Bir İmkânsız Kimlik Örneği olarak “Zapatista”: Rancière'de Öznelleşme ve EZLN

Öz

1 Ocak 1994'te ulusal bir kurtuluş ordusu olarak Meksika'nın Chiapas kentinde birkaç kasabayı işgal eden Zapatista hareketinin uzun süreli etkileri olmuştur. Zapatista hareketi, tüm dünyadaki diğer hareketlere ilham vermenin yanı sıra, seçim kazanma veya silahlı mücadele yoluyla siyasi iktidarı ele geçirme hedefine bir alternatif sunmuştur. Söz konusu alternatif siyaset, bir öznelleşme sürecini gerektiren eşitliğe dayanmaktadır. Böylelikle bu alternatifin ortaya çıkmasına olanak sağlayan, Rancière'in deyimiyle, toplumun parçalarına uygun yerleri atfederken aynı zamanda parçaların kendilerini de tanımlayan polis düzenine karşı özne oluşumu olarak siyasettir. Siyaset anının polis düzeni tarafından asimilasyonu sürekli gündemde olan bir risk olsa da, Zapatista hareketindeki imkansız kimlik yoluyla sürekli özne oluşumu, hareketi, diğer dışlanan grupların mücadelelerini harekete yansıtarak ve hareketi de diğer tüm bu mücadelelere yansıtarak, hareketi dışlananların tümünün hareketi haline getirebilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Zapatista Hareketi, Jacques Rancière, Siyaset, Öznelleşme, İmkânsız Kimlik JEL Sınıflandırması: H77, P32

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : Zapatista Hareketi
• Jacques Rancière
• Siyaset
• Öznelleşme
• İmkânsız Kimlik

“Zapatista” as a Case of Impossible Identification: Subjectification in Rancière and the EZLN

Öz

The Zapatista movement that went public on January 1st, 1994, as a national liberation army occupying several towns in Chiapas, Mexico had long-lasting effects. Apart from inspiring other movements all over the world, the Zapatista movement introduced an alternative to the objective of taking political power through electoral victory or armed struggle. The alternative politics in question was based on equality that entailed a subjectification process. In this way, what allowed for the emergence of the alternative was, in Rancière's terms, politics as subject formation against the police order that attributes the proper places of the parts of society as well as defining the parts themselves. While there is a constant risk of cooptation of the moment of politics by the police order, the continuous subject formation through impossible identification in the Zapatista movement could make the movement the movement of all the excluded by reflecting the struggles of the other excluded groups into the movement and reflecting the movement into those other struggles. Key Words: Zapatista Movement, Jacques Rancière, Politics, Subjectification, Impossible Identification JEL Classification: H77, P32

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zapatista Movement
• Jacques Rancière
• Politics
• Subjectification
• Impossible Identification

Kaynakça

1. Autonomedia. (1994). Zapatistas! Documents of the new Mexican revolution. Autonomedia.
2. Chambers, S. A. (2010). Police and Oligarchy. In Jacques Rancière: Key concepts (pp. 57–69). Durham: Acumen Publishing.
3. Davis, O. (2010). Jacques Rancière. Cambridge: Polity.
4. Dulkadiroğlu, M. (2008). Doğrudan Demokrasi: Zapatist Özyönetim Deneyimi. Ankara: Algıyayın.
5. EZLN. (1993). First Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle. Retrieved January 19, 2023, from Radio Zapatista website: https://radiozapatista.org/?p=20280&lang=en
6. EZLN. (2016, November 27). A Story to Try to Understand. Retrieved from Enlace Zapatista website: https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2016/11/26/a-story-to-try-to-understand/
7. Gunderson, C. (2018). Autonomist Marxist Interpretations of the Zapatista Uprising: A Critique. Science & Society, 82 (4), 531-554.
8. Harvey, N. (1998). The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

9. Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. Pluto.
10. Holloway, J., & Peláez, E. (1998). Zapatista! Reinventing revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto Press.
11. Khasnabish, A. (2010). Zapatistas. New York: Zed Books.
12. Kien, G. (2019). Communicating with memes: Consequences in post-truth civilization. London: Lexington Books.
13. Klein, N. (2002). Fences and windows: Dispatches from the front lines of the globalization debate. London: Flamingo.
14. La Botz, D. (2014, January 13). Twenty Years Since the Chiapas Rebellion: The Zapatistas, Their Politics, and Their Impact. Retrieved January 19, 2023, from Solidarity website: https://solidarity-us.org/site/node/4082/
15. Marcos, S. (2004). Ya basta! Ten years of the Zapatista uprising (Ž. Vodovnik, Ed.). Oakland: AK Press.
16. Mentinis, M. (2006). Zapatistas: The Chiapas revolt and what it means for radical politics. London: Pluto Press.
17. Nail, T. (2013). Zapatismo and the Global Origins of Occupy. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 12(3)., 20–35. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/NAIZAT
18. Oikonomakis, L. (2012, December 21). Zapatistas: “To be heard, we march in silence” Retrieved January 19, 2023, from ROAR Magazine website: http://roarmag.org/2012/12/zapatistas-march-chiapas-mayas/
19. Ramírez, G. M. (2008). The fire and the word: A history of the Zapatista movement. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
20. Rancière, J. (1992). Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization. October, 61, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/778785
21. Rancière, J. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy (J. Rose, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028
23. Rancière, J. (2007). On the shores of politics (L. Heron, Trans.). London: Verso.
24. The Political Constitution of the Mexican United States. (2005). http://historico.juridicas.unam.mx/infjur/leg/constmex/pdf/consting.pdf
25. Topal, A. (2014). Meksika’da tarım politikaları ve kırsal mücadele dinamikleri. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 41, 151-176.
26. Tormey, S. (2006). “Not in my name”: Deleuze, Zapatismo and the critique of representation. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(1)., 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsj001