Modern Toplumda Bilgi, Güç ve Etik Arasında Faustçu Bir Yolculuk

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 34, 79 - 91, 28.07.2025

Murat Şengöz

https://doi.org/10.57205/yenifikirjournal.1707042

Öz

Bu çalışma, Goethe’nin Faust eserini modern bireyin etik, epistemolojik ve vicdani krizleri bağlamında sosyolojik olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Faust’un bilgiye ulaşma arayışı, bireysel bir tutkunun ötesine geçerek, modern toplumda bilginin araçsallaşması, vicdanın bastırılması ve toplumsal eşitsizliklerin görünür hâle gelmesi gibi yapısal sorunları da temsil etmektedir. Çalışma, kuramsal temelde Zygmunt Bauman’ın “akışkan modernite”, Michel Foucault’nun “bilgi-iktidar ilişkisi”, Max Weber’in “araçsal akıl kavramları” ile Judith Butler, Nancy Fraser ve Carl Jung’un yaklaşımlarını bir arada değerlendirerek disiplinlerarası bir çözümleme sunmaktadır. Faust, Mefistofeles ve Gretchen karakterleri üzerinden birey-toplum, bilgi-güç, vicdan-etik ve cinsiyet-eşitsizlik eksenlerinde derinlemesine analizler yapılmıştır. Yapılan çözümlemeler, bilgi çağında bireyin yaşadığı kimlik bunalımı, etik sorumluluk eksikliği ve toplumsal adalet arayışının hâlâ Faustçu bir düzlemde sürdüğünü göstermektedir. Eser, bu yönüyle yalnızca edebi değil; sosyolojik, felsefi ve kültürel bir uyarı metnine dönüşmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Faust , bilgi toplumu , etik , vicdan , toplumsal cinsiyet , modern birey , sosyolojik kuram

A Faustian Journey Through Knowledge, Power, and Ethics in Modern Society

Öz

This study aims to examine Goethe’s Faust through a sociological lens, focusing on the ethical, epistemological, and moral crises of the modern individual. Faust’s quest for knowledge transcends a personal ambition and reflects broader structural issues in contemporary society, such as the instrumentalization of knowledge, the silencing of conscience, and the perpetuation of systemic inequality. The analysis employs a multidisciplinary theoretical framework, incorporating Zygmunt Bauman’s “liquid modernity,” Michel Foucault’s knowledge-power relationship, Max Weber’s concept of instrumental rationality, as well as insights from Judith Butler, Nancy Fraser, and Carl Jung. Through the characters of Faust, Mephistopheles, and Gretchen, the study explores tensions between individual and society, knowledge and power, conscience and ethics, and gender and marginalization. Findings suggest that the modern subject continues to navigate Faustian dilemmas in the digital age, where identity crisis, ethical disengagement, and demands for social justice remain highly relevant. In this context, Faust emerges not only as a literary classic but also as a sociological and philosophical warning text for our time.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Faust , knowledge society , ethics , conscience , gender , modern subject , sociological theory.

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, S. (2021). Complaint!. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1jgt3hs
• Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton University Press.
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
• Bloom, H. (Ed.). (1987). Goethe's Faust (Modern Critical Interpretations). Chelsea House.
• Boddington, P. (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence: A new approach. Springer.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
• Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
• Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press.
• Floridi, L. (2021). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.
• Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
• Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
• Goethe, J. W. von. (2006). Faust: A tragedy (D. Luke, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1808)
• Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Polity Press.
• Hui, Y. (2016). The question concerning technology in China: An essay in cosmotechnics. Urbanomic.
• Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.
• Jung, C. G. (1959). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self. Princeton University Press.
• Kaufmann, W. (1961). From Shakespeare to existentialism: Studies in poetry, religion, and philosophy. Princeton University Press.
• Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2020). Algorithmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757312 (Orijinal makale 2013'te yayımlanmış, ancak 2020 özel sayısında yeniden basılmıştır.)
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
• Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1905)
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.