Kamu Hizmeti Sağlayıcıları Olarak Kar Amacı Gütmeyen Kuruluşlar

Öz

This paper discusses nonprofit organizations as providers of public goods in the context of market failure theory. The paper defines common terms, elaborates on existing theory regarding non-profits and the market, and ties the argument to the current conversation in Public Administration. The author’s argument is that the establishment of non-profit organizations as community solutions to fill the void of market failure is congruent with the communitarian and implicitly Anti Federalist perspective in the Public Administration discourse. Due to urbanization and urban migration related problems, Turkey is facing market failures in the provision of public goods similar to those of the progressive era in the US. As government falls short of providing necessary services, third sector organizations step up to the task. Currently Turkey’s third sector is rather loosely structured and needs to be developed to be able to compensate for the shortcomings of the private and public sectors provision of these goods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nonprofit Organizations, Public Goods, Market Failure Theory

Kamu Hizmeti Sağlayıcıları Olarak Kar Amacı Gütmeyen Kuruluşlar

Öz

Bu makale kar amacı gütmeyen kuruluşların (KAGK) kamu hizmeti sağlamalarını pazar yetersizliği teorisi (market failure theory) bağlamında ele almaktadır. Ortak kavramlar oluşturulduktan sonra, KAGK ve pazar arasındaki ilişkiyi ele alan teoriler gözden geçirilerek kamu yönetimi literatürüyle ilişkilendirilmiştir. Yazar, KAGK’ların pazar yetersizliği sonucunda, hizmet ihtiyacını gidermek için komüteryen çözümler olarak gelişmelerinin kamu yönetiminde komüteryen (Communitarian) ve Anti Federalist görüşüyle uyuştuğunu iddia etmektedir. Kentleşme ve kente göç sonucunda Türkiye’de kamu hizmetlerinin yeterli ölçüde sağlanması aksamıştır. Bu ABD’de Progressive dönemde (1890-1920) yaşananlara benzemektedir. Devletin tedarik etmekte yetişemediği hizmetleri doğal bir süreç içinde KAGK’lar üstlenmiştir. Günümüzde Türkiye’nin üçüncü sektörü tam yapılanmamış olup, var olan eksiklikleri telafi edebilmesi için geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kar amacı gütmeyen kuruluşlar, kamu yararı, Pazar yetersizliği teorisi

Kaynakça

1. AL, Hamza (2008), ‘Çağdaş Kent Hizmetlerinin Sunumlarında Vakıfların Rolü’, Yerel Siyaset. 25, 45ARROW, Kenneth J. (1963), ‘Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care’, The American Economics Review, 53 (5), 941-973.
2. BORİS, Elizabeth T. (1999), ‘Nonprofit Organizations in a Democracy: Varied roles and Responsibilities’, E.T. Boris and C.E. Steuerle (Ed.) Nonprofits & Government: Collaboration and Conflict (3-31). Washington: The Urban Institute Press.
3. CORBİN, John J. (1999), ‘A Study of factors influencing the Growth of Nonprofits in Social Services’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28 (3) 296-314.
4. ES, Muharrem ve Hamza ATEŞ (2004), ‘Kent Tönetimi, Kentlileşme ve Göç: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri’, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 48, 205-248.
5. GREEN, Richard T. (1998), Communitarianism, In J.M. Shafritz (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration (435-439). Colorado: Westview Press.
6. HANDY, Famida ve Narasimhan SRİNİVASAM, (2004), ‘Valuing Volunteers: An Economic Evaluation of the Net Benefits of Hospital Volunteers’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33 ( 1), 28-54.
7. HANSMANN, Henry (1987), ‘Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization’, In
8. W.W.Powell (Ed.), The Nonprofit sector: A Research Handbook (27- 42). New Haven:Yale University Press. HEAD, John G. (1974), ‘Public Goods and Public Policy’, In S. Baker & C. Elliot

9. (Ed.) Readings in Public Sector Economics (176-192). Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company. HOCHMAN, Harold M. (1980), Book review. Journal of Economic Literature, 18 (XVIII), 1591
10. İNALCIK, Halil (2003), Osmanlı Imperatorluğu Klasik Çağ , Yapı Kredi Yayinları.
11. OTT, Steven (2001), ‘Introduction to the Non Profit Sector’, In J.S. Ott (Ed.) The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector (pp 1-8). Boulder: Westview Press.
12. PRESTON, Anne E. (1988), ‘The nonprofit firm: A potential solution to inherent market Failures’, Economic Inquiry 26 (3) 493-506.
13. SALAMON, Lester M. (1987), ‘Partners in Public Service: The Scope and Theory of GovernmentNonprofit Relations’, In W.W. Powell (Ed.) The Nonprofit sector: A Research Handbook (99-117), New Haven:Yale University Press.
14. SALAMON, Lester M. (1995), Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relationships in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. SPİCER, Michael W. (1985), ‘A public Choice Approach to Motivating People in Bureaucratic Organizations Organizations’, Academy of Management Review. 10( 3), 518-5
15. STİVERS, Camilla (2000), Bureau Men Settlement Women, Kansas : University Press of Kansas. TÜSEV (Third Sector Foundation of Turkey). STEP Report 2011.
16. WEİSBROD, Burton A. (1975). ‘Toward a theory of the Voluntary Non-Profit Sector in a Three Sector Economy’, In E.S. Phelps (Ed.) Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory (171195). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. WEİSBROD, Burton A. (1988). The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18. YOUNG, Dennis C. (2001), ‘Contract Failure Theory’ In J.S. Ott (Ed.) The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector (193-196). Boulder: Westview Press.
19. YOUNG, Dennis C. & David R. HAMMACK, (1993), Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy: Common Threads and Research Issues. In D.C. Young & D.R.Hammack Eds.) Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy (398- 419). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers .