THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS GOVERNING CHINA–AFRICA TRADE, AND THE (MIS)ALIGNMENT INTRODUCED BY HIMALAYAN TRADE-ROUTE CHALLENGES

Öz

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the regulatory and material foundations of international trade, with significant implications for China–Africa economic relations. This article argues that the emerging AI trade nexus can only be understood through the joint analysis of fragmented multi-level governance and contested physical geography. It examines how the dual-use nature of AI—covering hardware, software, and data-driven services—challenges traditional export control regimes and intersects with data governance frameworks amid intensifying US–China technological rivalry and Africa’s pursuit of digital sovereignty. Moving beyond policy-centred approaches, the paper shows how material geography mediates digital trade flows. Using the Himalayan region as an illustrative case, it demonstrates how geopolitical tensions, infrastructure constraints, and logistical bottlenecks indirectly reroute China–Africa AI supply chains, shaping enforcement capacity and vulnerabilities to regulatory circumvention. The article concludes by proposing integrated policy responses emphasizing multilateral cooperation, regulatory harmonisation, and export-control modernisation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial Intelligence
• China
• Africa
• Himalayan Trade
• Trade Challenge

THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS GOVERNING CHINA–AFRICA TRADE, AND THE (MIS)ALIGNMENT INTRODUCED BY HIMALAYAN TRADE-ROUTE CHALLENGES

Öz

Yapay zekânın (YZ) hızlı gelişimi, uluslararası ticaretin düzenleyici ve maddi temellerini yeniden şekillendirmekte; bu dönüşüm Çin–Afrika ekonomik ilişkileri açısından önemli sonuçlar doğurmaktadır. Bu makale, ortaya çıkan yapay zekâ ticaret dinamiğinin ancak parçalı çok düzeyli yönetişim yapıları ile tartışmalı fiziki coğrafyanın birlikte analiz edilmesiyle anlaşılabileceğini savunmaktadır. Donanım, yazılım ve veri temelli hizmetleri kapsayan yapay zekânın çift kullanımlı niteliğinin geleneksel ihracat kontrol rejimlerini nasıl zorladığı; bu sürecin, giderek yoğunlaşan ABD–Çin teknolojik rekabeti ve Afrika’nın dijital egemenlik arayışı bağlamında veri yönetişimi çerçeveleriyle nasıl kesiştiği incelenmektedir. Politika merkezli yaklaşımların ötesine geçilerek, fiziki coğrafyanın dijital ticaret akışlarını nasıl aracılık ettiği gösterilmektedir. Himalaya bölgesi örneği üzerinden, jeopolitik gerilimlerin, altyapı kısıtlarının ve lojistik darboğazların Çin–Afrika yapay zekâ tedarik zincirlerini dolaylı biçimde yeniden yönlendirdiği; denetim kapasitesini ve düzenleme aşma risklerini nasıl şekillendirdiği ortaya konulmaktadır. Makale, çok taraflı iş birliğini, düzenleyici uyumu ve ihracat kontrol rejimlerinin modernizasyonunu vurgulayan bütünleşik politika önerileriyle sonuçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay Zekâ
• Çin
• Afrika
• Himalaya Ticareti
• Ticaret Zorlukları

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, A. I., Salman, R. Y., Mahdi, S., & Naamo, G. S. (2024). Redefining global trade networks: Emerging patterns and trends in the 21st century. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 984–999.
2. Alden, C., & Alves, C. (2008). History & identity in the construction of China’s Africa policy. Review of African Political Economy, 35(115), 43–58.
3. Atacan, C., & Açık, A. (2023). Impact of geopolitical risk on international trade: Evidence from container throughputs. Transactions on Maritime Science, 12(02). https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/447404
4. Barkin, N. (2020). Export controls and the US-China tech war. MERICS China Monitor, 18(1). https://tendenzblick.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/merics_ChinaMonitor_US-CH-EU-Export-Controls_en_final.pdf
5. Bergé, J.-S., Grumbach, S., & Zeno-Zencovich, V. (2018). The ‘datasphere’, data flows beyond control and the challenges for law and governance. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 5(2), 144–178.
6. Broadman, H. G. (2006). Africa’s silk road: China and India’s new economic frontier. World Bank.
7. Brockmann, K. (2022). Applying export controls to AI: Current coverage and potential future controls. In T. Reinhold & N. Schörnig (Eds.), Armament, arms control and artificial intelligence (pp. 193–209). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11043-6_14
8. Chandra, M. (1977). Trade and trade routes in ancient India. Abhinav Publications.

9. Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Zhang, J., & Mo, M. (2019). Does the connectivity of the belt and road initiative contribute to the economic growth of the belt and road countries? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(14), 3227–3240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1643315
10. Chesterman, S. (2023). We, the robots? Regulating artificial intelligence and the limits of the law. Cambridge University Press.
11. Cowen, D. (2014). The deadly life of logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. U of Minnesota Press.
12. De Kluiver, J., & Neethling, T. (2024). The digital silk road: Implications for Africa’s digital governance and transformation. In G. Onyango & G. Karuri-Sebina (Eds.), Digitalisation and public policy in Africa (pp. 335–353). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75079-3_15
13. Echandi, R., Maliszewska, M., & Steenbergen, V. (2022). Making the most of the African continental free trade area. World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/37623.html
14. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
15. Glencross, A. (2024). The geopolitics of supply chains: EU efforts to ensure security of supply. Global Policy, 15(4), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13388
16. Gordon, D., & Nouwens, M. (2022). The digital silk road: China’s technological rise and the geopolitics of cyberspace. Taylor & Francis.
17. Gottardo, R. (2023). Algorithmic decision-making and public sector accountability in Africa: New challenges for law and policy. Comparative Legal Metrics.
18. Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China’s belt & road initiative: Motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40, 314–321.
19. Hussain, I., Shah, M. N. U. H., & Hussain, K. (2025). Digital silk roads: The geopolitics of tech infrastructure in emerging Asia. ASSAJ, 4(02), 1203–1214.
20. Katterbauer, K. (2022). Shipping of the future-cybersecurity aspects for autonomous AI-driven ships. Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 36(1), 1–12.
21. Katterbauer, K. (2024). Financial regulation reforms in China–can artificial intelligence be a gamechanger to more sustainable financial regulations. Financial Law Review, 36(4), 1–33.
22. Katterbauer, K., Yılmaz, S., Syed, H., & Özbay, R. D. (2025). Chinese electric vehicle (EV) financial performance–is the market supporting it? Journal of Recycling Economy & Sustainability Policy, 4(2), 1–13.
23. Khare, V. (2020). Shadows of the China-Ladakh-Pakistan routes. Shadow Exchanges Along the New Silk Roads. Routledge.
24. Lee, K.-F. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Harper Business.
25. Lindsay, J. R. (2020). Demystifying the quantum threat: Infrastructure, institutions, and intelligence advantage. Security Studies, 29(2), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2020.1722853
26. Lisinge, R. T. (2020). The belt and road initiative and Africa’s regional infrastructure development: Implications and lessons. Transnational Corporations Review, 12(4), 425–438.
27. Luong, H. T. (2015). Transnational drugs trafficking from west Africa to southeast Asia: A case study of Vietnam. Journal of Law and Criminal Justice, 3(2), 37–54.
28. Maihold, G. (2022). Shadow supply chains and criminal networks. In D. Brombacher, G. Maihold, M. Müller, & J. Vorrath (Eds.), Geopolitics of the illicit (pp. 53–82). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748935940-53
29. Manning, R. A. (2019). Techno-nationalism vs. the fourth industrial revolution. Global Asia, 14(1), 14–21. Meltzer, J. P. (2019). Governing digital trade. World Trade Review, 18(1), 23–48.
30. Montgomery, A. H. (2020). Double or nothing? The effects of the diffusion of dual-use enabling technologies on strategic stability. Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland.
31. Mori, S. (2019). US technological competition with China: The military, industrial and digital network dimensions. Asia-Pacific Review, 26(1), 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2019.1622871
32. Rolland, N. (2017). China’s Eurasian century: Political and strategic implications of the Belt and Road Initiative, NBR Books.
33. Sampath, P. G., & Tregenna, F. (2022). Digital sovereignty: African perspectives. DSI/NRF South African Research Chair in Industrial Development.
34. Sarkar, R., & Ray, I. (2006). Two nineteenth century trade routes in the eastern Himalayas: The Bhutanese trade with Tibet and Bengal. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 15, 56-83. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/6e77cf3e-f4a2-42c0-806b-262c20f22a3b/download
35. Shang, C. S. (2024). Mapping export control extraterritoriality in the U.S.-China technology decoupling. Journal of World Trade, 58(4), 545-570. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/58.1/TRAD2024030
36. Sharma, G. D., Yadav, A., & Chopra, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence and effective governance: A review, critique and research agenda. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100004.
37. Smailis, G. (2025). The geopolitics of global maritime energy transportation: Chokepoints, markets, risks and security. [Master’s thesis, University of Piraeus]. https://dione.lib.unipi.gr/xmlui/handle/unipi/17758
38. Thapliyal, S. (2017). Nepal’s trans-Himalayan linkages with China. Scholar Warrior, 46–54.
39. Vaseashta, A. (2026). Dual-use artificial intelligence—trends, security challenges, and mitigation strategies. In A. Vaseashta & A. Rocha (Eds.), Spectrum of dual-use technologies (Vol. 66, pp. 3–37). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00202-0_1
40. Wu, S., Yan, J., Zhang, Y., Peng, T., & Su, K. (2022). Evolutionary process and development implications of traditional trade routes in the Himalayan region. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(9), 1847–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-2026-1
41. Xu, X., Mao, L., & Zhang, M. (2025). Geopolitical decoupling and strategic export reallocation: Evidence from China’s ‘made in China 2025’ sectors during the 2018–2019 U.S.–China trade war. Open Economies Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-025-09838-0
42. Zhang, K. H. (2023). U.S.-China economic links and technological decoupling. The Chinese Economy, 56(5), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2023.2173399