PANEL DATA ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, EXCHANGE RATE AND TRADE OPENNESS IN NEWLY INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 94 - 114, 25.09.2021

Sevilay Küçüksakarya , Mustafa Özer

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.972141

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study examines the effects of foreign direct investment, gross fixed capital formation, real exchange rate, and trade openness on economic growth in newly industrialized countries for 1982 and 2019 by using the panel ARDL method. Before estimating panel ARDL, we tested the existence of cross-sectional dependence among the countries, determining the degree of the integrations of variables by using second-generation panel unit root tests and examining the cointegration among the variables. Finally, we carry out the Dumitreuscu Hurlin causality test to determine the direction of the causal relationship between variables. The study results indicate a positive long-run relationship between economic growth and FDI, gross capital formation and real exchange rate, and a negative long-run relationship with trade openness. The study's findings have significant implications for the industrial policies that these countries should adopt to reach developed countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic Growth, Newly Industrialized Countries, Panel ARDL, Panel Unit Root Tests, Panel Cointegration Tests, Dumitrescu Hurlin Causality Test

YENİ SANAYİLEŞEN ÜLKELERDE EKONOMIK BÜYÜME, DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIM, DÖVİZ KURU VE TİCARİ AÇIKLIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Öz

Bu çalışma, yeni sanayileşen ülkelerde 1982 ve 2019 yılları için doğrudan yabancı yatırım, brüt sabit sermaye oluşumu, reel döviz kuru ve ticarete açıklığın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini panel ARDL yöntemiyle araştırmaktadır. Panel ARDL'yi tahmin etmeden önce, ülkeler arasında yatay kesit bağımlılığının varlığını test edilmiştir. İkinci nesil panel birim kök testleri kullanarak değişkenlerin entegrasyon derecesi belirlenmiş ve aralarındaki eşbütünleşme incelenmiştir. Son olarak değişkenler arasındaki nedensel ilişkinin yönünü belirlemek için Dumitreuscu Hurlin nedensellik testi yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, ekonomik büyüme ile DYY, brüt sermaye oluşumu ve reel döviz kuru arasında uzun dönemli pozitif bir ilişkiye ve ticari açıklık ile uzun dönemli negatif bir ilişkiye işaret etmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları, bu ülkelerin gelişmiş ülkelere ulaşmak için benimsemeleri gereken sanayi politikaları üzerinde önemli etkilere sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Büyüme, Yeni Sanayileşen Ülkeler, Panel ARDL, Panel Birim Kök Testleri, Panel Eşbütünleşme Testleri, Dumitrescu Hurlin Nedensellik Testi

Kaynakça

• Asghar, N., & Hussain, Z. (2014) “Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in developing countries: Recent evidence from panel data”. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 99-126.
• Adhikary, B. K. (2011) “FDI, trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: a linkage analysis”. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 16.
• Bibi, S., Ahmad, S. T., & Rashid, H. (2014) “Impact of trade openness, FDI, exchange rate and inflation on economic growth: A case study of Pakistan”. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(2), 236.
• Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980) “The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specificationin econometrics”. Review of Economic Studies, 47: 239–253.
• Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (1987) “Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing”, Econometrica, 55, 251–76.
• Haque, S., & Amin, S. B. (2018) “Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: The case of Bangladesh”. World Review of Business Research, 8(3), 104-125.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
• Klasra, M. A. (2011) “Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in Pakistan and Turkey: An investigation using bounds test”. Quality & Quantity, 45(1), 223-231.
• Makki, S. S., & Somwaru, A. (2004) “Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries”. American journal of agricultural economics, 86(3), 795-801
• Nketiah, E., Cai, X., Adjei, M., & Boamah, B. B. (2019) “Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: Evidence from Ghana”. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8(01), 39.
• Olabisi, O. E., & Lau, E. (2018) “Causality Testing between Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Fresh Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries”. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 71(4), 437-464.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004) “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007) “A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence”. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1997) “Pooled estimation of long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels”.
• Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11, pp.105-127.
• Pradhan, R. P., Bagchi, T. P., Chowdhury, K., & Norman, N. R. (2012) “Growth, foreign investment and trade-openness interactions in ten OECD countries: a panel-VAR approach”. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 4(4), 273-293.
• Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Hall, J. H., & Nair, M. (2017) “Trade openness, foreign direct investment, and finance-growth nexus in the Eurozone countries”. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(3), 336-360.
• Westerlund, J. (2007) “Testing for error correction in panel data”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
• Wiredu, J., Nketiah, E., & Adjei, M. (2020) “The relationship between trade openness, foreign direct investment and economic growth in West Africa: Static panel data model”. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8(1), 18-34.
• Yusoff, M. B., & Febrina, I. (2014) “Trade openness, real exchange rate, gross domestic investment and growth in Indonesia”. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 8(1), 1-13.
• Yusoff, M. B., & Nuh, R. (2015) “Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Thailand”. Foreign Trade Review, 50(2), 73-84.
• World Trade Statistical Review 2020 https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2020_e/wts2020_e.pdf