Çevrimiçi Cinsel Sağlık ve Üreme Sağlığı Eğitimi Sonrası Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bilgi Düzeyleri: Yarı Deneysel Bir Araştırma

Öz

Amaç: Cinsel Sağlık/Üreme Sağlığı (CSÜS) genç yetişkin grupta bulunan üniversite öğrencileri için oldukça önemli bir konudur. Bu çalışma, çevrimiçi Cinsel Sağlık/Üreme Sağlığı eğitimine katılmak isteyen ve katılmak istemeyen üniversite öğrencileri arasındaki CSÜS bilgi düzeyinde farklılıkları incelemiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yarı deneysel araştırmaya 2022-2023 eğitim öğretim yılı bahar döneminde bir üniversiteye kayıt yaptıran öğrenciler katılmıştır. Araştırmacılar örneklemi, olasılıksız örnekleme yoluyla seçmişlerdir. Minimum örneklem büyüklüğü G-Power 3.1 yazılımı kullanılarak hesaplanmış ve 180 öğrenci katılmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu ve Cinsel Sağlık Bilgi Testi (CSBT) kullanılmıştır. Araştırma ön test, eğitim ve son test tasarımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan üniversite öğrencileri arasında CSBT toplam puan ortalamaları ve alt konu gruplarındaki toplam puan ortalamalarının eğitim grubunda anlamlı olarak daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Araştırmada eğitim alan gruptaki üniversite öğrencilerinin CSBT puan ortalamalarının kardeş sayısından olumsuz etkilendiği, baba eğitim durumunun ise orta düzeyde olumlu yönde etkilendiği belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Sonuç: Çevrimiçi cinsel sağlık eğitimi alan öğrencilerin cinsel sağlık bilgi düzeylerinin almayanlara göre daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Güvenilir bilgi kaynaklarından verilen eğitim serileri sonucunda öğrencilerin güvenli cinsel davranış becerilerinin artacağı, riskli ve sağlıksız cinsel uygulamalarının ise azalacağı öngörülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Üniversite öğrencisi
• Online
• Eğitim
• Cinsel sağlık
• Üreme sağlığı

University Students' Level of Knowledge After Online Sexual and Reproductive Health Education: A Quasi-Experimental Research

Öz

Objectives: Sexual/Reproductive Health (SRH) is a very important issue for university students in the young adult group. This study examined the differences in SRH knowledge levels between university students who wanted to participate in online SRH education and those who did not. Materials and Methods: Students enrolled at a university in the spring semester of the 2022-2023 academic year participated in the quasi-experimental research. The researchers selected the sample through non-probability sampling. The minimum sample size was calculated using the G-Power 3.1 software, and 180 students participated. The Introductory Information Form and Sexual Health Knowledge Test (SHKT) were used to collect data. The study was conducted using a pre-test, training, and post-test design. Results: Among the university students participating in the study, it was determined that the SHKT total score averages and the total score averages in the sub-subject groups were significantly higher in the training group (p<0.05). The study determined that the SHKT score averages of the university students in the group receiving education were negatively affected by the number of siblings, and the education level of their fathers had a moderately positive effect (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was observed that the level of sexual health knowledge of the students who received online sexual health education was higher than those who did not. As a result of the training series given from traditional information sources, it is predicted that the safe sexual behaviour skills of the students will increase and their risky and unhealthy sexual practices will decrease.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• University student
• Online
• Education
• Sexual health
• Reproductive health

Kaynakça

1. United Nations Population Fund. Comperehensive sexuality education. 2021. Accessed Date; 16.09.2023, Accessed Address; https://www.unfpa.org/comprehensive-sexuality-education#readmore-expand
2. WHO. Adolescent pregnancy. 2020. Accessed Date; 18.06.2023, Accessed Address; https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy
3. Yanıkkerem E, Üstgörül S. The thoughts about sexual health education of nursing students who took and did not take sexual health course. JHVS. 2019;7(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.469855
4. Aslan F. School-based sexual health education for adolescents in Türkiye: A Systematic Review. Int. Q. Community Health Educ. 2022;42(2):135-143.
5. Fisher CM, Kauer S, Singleton A, Walsh-Buhi E. An examination of sexual health information sources, knowledge and behaviours among Australian teens: a latent class analysis. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy. 2021;20:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00679-3
6. Benton AD, Nason E, Lewis C, Vinklarek A, Santana A. Dose matters in evaluation of a school-based adolescent sexual health education program. J Sch Health. 2022;92(8):815-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13158
7. Grayson N, Quinones N, Oseguera TA. model of true CHOICES: learnings from a comprehensive sexual and reproductive health clinic in Tennessee that provides abortions and opened the city’s first birth center. JMWH. 2022;67:689-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13448
8. Cirban Ekrem E, Kurt A, Önal Y. The relationship between sexual myths and intercultural sensitivity in university students. PPC. 2022;58: 2910–2917. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.13140

9. Doğan N, Fışkın G, Yüceler Kaçmaz H. Beliefs and attitudes regarding sexual health care of students who take and didn’t take sexual health lessons. Androl Bul. 2022;24:1-10. https://doi.org/10.24898/tandro.2022.67689 (Turkish)
10. Warner C, Carlson S, Crichlow R, Ross, MW. Sexual health knowledge of u.s. medical students: a national survey. JSM. 2018;15(8):1093-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.019
11. Zeren F, Gürsoy E. Why sexual health education? JDU Health Sci Inst. 2018;8(1):29-33.
12. Aşcı Ö, Gökdemir F, Çiçekoğlu E. Efficiency of training on reproductive health provided by peer trainers to nursing students. HSP. 2016;3(3):173-183. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.56193 (Turkish)
13. Gursoy E, Yesildere Saglam H. Factors affecting sexual health-seeking behaviors of young people. J Public Health. 2022;30:2899-2910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01508-y
14. Özcan H, Kızılkaya Beji N, Karadağ A, Emlik K. University students’ knowledge level for sexual and reproductive health. International Refereed Journal Of Nursing Researches. 2016;7:83-97. https://doi.org/10.17371/UHD.2016719478 (Turkish)
15. Guan M. Sexual and reproductive health knowledge, sexual attitudes, and sexual behaviour of university students: findings of a Beijing based survey in 2010-2011. Arch Public Health. 2021;79:215. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00739-5
16. Karamouzian M, Shahesmaeili A, Khajehkazemi R, et al. Awareness of and knowledge about stis among nonmedical students in Iran. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health. 2017;43(1):21-28.
17. Beyhan A, Ergün A. Young men’s perceptions about sexual health and sexual education: a qualitative study. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2023;13:1-7. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1092854
18. Kömürcü N, Değirmenci Öz S, Uysal N, Yedek S. Peer education in informing university youth on HPV and safe sexual life. BANU Journal of Health Science and Research. 2023;5(1):55-64. https://doi.org/10.46413/boneyusbad.1171532 (Turkish)
19. Lyu J, Shen X, Hesketh T. Sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among undergraduate students in China—Implications for sex education. Int. J. Environ. Health Res.2020;17(18):6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186716
20. Sarı C, Adıgüzel L, Demirbağ BC. Knowledge about family planning and sexually transmitted diseases among university students. TJFMPC. 2023;17(1):50-61. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjmpc.1126454 (Turkish)
21. Gonenc IM, Alan Dikmen H, Golbası Z. The effect of WhatsApp-based and conventional education methods on sexual myths and sexual health knowledge: a comparative intervention study in midwifery students. Int. J. Sex. Health. 2021;33(3):326-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1913688
22. The Global Goals for Sustainable Development. Sustainable development goals. 2023. Access Date; 18.06.2023, Access Address; https://www.kureselamaclar.org/
23. Lahza H, Khosravi H, Demartini G. Analytics of learning tactics and strategies in an online learner sourcing environment. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2023;39:94-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12729
24. Wong JYH, Zhang W, Wu Y, et al. An ınteractive web-based sexual health literacy program for safe sex practice for female Chinese university students: multicenter randomised controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e22564. https://doi.org/10.2196/22564
25. Evgin D, Sümen A. Effect of online case-based teaching method on professional development of nursing students. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2023;13:9-17. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.942370
26. Aksakoglu G. Research designing and analysis. 3. Edition, Dokuz Eylül University Rectorship Press. Izmir. 2013. Evcili F, Gölbaşı Z. Sexual Health Knowledge Test: developing, reliability and validation. AUHSJ. 2017;1:29-33. (Turkish)
27. Irmak Vural P, Bakır N, Oskay Ü. Evaluation of the knowledge levels of vocational school students about sexually transmitted ınfections. JOWHEN. 2015;2(2):58-70. (Turkish)
28. Leon-Larios F, Macías-Seda J. Factors related to healthy sexual and contraceptive behaviors in undergraduate students at university of Seville: a cross-sectional study. Reprod. Health. 2017;14:179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0444-9
29. Boti N, Hussen S, Shegaze M, et al. Effects of comprehensive sexuality education on the comprehensive knowledge and attitude to condom use among first-year students in Arba Minch University: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Res. Notes. 2019;12(1):700–707.
30. Chi X., Hawk ST, Winter S, Meeus W. The effect of comprehensive sexual education program on sexual health knowledge and sexual attitude among college students in southwest China. APACPH. 2015;27(2): 2049–2066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513475655
31. Taffa N, Haimanot R, Desalegn S, Tesfaye A, Mohammed K. Do parents and young people communicate on sexual matters. EJHD. 2021;3(3):1-7.
32. Karatana Ö, Ergun A, Erol S. The effect of the transtheoretical model-based healthy youth program on sexual health knowledge and behavior of college women. Am. J. Sex. Educ. 2022;18(2):300-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2022.2086655
33. Bennett AT, Patel DA, Carlos RC, Zochowski MK. Human Papillomavirus vaccine uptake after a tailored, online educational intervention for female university students: a randomised controlled trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24(11):950-957. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5251
34. Evcili F, Golbası Z. The effect of peer education model on sexual myths of Turkish university students: an interventional study. PPC. 2018;55(2):239-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12344
35. Narkarat Ptaneepanichskul S, Kumar R, Somrongthong R. Effects of mobile health education on sexual and reproductive health information among female school-going adolescents of rural Thailand. F1000Res. 2021;10:452. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53007.1
36. Darabi F, Kaveh MH, Farahani FK, Yaseri M, Majlessi F, Shojaeizadeh D. The effect of a theory of planned behavior-based educational intervention on sexual and reproductive health in Iranian adolescent girls: a randomised controlled trial. J. Res. Health Sci. 2017;17(4):400.
37. Mukherjee A, Gopalakrishnan R, Thangadurai P, Kuruvilla A, Jacob KS. Knowledge and attitudes toward sexual health and common sexual practices among college students – a survey from Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2019;41(4):348-356. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_441_18 Evcili F, Golbası Z. Sexual myths and sexual health knowledge levels of Turkish university students. Sex. Cult. 2017;21:976–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9436-8
38. Cirban Ekrem E. The sexual dimension of domestic violence. Arch. Med. Res. 2021;30(1):31-36. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.823570