Dinamik Yetenekler ve İnovasyon Performansı: Yönetim ve İşletme Alanındaki Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

İşletmelerin rekabet avantajını sürdürebilmesi ve yenilikçi kapasitesini artırabilmesi için önemli kavramlar arasında bulunan dinamik yetenekler ve inovasyon performansı yönetim ve organizasyon literatüründe giderek daha fazla incelenmektedir. Bu araştırma, söz konusu alandaki söz konusu kavramların araştırma eğilimlerini bibliyometrik yöntemle analiz etmektedir. Web of Science veri tabanında "dynamic capabilities" ve "innovation performance" anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak yapılan tarama sonucunda, 2006-2025 yılları arasında yayımlanmış toplam 311 makale incelenmiştir. Yapılan bibliyometrik analizle yayın sayıları, atıf ilişkileri, en etkili yazarlar, dergiler ve ülkeler belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, dinamik yetenekler ve inovasyon performansı konularına yönelik akademik ilginin özellikle 2015 sonrasında hızlı bir şekilde arttığını göstermektedir. En çok yayın yapan ülkeler arasında Çin, Almanya ve İspanya öne çıkarken, en etkili dergiler arasında Strategic Management Journal ve Journal of Business Research yer almaktadır. Çalışmada RStudio tabanlı Biblioshiny programı kullanılarak veri görselleştirmeleri yapılmış, alandaki araştırma eğilimleri ve geleceğe yönelik potansiyel çalışma alanları belirlenmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Dinamik Yetenekler, İnovasyon Performansı, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science, Yönetim ve İşletme JEL Sınıflandırması: M10, L20, L25

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dinamik Yetenekler
• İnovasyon Performansı
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Web of Science
• Yönetim ve İşletme

Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis of Management and Business Research

Öz

Dynamic capabilities and innovation performance, which are among the important concepts for firms to maintain their competitive advantage and increase their innovative capacity, are increasingly studied in the management and organisation literature. This study analyses the research trends of these concepts in this area using a bibliometric method. A total of 311 articles published between 2006 and 2025 were analysed by searching the Web of Science database using the keywords "dynamic capabilities" and "innovation performance". The bibliometric analysis identified the number of publications, citation ratios, most influential authors, journals and countries. The results show that academic interest in dynamic capabilities and innovation performance has grown rapidly, especially after 2015. China, Germany and Spain stand out among the top publishing countries, while Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Business Research are among the most influential journals. The study used the RStudio-based program Biblioshiny to create data visualisations, identify research trends in the field and potential future areas of study. Key Words: Dynamic Capabilities, Innovation Performance, Bibliometric Analysis, Web of Science, Management and Business JEL Classification: M10, L20, L25

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dynamic Capabilities
• Innovation Performance
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Web of Science
• Management and Business

Kaynakça

1. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic management journal, 22(3), 197-220.
2. Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2018). Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 42-52.
3. Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Abed, I. A., Nikkeh, N. S., & Mohammed, M. A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and innovation performance: systematic literature review. Technology Reports of Kansai University, 62(10), 5989-6000.
4. Ali, M. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Alkhodary, D., & Marei, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and their impact on intellectual capital and innovation performance. Sustainability, 13(18), 10028.
5. Alpsoy, İ. (2026). Sürükleyici gazetecilik üzerine WOS’ta bibliyometrik bir analiz (1997–2025). International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 12(2), 232–243.
6. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British journal of management, 20, S9-S24.
7. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
8. Bağış, M. (2021). Dinamik yeteneklerin entelektüel yapısının ortak kelime analiziyle incelenmesi: 1991-2021. 6th International EMI Entrepreneurship & Social Sciences Congress, 16-18 September 2021, Aksaray, Türkiye (ss. 294-310). Dilkur Academy.

9. Bayazıt, A., & Gürbüzer, G. B. (2024). Dinamik Yetenekler Yaklaşımına Yönelik Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 368-380.
10. Bornay-Barrachina, M., López-Cabrales, Á., & Salas-Vallina, A. (2023). Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring dynamic capabilities in innovative firms: Why does strategic leadership make a difference?. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23409444231185790.
11. Burton, A. M., & Dickinger, A. (2025). Innovation in Crisis. The role of leadership and dynamic capabilities for a more innovative hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124, 103946.
12. Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2018). How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance. Journal of knowledge management, 22(3), 621-648.
13. Cheng, J. H., Chen, M. C., & Huang, C. M. (2014). Assessing inter-organizational innovation performance through relational governance and dynamic capabilities in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 173-186.
14. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
15. de Noronha, M. E. S., Ferraro, D. M. J., & Silva, R. D. S. V. (2022). Bibliometric analysis on the orchestration of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Innovation: IJI Journal, 10(4), 610-637.
16. Demirel, E. (2022). Dinamik Yetenekler Yaklaşımının Görsel Haritalama Tekniğine Göre Bibliyometrik Analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(1), 102–125.
17. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
18. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, Nos 10‐11, pp. 1105-1121.
19. Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: a meta‐analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of management studies, 53(8), 1348-1380.
20. Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92, 102061.
21. Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research policy, 32(5), 715-736.
22. Geroski, P., & Machin, S. (1992). Do innovating firms outperform non‐innovators?. Business Strategy Review, 3(2), 79-90.
23. Geroski, P., Machin, S., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. The Rand journal of economics, 198-211.
24. Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: Interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 985-991.
25. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Springer.
26. Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. (2017). Linkage between dynamics capability and knowledge management factors: A structural equation model. Management Decision, 55(10), 2256-2276.
27. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Herrera, F. (2019). Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 615-646.
28. Harsono, T. W., Hidayat, K., Iqbal, M., & Abdillah, Y. (2024). Creating Sustainable Innovation Performance: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(12), 4990.
29. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 36(6), 831-850.
30. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Blackwell Publishing.
31. Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1609-1621.
32. Hu, L., Wu, P., & Chen, H. (2022). Enterprise innovation performance: bibliometric review and future research trends. Open Access Library Journal, 9(5), 1-15.
33. Jin, X., Wang, J., Chen, S., & Wang, T. (2015). A study of the relationship between the knowledge base and the innovation performance under the organizational slack regulating. Management Decision, 53(10), 2202-2225.
34. Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of management information systems, 32(1), 39-81.
35. Lin, Y., & Wu, L. Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of business research, 67(3), 407-413.
36. Martínez-Román, J. A., Tamayo, J. A., Gamero, J., & Romero, J. E. (2015). Innovativeness and business performances in tourism SMEs. Annals of Tourism Research, 54, 118-135.
37. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
38. Narayanan, V. K., Colwell, K., & Douglas, F. L. (2009). Building organizational and scientific platforms in the pharmaceutical industry: A process perspective on the development of dynamic capabilities. British Journal of Management, 20, S25-S40.
39. Pavlou, P.A. and El Sawy, O.A. (2011), “Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities”, Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
40. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York.
41. Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research policy, 31(7), 1053-1067.
42. Salvato, C., & Vassolo, R. (2018). The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 39(6), 1728-1752.
43. Schilke, O. (2014), “Second-order dynamic capabilities: how do they matter?”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), pp. 368-380.
44. Sebrek, S. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Kosztyán, Z. T. (2025). How to create dynamic capabilities: A design science study. Technovation, 143, 103204.
45. Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & management, 41(8), 933-945.
46. Stek, P. E., & van Geenhuizen, M. S. (2016). The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 61-70.
47. Taghizadeh, S. K., Rahman, S. A., Nikbin, D., Radomska, M., & Maleki Far, S. (2024). Dynamic capabilities of the SMEs for sustainable innovation performance: role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(4), 767-787.
48. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
49. Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: the role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 679-730). North-Holland.
50. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
51. Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537-556.
52. Theoharakis, V., & Hooley, G. (2008). Customer orientation and innovativeness: Differing roles in New and Old Europe. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 69-79.
53. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
54. Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PloS one, 10(7), e0131816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131816
55. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
56. Wang, C., Jesiek, B., & Zhang, W. (2024). Elevating international collaboration and academic outcomes through strategic research funding: a bibliometric analysis of China Scholarship Council funded publications. Scientometrics, 129(7), 4329-4351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05054-8
57. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 991-995.
58. Wu, L. Y. (2006). Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment: Perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises. Information & Management, 43(4), 447-454.
59. Zehir, C., & Vural, S. Ç. (2025). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance: moderated mediation model with product innovation as mediator and technology uncertainty as moderator. Journal of Strategy and Management, 18(2), 326-348.
60. Zehir, C., Karaboğa, T., Karaboğa, H., & Üzmez, A. (2019). Market orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial strategic posture. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences.
61. Zhang, C., & Guo, J. (2017). China’s international research collaboration: Evidence from a panel gravity model. Scientometrics, 113(2), 1129-1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2513-9
62. Zhang, J., & Wu, W. P. (2013). Social capital and new product development outcomes: The mediating role of sensing capability in Chinese high-tech firms. Journal of World Business, 48(4), 539-548.
63. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339-351.
64. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629