TBMM Tartışmalarında Göçün Bağlamsal Güvenlikleştirilmesi ve Güvenlikdışılaştırılması

Öz

Göç–güvenlik literatürünün önemli bir bölümü göçü tekil bir güvenlik söylemi üzerinden ele almakta; bu yaklaşım, göçün farklı siyasal ve politika alanlarında nasıl ele alındığını görünmez kılmaktadır. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi’nde (TBMM) göçe ilişkin parlamento tartışmalarına dayanan bu makale, Türkiye bağlamında göçün tek bir güvenlik mantığıyla değil, bağlama göre değişen çoklu güvenlik çerçeveleri üzerinden kurulduğunu göstermektedir. MAXQDA destekli nitel söylem analizi temelinde yürütülen çalışma, göçün güvenlik politikaları, ekonomi, kamu hizmetleri, toplumsal uyum, demografik değişim ile dış politika alanlarında nasıl konumlandırıldığını incelemektedir. Bulgular, güvenlikleştirme ve güvenlikdışılaştırma süreçlerinin doğrusal bir seyir izlemediğini; aksine bağlamsal yeniden yapılandırmalar yoluyla işlediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güvenlikleştirme
• Göç
• Bağlamsal Güvenlikleştirme
• Söylem Analizi
• Türkiye

Contextual (De)Securitization Of Migration In Turkish Parliamentary Debates

Öz

A significant strand of the migration–security literature approaches migration through a largely singular security discourse, an orientation that tends to obscure its articulation across different political and policy arenas. Drawing on parliamentary debates on migration in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA), this article shows that migration in Türkiye is framed not through a unified security logic but across multiple security registers that vary by context. Based on qualitative discourse analysis supported by MAXQDA-assisted coding, the study traces how migration is articulated across debates on security policy, the economy, public services, social cohesion, demographic change, as well as foreign policy relations. The findings indicate that securitization and desecuritization operate through contextual reconfiguration rather than a fixed trajectory.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Migration
• Contextual Securitization
• Discourse Analysis
• Türkiye
• Securitization

Kaynakça

1. Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388413. [CrossRef]
2. Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The Concept of Security. Review of International Studies, 23, 526. [CrossRef]
3. Balzacq, T., Léonard, S., Kaunert, C., Vultee, F., Wilkinson, C., Salter, M., Trombetta, M. J., Sjöstedt, R., Stritzel, H., Schmittchen, D., Vuori, J., & Williams, M. (2011). Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve (T. Balzacq, Ed.). Routledge. [CrossRef]
4. Bartram, D., Poros, M. V., & Monforte, P. (2019). Key Concepts in Migration Studies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5. Baysal, B. (2020). 20 Years of Securitization: Strengths, Limitations and A New Dual Framework. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 17(67), 320.
6. Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (1st ed.). Pearson Education.
7. Canveren, Ö. and Akgül-Durakçay, F. (2017). The analysis of the Hungarian government's discourse towards the migrant crisis: A combination of securitization and Euroscepticism. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 24(3), 857876. [CrossRef]
8. Fotopoulos, S., & Kaimaklioti, M. (2016). Media discourse on the refugee crisis: On what have the Greek, German and British press focused? European View, 15, 265279. [CrossRef]

9. Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A. and McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the "refugee/migrant crisis". Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 105114. [CrossRef]
10. Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751777. [CrossRef] İçduygu, A., & Aksel, D. B. (2012). Irregular Migration in Turkey. IOM Migration Research Series.
11. İçduygu, A., & Demiryontar, B. (2022). The state and Syrian refugees in Turkey: Contradictory policies and instrumental rationality. Journal of Social Sciences of Istanbul Commerce University, 21(Special Issue), 316334. [CrossRef]
12. Kabacaoğlu, S., & Memişoğlu, F. (2021). Political leaders' discourses and the securitization of migration: A comparison of Turkey and the United States. Journal of Humanity and Society, 11(3), 138. [CrossRef]
13. Karyotis, G. (2007). European migration policy in the aftermath of September 11. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(1), 117. [CrossRef]
14. Koser, K. (2007). International Migration: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
15. Koser, K. (2010). Dimensions and Dynamics of Irregular Migration. Population, Space and Place, 16, 181193. [CrossRef]
16. Lara, R. de la L. R. (2022). Managing Irregularized Migration in Mexico: Rhetoric of a Renewed Approach. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 39(1), 122. [CrossRef]
17. McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563587. [CrossRef] Memişoğlu, F., & Başol, A. (2015). Turkish media and the 2015 refugee crisis: Coverage and framing. Alternatif Politik, 11(1), 95120.
18. Norman, K. P. (2020). Migration Diplomacy and Policy Liberalization in Morocco and Turkey. The International Migration Review, 54(4), 11581183. [CrossRef]
19. Oğuz-Gök, G. (2016). Whose Security? Analyzing the Relationship between international migration and security through the role of International Organizations. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31, 6582. [Turkish]
20. Öner, A. Ş. (2021). Key concepts in migration studies. In G. Ihlamur-Öner & A. Ş. Öner (Eds.), Migration in the age of globalization: Concepts and debates (5th ed., pp. 1328). İletişim Publications. [Turkish]
21. Özey, R. (2017). The geopolitics of Turkey: Transformations and priorities. Pegem Academy.
22. Rules of Procedure of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. (2015). TGNA Session No: 1. Available at: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/files/anayasa/docs/ictuzuk/11-1973(Yururlukteki_Ictuzuk)/1973-y%C3%BCr%C3%BCrl%C3%BCkteki%20metin/ictuzuk_20181116.pdf Accessed on 2015
23. Rules of Procedure of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. (2015). TGNA Session No: 63. Available at: https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/files/anayasa/docs/ictuzuk/11-1973(Yururlukteki_Ictuzuk)/1973- y%C3%BCr%C3%BCrl%C3%BCkteki%20metin/ictuzuk_20181116.pdf Accessed on Feb 24, 2015
24. Şemşit, S. (2010). The securitization and externalization of European Union migration policy: Implications for Turkey [Doctorial thesis]. Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Social Sciences. [Turkish] Van der Valk, I. (2003). Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society, 14(3), 309348. [CrossRef]
25. Vogel, D. (2016). The challenge of irregular migration. In A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Routledge handbook of immigration and refugee studies (1st ed., pp. 333340). Routledge.
26. Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46-86). Columbia University Press. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse Analysis. Sage Publications. [CrossRef]