Örgütsel Geleneğe Kuramsal Bir Giriş- Kültürün Ötesinde Bir Analitik Çerçeve

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 99 - 105, 31.12.2025

Ayşe Öner Çeven , Ali Ekber Akgün

https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1812616

Öz

Bu çalışma, örgütsel gelenek kavramını bağımsız bir analitik çerçevede ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Gelenek, sosyal bilimlerde ritüel, sembol, anlatı ve hafıza üzerinden tartışılan çok boyutlu bir olgu iken, örgütsel bağlamda çoğunlukla örgüt kültürüyle eşanlamlı olarak kullanılmıştır ve bu nedenle analitik potansiyeli gölgede kalmıştır. Çalışma, kuramsal bir derleme yöntemi benimseyerek kültür ve geleneğe dair temel literatürü sistematik biçimde incelemekte ve kavramsal bir karşılaştırma çerçevesi geliştirmektedir. Bu çerçevede kültür ve gelenek arasındaki kavramsal ayrım ortaya konulmakta; örgütsel geleneğin yapısal bileşenleri ve işlevsel boyutları tartışılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, örgütsel gelenek yalnızca örgüt kültürünün bir alt unsuru değil, normatif düzenleri ve kimlik üretim süreçlerini şekillendiren özgün bir kurumsal yapı olarak konumlandırılmaktadır. Gelecekte bu alanda yapılacak çalışmalar, örgütsel geleneklerin analitik potansiyelinin daha iyi anlaşılmasına ve pratikte değerlendirilmesine katkı sağlayabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Culture , tradition , organizational tradition , organizational culture

A Theoretical Introduction to Organizational Tradition: An Analytical Framework Beyond Culture

Öz

This study aims to examine the concept of organizational tradition within an independent analytical framework. While tradition has long been discussed in the social sciences through ritual, symbol, narrative, and memory, it has often been treated as synonymous with organizational culture in organizational studies, which has overshadowed its analytical potential. The study adopts a conceptual review method, systematically analyzing key literature on culture and tradition to develop a comparative framework. Within this framework, the article distinguishes between culture and tradition, highlighting the structural components of organizational tradition and its functional dimensions. Accordingly, organizational tradition is positioned not as a sub-element of culture but as a distinctive institutional structure that shapes normative orders and identity formation processes. Future research in this field can contribute to a better understanding of the analytical potential of organizational traditions as well as their practical implications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Culture , tradition , organizational tradition

Kaynakça

• Alexander, J. C. (2016). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, & J. L. Mast (Eds.), Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual (pp. 29–90). Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
• Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. Sage Publication. [CrossRef]
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
• Dacin, M. T., & Dacin, P. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In R.
• Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 327–352). Sage Publication. [CrossRef]
• Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–1418. [CrossRef]
• Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Kent, D. (2019). Tradition in organizations: A review and future research directions. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 1–41. [CrossRef]
• Durkheim, É. (1912/2008). The elementary forms of religious life (Trans. C. Cosman). Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
• Feldman, M. S. (2006). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(5), 727–752. [CrossRef]
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. [CrossRef]
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
• Giorgi, S., Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 1–54. [CrossRef]
• Glassie, H. (1995). Tradition. The Journal of American Folklore, 108(430), 395–412. [CrossRef]
• Handler, R., & Linnekin, J. (1984). Tradition, genuine or spurious. Journal of American Folklore, 97(385), 273–290. [CrossRef]
• Hatch, M. J. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Hibbert, P., & Huxham, C. (2010). The past in play: Tradition as a dynamic capability. Organization Studies, 31(5), 525–544. [CrossRef]
• Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.
• Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2017). How and why do organizational traditions matter? Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 53, 61–84.
• Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Routledge.
• Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Sage. [CrossRef]
• Mathias, B. D., Solomon, S. J., & Hutto, H. (2024). Passing the torch: Exploring how tradition and innovation influence coopetition among street performers. Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 1795–1826.
• McDonald, M. (1997). Tradition is a form of personal relationship. Ethnos, 62(3–4), 59–83.
• Morris, W. (2018). Step Sing: Ritual, tradition, and identity at Samford University. Southern Cultures, 24(4), 102–123. [CrossRef]
• Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J. (1998). Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140. [CrossRef]
• Ortner, S. B. (1996). Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Beacon Press.
• Prickett, S. (2009). Modernity and the reinvention of tradition: Backing into the future. Cambridge University Press.
• Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. (2010). Practicing history: Mediating past and present in organizational change. Organization Studies, 31(4), 437–457.
• Shils, E. (1981). Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
• Shoham, S. (2011). Culture, tradition, and identity in the organization. Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 733–743.
• Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339–358. [CrossRef]
• Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Trank, C. Q. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 147–173. [CrossRef]
• Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Prentice Hall.
• Truong, V. D. (2019). Organizational tradition: Conceptualization, scale development, outcomes, and value in times of change (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
• Weber, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue. Organization Science, 22(2), 287–298. [CrossRef]
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Trans. G. Roth & C. Wittich). University of California Press.
• Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743. [CrossRef]