Sosyal Girişimcilik Uygulamaları: Ahilik Teşkilatı Örneği

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 3, 507 - 520, 27.09.2024

Hamza Öz

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.1511576

Öz

Bu çalışmada, sosyal girişimcilik ile Ahilik Teşkilatı arasındaki ilişkiler, Türk tarihinde önemli bir yere sahip olan Ahilik Teşkilatı'nda gerçekleştirilen uygulamalar bağlamında incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde sosyal girişimcilik kavramı açıklanmış, ikinci bölümde ise Ahilik Teşkilatı detaylı bir şekilde ele alınmıştır. Üçüncü bölüm ise, her iki yapı arasındaki ilişkiyi benzerlikler ve farklılıklar bağlamında açıklamak üzere yapılan uygulamaları değerlendirmiştir. Araştırmanın en önemli bulguları arasında, her Ahi’nin aynı zamanda bir sosyal girişimci olduğu ancak her sosyal girişimcinin aynı zamanda bir Ahi olmadığı yer almaktadır. Ayrıca, bu kurumlar tarafından yerine getirilen değer temelli uygulamaların günümüz sivil toplum örgütleri için bir örnek teşkil etmesi gerektiği vurgulanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Girişimcilik, Sosyal Girişimcilik, Ahilik, Ahilik Teşkilatı
JEL Sınıflandırması: I25, L26, L31

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, Sosyal Girişimcilik, Ahilik, Ahilik Teşkilatı

Social Entrepreneurship Practices: The Example of Ahi Organization

Öz

In this study, the relations between social entrepreneurship and the Ahilik Organization were examined in the context of the practices implemented in the Ahilik Organization, which has an important place in Turkish history. In the first part of the study, the concept of social entrepreneurship was explained, and in the second part, the Ahilik Organization was discussed in detail. The third part evaluated the practices implemented in order to explain the relationship between the two structures in terms of similarities and differences. Among the most important findings of the study is that every Ahi is also a social entrepreneur, but not every social entrepreneur is also an Ahi. In addition, it was emphasized that the value-based practices implemented by these institutions should be an example for today's civil society organizations.
Key Words: Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship, Ahi Order, Ahi Organization
JEL Classification: I25, L26, L31

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship, Ahi Order, Ahi Organization

Kaynakça

• Abolarin, M. E. (2014). Social entrepreneurs: a phenomenological study of social value. Doctoral Thesis, Capella University.
• Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: definition and boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review. (2)2, 22-27.
• Akgündüz, M. (2014). The organisation of ahilik based on brotherhood in commercial life. Harran University Journal of Faculty of Theology, (31) 1. 9-18.
• Aktaş, Ü. N., & Akdeve, E. (2024). Social entrepreneurship and its development process in Turkey Suggestion Journal, (19) 61. 164-185.
• Aldawood, A. (2020). Women leaders in social entrepreneurship: leadership perception, and barriers. Doctoral Thesis. Seattle University.
• Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. https://knowhow3000.org/wp-content/files/CoPs/KM/Global%20Social%20Enterprise/Sessions/1.%20Introduction/Social_Enterprise_Typology_Updated_Novem.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 25.8.2024.
• Andaç, F. (1994). Ahi organisation in the Ottoman period. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 11, 1-14.
• Ashoka Foundation (2020). http://ashokaturkiye.org/hakkimizda.
• Balcı, A. (2013). Research in social sciences: methods, techniques and principles. (10th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi
• Bandinelli, C. (2017). Social entrepreneurship: sociality, ethics, and politics. Doctoral Thesis. University of London,
• Bayraktar, L. (2005). Ahlism and morality. I. Ahî Evran-ı Veli and Ahîlik Research Symposium, Kırşehir: Gazi University Ahi Culture Research Centre Publications.
• Bayram, M. (1991). Ahi Evran and the establishment of ahi organisation. Damla Matbaacılık.
• Bayram, S. (2012). Local elements of economic life in the Ottoman Empire: ahilik organisation and artisan guilds. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology. 21. 81-114.
• Besler, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship. Senem Besler (Edt), Social entrepreneurship in. Beta Publications.
• Bornstein, D. & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press. 2010.
• Bozpınar, C. (2020). Ahilik as narrated by Ibn Battûta: An ulgenerist perspective. Journal of History School. https://doi:10.29228/joh.44764
• Coşkun, E. (2015). The role of voluntary organisations in pre-school social entrepreneurship education. Master Thesis. Yalova University, Institute of Social Sciences.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2th. Ed.). USA: SAGE Publications
• Çağatay, N. (1981). A Turkish institution, ahilik. Selcuk University Press.
• Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacyof social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(4), 411-424.
• Dees, G.J. (1998). The meaning of "social entrepreneurship". Comments and suggestions contributed from. The Social Entrepreneurship Founders Working Group in. Durham: NC: Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
• Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. (2010). Social Entreprise, in K. Hart, J.-L. Laville & D. Cattani, eds., The Human Economy: A Citizen’s Guide, 284-292, Polity Press: Cambridge.
• Demirel, E. T. (2017). Social entrepreneurship. Kaygın, E. (Ed.). Entrepreneurship: basic concepts, types of entrepreneurship, current issues entrepreneurship in 121-140. Cinius Publications.
• Demirtaş, F. (2021). Fütüvvet and Ahilik in the Anatolian Seljuk State: From the Institution of Politics to the Politics of Institution. Bilimname, (46), 41-68.
• Denizalp, H. (2009). Social entrepreneurship for social transformation. Fersa Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti.
• Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120-132.
• Durak, İ. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and ahilik organisation: theoretical framework. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 47. 101-120.
• Ersen, T. B., Kaya, D. & Meydanoğlu, Z. (2010). Social enterprises and Turkey needs analysis report. Istanbul: TÜSEV Publications. 50.
• Ersoy, E. (2012). Living architects of turkish society from past to present: Ahis. Turkish World Studies.201. 171-184.
• Erturgut, R., & Soysekerci, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship effect on educational activity: The research in turkey universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(1997), 3954–3958. https://doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.178
• Gök, M. (2021). Ahilik organisation and socio-economic effects. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences. 11(2). 91-120.
• Gökbunar, R., Kargın, M. & Aktaş, H. (2018). Social entrepreneurship in universities: opportunities and recommendations. Journal of Management and Economics 25(1), 155-170.
• Göksel, A., & Yüksel, A. N. (2020). Ahi organisation as an example of regional clustering. Ahi Evran University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences. 6(3), 794-812.
• Gölpınarlı, A. (1954). Fütüvvet organisation and sources in ıslamic and Turkish cities. Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, 11/1-4, 6-354.
• Gündüz, A. Y., Kaya, M., & Aydemir, C. (2012). An evaluation on the studies on the protection of consumers in the Ahi organisation and today. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 14(2). 37-54.
• Hacıgökmen, M. A. (2012). The transformation of ahlism into an artisan organisation in anatolia and ıts reflections on the fief system: The case of Ankara. Selcuk University Journal of Turkiat Studies, 32, 263-91.
• Işık, V. (2013). The concept of work changed by corporate social responsibility and social enterprises as a new field of work. Journal of Social Security, 3(1), 101-131.
• Jiao, H. (2011). A conceptual model for social entrepreneurship directed toward social impact on society. Social Enterprise Journal. 7(2). 130-149.
• Kaya İnceiplik, G. (2018). Success factors for sustainable social enterprises: a theoretical model on the case of Turkey. Master Thesis. Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Social Structure Social Change.
• Kaya, U. (2013). A professional organisation in values education: Ahilik. Journal of Values Education, 11(26). 41-69.
• Kılıç, S. (2013). A research on determining the perceptions of entrepreneurship and transformative leadership of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development. 8(1), 103-128.
• Köprülü, M. F., & Köprülü, O. (2015). The foundation of the Ottoman Empire. Alfa Press and Publication Distribution.
• Leadbeater, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos.
• Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1). 36-44.
• Mair, J. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: taking stock and looking ahead. A. Fayolle ve H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook fo research on social entrepreneurship in. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: IESE Business School Working Paper No. WP-888.
• Marşap, G. (2023). Ahilik understanding and strategic leadership approach in anatolia in the light of universal ethical values. Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research, 12(3), 1948-1964. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1258910.
• Martin, R. L. & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 28-39.
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: a guide to design and application (Translation from 3rd Edition, Translation Editor: S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution
• Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J. & Carnegie, K. (2002). Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualization and measurement. American Marketing Association Conference Procedings, 13.5
• Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali. R. & Sanders, B. (2007). Social ınnovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. London: University of Oxford, Young Foundation.
• Ojeda, D. P. (2021). Design by social entrepreneurs: the analysis of four chilean social entrepreneurs. Doctoral Thesis. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
• Özdemir, B. K. (2010), Social entrepreneurship and sustainable development, (ed. Senem Besler), Social Entrepreneurship (in) Beta, İstanbul, pp.93-116.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. & Cingöz, A. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurs: theoretical framework. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 32. 81-95.
• Öztürk, N. (2002), Ahi organisation and its evaluation in terms of today's economy, working life and business ethics, Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(Special Issue), 1-12.
• Paksoy, M. (2002). Human and total quality management in the working environment (282). Istanbul: Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration Publications.
• Roundy, P. T. (2013). The stories of social entrepreneurship: narrative discourse and social enterprise resource acquisition. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Texas at Austin.
• Sarıkaya, M. (2010), Social entrepreneurship in nonprofit organisations, (ed. Senem Besler), Social Entrepreneurship (in) Beta, İstanbul, pp.31- 52.
• Somervılle, P. (2012). Understanding social enterprise: theory and practice. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 13(3), 220-221.
• Şimşek, M. (2002). Ahilik:TKY and an application in history. Istanbul: Hayat Publications.
• Tan, W-L, Williams, J., & Tan, T-M. (2005). Defining the ‘social’in ‘social entrepreneurship’: altruism and entrepreneurship. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(3). 353-365.
• Tishler, B.J. (2018). Exploring knowledge and awareness of social entrepreneurship. Doctoral Thesis. Nova Southeas.
• Ülgener, S. (2006). The morality and mentality world of economic dissolution, Istanbul: Derin Publications.
• Wry, T. & York, J.G. (2015). An ıdentity based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 437-460.