TEXT MINING AND KNOWLEDGE MAPPING OF POSTGRADUATE THESES ON GENERATIONS IN TURKEY

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 186 - 203

Celalettin Yanık , Melih Engin

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1522209

Öz

In the realm of social sciences, the concept of generation represents one of the most contentious areas. The problem lies not in the concept itself, but rather in the meanings attributed to it. The meanings attributed to the concept are used to establish marketing principles by comparing a group of individuals that are taken into consideration or based within a specific category with the basic characteristics that are assumed to have opposite qualities of this group. In this study, keywords were collected from the theses containing the word generation that were downloaded from the website where graduate theses belonging to the Council of Higher Education are published. In addition to the descriptive statistical findings on the year, university, and subject data of the theses, an association analysis of the keywords of these theses was performed using the Apriori algorithm. The research findings revealed that the majority of graduate theses on generation are master's theses, their popularity is increasing, and the keyword “generation” is associated with various fields such as behavior, difference, business, social relations, media, and conflict

Anahtar Kelimeler

Generation, Text Mining, Apriori, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Aka, B. (2018) “Bebek Patlaması, X ve Y Kuşağı Yöneticilerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeylerinin Kamu ve Özel Sektör Farklılıklarına Göre İncelenmesi: Bir Araştırma”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, C. 9 (20), 118-135.
• Andrea, B., Gabriella, H. and Tímea, J. (2016) “Y and Z Generations at Workplaces”, Journal of Competitiveness, 8 (3), 90-106.
• Bayramoğlu, G. (2018) “X ve Y Kuşağının Liderlik Davranışı Açısından Karşılaştırılması”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 18(1), 15-30.
• Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B. and Gade, P. A. (2012) “Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 27 (4), 375-394.
• Csobanka, Z.E. (2016) “The Z Generation”, Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 6(2), 63-76.
• Çakır, H. and Azman, A. (2022) “Sosyal Kuşaklar: Kuşaklar Sosyolojisinde Metodolojik Bir Açılım, İmgelem”, 6(11), 331-350.
• Demirdağ, A. and Gündüz, Ş. (2021) “Ruhsal Liderliğin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisini Farklı Kuşaklar Üzerinden İnceleme”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 99-118.
• Egri, C. P. and Ralston, D. A. (2004) “Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States”, Organization Science, 15(2), 210-220.
• Emmanual, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, N., Karthikeyan, M. and Felix, A J. (2014) “Independent Knowledge Extraction in Nature of Humorous Text Analysis Review Using Online Text Analysis Tool”, in ICCCNT 2014: 5th International Conference on Computing Communications and Networking Technologies, Sivakasi.
• Katz, S. (2017) “Generation X: A Critical Sociological Perspective. Generations”, Journal of the American Society on Aging, 41(3), 12-19.
• Keleş, H. N. (2011) “Y Kuşağı Çalışanlarının Motivasyon Profillerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 129-139.
• Kırık, A. M. and Köyüstü, S. (2018) “Z Kuşağı Konusunda Yapılmış Tezlerin İçerik Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(2), 1497-1518.
• Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A., Reicher, R. Z. and Szeghegyi, A. (2017) “The X and Y Generations’ Characteristics Comparison”, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 14(8), 107-125.
• Kraus, M. (2017) “Comparing Generation X and Generation Y on Their Preferred Emotional Leadership Style”, Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, 5, 62-75.
• Lancaster, L. C. and Stillman, D. (2009) “When Generations Collide: Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work”, HarperCollins.
• Mannheim, K. (1952) “The Problem of Generations”, Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, (Ed. Paul Kecskemeti), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 276-320.
• Martin, C. A. and Tulgan, B. (2006) “Managing the Generation Mix: From Urgency to Opportunity”, Second Edition, HRD Press, Massachusetts.
• Nieżurawska, J., Kycia, R. A. and Niemczynowicz, A. (2023) “Managing Generation Z: Motivation, Engagement and Loyalty”, Routledge, New York.
• Pyöriä, P., Ojala, S., Saari, T. and Järvinen, K. M. (2017) “The Millennial Generation: A New Breed of Labour?”, SAGE Open, 7(1), 1-14.
• Sandeen, C. (2008) “Boomers, Xers, and Millennials: Who are They and What Do They Really Want from Continuing Higher Education?”, Continuing Higher Education Review, 72, 11-31.
• Schroth, H. (2019). “Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?”, California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18.
• Zemke, R., Raines, C. and Filipczak, B. (2000) “Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace”, AMACOM, New York.