FOCUS GROUP ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION PERCEPTION WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED SUMMARIZATION

Öz

The influence of artificial intelligence in facilitating daily living has led to its growing adoption across all sectors. In academic writing and education, the significance of artificial intelligence is growing as it rapidly analyzes data, enhances information accessibility, and possesses the capability to summarize, clarify, and elucidate concepts, hence improving understanding for non-experts. This study was conducted in the realm of education, specifically focusing on adaptive learning, with the research issue addressing the extent of material comprehension facilitated by AI summarization. In the study, to assess information perception, a chosen article was read to 12 individuals from a focus group of 24 via the AI-assisted summarizing tool NotebookLM, while the remaining 12 individuals listened to the article. The participants were inquired about the article's title, central theme, subject of the academic investigation, pertinent constitutional provision, data source, volume of data, analytical methodology, findings, and prospective research inquiries. The provided responses were classified as correct or wrong. The K Independent Samples analysis, a non-parametric test, was employed in the data analysis. The findings indicated no disparity between the reading and listening groups about their comprehension of the constitutional article examined, the data source, and the nation in which the research was done. Nonetheless, disparities arise between the reading and listening groups regarding the article title, the emphasis of the academic study, the topic matter, the volume of data, the analytical methodology, the findings, and the prospective research objectives. Consequently, it has been noted that there is no distinction between readers and listeners regarding the acquisition of fundamental and superficial knowledge in the study. Nonetheless, the study's significance lies in the observation that listeners demonstrated a disparity in accurately responding to queries necessitating greater detail in comparison to readers. In this context, AI-assisted summarization not only enhances information accessibility but also offers significant insights into how various learning methodologies influence the information perception process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• Information Perception
• i Non-parametric
• Focus Group

Etik Beyan

I declare that this study is original; that I adhered to scientific ethical principles and rules in all stages of the study, including preparation, data collection, analysis, and presentation of information; that I cited all data and information not obtained within the scope of this study and included these sources in the bibliography; that I did not make any changes to the data used; and that I complied with all the terms and conditions of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and fulfilled my ethical duties and responsibilities. I hereby declare that I am aware that if any situation contrary to this statement regarding my work is detected at any time, I will accept all resulting ethical and legal consequences.

FOCUS GROUP ANALYSIS ON INFORMATION PERCEPTION WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED SUMMARIZATION

Öz

Yapay zekanın günlük yaşamı kolaylaştırmadaki etkisi, tüm sektörlerde giderek artan bir şekilde benimsenmesine yol açmaktadır. Akademik yazımda ve eğitimde, yapay zekânın önemi, verileri hızla analiz etmesi, bilgiye erişilebilirliği artırması ve kavramları özetleme, açıklama ve aydınlatma yeteneğine sahip olması nedeniyle artmaktadır. Bu da uzman olmayanlar için de anlaşılabilir olmayı geliştirmektedir. Bu çalışma, eğitim alanında, özellikle uyarlanabilir öğrenmeye odaklanarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırma konusu ise yapay zekâ özetlemesinin, makaleleri anlama düzeyini ne ölçüde kolaylaştırdığının araştırılmasıdır. Çalışmada, bilgi algısını değerlendirmek amacıyla, 24 kişilik bir odak grup içinden seçilen bir makale, NotebookLM yapay zekâ destekli özetleme aracı aracılığıyla 12 kişiye okunurken, kalan 12 kişi makaleyi dinlemiştir. Katılımcılara makalenin başlığı, ana teması, akademik araştırmanın konusu, ilgili anayasal hüküm, veri kaynağı, veri hacmi, analitik metodolojisi, bulguları ve olası araştırma soruları hakkında bilgi sorulmuştur. Verilen yanıtlar doğru veya yanlış olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Veri analizinde parametrik olmayan bir test olan K Bağımsız Örneklem analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, okuma ve dinleme grupları arasında incelenen anayasa maddesini, veri kaynağını ve araştırmanın yapıldığı ülkeyi anlama konusunda bir farklılık olmadığını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, makale başlığı, akademik çalışmanın vurgusu, konu, veri hacmi, analitik metodoloji, bulgular ve olası araştırma hedefleri açısından okuma ve dinleme grupları arasında farklılıklar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, çalışmada okuyucular ve dinleyiciler arasında temel ve yüzeysel bilgi edinimi açısından bir ayrım olmadığı belirtilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, çalışmanın önemi, dinleyicilerin daha fazla ayrıntı gerektiren sorulara doğru yanıt verme konusunda okuyuculara kıyasla farklılık gösterdiğinin gözlemlenmesinde yatmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, yapay zekâ destekli özetleme yalnızca bilgiye erişilebilirliği artırmakla kalmamakta, aynı zamanda çeşitli öğrenme yöntemlerinin bilgi algılama sürecini nasıl etkilediğine dair önemli içgörüler de sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay zeka
• Bilgi farkındalığı
• parametrik olmayan
• Odak grup

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu; çalışmanın hazırlık, veri toplama, analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarından bilimsel etik ilke ve kurallarına uygun davrandığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara kaynakçada yer verdiğimi; kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)' in tüm şartlarını ve koşullarını kabul ederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim. Herhangi bir zamanda, çalışmayla ilgili yaptığım bu beyana aykırı bir durumun saptanması durumunda, ortaya çıkacak tüm ahlaki ve hukuki sonuçlara razı olduğumu bildiririm.

Kaynakça

1. Alkan, A. (2024) “Artificial Intelligence: Its Role and Potential In Education”, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1): 483–497.
2. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Pelletier, R. (1995) “Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2): 167–207.
3. Bicciato, S., Pandin, M., Didone, G., and Di Bello, C. (2002) “Pattern Identification and Classification In Gene Expression Data Using an Autoassociative Neural Network Model”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 81: 594–606.
4. Bircan, T. Ş. (2024) “Sosyal Bilgiler ve Tarih Öğretiminde Adaptif Öğrenme Üzerine Ne Yapıldı?”, International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(109): 1337–1344.
5. Blanton, H. (1997) “An Introduction to Neural Networks For Technicians, Engineers and Other Non-PhDs”, In Proceedings of the Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering Conference, St. Louis.
6. Borkowska, E. M., Kruk, A., Jedrzejczyk, A., Rozniecki, M., Jablonowski, Z., Traczyk, M., Constantinou, M., Banaszkiewicz, M., Pietrusinski, M., and Sosnowski, M. (2014) “Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer Using Kohonen Self-Organizing Maps”, Cancer Medicine, 3(5); 1225–1234.
7. Cooper, C. S. (2001) “Applications of Microarray Technology In Breast Cancer Research”, Breast Cancer Research, 3(3): 158.
8. Danaee, P., Ghaeini, R., and Hendrix, D. A. (2017) “A Deep Learning Approach For Cancer Detection and Relevant Gene Identification”, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 22: 219–227.

9. Ellis, M., Davis, N., Coop, A., Liu, M., Schumaker, L., Lee, R. Y., et al. (2002) “Development and Validation of a Method For Using Breast Core Needle Biopsies For Gene Expression Microarray Analyses”, Clinical Cancer Research, 8: 1155–1166.
10. Fakoor, R., Ladhak, F., Nazi, A., and Huber, M. (2013) “Using Deep Learning to Enhance Cancer Diagnosis and Classification”, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, Atlanta-GA.
11. Feyzi, A. Ş., Yıldız, A., Kılınç, S., Aytekin, N., Adalı, R., and Kurnaz, K. (2023) “Yapay Zekânın Eğitime Etkileri”, International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 10(98): 2100–2107.
12. Field, A. (2024) “Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics”, USA: Sage publications limited.
13. Goel, A. K., and Polepeddi, L. (2016) “Jill Watson: A Virtual Teaching Assistant For Online Education”, In C. Dede, J. Richards, and B. Saxberg (eds.) Learning Engineering for Online Education: Theoretical Contexts and Design-Based Examples, 120–143, Routledge.
14. Grau, A., Indri, M., Bello, L. L., and Sauter, T. (2017) “Industrial Robotics In Factory Automation: From The Early Stage to the Internet of Things”, Proceedings of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2017), Beijing-China: 6159–6164.
15. Green, T. D., and Donovan, L. C. (2018) “Learning Anytime, Anywhere through Technology: Reconsidering Teaching and Learning for the iMaker Generation”, In G. E. Hall, L. F. Quinn, and D. M. Gollnick (eds.) The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning, Wiley & Sons: 225–256.
16. Hsieh, Y.-Z., Lin, S.-S., Luo, Y.-C., Jeng, Y.-L., Tan, S.-W., Chen, C.-R., and Chiang, P. (2020) “Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data For Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation”, Sustainability, 12(14): 1–17.
17. Hu, Y. H., Fu, J. S., and Yeh, H. C. (2023) “Developing an Early-Warning System Through Robotic Process Automation: Are Intelligent Tutoring Robots As Effective As Human Teachers?”, Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6): 2803–2816.
18. Huang, J., Saleh, S., and Liu, Y. (2021) “A Review On Artificial Intelligence In Education”, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3): 206–217.
19. Kumar, P. G., Victoire, T. A., Renukadevi, P., and Devaraj, D. (2012) “Design of Fuzzy Expert System For Microarray Data Classification Using a Novel Genetic Swarm Algorithm”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(2): 1811–1821.
20. Lakhal, S., Bateman, D., and Bédard, J. (2017) “Blended Synchronous Delivery Modes In Graduate Programs: a Literature Review and How It Is Implemented in the Master Teacher Program” Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10: 47–60.
21. Leung, M. M. K., Delong, A., Alipanahi, B., and Frey, B. J. (2016) “Machine Learning In Genomic Medicine: a Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(1): 176–197.
22. Li, L., Jiang, W., Li, X., Moser, K. L., Guo, Z., Du, L., et al. (2005) “A Robust Hybrid Between Genetic Algorithm and Support Vector Machine for Extracting an Optimal Feature Gene Subset”, Genomics, 85(1): 16–23.
23. Li, L., Lin, Y. L., Zheng, N. N., Wang, F. Y., Liu, Y., Cao, D., Wang, K., et al. (2018) “Artificial Intelligence Test: a Case Study of Intelligent Vehicles”, Artificial Intelligence Review, 50(3): 441–465.
24. Li, Q., Cao, H., and Lu, Y. (2017) “Connecting Paper to Digitization: a Homework Data Processing System With Data Labeling and Visualization”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Melbourne: 504–510.
25. Lv, J., Peng, Q., Chen, X., and Sun, Z. (2016) “A Multi-Objective Heuristic Algorithm For Gene Expression Microarray Data Classification”, Expert Systems with Applications, 59: 13–19.
26. Martins, P., Lopes, S. I., da Cruz, A. M. R., and Curado, A. (2021) “Towards a Smart and Sustainable Campus: an Application-Oriented Architecture to Streamline Digitization and Strengthen Sustainability In Academia”, Sustainability, 13(6): 1–25.
27. Morgan, D. L. (1997) “Focus Groups as Qualitative Research”, 2nd Edition, London, Sage.
28. Nguyen, T., Tran, H. T., and Nguyen, M. T. (2023) “Empowering Education: Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence”, USA, ISTES Organization Monument.
29. Ontañón, S., Mishra, K., Sugandh, N., and Ram, A. (2008) “Learning From Demonstration and Case-Based Planning For Real-Time Strategy Games”, In: Prasad, B. (eds.) Soft Computing Applications in Industry. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 226: Springer-Berlin, Heidelberg.
30. Peng, S., Xu, Q., Ling, X. B., Peng, X., Du, W., and Chen, L. (2003) “Molecular Classification of Cancer Types From Microarray Data Using Combination of Genetic Algorithms and Support Vector Machines”, FEBS Letters, 555(2): 358–362.
31. Petalidis, L. P., Oulas, A., Backlund, M., Wayland, M. T., Liu, L., Plant, K., et al. (2008) “Improved Grading and Survival Prediction of Human Astrocytic Brain Tumors By Artificial Neural Network Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data”, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 7(5): 1013–1024.
32. Peterson, L. E., and Coleman, M. A. (2008) “Machine Learning-Based Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves For Crisp and Fuzzy Classification of DNA Microarrays In Cancer Research”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 47(1): 17–36.
33. Polin, K., Yigitcanlar, T., Limb, M., and Washington, T. (2023) “The Making of Smart Campus: a Review and Conceptual Framework”, Buildings, 13(4): 891.
34. Rahim, T. N. T. A., Aziz, Z. A., Rauf, R. H. A., and Shamsudin, N. (2017) “Automated Exam Question Generator Using Genetic Algorithm”, IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services, Malaysia, 12–17.
35. Rani, R. R., and Ramyachitra, D. (2018) “Microarray Cancer Gene Feature Selection Using Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm and Cancer Classification Using SVM”, Procedia Computer Science, 143: 108–116.
36. Rao, A. C., Somayajulu, D., Banka, H., and Chaturverdi, R. (2012) “Outlier Detection In Microarray Data Using Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm”, Procedia Technology, 6: 291–298.
37. Shohel, M.M.C., Naomee, I., Ashrafuzzaman, M., and Tanni, S.A. (2022) “Game-Based Teaching and Learning In Higher Education: Challenges and Prospects”, In M.M.C. Shohel, M. Shrafuzzaman, I. Naomee, S.A. Tanni and F. Azim (eds.) Acquiring 21 Century Literacy Skills Through Game-Based Learning, Hershey: IGI Global.
38. Shukla, A. K., Singh, P., and Vardhan, M. (2018) “A Two-Stage Gene Selection Method For Biomarker Discovery From Microarray Data For Cancer Classification”, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 183: 47–58.
39. Şahin, M., and Kışla, T. (2013) “Kişiselleştirilebilir Öğrenme Ortamları: Literatür İncelemesi”, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(1): 81–91.
40. Tabakhi, S., Najafi, A., Ranjbar, R., and Moradi, P. (2015) “Gene Selection For Microarray Data Classification Using a Novel Ant Colony Optimization”, Neurocomputing, 168: 1024–1036.
41. Torun, N. K., and Şimşek, N. (2023) “Sosyal Medya Yasasına Yönelik Kullanıcı Tepkilerinin Ölçümlenmesi: Youtube ve Twitter Örneği”, Scientific Journal of Innovation and Social Sciences Research, 3(2): 63–80.
42. Van der Vorst, T., and Jelicic, N. (2019) “Artificial Intelligence In Education: Can AI Bring The Full Potential of Personalized Learning to Education?”, Proceedings of the 30th European Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Helsinki.
43. Wahyono, I. D., Putranto, H., Saryono, D., Asfani, K., and Sunarti (2019) “Development of a Personalized Virtual Laboratory Using Artificial Intelligence”, International Conference on Learning Innovation, Sweden, 101–107.
44. Wang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H.-L., and Wang, X. (2018) “A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality In Construction Engineering Education And Training”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6): 1–18.
45. Woolf, B. P. (2008) “Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies For Revolutionizing E-Learning”, Burlington-USA: Elsevier & Morgan Kaufmann.
46. Yang, W. (2022) “Artificial Intelligence Education For Young Children: Why, What, and How In Curriculum Design and Implementation”, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(5): 1–7.
47. Yu, Z., Chen, H., You, J., Liu, J., Wong, H. S., Han, G., and Li, L. (2015) “Adaptive Fuzzy Consensus Clustering Framework For Clustering Analysis of Cancer Data”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 12(4): 887–901.