Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity

Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3 11 Ocak 2016
  • Kamil Kayabalı
  • Özgür Aktürk
  • Mustafa Fener
  • Ayla Bulut Üstün
  • Orhan Dikmen
  • Furkan Hamza Harputlugil
PDF İndir

Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity

Öz

Undrained shear strength (su) is one of the key geotechnical parameters for both natural and remolded soils. While it is basically a function of water content, it is also related to soil plasticity. There has been a long-lasting debate as to whether the su at the plastic and liquid limits are constant and whether the ratio of the su at the plastic limit to the su at the liquid limit is mostly fixed to 100. While this view is embraced by a great majority of researchers, some proclaim that the range of both the su at the plastic limit (PL) and the su at the liquid limit (LL) is rather wide; therefore, constant values of the su cannot be assigned for either the PL or the LL. Accordingly, the view that there is a constant ratio between the two shear strengths is invalid. The scope of this investigation is to reassess this problem using the laboratory vane shear test (VST) along with a new supplementary tool, the mud-press machine (MPM). Sixty remolded soil samples were employed as the study material. The variation of soil strength at both the plastic and liquid limit is investigated using the VST and MPM methods. While the VST method does not portray a distinctive relationship between the su and the two Atterberg limits, the newly introduced MPM method clearly shows that there is a meaningful relationship between the extrusion force, which is considered akin to the undrained shear strength, at the Atterberg limits and the two consistency limits, particularly the liquid limit. Concerning the constant ratio between the two shear strengths, namely the one at the plastic limit to the one at the liquid limit, it was found that this ratio is a constant, but it increases with the increase in soil plasticity.

Keywords: Undrained shear strength, soil plasticity, vane shear test, mud press method, remolded soils.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. ASTM, 2000. Standard test method for labora- tory miniature vane shear test for satu- rated fine-grained soil. ASTM Standard D4648-00. American Society for Tes- ting and Materials (ASTM), West Cons- hohocken, PA.
  2. American Society for Testing Materials, 2001. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-00 West Conshohocken, PA.
  3. Arrowsmith, E. J., 1978. Roadwork fills – a ma- terial engineer’s viewpoint. Proc. Clay Fills Conf., ICE, London, 25-36.
  4. Belviso, R., Ciampoli, S., Cotecchia, V., and Fe- derico, A., 1985. Use of the cone penet- rometer to determine consistency limits. Ground Engineering, 18(5), 21-22.
  5. Bozozuk, M., 1972. Downdrag measurements on a 160-ft floating pipe test pile in ma- rine clay. Canadian Geotechnical Jour- nal, 9(2), 127-136.
  6. British Standards Institution, 1990. British stan- dard methods of test for soils for en- gineering purposes, BS 1377: Milton Keynes, British Standards Institution.
  7. Dennehy, J. P., 1978. The remoulded undrained shear strength of cohesive soils and its influence on the suitability of embank- ment fill. Proc. Clay Fills Conf., ICE, London, 87-94.
  8. Federico, A., 1983. Relationships (c–w) and u (c–s) for remolded clayey soils at high water content. Riv. Ital. Geotech., 17(1), 38-41.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Özgür Aktürk Bu kişi benim

Mustafa Fener Bu kişi benim

Ayla Bulut Üstün Bu kişi benim

Orhan Dikmen Bu kişi benim

Furkan Hamza Harputlugil Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Ocak 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Ocak 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kayabalı, K., Aktürk, Ö., Fener, M., Bulut Üstün, A., Dikmen, O., & Harputlugil, F. H. (2016). Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri, 36(3), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.17824/yrb.99784
AMA
1.Kayabalı K, Aktürk Ö, Fener M, Bulut Üstün A, Dikmen O, Harputlugil FH. Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri. 2016;36(3):121-136. doi:10.17824/yrb.99784
Chicago
Kayabalı, Kamil, Özgür Aktürk, Mustafa Fener, Ayla Bulut Üstün, Orhan Dikmen, ve Furkan Hamza Harputlugil. 2016. “Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity”. Yerbilimleri 36 (3): 121-36. https://doi.org/10.17824/yrb.99784.
EndNote
Kayabalı K, Aktürk Ö, Fener M, Bulut Üstün A, Dikmen O, Harputlugil FH (01 Mart 2016) Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri 36 3 121–136.
IEEE
[1]K. Kayabalı, Ö. Aktürk, M. Fener, A. Bulut Üstün, O. Dikmen, ve F. H. Harputlugil, “Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity”, Yerbilimleri, c. 36, sy 3, ss. 121–136, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.17824/yrb.99784.
ISNAD
Kayabalı, Kamil - Aktürk, Özgür - Fener, Mustafa - Bulut Üstün, Ayla - Dikmen, Orhan - Harputlugil, Furkan Hamza. “Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity”. Yerbilimleri 36/3 (01 Mart 2016): 121-136. https://doi.org/10.17824/yrb.99784.
JAMA
1.Kayabalı K, Aktürk Ö, Fener M, Bulut Üstün A, Dikmen O, Harputlugil FH. Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri. 2016;36:121–136.
MLA
Kayabalı, Kamil, vd. “Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity”. Yerbilimleri, c. 36, sy 3, Mart 2016, ss. 121-36, doi:10.17824/yrb.99784.
Vancouver
1.Kamil Kayabalı, Özgür Aktürk, Mustafa Fener, Ayla Bulut Üstün, Orhan Dikmen, Furkan Hamza Harputlugil. Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri. 01 Mart 2016;36(3):121-36. doi:10.17824/yrb.99784

Cited By