2021) “Foreign direct investments, economic growth and regulatory quality in developing countries”, The Journal of Developing Areas, 55(4): 147-171.
• You, W. and Lv, Z. (2018) “Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach”, Energy Economics, 73: 248-257.
• Zarsky, L. (1999) “Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment”, Foreign direct Investment and the Environment, 13(8): 47-74.
• Zhang, D., Ozturk, I., & Ullah, S. (2022). Institutional factors-environmental quality nexus in BRICS: a strategic pillar of governmental performance. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 5777-5789.
• Zhao, H. and Kim, S. H. (2011) “An exploratory examination of the social capital and FDI linkage and the moderating role of regulatory quality: A cross‐country study”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 53(5): 629-646.