Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Destek ve Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Algılarının Tutumsal Sonuçları

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Pt 2, 495 - 507, 31.08.2021

Ozan Büyükyılmaz Meltem Yenici

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.577190

Öz

Bu çalışma, sosyal mübadele teorisi kapsamında ele alınan iki kavram olan algılanan örgütsel destek ve lider-üye etkileşiminin tutumsal sonuçlarını incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı akademisyenler tarafından algılanan örgütsel desteğin ve lider-üye etkileşiminin; iş tatmini, örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel güven ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini belirleyebilmektir. Bu amaç kapsamında, Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi'ndeki iki farklı devlet üniversitesinde görev yapmakta olan 364 akademik personelden anket yoluyla elde edilen veriler ile bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın amacına uygun olarak oluşturulan hipotezler, yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kapsamında yol analizi yardımı ile test edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda hem algılanan örgütsel desteğin hem de lider-üye etkileşiminin çalışan tutumları üzerinde etkisi bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Buna göre, akademisyenlerin üniversitelerinden algıladığı desteğin artması iş tatmininde, örgütsel özdeşleşmede ve örgüte duyulan güvende artışa, buna karşılık işten ayrılma niyetinde azalmaya neden olmaktadır. Yine, lider-üye etkileşiminin kuvvetlenmesinin iş tatminini, örgüt ile özdeşleşmeyi ve örgüte duyulan güveni artırdığı, işten ayrılma niyetini azalttığı saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan örgütsel destek, iş tatmini, işten ayrılma niyeti, lider-üye etkileşimi, örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme

The Attitudinal Consequences of Perceived Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange for Academic Staff

Öz

This study examines the attitudinal consequences of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange, which are two concepts addressed within the scope of social exchange theory. The aim of the study is to determine the effects of organizational support and leader-member exchange perceived by academics on their job satisfaction, organizational identification, organizational trust, and intent to leave. To achieve this aim, a survey was conducted with 364 academic staff working in two different state universities in the Western Black Sea Region. The hypotheses were tested with the structural equation modeling path analysis. The results indicate that both perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange influence employee attitudes. Academics' perception of high level of support by their universities was found to lead to increased job satisfaction, organizational identification and trust in the organization, and decreased intention to leave. Furthermore, strengthening leader-member exchange was found to increase academics' job satisfaction, identification with the organization and trust in the organization, and to reduce their intention to leave.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intention to leave, job satisfaction, leader-member exchange, organizational identification, organizational trust, perceived organizational support

Kaynakça

• Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 491–509.
• Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., & Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived organizational support and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of locus of control and work autonomy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(5), 479–495.
• Başaran, Ü., Büyükyılmaz, O., & Çevik, E. İ. (2011). İçsel pazarlamanın algılanan hizmet kalitesi üzerindeki etkisinde iş tatmininin aracılık rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 201–225.
• Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567.
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Bolat, O. İ. (2011). Lider üye etkileşimi ve tükenmişlik ilişkisi. “İşGüç” Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 13(2), 63–80.
• Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & van den Heuvel, M. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754–770.
• Büyükyılmaz, O. (2013). Akademik personel açısından psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerin analizi. Doktora tezi, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.
• Büyükyılmaz, O., & Fidan, Y. (2017). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel güvenin aracılık rolü. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(3), 500–524.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Survey: Conceptualization and instrumentation. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures and practices (pp. 71–138). New York, NY: Wiley Interstice.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774–781.
• Dawley, D., Houghton, J. D., & Bucklew, N. S. (2010). Perceived organizational support and turnover intention: The mediating effects of personal sacrifice and job fit. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 238–257.
• Deluga, R. J. (1998). Leader-member exchange quality and effectiveness ratings: The role of subordinate-supervisor conscientiousness similarity. Group & Organization Management, 23(2), 189–216.
• Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618–634.
• Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.
• Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2010). Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes: Testing a simultaneous multifoci model. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(1), 17–26.
• Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812–820.
• Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59.
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
• Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085–1103.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
• Gaudet, M.-C., & Tremblay, M. (2017). Initiating structure leadership and employee behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and leader–member exchange. European Management Journal, 35(5), 663–675.
• Genç, M. Ö. (2010). The influence of organizational culture, leader–member exchange (LMX) and employees’ attitudes toward change on information systems implementations in Turkey. Doktora tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.
• Graen, G. (1969). Instrumentality theory of work motivation: Some experimental results and suggested modifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(2), 1–25.
• Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175–208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.
• Greguras, G. J., & Ford, J. M. (2006). An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader-member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 433–465.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson New International Edition.
• Hameed, Z., Khan, I. U., Sheikh, Z., Islam, T., Rasheed, M. I., & Naeem, R. M. (2019). Organizational justice and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of psychological ownership and perceived organizational support. Personnel Review, 48(3), 748–773.
• Ilgın, B. (2010). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının oluşumunda ve sosyal kaytarma ile ilişkisinde, duygusal zeka ve lider üye etkileşiminin rolü. Doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277.
• Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R., & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 558–583.
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884.
• Kuvaas, B., & Buch, R. (2018). Leader-member exchange relationships and follower outcomes: The mediating role of perceiving goals as invariable. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 235–248.
• Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2019). Determinants of innovation capability: The roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), 527–547.
• Lee, A., Thomas, G., Martin, R., & Guillaume, Y. (2019). Leader-member exchange (LMX) ambivalence and task performance: The cross-domain buffering role of social support. Journal of Management, 45(5), 1927–1957.
• Li, L., Zhu, Y., & Park, C. (2018). Leader–member exchange, sales performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment affect turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(11), 1909–1922.
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662–674.
• Mabasa, F. D., & Ngirande, H. (2015). Perceived organisational support influences on job satisfaction and organisational commitment among junior academic staff Members. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 25(4), 364–366.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.
• Maertz Jr., C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059–1075.
• Marchand, C., & Vandenberghe, C. (2014). Job scope and affective commitments: The moderating role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 69(3), 621–644.
• Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Miao, R. (2010). Perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and employee performance: An chinese empirical study. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(2), 257–264.
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İkitisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 113–130.
• Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 224–236.
• Polatçı, S., Karaca, M., & Bayram, A. (2018). Lider üye etkileşiminin iş tatmini ve tükenmişlik üzerine etkileri: Öğretmenler üzerine bir araştırma. “İşGüç” Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 20(3), 91–103.
• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836.
• Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1027–1030.
• Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.
• Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599–627.
• Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436.
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business a skill-building approach (7th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
• Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.
• Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Latham, G. P. (2016). The buffering effect of perceived organizational support on the relationship between work engagement and behavioral outcomes. Human Resource Management, 55(1), 25–38.
• Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774–780.
• Shukla, A., & Rai, H. (2015). Linking perceived organizational support to organizational trust and commitment: Moderating role of psychological capital. Global Business Review, 16(6), 981–996.
• Sökmen, A., & Benk, O. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel destek, iş tatmini ve diğergamlık ilişkisi: Akademisyenler üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(3), 2231–2241.
• Tokgöz, E., & Seymen, O. A. (2013). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 10(39), 61–76.
• Wang, P. Q., Kim, P. B., & Milne, S. (2017). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and its work outcomes: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 26(2), 125–143.
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.
• Zhong, L., Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (2016). Job engagement, perceived organizational support, high-performance human resource practices, and cultural value orientations: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 823–844.