Kimlik İktisadı mı, İktisadın Kimliği mi?

Öz

Bireysel ve sosyal teoriden hareket eden bu makalede, Akerlof ve Kranton’la bağdaştırılan kimlik iktisadı yaklaşımı, kendi tanımsal ve teknik çıkmazları üzerinden eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirilmektedir. Bu değerlendirme, kimlik konusunu ana akım iktisadi yöntemlerle ele almanın kısıtlarıyla ilgili dışsal bir eleştiriyi de beraberinde getirir. Gerçekten de ikinci eleştiri, kavrayışları – postmodernizm bir yana – esasen modernizmle birlikte ortaya çıkan kimliğin doğasına münhasır kılar. Sonuç olarak, bir kimlik iktisadı inşası girişimi, günümüz iktisadının kimliğindeki son değişimler ve bu kimliğin yorumlanmasındaki uyuşmazlık bağlamında şekillenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İktisatta kimlik
• İktisatta son gelişmeler
• İktisat Emperyalizmi

The economics of identity and the identity of economics?

Öz

Drawing upon individual and social choice theory, the economic approach to identity associated with Akerlof and Kranton is critically assessed in terms of its own definitional and technical conundrums. This leads on to an external critique in terms of the limited extent to which identity can be addressed by mainstream economic methods. Indeed, the latter essentially sets aside the insights into the nature of identity that emerged with modernism, let alone postmodernism. As a result, the enterprise of constructing an economics of identity is set in the context of recent changes in, and disagreement over interpretation of, the identity of contemporary economics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Identity in Economics
• Recent developments in economics
• Economics imperialism

Kaynakça

1. Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 488–500
2. Akerlof, G. 1990. George A. Akerlof, in Swedberg, R. (ed), Economics and Sociology, Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton, Princeton University Press
3. Akerlof, G. 2006. The missing motivation in macroeconomics, Preliminary Draft, American Economic Association, Presidential Draft, January 6th, 2007, Chicago, http://www.aeaweb.org/ annual_mtg_papers/2007/0106_1640_0101.pdf [date last accessed: 4 September 2008]
4. Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. 2000. Economics and identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 715–53
5. Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. 2002. Identity and schooling: some lessons for the economics of education, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XL, no. 4, pp. 1167–1201
6. Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. 2003. ‘Identity and the Economics of Organizations’, mimeo, available at http://www.wam.umd.edu/,rkranton/identityandorganizations.pdf#search5 ’Identity%20and%20the%20Economics%20of%20Organizations’ [date last accessed: 4 September 2008]
7. Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R. 2005. Identity and the economics of organizations, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 9–32
8. Becker, G. 1996. Accounting for Tastes, Cambridge, Harvard University Press

9. Becker, G. and Tomes, N. 1979. An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1153–89 Be ́nabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2005. ‘Incentives and Prosocial Behavior’, Discussion Paper, no 1695, Institute for the Study of Labour, IZA, Bonn
10. Colander, D. 2000. The death of neoclassical economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 127–44, reproduced in colander (2001)
11. Colander, D. 2001. The Lost Art of Economics, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar
12. Coleman, J. 1961. The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education, New York, The Free Press
13. Cullenberg, S, Amariglio, J, and Ruccio, D. (eds), 2001. Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge, London, Routledge
14. Daly, H. 1982. Chicago School individualism versus sexual reproduction: a critique of Becker and Tomes, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 307–12
15. Davis, J. 2003. The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, London, Routledge Davis, J. 2006A. The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–20
16. Davis, J. 2006B. Social identity strategies in recent economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 371–90
17. Davis, J. 2007A. Akerlof and Kranton on identity in economics: inverting the analysis, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 349–62
18. Davis, J. 2007B. Postmodernism and the individual as a process: comment on Ruccio and Amariglio, Review of Social Economy, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 203–8
19. Dugger, W. 1980. Power: an institutional framework of analysis, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. XIV, no. 4, pp. 897–907
20. Fine, B. 1975. Individual Liberalism in a Paretian Society, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, no 6, 1277–81, pp. 1277–81
21. Fine, B. 1995. On the relationship between true preference and actual choice, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 353–61
22. Fine, B. 1996. Reconciling interpersonal comparability and the intensity of preference for the utility sum rule, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 319–25
23. Fine, B. 2001. Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium, London, Routledge
24. Fine, B. 2002A. ‘Economic imperialism’: a view from the periphery, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 187–201
25. Fine, B. 2002B. The World of Consumption: The Material and Cultural Revisited, London, Routledge
26. Fine, B. 2004. Economics and ethics: Amartya Sen as point of departure, ABCDE Conference, Oslo, June, 2002, published in The New School Economic Review, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 151–62, http://www.newschooljournal.com/files/NSER01/NSER01%20full%20issue.pdf [date last accessed: 4 September 2008]
27. Fine, B. 2005. Addressing the consumer, in Trentmann, F. (ed.), The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World, Oxford, Berg
28. Fine, B. 2006. ‘The General Impossibility of the New Institutional Economics: or Does Bertrand Russell Deserve a Nobel Prize for Economics?’, mimeo available from author
29. Fine, B. 2007. ‘Critical Realism and Heterodoxy’, mimeo available from author
30. Fine, B. and Fine, K. 1974A. Social choice and individual ranking, Part I, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41, no. 127, pp. 303–322
31. Fine, B. and Fine, K. 1974B. Social choice and individual ranking, Part II, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 41, no. 128, pp. 459–475
32. Fine, B. and Milonakis, D. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries Between Economics and Other Social Sciences, London, Routledge forthcoming
33. Hill, C. 2005. ‘What the New Economics of Identity Has to Say to Legal Scholarship’, Research Paper, no 05-46, University of Minnesota Legal Studies Downloaded from http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of Pittsburgh on March 15, 2015
34. Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 483–505
35. Lazear, E. 2000. Economic Imperialism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 99–146 McCloskey, D. 1999. Crossing: A Memoir, Chicago, Chicago University Press
36. McCloskey, D. 2001. The genealogy of postmodernism: an economist’s guide, in Cullenberg et al (eds), Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge, London, Routledge
37. Milonakis, D. and Fine, B. 2009. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory, London, Routledge, forthcoming
38. Moscati, I. 2005. ‘History of Consumer Demand Theory 1871–1971: a Neo-Kantian Rational Reconstruction’, mimeo, Universita` Bocconi, Milan
39. Parsons, T. 1931. Wants and activities in Marshall, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 101–40
40. Parsons, T. 1932. Economics and sociology: Marshall in relation to the thought of his time, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 316–47
41. Parsons, T. 1934. Some reflections on ‘The nature and significance of economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 511–45
42. Parsons, T. 1968. The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers, Vols.I and II, NewYork, The Free Press, first edition of 1937
43. Sen, A. 2005. Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity, London, Allen Lane
44. Sen, A. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, London, Allen Lane
45. Swedberg, R. (ed.) 1990. Economics and Sociology, Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton, Princeton University Press
46. Trentmann, F. (ed.) 2005. The Making of the Consumer: Knowledge, Power and Identity in the Modern World, Oxford, Berg
47. Waller, W. 2004. Review of Davis (2003), Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1112–14