Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2024, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 262 - 274
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1576375

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altun, Y., and İşleyen, Ş. (2019) “Türkiye’de Iktisadi Büyüme ile Sanayi Sektöründe İstihdam Arasındaki İlişkinin ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı ile Ekonometrik Analizi: 1991-2017”, Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, 657-676.
  • Auer, P. (2007) “Security in Labour Markets: Combining Flexibility with Security for Decent Work”, Economic and Labour Market Papers 2007-12, International Labour Office.
  • Blanchard, O., Jaumotte, F. and Loungani, P. (2014) “Labour Market Policies and IMF Advice in Advanced Economies During the Great Recession”, IZA Journal of Labour Policy, 3(1): 1–23.
  • Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (2007) “Implementing Public Employment Policy: What Happens When Non-Public Agencies Take Over?”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(7/8):287-301.
  • Davoine, T. (2023) “Flexicurity, Education and Optimal Labour Market Policies”, Labour, 37(4): 592-625.
  • Demir, Y. (2021) “Balkan Ülkelerine Ait İşsizliğin Mekânsal Panel Ekonometri Yaklaşımı ile Analizi”, Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(19), 26-35.
  • Demir, Y. (2021) “Analyzing the Effect of Employment in The Agricultural and Industrial Sectors on Economic Growth with The ARDL Bounds Test”, International Journal of Contemporary Economics And Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 178–192. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.5136851 .
  • Euractiv (2007a) “Social Partners On Flexicurity And Labour Market Reforms”, Available At: Https://Www.Euractiv.Com/Section/Social-Europe-Jobs/Interview/Social-Partners-On-Flexicurity-And-Labour-Market-Reforms/.
  • European Commission (2007) “Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs Through Flexibility and Security”, Office for Official Publication of The European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Fernandez, L. and Ramirez, J. (2019) “Labor Market Reforms and Youth Employment in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, And Mexico”, Latin American Economic Review, 25(2): 123-145.
  • Garcia, M. and Rodriguez, L. (2019) “Assessing the Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment Transitions: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Youth Studies, 15(4): 567-589.
  • Gazier, B. (2007) “Making Transitions Pay: The Transitional Labour Market Approach to Flexicurity”, In Jorgensen H. And Madsen P.K., Ed. 2007, Flexicurity and Beyond. Finding A New Agenda for The European Social Model, DJOF Publishing, Copenhagen, P. 99-130.
  • Gomez, M. and Fernandez, P. (2016) “Labor Market Reforms and Youth Entrepreneurship: Evidence from European Countries”, Small Business Economics, 28(3): 217-240.
  • Hansen, L. and Andersen, K. (2015) “The Role of Labor Market Reforms in Addressing Youth Unemployment: Lessons from Nordic Countries”, Economic Policy, 20(4): 567-589.
  • Ince Yenilmez, M. (2013) “Labour Market Consequences of Job Security and Labor Laws in The Era of Flexicurity: Implications for Turkey”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, Scientificpapers.Org, Vol. 3(1):1-6.
  • Ince Yenilmez, M. and Özdemir, Ç. M. (2024) “Labor Market Dynamics in Turkey During the Last 100 Years”, Lexington Books, ISBN: 9781666956177
  • Keune, M. and Jepsen, M. (2007) “Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity”, In Jørgensen, H. And P.K. Madsen, (2007) Flexicurity and Beyond – Finding A New Agenda for The European Social Model, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, Pp.189-211.
  • Klammer, U. (2005) “Flexicurity Schemes. In Council of Europe, Ed. 2005, Reconciling Labour Flexibility with Social Cohesion – Facing the Challenge- Trends in Social Cohesion 15”, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  • Kumar, R. and Patel, S. (2018) “Youth Unemployment Dynamics and Labor Market Reforms in Developing Economies”, Development Studies Quarterly, 42(2): 87-110.
  • Martinez, J. and Lopez, A. (2017) “Effects of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment: A Meta-Analysis”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(1): 45-68.
  • Petrongolo, B. (2004) “Gender Segregation in Employment Contracts”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3): 331-345.
  • Smith, J. and Jones, A. (2021) “The Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Economic Policy, 25(3): 123-145.
  • Vermeylen, G. and Hurley, J. (2007) “Varieties of Flexicurity: Reflections on Key Elements of Flexibility and Security”, European Foundation for The Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.
  • Wilthagen, T. and Tros, F. (2004) “The Concept Of ‘Flexicurity’: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets”, Transfer – European Review of Labour and Research, 10(2):166-187.

Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 262 - 274
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1576375

Öz

This paper investigates how flexicurity—combining full social security with labour market flexibility—might be able to help Turkey with its particular labour market issues. A concept that originated in Denmark and was incorporated into the EU's 1997 European Employment Strategy, flexicurity aims to strike a balance between worker protection and enterprise flexibility. Flexicurity in the EU has demonstrated the potential to address structural unemployment and low workforce participation. To use this model in Turkey, nevertheless, one must modify it to fit the unique economic and demographic conditions of the nation. High rates of youth unemployment, poor labour force participation, particularly among women, and restricted job mobility are all problems in Turkey. An inclusive workforce could be promoted in Turkey by implementing customised flexicurity concepts, such as active labour market policies and improved employment security. It explores how Turkey can use flexicurity to advance economic equity and growth by drawing on Dual Labour Market Theory, which makes a distinction between primary (stable) and secondary (unstable) employment sectors; Human Capital Theory, which emphasises the importance of education in economic outcomes; and Historical-Institutional Theory, which focusses on the role of labour market policies. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we examine the effects of graded security contracts on job mobility and stability in Turkey's recent employment reforms. An adjusted flexicurity strategy that prioritises job security, income stability, and better job transitions may improve the resilience and inclusivity of Turkey's labour market, according to the findings. With this model, Turkey can accomplish its long-term economic modernisation objectives as well as its current employment demands by paving the road for a more equal and competitive labour market.

Kaynakça

  • Altun, Y., and İşleyen, Ş. (2019) “Türkiye’de Iktisadi Büyüme ile Sanayi Sektöründe İstihdam Arasındaki İlişkinin ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı ile Ekonometrik Analizi: 1991-2017”, Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, 657-676.
  • Auer, P. (2007) “Security in Labour Markets: Combining Flexibility with Security for Decent Work”, Economic and Labour Market Papers 2007-12, International Labour Office.
  • Blanchard, O., Jaumotte, F. and Loungani, P. (2014) “Labour Market Policies and IMF Advice in Advanced Economies During the Great Recession”, IZA Journal of Labour Policy, 3(1): 1–23.
  • Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (2007) “Implementing Public Employment Policy: What Happens When Non-Public Agencies Take Over?”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(7/8):287-301.
  • Davoine, T. (2023) “Flexicurity, Education and Optimal Labour Market Policies”, Labour, 37(4): 592-625.
  • Demir, Y. (2021) “Balkan Ülkelerine Ait İşsizliğin Mekânsal Panel Ekonometri Yaklaşımı ile Analizi”, Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(19), 26-35.
  • Demir, Y. (2021) “Analyzing the Effect of Employment in The Agricultural and Industrial Sectors on Economic Growth with The ARDL Bounds Test”, International Journal of Contemporary Economics And Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 178–192. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.5136851 .
  • Euractiv (2007a) “Social Partners On Flexicurity And Labour Market Reforms”, Available At: Https://Www.Euractiv.Com/Section/Social-Europe-Jobs/Interview/Social-Partners-On-Flexicurity-And-Labour-Market-Reforms/.
  • European Commission (2007) “Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs Through Flexibility and Security”, Office for Official Publication of The European Communities, Luxembourg.
  • Fernandez, L. and Ramirez, J. (2019) “Labor Market Reforms and Youth Employment in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, And Mexico”, Latin American Economic Review, 25(2): 123-145.
  • Garcia, M. and Rodriguez, L. (2019) “Assessing the Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment Transitions: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Youth Studies, 15(4): 567-589.
  • Gazier, B. (2007) “Making Transitions Pay: The Transitional Labour Market Approach to Flexicurity”, In Jorgensen H. And Madsen P.K., Ed. 2007, Flexicurity and Beyond. Finding A New Agenda for The European Social Model, DJOF Publishing, Copenhagen, P. 99-130.
  • Gomez, M. and Fernandez, P. (2016) “Labor Market Reforms and Youth Entrepreneurship: Evidence from European Countries”, Small Business Economics, 28(3): 217-240.
  • Hansen, L. and Andersen, K. (2015) “The Role of Labor Market Reforms in Addressing Youth Unemployment: Lessons from Nordic Countries”, Economic Policy, 20(4): 567-589.
  • Ince Yenilmez, M. (2013) “Labour Market Consequences of Job Security and Labor Laws in The Era of Flexicurity: Implications for Turkey”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, Scientificpapers.Org, Vol. 3(1):1-6.
  • Ince Yenilmez, M. and Özdemir, Ç. M. (2024) “Labor Market Dynamics in Turkey During the Last 100 Years”, Lexington Books, ISBN: 9781666956177
  • Keune, M. and Jepsen, M. (2007) “Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity”, In Jørgensen, H. And P.K. Madsen, (2007) Flexicurity and Beyond – Finding A New Agenda for The European Social Model, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, Pp.189-211.
  • Klammer, U. (2005) “Flexicurity Schemes. In Council of Europe, Ed. 2005, Reconciling Labour Flexibility with Social Cohesion – Facing the Challenge- Trends in Social Cohesion 15”, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  • Kumar, R. and Patel, S. (2018) “Youth Unemployment Dynamics and Labor Market Reforms in Developing Economies”, Development Studies Quarterly, 42(2): 87-110.
  • Martinez, J. and Lopez, A. (2017) “Effects of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Employment: A Meta-Analysis”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(1): 45-68.
  • Petrongolo, B. (2004) “Gender Segregation in Employment Contracts”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3): 331-345.
  • Smith, J. and Jones, A. (2021) “The Impact of Labor Market Reforms on Youth Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Economic Policy, 25(3): 123-145.
  • Vermeylen, G. and Hurley, J. (2007) “Varieties of Flexicurity: Reflections on Key Elements of Flexibility and Security”, European Foundation for The Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.
  • Wilthagen, T. and Tros, F. (2004) “The Concept Of ‘Flexicurity’: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets”, Transfer – European Review of Labour and Research, 10(2):166-187.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Aile ve Hanehalkı Çalışmaları, Kamu Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Eylül Kabakçı Günay 0000-0001-5547-4316

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Aralık 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 29 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Kabakçı Günay, E. (2024). Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(4), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1576375
AMA Kabakçı Günay E. Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. Aralık 2024;22(4):262-274. doi:10.11611/yead.1576375
Chicago Kabakçı Günay, Eylül. “Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 22, sy. 4 (Aralık 2024): 262-74. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1576375.
EndNote Kabakçı Günay E (01 Aralık 2024) Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 4 262–274.
IEEE E. Kabakçı Günay, “Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 4, ss. 262–274, 2024, doi: 10.11611/yead.1576375.
ISNAD Kabakçı Günay, Eylül. “Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 22/4 (Aralık 2024), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1576375.
JAMA Kabakçı Günay E. Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;22:262–274.
MLA Kabakçı Günay, Eylül. “Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 22, sy. 4, 2024, ss. 262-74, doi:10.11611/yead.1576375.
Vancouver Kabakçı Günay E. Job Security, Labour Law Reforms, and Youth Unemployment: Flexicurity’s Role in Shaping Turkey’s Future Workforce. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;22(4):262-74.