Yeni Nesil Üniversite: Bir Model Önerisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Pt 1, 344 - 362, 01.08.2021

Metin Toprak , Yüksel Bayraktar Armağan Erdoğan Deniz Kolat Mehmet Şengül

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.210226

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bilgi toplumunun gerektirdiği nitelikteki insan kaynağının ana mecrası olan üniversitenin eğitim ve araştırma faaliyetleriyle, ekonomik büyümeye ve toplumsal gelişmeye pozitif etkisini güçlendirmek için, üniversite kurumunda yapısal ve işlevsel yeniden yapılandırma çabaları, son çeyrek asırda giderek artmıştır. Günümüzde Anglo-Sakson ve Uzak Doğu ülkeleri, bu çerçevede en başarılı üniversite örneklerine sahipken; ülkeye göre önemli farklılaşma göstermekle birlikte, Avrupa üniversiteleri ikinci sırada performans göstermektedir. Türkiye'nin Avrupa Yükseköğrenim Alanındaki reformları uygulaması, Avrupa Birliği üyeliğine aday olması ve Avrupa Konseyi Kültür Konvansiyonunu ilk imzalayan ülkelerden biri olması dolayısıyla, bir yükümlülüktür. Bu çalışmada, yeni nesil tematik-teknik bir üniversite için Avrupa üniversite reform gündemiyle uyumlu bir organizasyon ve işletim modeli tasarlanmıştır. Geliştirilen modelin Yükseköğretim Kurulunun tematik ve bölgesel kalkınma odaklı üniversite sınıflaması ile uyumluluğu gözetilmiştir. Bu çalışmada önerilen üniversite modelinde, organizasyonel ve işlevsel konfigürasyon bakımından beş yenilikten bahsedilebilir: (i) Yeni nesil üniversitenin eğitim, araştırma ve toplumsal fayda misyonu ile mezun profili, (ii) Politika geliştirme ve uygulama ofisleri, (iii) Üniversite ekosistemi istişare ve yönlendirme kurulu ve diğer komiteler ve kurullar, (iv) Konsept dersler ve markalı dersler, (v) Önceki öğrenmenin tanınması, (vi) Ortak eğitim modeli ve çözüm ortaklıkları.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bologna süreci, dijital üniversite, endüstri 4.0, üniversite 4.0, yeni nesil üniversite

Destekleyen Kurum

OSTİM Vakfı

Teşekkür

OSTİM Teknik Üniversitesine katkılarından dolayı teşekkür ederiz. Toprak ve diğerlerinin (Toprak, Bayraktar, Erdoğan, Kolat ve Şengül, 2019; Toprak, Bayraktar ve Özyılmaz, 2020) çalışmaları ise bu çalışmada geliştirilen modelin uygulanmasına yönelik ardışık çalışmalar olmakla birlikte, diğer yayınların değerlendirme sürelerindeki farklılık nedeniyle onlar daha önce yayımlanmışlardır.

New Generation University: A Model Proposal

Öz

In the last quarter century, since the university is the main source of the human resources required by the knowledge society, structural and functional restructuring efforts of the university institution have been increasing to strengthen the positive impact on economic growth and social development through education and research activities. Today, the Anglo-Saxon and the Far East countries have the most successful university examples in this context; European universities come second in performance, although there are tremendous differences among member countries. Being a candidate for the European Union membership and as a member of the Council of Europe as the first signatory states of the Cultural Convention; implementation of reforms in the European Higher Education Area is obligatory for Turkey. In this study, an organizational and operating model has been developed in line with the European university reform agenda. CoHE's university approach which focuses on thematic and regional development has also been taken into consideration. Five innovations can be mentioned in terms of organizational and functional configuration of the model: (i) Profile of graduate and mission of the new generation university in the fields of education, research and community services, (ii) Policy development and implementation offices, (iii) University ecosystem consultation and steering committee and other committees and boards, (iv) Concept courses and branded courses, (v) Recognition of prior learning, (vi) Coop-education and solution partnerships.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bologna process, digital university, industry 4.0, new generation university, university 4.0

Kaynakça

• Adams, D. (2001). Learning from experience – making the most of work-based learning. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(5), 235–240.
• Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2008). Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European universities. In A. fielding (Ed.), Bruegel Blueprint Series (Vol. 5, pp. 1–70). Brussels: Bruegel.
• Alan, G. A., & Alan, E. (2016). Türkiye’de yeni nesil üniversiteler. Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 105–118.
• Alsharari, N. M. (2018). Internationalization of the higher education system, an interpretive analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3), 359–381.
• Barbeau, J. E. (1973). Cooperative education in America – its historical development. Erişim adresi https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED083913.pdf (5 Nisan 2019).
• Barrett, B. (2011). The Lisbon Treaty’s “Europe 2020”, economic growth strategy and the Bologna Process. The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, 8(12), 1–13.
• Berglund, L., & Andersson, P. (2012). Recognition of knowledge and skills at work, in whose interests? Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(2), 73–84.
• Bridges, E. (2018). Executive ethical decisions initiating organizational culture and values. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(5), 576–608.
• Bruton, A. (2014). Innovating university-based entrepreneurship in order to inform innovation for the 21st century. In S. Hoskison, & D. F. Kuratkoa (Eds.), Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21st century (Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 24, pp. 145–170), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Cedefop (2016). Application of learning outcomes approaches across Europe: A comparative study. Cedefop Reference Series, No. 105. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Erişim adresi http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3074_en.pdf (1 Nisan 2019).
• Chapleo, C., & Sims, C. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education. Perspectives, 14(1), 12–20.
• Cincinnati University. (2005). Minutes of the board of trustees meeting. Erişim adresi http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/trustees/docs/minutes_2005/MN092705.pdf (1 Nisan 2019).
• Deeg, J. (2016). Reformed or deformed? The unending renewal of the public university between unintended consequences and unexpected challenges. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 45, 59–80.
• DeVos, B. (2019). Consensus on higher education reforms. Erişim adresi https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/secretary-devos-applauds-consensus-higher-education-reforms (3 Nisan 2019).
• Dewar, J. (2017). University 4.0: Redefining the role of universities in the modern era. The Higher Education Review. Erişim adresi https://www.thehighereducationreview.com/magazine/university-40-redefining-the-role-of-universities-in-the-modern-era-SUPG758722027.html (1 Nisan 2019).
• Drewery, D., Nevison, C., & Pretti, T. J. (2016). The influence of cooperative education and reflection upon previous work experiences on university graduates’ vocational self-concept. Education + Training, 58(2), 179–192.
• Dulupçu, M. A., & Sungur, O. (2018). Üniversitelerin misyon farklılaşması, bölgesel kalkınmayı yeniden düşünmek. YÖK Yüksek Öğretim Dergisi, 7, 11–16.
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2019). Global innovation index 2018. Energizing The World with Innovation. Erişim adresi https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator (11 Nisan 2019).
• EC (2006). Key competences. Erişim adresi https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32006H0962 (8 Eylül 2018).
• EC (2008). TUNING – Generic competences. Erişim adresi https://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/images/stories/documents/General_Brochure_final_version.pdf (1 Eylül 2018).
• EC (2010). Europe 2020: European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Erişim adresi http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020% 20-%20EN%20version.pdf (26 Eylül 2018).
• EC (2014). U-Multirank project. Erişim adresi https://www.umultirank.org/ about/u-multirank/the-project/ 1 Nisan 2019).
• EC (2017). Strengthening European identity through education and culture. Erişim adresi https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-strengthening-european-identity-education-culture_en.pdf (1 Nisan 2019).
• EHEA (1998). Sorbonne Joint Declaration. Erişim adresi http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/1998_Sorbonne/61/2/1998_Sorbonne_Declaration_English_552612.pdf (26 Eylül 2018).
• EHEA (2018). European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process. Erişim adresi http://ehea.info/page-qualification-frameworks (1 Nisan 2019).
• EHEA (2019). The Bologna Process revisited: The future of the European Higher Education Area. Erişim adresi http://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/71/1/Bologna_Process_Revisited_Future_of_the_EHEA_Final_613711.pdf (1 Nisan 2019).
• EHEA (2020). Rome Ministerial Communiqué. Erişim adresi <https://ehea.info/Upload/Rome_Ministerial_Communique.pdf (13 Şubat 2021).
• Erdoğmuş, N. (2019). Geleceğin Türkiyesinde yükseköğretim. Erişim adresi https://ilke.org.tr/images/yayin/pdf/yuksekogretim_rapor_ozeti.pdf (9 Nisan 2019).
• Fielden, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance. The Education Working Paper Series, 9, 1–70.
• Garnett, J., & Cavaye, A. (2015). Recognition of prior learning, opportunities and challenges for higher education. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 7(1), 28–37.
• González, F. (2015). Reinventing the company for the digital age. Erişim adresi https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ BBVA-OpenMind-book-Reinventing-the-Company-in-the-Digital-Age-business-innovation1.pdf (20 Nisan 2019).
• González, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Erişim adresi http://tuningacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TuningEUI_Final-Report_EN.pdf (12 Nisan 2019).
• Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25–48.
• Güven, C. (2009). Yüksek öğretime giriş ve katsayı sorunu. Erişim adresi http://www.aes.org.tr/uyehaber-273-yuksek-ogretime-giris-ve-katsayi-sorunu.html (4 Nisan 2019).
• HESA (2018). Staff in higher education 2016/17. Erişim adresi https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/18-01-2018/sfr248-higher-education-staff-statistics (2 Eylül 2018).
• Holtzman, D., & Kraft, E. (2011). Skills needed in the 21st century workplace: A comparison of feedback from undergraduate business alumni and employers with a national study. Business Education & Accreditation, 3(1), 61–76.
• ICEF (2014). American universities maintain dominance in latest Shanghai rankings. ICEF MONITOR, 27 August. Erişim adresi http://monitor.icef.com/2014/08/american-universities-maintain-dominance-in-latest-shanghai-rankings/ (2 Eylül 2018).
• İnam, İ., Bal, H., Bahçeci, A., Doğan, M. E., & Buran, O. M. (2018). Kamu-üniversite-sanayi iş birliğinin güçlendirilmesine yönelik yeni bir model. Erişim adresi https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Necla-Arslan/publication/342917578_Ar-Ge_Alaninda_Kurumsal_Performans_Endeksleri/links/5f0d69cca6fdcc547aee9d79/Ar-Ge-Alaninda-Kurumsal-Performans-Endeksleri.pdf (2 Nisan 2019).
• Johnston, B., Macneill, S., & Smyth, K. (2019). Conceptualising the digital university: The intersection of policy, pedagogy and practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature.
• Jones, M. (2018). Contemporary trends in professional doctorates. Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 814–825.
• Kabashkin, I. (2018). University 4.0, reality and expectations. Erişim adresi https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324115132_University_40_Reality_and_Expectations (1 Eylül 2018).
• Kirecçi, M. A., Bacanlı, H., Erişen, Y., Karadağ, E., Çeliköz, N., Dombaycı, M., … & Şahin, M. (2016). The Internationalization of higher education in Turkey: Creating an index. Education and Science, 41(187), 1–28.
• Kulkarni, S., & Kulkarni, D. G. (2019). Gap analysis of soft skills in the curriculum of higher education: A case study of management institutes in Karnataka. Advances in Management, 12(1), 64–67.
• Lapteva, A. V., & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New generation of universities: University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(2016-9), 2681–2696.
• Lee, N.-J. (2008). Achieving your professional doctorate: A handbook. London: Mc-Graw Hill Education.
• Makdisi, G. (1970). Madrasa and university in the middle ages. Studia Islamica, 32, 255–264.
• Malik, G., & Venkatraman, A. (2017). “The great divide”: Skill gap between the employer’s expectations and skills possessed by employees. Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(4), 175–182.
• Martin, R. E., Hill, R. C., & Waters, M. S. (2014). Baumol and Bowen cost effects in research universities. Working Paper 2012-05. Baton Rouge, LA: Department of Economics Louisiana State University. Erişim adresi https://www.lsu.edu/business/economics/files/workingpapers/pap12_05.pdf (2 Eylül 2018).
• McCuddy, M. K., & Nondorf, J. G. (2009). Ethics in college and university admissions, a trilogy of concerns and arguments. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(7), 537–552.
• McMahon, W. W. (2010). The private and social benefits of higher education, the evidence, their value, and policy implications. TIAA-CREF Institute Advancing Higher Education, 2, 1–12.
• McRae, N., & Ramji, K. (2017). Intercultural competency development curriculum: A strategy for internationalizing work-integrated learning for the 21st century global village. In T. Bowen, & M. T. Drysdale (Eds.), Work-integrated learning in the 21st century (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 32, pp. 129–143), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• MEB (2017). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Önceki Öğrenmelerin Tanınması, Denklik ve Ölçme Değerlendirme İşlemleri ile İlgili Usül ve Esalslara İlişkin Yönerge. Erişim adresi http://www.meb.gov.tr/mevzuat/liste.php?ara=5 (4 Mayıs 2019).
• MEB (2018a). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Kurumları Yönetmeliği. Erişim adresi http://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_04/11093946_MEB_HBO_KURUMLARI_YYNETMELYYY. pdf (4 Mayıs 2019).
• MEB (2018b). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı mesleki ve teknik eğitimde tüm programların ulusal meslek standartları ve ulusal yeterliliklerle uyumunu masaya yatırdı. Erişim adresi http://mtegm.meb.gov.tr/www/milli-egitim-bakanligi-mesleki-ve-teknik-egitimde-tum-programlarin-ulusal-meslek-standartlari-ve-ulusal-yeterliliklerle-uyumunu-masaya-yatirdi/ icerik/2145 (4 Nisan 2019).
• Moore, J. C. (2019). A brief history of universities. New York, NY: Palgrave Pivot/Springer Nature.
• Morrison, M. (2014). Doctoral study ın challenging times: Entrenching banality or revitalising prospects for ‘wicked’ intellectual work. The case of educational administration. International Perspective on Higher Education Research, 13, 31–57.
• Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657–683.
• MYK (2006). Mesleki Yeterlilik Kurumu Kanunu. Resmi Gazete, 26312. Erişim adresi https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2006/10/20061007-1. htm (15 Ekim 2019).
• MYK (2015). Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesinin Uygulanmasına İlişkin Usul ve Esaslar Hakkında Yönetmelik. Erişim adresi tarihinde https://www.myk.gov.tr/images/articles/TYC/TYC_Yonetmeligi_v2.pdf (8 Eylül 2018).
• MYK (2016). Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi Tebliği. Erişim adresi https://www.myk.gov.tr/images/articles/editor/130116/TYC_teblig_2.pdf (8 Eylül 2018).
• MYK (2017). Turkish Referencing Report. Erişim adresi <https://www.myk.gov.tr/index.php/en/haberler/102-tuerkiye-yeterlilikle-cercevesi-dairesi-bakanl/2687-tuerkiye-referanslama-raporu-avrupa-yeterlilikler-cercevesi-ayc-danma-grubuna-sunuldu (8 Eylül 2018).
• MYK (2019). Yayımlanmış ulusal meslek standartları. Erişim adresi http://portal.myk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_meslek_std_taslak&view=taslak_listesi_yeni&msd=2&Itemid=432 (20 Eylül 2018).
• Observatory (1988). The Magna Charta Universitatum. Erişim adresi http://www.magna-charta.org/resources/files/Turkish.pdf (26 Eylül 2018).
• ODTÜ (2019). 2018 yılında üniversitelerimizin 11 dünya genel sıralamasındaki durumu. Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Enformatik Enstitüsü. Erişim adresi http://tr.urapcenter.org/2017/2017.php (3 Nisan 2019).
• OECD (2014). Competency framework. Erişim adresi https://www.oecd.org/careers/competency_framework_en.pdf (8 Eylül 2018).
• OECD (2017). Benchmarking higher education system performance. Conceptual framework and data: Enhancing higher education system performance. Erişim adresi http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/Benchmarking%20Report.pdf (8 Eylül 2018).
• OECD-IMHE. (2009). Higher education management and policy, programme on institutional management. Erişim adresi http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/50309916.pdf (1 Eylül 2018).
• OSTİM Teknik Üniversitesi (2018). Ana yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete, 30614. Erişim adresi https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=29029&MevzuatTur=8&MevzuatTertip=5 (15 Ekim 2019).
• Owen, T. (2016). Disruptive power: The crisis of the state in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Patton, N. (2017). Driving change, students shaping and reshaping work-integrated learning spaces. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 32, 163–176.
• Pawlowski, K. (2009). The “fourth generation university” as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51–64.
• Ramachandran, N. T. (2010). Marketing framework in higher Education: Addressing aspirations of students beyond conventional tenets of selling products. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(6), 544–556.
• Rauhvargers, A. (2013). Global university rankings and their impact, report II. Erişim adresi https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/global%20university%20rankings%20and%20their%20impact%20-%20report%20ii.pdf (2 Eylül 2018).
• Reilly, M. B. (2006). The ivory tower and the smokestack, 100 years of cooperative education at the Univeristy of Cincinnati. Cincinnati, OH: Emmis Books.
• Rogers, R. (2014). Herman Schneider and the journey of cooperative education. PhD. thesis, Clatyton State University, Morrow, GA, USA.
• Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A. & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities, People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(3), 354–372.
• Saraç, Y. (2019). Yükseköğretim politikalarında Yeni YÖK: 2014’ten sonrası. Erişim adresi https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/Yuksekogretim_politikalarinda_yeni_yok.pdf (4 Nisan 2019).
• SCImago (2020). University ranking. Erişim adresi https://www.scimagoir.com (10 Şubat 2021).
• Shapiro, H., Lauritzen, J. R. K., & Irving, P. (2011). Emerging skills and competences – a transatlantic study: EU-US study for the European Commission. Erişim adresi https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_9_politikalar/1_9_4_egitim_politikasi/skills_en.pdf (9 Nisan 2019).
• Shattock, M. (2017). The “world class” university and international ranking systems, what are the policy implications for governments and institutions? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(1), 4–21.
• Sheety, A., Moy, E., Parsons, J., Dunbar, D., Doutt, K. C., Faunce, E., & Myers, L. (2016). University partnerships for academic program and professional development, building faculty capacity for 21st century teaching and learning. In P. Blessinger, & B. Cozza (Eds.), University partnerships for academic programs and professional development (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, pp. 221–241), Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Smethurst, R. (1995). Education, a public or private good? RSA Journal, 143(5465), 33–45.
• Steinbuch, M. (2016). Towards the 4th generation university. Erişim adresi https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2016/07/23/towards-the-4th-generation-university/ (10 Eylül 2018).
• Su, D., Zhou, D., Liu, C., & Kong L.(2015). Government-driven university-industry linkages in an emerging country, the case of China. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 6(3), 263–282.
• Sumanjeet, S. (2012). Developing e-skills for competitiveness, growth and employment in the 21st century: The European perspective. International Journal of Development Issues, 11(1), 37–59.
• Tereseviãienò, M., Zuzeviãi�tò, V., & Hyde, J. (2007). The need of validation and recognition of learning outcomes acquired non-formally and informally: A comparative study. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(3), 334-350.
• THE (2015). Academics in the minority at more than two-thirds of UK universities. Erişim adresi https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/academics-minority-more-two-thirds-uk-universities (2 Eylül 2018).
• The Co-operative College (2018). Together enterprise. Erişim adresi https:// www.co-op.ac.uk/co-operative-university (1 Eylül 2018).
• The European Council (2000). Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000, Presidency conclusions. Erişim adresi http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (2 Eylül 2018).
• Toprak, M., & Bayraktar, Y. (2017). Corporate governance practices of Turkey: A critical review. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, XVI(2), 54–75.
• Toprak, M., Bayraktar, Y., Erdoğan, A., Kolat, D., & Şengül, M. (2019). Developing a tool for quality assurance and accreditation of a new generation university in the digitalized society: The case of a thematic-technical university. Oikos Economics, 7(2), 69–89.
• Toprak, M., Bayraktar, Y., & Özyılmaz, A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and digital transformation in higher education: An evaluation from the perspectives of industry 4.0 and society 5.0. In D. Demirbaş, V. Bozkurt, & S. Yorğun (Eds.), Economic, social and political effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for Turkey (pp. 167–186). Istanbul: Istanbul University Faculty of Economics Press.
• Toprak, M., & Erdoğan, A. (2013). Lisansüstü eğitimde Avrupa yaklaşımı. VI. Ulusal Lisansüstü Eğitim Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabı (pp. 10–36). Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi.
• Toprak, M., Erdoğan, A., & Açıkgöz, Ö. (2013). Field qualifications: A framework suggestion. The New Educational Review, 31(1), 153–164.
• Toprak, M., Özcan, Y. Z., Dalmış, İ., & Aydın, E. (2006). 2005 yılı değerlendirme ve gelecek beklentileri araştırması. Kayseri: Kayseri Sanayi Odası Yayınları.
• TÜBİTAK (2013). Girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversite endeksi gösterge seti. Erişim adresi http://ulakbim.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/haber/turkiyenin-en-girisimci-ve-yenilikci-universiteleri-aciklandi (2 Eylül 2018).
• TÜBİTAK (2016). Girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversite endeksi 2016 sıralaması. Erişim adresi https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2016_gyue_ilk50.pdf (2 Eylül 2018). UKRI (2020). Seven prenciples of public life. Erişim adresi https://ahrc.ukri.org/about/policies/sevenprinciplesofpubliclife/ (10 Şubat 2021).
• UNESCO (2015). International standard classification of education, fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013): Detailed field descriptions. Erişim adresi https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark,/48223/pf0000235049 (2 Eylül 2018).
• UNESCO (2019). World heritage list. Erişim adresi https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/170 (2 Nisan 2019).
• Unvan, C. (2016). Üniversitelerimizde Bologna Süreci uygulamaları ve geleceğe bakış. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı, Eğitim Yönetimi, Teftişi, Planlaması ve Ekonomisi, Ankara.
• Wagenaar, R. (2016). Modernisation of education II, education policy and programme, innovation, EIT and MSCA. Developing future skills in higher education”, ET2020 – Peer learning activity (PLA). Erişim adresi http://cced-complete.com/documentation/developing_future_skills_in_higher_education_eng.pdf (10 Eylül 2018).
• Wagner, T. (2009). The global achievement gap. New York, NY: Perseus Books Group.
• Watson, J., & Cates, C. (2014). Creating sustainable cooperative education programs. WACE 10th International Symposium on Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education, 2–4 June. University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.
• Williams, G. (2016). Higher education: Public good or private commodity? London Review of Education, 14(1), 131–142.
• Yeo, B. (2018). Societal impact of university innovation. Management Research Review, 41(11), 1309–1335.
• YÖK (2010). Türkiye yükseköğretim yeterlilikler çerçevesi. Erişim adresi http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/ (8 Eylül 2018).
• YÖK (2011). Türkiye yükseköğretim temel alan yeterlilikleri. Erişim adresi http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/?pid=48 (20 Nisan 2018).
• YÖK (2019). Bölgesel kalkınma odaklı misyon farklılaşması ve ihtisaslaşma programı. Erişim adresi https://bolgeselkalkinma.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/yok-baskani-ihtisaslacak-5-yeni-universiteyi-acikladi.aspx (12 Eylül 2020).
• Zuti, B., & Lukovics, M. (2015). Higher education institutions and regional development. Proceedings of the 3rd ERSA International Workshop. Erişim adresi https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruediger-Hamm/publication/301292699_Higher_Education_Institutions_and_Regional_Development_Proceedings_of_the_3_ERSA_International_Workshop/links/5715f35d08ae1a8402650bb7/Higher-Education-Institutions-and-Regional-Development-Proceedings-of-the-3-ERSA-International-Workshop.pdf (20 Nisan 2018).