Bilimsel Kanıta Ulaşmak: Biyomedikal Veri Tabanları ile İlgili Derleme

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 104 - 108, 01.08.2012

Özlem Serpil Çakmakkaya

Öz

Son yıllarda yüksek öğretimde eğitim, eğitici merkezli olmaktan öğrenci merkezli olmaya doğru yön değiştirmektedir. Bu değişime bilgisayar ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki ilerlemeler ve çevrimiçi olarak ulaşılan bilginin fazlalığı hız kazandırmaktadır. Ancak internet üzerinden ulaşılan bilginin fazlalığı ve çoğu zaman kaynakların belirgin olmaması güvenilir kanıta ulaşmakta zorluklar yaratabilmektedir. Kanıta dayalı karar vermede ve problem temelli eğitimde bilgi kaynağı olarak veri tabanlarının nitelikli kullanımı vazgeçilmezdir. Yükseköğretimde müfredata en iyi bilimsel kanıta nereden ve nasıl ulaşılacağına dair eğitimlerin de eklenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu makalede önemli tıbbi veri tabanları ve bu veri tabanlarının özellikleri incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliyografik veri tabanları , internet , kanıta dayalı tıp.

Searching for scientific evidence: A review of biomedical databases

Öz

Over the last decade higher education has shifted from the teacher centered delivery of information towards a student centered problem based learning approach. This shift was made possible by the increasing availability of scientific information from online resources. However, the amount and often ambiguous information provided by the internet poses a challenge to find the best available evidence. Consequently, a new area of learning has to be added to the curricula of higher education: Where and how to search for the best evidence available. This article reviews the most important medical databases and their features. The skilled utilization of these databases as a source of information is indispensable for problem based learning and evidence based decision making in medical education today.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliographic databases , evidence-based medicine , internet.

Kaynakça

• Akobeng, A. K. (2005). Principles of evidence based medicine. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), 837-840.
• Apfel, C. C., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Kolodzie, K., and Pace, N. L. (2010). Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence. The Cochrane Library. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008877
• Bundy, A. (2010). Arguments about propositions. In: Budy, A (Ed). The computer modelling of mathematical reasoning (Digital edition, pp 13- 52). Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh, Informatics Forum.
• Chalmers, I. (1993). The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintain- ing, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 156-165.
• Crowley, P. (2006). Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No: CD000065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
• De Groote, S. L., Raszewski, R. (2012). Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nursing Outlook. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
• Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., and Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092-1096.
• Liggins, G., Howie, R. N. (1972). A controlled trial of antepartum glu- cocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syn- drome in premature infants. Pediatrics, 50(4), 515-525.
• Peh, W., and Ng, K. (2010). Effective medical writing. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(1), 10-14.
• Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D., Badenoch, D., Straus, S., Haynes, B., et al. (2001). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. 08 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde <http://www.cebm.net> adresinden erişildi.
• Rosenberg, W. M., Deeks, J., Lusher, A., Snowball, R., Dooley, G., and Sackett, D. (1998). Improving searching skills and evidence retrieval. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 32(6), 557.
• Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R. B., and Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
• Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., and Haynes, R. B. (2011). Acquiring the evidence: How to find current best evidence and have current best evidence find us. In: S. E. Straus, W. S. Richardson, P. Glasziou, and Haynes, R. B. (Eds.) Evidence-based medicine: How to prac- tice and teach EBM. (4th ed., pp 29-63). Edinburgh: Elsevier Science.
• Tugwell, P. (2012). Cochrane İşbirliği ve Kütüphanesi, H. Yazıcı (Ed.) Ro- matolojide klinik araştırmalar ve nesnel tıp V (s. 29-36). İstanbul: Deomed.