Konferans Bildirisi

POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1 27 Ocak 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1

Öz

The studies that have been conducted in recent years suggest that incumbent governments manipulate the economy for political reasons, in particular, with the aim of re-election. In new political economy literature, this situation is known as the Political Business Cycle; a macroeconomic cycle induced by the political cycle. The theory of PBC is studied under four theories called “The Traditional Opportunistic PBC Theory”, “The Traditional Partisan PBC Theory”, “The Rational Opportunistic PBC Theory” and “The Rational Partisan PBC Theory”. From these theories, the assumptions of the “The Rational Opportunistic PBC Theory”, “The Traditional Partisan PBC Theory” and “The Rational Partisan PBC Theory” do not seem to be valid in the Turkish context; hence testing of these models would not be meaningful. Therefore, in this study, “The Traditional Opportunistic PBC Model” is examined. In the study, the quarterly series of GDP, inflation, money in circulation (M0), money supply (M1) for the period of 1987- 2012 are analyzed with “Seasonal BoxJenkins Models”. According to the results obtained from this study, political business cycles hasn’t been observed in any series. This means that The Traditional Opportunistic PBC Theory isn’t valid for Turkish context. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Konferans Bildirisi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Ocak 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Ocak 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eryılmaz, F., & Murat, D. (2016). POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 14(1), 248-268. https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG
AMA
1.Eryılmaz F, Murat D. POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2016;14(1):248-268. https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG
Chicago
Eryılmaz, Filiz, ve Dilek Murat. 2016. “POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1”. Journal of Management and Economics Research 14 (1): 248-68. https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG.
EndNote
Eryılmaz F, Murat D (01 Ocak 2016) POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1. Journal of Management and Economics Research 14 1 248–268.
IEEE
[1]F. Eryılmaz ve D. Murat, “POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1”, Journal of Management and Economics Research, c. 14, sy 1, ss. 248–268, Oca. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG
ISNAD
Eryılmaz, Filiz - Murat, Dilek. “POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1”. Journal of Management and Economics Research 14/1 (01 Ocak 2016): 248-268. https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG.
JAMA
1.Eryılmaz F, Murat D. POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2016;14:248–268.
MLA
Eryılmaz, Filiz, ve Dilek Murat. “POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1”. Journal of Management and Economics Research, c. 14, sy 1, Ocak 2016, ss. 248-6, https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG.
Vancouver
1.Filiz Eryılmaz, Dilek Murat. POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES THEORIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY1. Journal of Management and Economics Research [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2016;14(1):248-6. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA68AZ29PG